Www.transparentnost.org.yu www.transparency.org/surveys/#cpi Global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) Transparency International 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 At first there were 6 members  Today there are 27 members of the EU  Created in  Requirements:  Democratic  Free market government Flag of.
Advertisements

Journalism and Economic Development Economics and Business Information Empowering Change Mark Nelson, World Bank Institute.
Partners for Financial Stability Capital Markets Trends for SEE and Eurasia February
Public Procurement in Transition Countries: Major Trends in Provision of Access to Justice 16 July 2014 UNCITRAL Standards for Transparency, Accountability.
EU Enlargement EU Enlargement. FYR Enlargement: from 6 to 27  1973: United Kingdom, Ireland, Denmark  : Greece, Spain, Portugal  1995: Sweden,
Twinning as an instrument for promoting HTA POLAND/AHTAPol AS A BENEFICIARY AND A DONOR OF TWINNING ASSISSTANCE Aleksandra Pajor Agency for Health Technology.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia,
Corruption prevention in respect of judges and prosecutors - GRECO in the midst of its fourth evaluation round Christian Manquet, Vice-President of GRECO.
Changes in the educational system- Implementation of Bologna Oslo October 2009.
EaP/CoE Facility Project Good Governance and Fight against Corruption Results and Achievements May-October
Corruption Perception Index VS Unemployment Rate Li Wing Cheung Wai Yin Kwan Nga Lee Leung Man Chun Ho Kwong Yin
Climate Change - International Efforts. Direct Observation of Climate Change Source: IPCC 4AR.
Transitional Countries Integration with the European Union 4th period Intensive Course 1st Lecture Monday Professor Juha Väätänen.
International Comparison. 2 Business Environment and Innovation.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
1 Doing Business 2010: Poland Neil Gregory Advisor and Acting Director Financial & Private Sector Development Krakow, Poland September 9, 2009.
CORRUPTION & TRANSPARENCY. “Trust in Allah but don’t forget to tie up your camel” Good Governance, Transparency and Controlling Corruption -> Key Pre-requisites.
Study initiated by Open Society Forum Team Leader: D. Jargalsaikhan, MBA (Finance), Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, USA Senior Researcher:
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 Policy and Research Department Communications Department.
Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2008 Transparency International-Estonia.
Global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) Transparency International 2012.
esearch/cpi/overview Global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2014.
THE CHANGING REAL ESTATE MARKET TRANSPARENCY IN THE EUROPEAN REAL ESTATE MARKETS PROFESSOR GRAEME NEWELL University of Western Sydney
CIDA's Cooperation with Emerging Donors ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN FINLAND DENMARK ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA BELARUS UNITED KINGDOM IRELAND GERMANY POLAND UKRAINE.
EBRD 2010 Regional Assessment – Scope, Focus & Main Findings on the Public Procurement Law and Practice in the EBRD region Eliza Niewiadomska Legal Transition.
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 Policy and Research Department Communications Department TI –Secretariat.
Global Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) Transparency International
Economies on Transition: At the Crossroads of Development Olga Gassan-zade Center for Clean Air Policy, Ukraine SB-18, Bonn, June 9.
Tine Jeppesen FIW Research Conference Vienna December 10 th 2010.
UNECE Country Profiles on Housing and Land Management.
Media Freedom The Catch Up Index Findings. What is the Catch Up Index? Are the ten “new”, post-communist member states of the EU – the EU10 – catching.
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 Policy and Research Department Communications Department.
KAJ MORTENSEN DG AGRI – G.4 European Commission EastAgri Annual Meeting, Paris, 11 Sep 2008 Support to agriculture and rural development.
‘State Capture in Transition’: Summary Findings Joel Hellman and Daniel Kaufmann The World Bank
CORRUPTION Transition Economies Presented By AJ Cericola.
Conference Objectives To highlight the rising number of people living with HIV in Europe who are unaware of their serostatus To identify political, structural,
GORAN RADMAN Chairman, SenseConsulting Technology and Innovation Competitiveness in Eastern and Southeastern Europe.
Doing Business in Europe Bay Area CITD Seminar Series Tuesday, September 21st, 2004 Kemarra Inc. - Key Marketing Resources & Associates San Francisco USA.
Elisabetta Piselli Senior Counsel, LEGIA Procurement and Consultant Services.
CORRUPTION. International standards in criminal law – what do we need? National legislation – what do we have? What is corruption? Manifestations of corruption.
Europe. Albania AL Austria Belarus Belgium.
Summary results of our bi-annual Central Eastern Europe business benchmarking survey June 2015.
Delegations LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Corruption Perception Index CPI 组员:刘天云 施蓓蓓 龚佳瑛 沈蝶 周枫.
Social Studies: Europe & Russia Lesson 34 Practice & Review
Youth in Action Youth in Action supports providing competencies for young people contributes to the Lisbon strategy builds on the previous.
Computer Class – Summer 20092/21/2016 3:45 AM European Countries Albania Andorra Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech.
THE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROGRAMME Oleg Dzioubinski UNECE/Environment, Housing and Land Management.
Emerging Market Update 2005 Main Streets Across The World 2005 Real Estate Market Slovakia Bratislava
Bosnia & Herzegovina Gap Analysis Monitoring Country Progress Team Strategic Planning and Analysis Division Program Office E&E Bureau December 2015.
How to counter democratic backsliding in CEE? Peter Golias INEKO Director, Slovakia June 21st 2016 Warsaw, Poland.
France Ireland Norway Sweden Finland Estonia Latvia Spain Portugal Belgium Netherlands Germany Switzerland Italy Czech Rep Slovakia Austria Poland Ukraine.
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2012 Published 5 th December 2012 Scores and ranks 176 countries and territories from around the world on the perceived level.
Comparative analysis on wages
THE EUROPEAN UNION How does the structure of government within the EU compare with the structure of government in the United States?
Summary results of our bi-annual Central Eastern Europe business benchmarking survey December 2016.
Identifying gaps: why is a wage increase needed? An ACTRAV perspective
Monitoring Progress in Transition to a Market Economy
Alexei Zverev Senior Counsel, EBRD Budapest , 7 March 2007
Coalition 2000 THE CORRUPTION MONITORING SYSTEM OF
Comparative European Law on Abortion Joint Oireachtas Committee on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution – 8 November 2017 Leah Hoctor, Regional.
The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 经济合作与发展组织跨国企业准则
IGO Presentation: The European Union
Намалување на загадувањето на воздухот со електромобилност
Development of economy in previous years
Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology. Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in.
Development of economy in previous years
Status of implementation of e-agriculture in Europe, including Western Balkans Mihaly Csoto, FAO Consultant / National University of Public Service (NUPS)
Presentation transcript:

