Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The E-Mentee Guide to Beginning Teaching Success Welcome to the Project REACH E-Mentorship.
Advertisements

Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Fostering STEM Diversity OPAS Vision for the Year All Oregonians have the opportunity to choose and successfully pursue engineering or applied science.
Recruitment of online tutors Sharon Slade, Fenella Galpin OU Business School.
Math in the Middle What are we learning about rural mathematics education? Ruth Heaton and Jim Lewis University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
Home Economics Teachers’ Readiness for Teaching STEM
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
You and Early Childhood Education
National Partnerships Primary Mathematics Specialists Initiative
The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY
ABSTRACT Key Terms: Parent involvement, Common Core State Standards, Homework, K – 2 Mathematics In this study, the 2015 REU mathematics team from Elizabeth.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
AFT 7/12/04 Marywood University Using Data for Decision Support and Planning.
STEM Education Meeting Cleveland Metropolitan School District September 22, 2010 Dr. Joanne Goodell, Associate Professor, CSUTeach Director, STEMM Center.
Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Centennial Elementary School Parent Opinion Inventory 1 Ocean City Public Schools Parent Opinion Inventory Summary Analysis November 2007 Prepared by the.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 2 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Friday February 4 th, 2011.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
ENHANCING PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN NC-CCSS FOR K-2 MATHEMATICS AT P.W. MOORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Staff Development and the Change Process
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Teaching Excellence Project funded by CELT Teaching Economics through Innovative Content and Effective Teaching Methods Necati Aydin,
 Collecting Quantitative  Data  By: Zainab Aidroos.
What is PowerTeaching? PowerTeaching is an instructional process that links Pennsylvania's Standards-Based Alignment System to research-proven instructional.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Tech-Know-Build: Indiana Students Building Knowledge with Technology Kathleen Keck Kathleen Steele Tami Haas Crawfordsville Community Schools Crawfordsville,
DeArmanville Elementary Kim Vivanco IL 622 Effective School Research.
How did our school get involved? Iowa Sustaining Parent Involvement Network i S P I N.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
Ohio’s Statewide STEM Initiative Sonya Pryor-Jones Metropolitan Cleveland Consortium for STEM Ohio STEM Learning Network-Cleveland Hub.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Amanda Ollis DSP PRESENTATION.  Engagement means: the teacher is actively attempting to understand the specific needs of all her students and working.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Science Mentoring Program Hughes STEM High School Community Partnership Experiences February 7, 2012 Kent Buckingham, Ph.D., Program Coordinator.
Welcome and Thank you for participating Our topic is professional growth in a school setting The results will be used to assist me in a school related.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
The 8 Elements of STEM Schools Melanie LaForce, PhD Outlier Research & Evaluation The University of Chicago July 2015.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Session #4 March 2014 preparation policy practice Key Leaders Network.
The Ohio STEM Learning Network: A Study of Factors Affecting Implementation Spread and Sustainability.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Jeanne Century CEMSE, University of Chicago NRC Committee on Integrated STEM January 10, 2012 Defining iSTEM.
NEPF-ALIGNED STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION By Ms. Amanda Byrd.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
1 Innovative Teaching and Learning (ITL) Research Corinne Singleton SRI International.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
SCALE Quality Indicator System
Academic Advising Assessment: Perceived Support and Scale Development Tracie D. Burt, Erin M. Buchanan, Michael T. Carr, Marilee L. Teasley, Carly A.
You and Early Childhood Education
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
Imagine Success Engaging Entering Students Innovations 2009
USER’S PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDE ABOUT E- LEARNING
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Learning February 23, 2012

Melanie LaForce, PhD and Sarah Rand, MA NIHF-STEM Student and Teacher Findings OSLN Study Year 1

Background Information The purpose of the study is to better understand the STEM “Platform Schools” within the Ohio STEM Learning Network (OSLN) To understand the ways that teachers, students, school leaders, and school partners implement STEM school models To learn about ways that innovative STEM practices are spread between schools and regions and sustained over time

Understanding Implementation at STEM schools We define innovation models by essential components. What makes your school your school? How is your school enacting these components? What factors (context, disposition) contribute to or inhibit implementation?

Sources of Data The Instructional Questionnaire asked questions about the instructional structures and practices used at NIHF-STEM The Factor Questionnaire asked questions about factors that may influence the implementation of practices in STEM schools The Student Questionnaire asked questions about student feelings about the school, attitudes about STEM, and motivation and confidence in STEM and learning. NIHF-STEM All Other OSLN Schools Teacher Instructional Questionnaire2054 Teacher Factor Questionnaire2168 Student Questionnaire211429

Participating STEM Schools Dayton Regional STEM School, Dayton, OH Metro Early College High School, Columbus, OH National Inventors Hall of Fame School, Akron, OH MC 2 STEM High School, Cleveland, OH Hughes STEM High School, Cincinnati, OH Number of Districts Served

Participating STEM Schools

Percent Free/Reduced LunchPercent Special Education

Student Questionnaires NIHF-STEM (n=211)All other OSLN (n=547) Male60%52% Female40%48% Grade 541%0% Grade 651%0% Grade 735%0% Grade 80%5% Grade 9 and above0%95%

Topics of Key Findings Student Attitudes toward STEM and school Reports of their own behavior Teacher Perceptions about staff Perceptions about their school/district

Considerations There are unique factors about NIHF-STEM (and all schools in our sample) that may influence data. NIHF-STEM -younger student population, somewhat more experienced teacher population Data are presented here in a format for school benefit. In our analysis work, we use data in a different way. Our questionnaire and other instruments are always being improved.

