Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Advertisements

Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Why are we revising writing?
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Assessments Matching Assessments to Standards. Agenda ● Welcome ● What do you think of assessment? ● Overview of all types of evidence ● Performance Tasks.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Classroom Assessment Literacy and What you need to know to do it well!
Next Generation Science Cadre Facilitators: Jennifer Spencer Katrina Slone.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Formative Assessment Formative Assessment Assessment carried out during the instructional process for the purpose of improving teaching or learning.
Chief Instructional Leaders Title I Fall Conference October 5, 2010 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV.
Examining the Modules: Assessment Practices LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
CCSS-M and Classroom Practice: Reflecting Conversation DECEMBER 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Summer Assessment Institute: Linking Data Teams & Quality Assessment August 2015.
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Project & Syllabus.
Ratio Reasoning in 6th Grade The Road to Proportional Reasoning
Equality Project Part A Observations
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Our Leadership Journey
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Development Cycle Stages 4 and 5 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Development Cycle Stand up and move! Find a partner and describe the meaning of the first four steps of the assessment development cycle. Step 1: Partner A describes step; partner B paraphrases and adds on. Step 2: Partner B describes step; partner A paraphrases and adds on. Etc. See pages for support.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Keys to Quality Assessment: Sound Design Key 1: Clear Purpose Key 2: Clear Targets Key 3: Sound Design Key 4: Effective Communication Key 5: Student Involvement Sound Design: How to design assessments that align with our targets and serve our purposes.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Development Cycle Planning Stage 1.Determine who will use the assessment results and how they will use them. 2.Identify the learning targets to be assessed. 3.Select appropriate assessment method or methods. 4.Determine sample size. Development Stage 5. Develop or select items, exercises, tasks, and scoring procedures. 6. Review and critique the overall assessment for quality before use. Use Stage 7. Conduct and score assessment. 8. Revise as needed for future use.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target Learning Target: Deepen understanding of the connection between learning targets and quality assessments.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Homework from Last Session Assessing the Learning Target: Working with your November learning targets, either write your own assessment item or find an assessment item from the suggested resources that will reveal evidence of student learning. At least one of your targets should be a reasoning target. Consider the learning from Chapter 4 as you put together your assessment item(s). Online Resources:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Target/Assessment Discussion In pairs, examine and offer feedback to your partners on their learning targets and assessment item(s). Spend some time in your discussion on the: 1.classification of the learning target 2.student-friendly language 3.target as an activity or a learning 4.match of assessment method/learning target 5.assessment item(s) 6.answer one of the assessment items as a proficient student and discuss evidence of student learning.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target – Assessment Method Match Selected Response Written Response Performance Assessment Personal Communication KnowledgeGoodStrongPartialStrong ReasoningGoodStrongPartialStrong SkillPartialPoorStrongPartial ProductPoor StrongPoor

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Teacher’s Role in Assessment FOR Learning 1.Identify the standard. 2.Deconstruct it to enabling targets. 3.Transform to student friendly version. 4.Create accurate classroom assessments. 5.Use with students to track growth.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Sound Design: Conditions for Formative Assessment Use

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Conditions for Formative Assessment Use 1.The assessment instrument/event is designed so that it aligns directly with the content standards to be learned. 2.All of the instrument/event’s items or tasks match what has been or will be taught. 3.The instrument/event provides information of sufficient detail to pinpoint specific problems, such as misunderstandings, so that teachers can make good decisions about what actions to take and with whom. 4.The results are available in time to take action with the students who generated them. 5.Teachers and students do indeed take action based on the results.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Conditions for Formative Assessment Use Turn to page 105, the conditions for formative use are listed. Read carefully. When you think about formative assessment practices in your classroom, which conditions are you feeling confident in and which conditions is still new learning for you?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Planning for Formative Assessment Events: An Assessment Blueprint

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Blueprint Discuss the chart on page 306. Questions to consider: 1.How is the chart set up? 2.What suggestions do you have for revision to adapt to your grade level?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Blueprint A Formative Assessment Blueprint, should include: Learning targets Type of Target Description of lesson Description of assessment

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Formative Assessment Practices: Student Involvement

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target Learning Target: Deepen understanding of the connection between learning targets and quality assessments.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Student Involvement Turn to page 115. With your teammates, discuss the ideas below and what they might look like in classroom practice. Assessment for Learning Using Assessment Blueprints Differentiate subsequent instruction after giving a quiz or test, by grouping students according to which learning targets they had trouble with. Share the blueprint with students at the outset to make the learning targets clearer. Share the blueprint with the students and ask them to identify where each day’s instruction fits. Share the blueprint with students and have them write practice test questions periodically for each cell, as a form of focused review.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Homework Choose one or two of the ideas below to imbed into your classroom practice for your unit in November. Reflect on how you structured the assessment ideas and how it impacted student learning. Be prepared to share this in December. (Approx. 2-3 paragraphs) Assessment for Learning Using Assessment Blueprints Differentiate subsequent instruction after giving a quiz or test, by grouping students according to which learning targets they had trouble with. Share the blueprint with students at the outset to make the learning targets clearer. Share the blueprint with the students and ask them to identify where each day’s instruction fits. Share the blueprint with students and have them write practice test questions periodically for each cell, as a form of focused review.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reflecting on Tonight’s Learning Target In partners, explain steps 4 and 5 of the assessment cycle. In thinking about your November math lessons and the assessment cycle ….. 1)What do you look forward to in regards to November’s math lessons? 2)What make you anxious?