Global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) Transparency International 2006

Measures the level in which the corruption of public servants and politicians is perceived Index is made on the bases of twelve different researches and studies, which were conducted by nine independent institutions questioning businessmen, analysts and local experts Corruption Perception Index for 2006

CPI 2006 – The best and the worst RankCountry Score (1-10) No. of research Finland Iceland 9.66 New Zealand Denmark 9.57 RankCountry Score (1-10)No. of research Guinea Myanmar1.93 Iraq Haiti1.83 Countries recognized as the most corrupted Countries recognized as the least corrupted

CPI goals To measure how much is the corruption perceived in public sector by businessmen, experts and analysts of risk To promote comparative comprehension of the level of corruption To offer overview of decision makers’ points of view which affects the market and investments To stimulate scientific researches, analysis of the cause and consequences of corruption, in international and domestic level To contribute to building the public consciousness about corruption – and create climate for changes

Methodology CPI is “research of group of researches” which is conducted every year and provides information which can continuously be monitored Minimum three researches by country - Research includes previous two years Countries are scored on the scale from 10 (very ‘clean’) to 0 (very corrupted). Perception is questioned and not the facts (e.g. number of convictions, number of media texts) Corruption determined as “abuse of public authorities for private interests”

Possibility of comparing Index represents overview of points of view of businessmen and analysts about certain countries’ situation and doesn’t reflect necessarily trends for certain years Score is more relevant than the rank on the list (because the number of countries included in the list is constantly increasing) Index changes of certain countries can be a result of sample changes – researches taken into consideration when creating the index

Disadvantages and advantages of CPI Index doesn’t reflect the level of efforts invested into fight against corruption Developing countries can be shown in worse light due to prejudice and pre convictions of foreign investors (that is why other instruments for measuring corruption exist) Other instruments for measuring corruption also come to similar results as CPI CPI is good chance to promote public debate on corruption CPI is good stimulation for conducting further analysis CPI includes almost all the world countries

Resources CPIA: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment by the IDA and IBRD EIU: Economist Intelligence Unit FH: Freedom House, Nations in Transit IMD: World Competitiveness Report of the Institute for Management Development MIG: Merchant International Group PERC: Political and Economic Risk Consultancy, Hong Kong UNECA: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, African Governance Report WEF: Global Competitiveness Report of the World Economic Forum WMRC: World Markets Research Centre

Resource of information in initial researches ResourceSample 1EIU, FH, MIG i WMRC Non residents’ perception; examinees mostly come from developed countries. 2CPIA Experts engaged from World Bank 3WEFResidents’ perception; examinees are mostly local experts, local businessmen and multinational companies.

CPI results and Serbia SCG is included in seven researches which are taken into consideration when creating the index Researches published during 2005 and 2006 Ranking by certain researches is from 2,3 to 4,0 Standard deviation is in acceptable limits (0,7)

CORRUTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2006

Former socialist countries in Europe Estonia6.7 Slovenia6.4 Hungary5.2 Lithuania4.8 Chech Republic 4.8 Slovakia4.7 Latvia4.7 Bulgaria4.0 Poland3.7 Croatia3.4 Moldova3.2 Romania3.1 Serbia3.0 Armenia2.9 BIH2.9 Georgia2.8 Ukraine2.8 Macedonia 2.7 Albania2.6 Russia2.5 Belarus2.1

CPI 2006 – ex SFRJ RankCountryScore 1-10 Score Score Score Score 2005 Researches 28Slovenia 6,4  5,55,96,06,18 69Croatia3,43,7 3,53,47 90Serbia (SCG) 3,0  1,32,32,72,87 93BiH2,92,9/3,33,12,96 105Macedonia2,7/2,32,7 6 Serbia Gabon Suriname 90. place

Evolution of SCG and Serbia

SCG and Serbia’s place by years

Reactions to recent ranking Data from 2000: facing with catastrophic picture of Serbia 2003: Expected larger move on the list, but the perception changes slowly 2004: New move made – getting close to real state 2005 and 2006: Minimal trend of increase is kept – no radical changes which would lead to fast change of corruption perception Corruption perception in Serbia is similar to that in surrounding countries – progress exists but is very slow

CPI results and Serbia Countries can ignore CPI results only on their damage – even if it doesn’t reflect totally to real state of things, CPI is good index of what other people think of us Adopted strategy for fight against corruption must be elaborated as soon as possible through quality action plans and their implementation should be controlled If the anticorruption regulations and institutions are just established, and their functioning in practice isn’t enabled, important move can’t be expected Ambient for business must be renovated through guarantee of legal safety, effective court protection and decreasing chance of the bureaucracy to extort bribe