Student Findings

Reasons for Attending NIHF-STEM

Student Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Efficacy Intrinsic Motivation – General I want to do well in school. I want to succeed in the world outside of school. I want to learn as much as I can. Intrinsic Motivation – STEM I am interested in (science, math, engineering, technology) I enjoy learning about (science, math, engineering, technology) Self-Efficacy – General I have the skills and ability to do my schoolwork. I will be able to achieve most of the goals I have set for myself When facing difficult tasks, I know I will accomplish them. Self-Efficacy – STEM I am good at (science, math, engineering, technology) I have the skills and ability to learn (science, math, engineering, technology) * Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree scale

Intrinsic Motivation Note: 1= Strongly Disagree – 6= Strongly Agree

Self-Efficacy Note: 1= Strongly Disagree – 6= Strongly Agree

Attitudes about School % Indicating “Agree” or “Strongly Agree”

Students are engaged in cognitively demanding work Students responded to a series of items measuring the extent to which they participate in assignments, tasks, and work that is cognitively demanding. Items measuring student cognitive demand include: I make hypotheses. I analyze (organize, process, manipulate, re-evaluate) data. I support my conclusions with evidence. I explain my reasoning. I consider alternative explanations/arguments. I analyze subject-specific text (e.g. section from a textbook or an article, paragraph from an autobiography, a mathematical algorithm, opening from play, etc.) NIHF-STEM students reported high levels of cognitive demand

Students are engaged in cognitively demanding work Table 2: Student engagement in cognitively demanding work

Teacher Findings

Staff treat one another with trust and respect Items measuring the extent to which staff respect and trust one another include: Staff at my school treat one another with respect. Staff at my school trust one another. NIHF-STEM teachers report high levels of trust and respect amongst staff.

Staff treat one another with trust and respect Figure 6. Staff at my school trust one another.

Staff spread practices Staff share practices they enact in their classrooms and schools with others. Items include: Staff at my school share practices with others outside of my school. My school is a source of information and learning for other schools. NIHF-STEM teachers show high rates of reporting staff spread practices.

Staff spread practices Figure 7. Staff at my school share practices with others outside of my school.

School Innovativeness Innovativeness: the extent to which an individual or organization seeks out, creates, and/or enacts new ways of doing things. Items measuring school innovativeness include: My school experiments with new practices. My school reflects on or questions existing ways of doing things. My school is not afraid to make mistakes. My school looks for alternative ways of doing things. My school is among the first to try new things. NIHF-STEM teachers report very high levels of school innovativeness. OSLN schools overall reported more variability in “My school is not afraid to make mistakes.”

School Innovativeness Figure 31. My school experiments with new practices.

School Innovativeness Figure 34. My school is not afraid to make mistakes.

School Effectiveness School effectiveness items measure evidence (can be empirical or informal) that an innovation accomplishes desired outcomes. Items measuring school effectiveness include: My school accomplishes its goals about student learning. My school accomplishes its goals in terms of developing student interest in STEM. Evidence from other schools suggests that the approaches my school uses are effective. NIHF-STEM teachers report very high ratings of school effectiveness.

School Effectiveness Figure 39. My school accomplishes its goals in terms of developing student interest in STEM.

Resource Sufficiency Resource sufficiency: the extent to which users feel they have enough resources to implement the innovation. Items measuring resource sufficiency include: I have all the materials I need to teach effectively. This school has sufficient resources that allow me to do my job effectively. NIHF-STEM teachers report very high levels of resource sufficiency as compared to other OSLN schools.

Resource Sufficiency

STEM Hub Participation Figure 46. Do you participate in your regional STEM hub?

Opportunities for Learning The extent to which sources of growth and development for implementers of an innovation are present. Items measuring opportunities for learning include: My school provides me with sources of growth and development. My district provides me with sources of growth and development. The regional STEM hub provides me with sources of growth and development. I am provided with sufficient opportunities for growth and development to be an effective teacher at my school. NIHF-STEM teachers report high levels of professional development opportunities

Opportunities for Learning Figure 47. My school provides me with sources of growth and development.

Opportunities for Learning Figure 48. My district provides me with sources of growth and development.

Next Steps Site Visit- This week! Teacher Interviews School Leader Interviews Observations Student Focus Groups Spring Questionnaires Teacher & School Leader Instructional Questionnaire: Spring 2012 Teacher & School Leader Factor Questionnaire: Spring 2012 Student Questionnaire: Spring 2012

Data Visualizations

STEM Community Group

Melanie LaForce, PhD Sarah Rand, MA To access this presentation and reports, please visit