Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

WHAT IS TITLE I ? SEAFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL PARENT MEETING October 7, 2010.
Whittier City School District
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
1 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Santa Ana Unified School District Leadership Summit.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
West Point Elementary Continuous Improvement Plan E3-Excellence- Everyday- Everyone.
H igh Expectations F amily Participation E xcellence in Instruction S uccess for Students A School-Wide Title 1 School.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Title I Rights and Services Annual Parent Meeting Keansburg School District September 16, 2013.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“Making the Case for Professional Learning Communities” Placer County Office of Education Renee Regacho-Anaclerio- Assistant Superintendent Educational.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
The Learning Journey Christie Kay, Teacher, Solana Pacific School Lisa Denham, Principal, Skyline School Leslie Fausset, Superintendent.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
Teaching is Contagious
H igh Expectations F amily Participation E xcellence in Instruction S uccess for Students A School-Wide Title 1 School.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
CCSS in the Classroom Melina Reeves EDU695: MAED Capstone Professor Shannon O'Day January 15, 2015.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
What you need to know About Title I
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011

 Whittier City School District grew 15 points on the Academic Performance Index (API) from 755 to 770  Sorensen School made an astonishing 66 points growth on the API!  Jackson School, with the 2 nd to the highest % of students on Free and Reduced Lunch in our district, made 39 points growth this year and almost 100 points growth over the past 5 years

 Dexter Middle School made 39 points growth on the API over the past two years  Hoover School grew 37 points on their API this year  Of our schools that are currently in Program Improvement, 3 of them (Sorensen, West Whittier, and Jackson) met all AYP targets through Safe Harbor * A school can meet Safe Harbor when it reduces the percentage of students not scoring proficient by 10%

Student GroupIncrease in Proficiency Rates Subject Area All Students5.3%Mathematics English Learners5.4%Mathematics English Learners5.1%English Language Arts Disadvantaged5%Mathematics All students5%Scored Advanced in ELA and Mathematics

 The sign of an effective learning organization is when it can identify clearly why there is improvement  Reasons we believe caused the growth are: Greater focus on standards Professional development from =M Math grant on effective instructional strategies Professional development in ELD strategies Emerging work on Common Assessments

 Three schools did not make progress on their API (although two of those schools had made growth the previous years)  Only two of our schools have met the 800 target  Four more schools have entered into Program Improvement

 While the statewide average API score rose 11 points to 778, with all racial groups making academic gains, 4,600 schools from throughout the state are now labeled as failing under the federal No Child Left Behind law  That means that 80% of all Title I schools are now in PI.  Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson has joined leaders in other states in calling for a reprieve from the No Child Left Behind law

 “(NCLB's) requirement that 100 percent of students reach proficiency by the school year means a rapidly escalating number of schools and districts are being deemed failures, despite rising test scores and rankings according to the state's formula…and the federally imposed labels cease to provide any meaningful information to stakeholders who deserve a more comprehensive understanding of a school's performance,” California Superintendent of Schools, Tom Torlakson in a letter to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan

 Our goal is for all schools to reach or exceed 800 on the Academic Performance Index  Our pursuit of Professional Learning Communities will be a critical aspect of that work  We will begin classroom walk-thrus to give feedback on instructional practices as part of our improvement process

“Many schools operate as if their primary purpose is to ensure that children are taught, PLCs are dedicated to the idea that our schools exist to ensure that all children learn the essential skills and knowledge expected” ~ Richard DuFour

 Focus on learning not just teaching  Create a collaborative culture  Identify priority standards  Create formative assessments to frequently measure student learning: Identify best practices in teaching Identify students in need of immediate intervention

 Create creative structures for providing interventions to move students to proficiency  Provide enrichment opportunities for students who learn it the first time

We accept learning as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of their impact on learning.