1 Database for Energy Efficiency Resource User Demonstration Jennifer Barnes Pacific Energy Center October 11, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restaurants Can Take a Bite Out of Energy Costs a.
Advertisements

E2=P2 Add Energy Efficiency to your P2 Toolbox Peter Crawford Vermont Small Business Development Center Vermont Small Business Development Center Regulatory.
Energy Efficiency & Conservation for Businesses and Homes Pacific Gas & Electric Company Presented By: Joe Segura Energy Solutions and Service April 17.
Planning for Updates and Linkages to EM&V CALMAC February 17, 2004.
Save Energy and Money PNM Energy Efficiency Programs
Residential Refrigerators and Freezers UES Measure Update Regional Technical Forum October 14, 2014.
DEER2015 Code Update Presentation of Documentation and Draft Results DEER2015 Code Update Comment period: 24 October – 10 November 2014 Final release:
Commercial Energy Efficiency Program GAPPA May 27, 2014.
DEER2013 Codes and Standards Update for the Cycle 17 July 2013.
Commercial Energy Efficiency Program IFMA Luncheon July 16, 2014.
T OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AT TRIBAL GAMING FACILITIES.
 Using the “How to Read the EnergyGuide Label” and EnergyGuide examples fill in the template below (1) Estimated Yearly Operating Cost (Natural gas water.
Statewide Measure Cost Update Overview & Discussion.
School Measure Proposals for Small and Rural Utilities.
1 What is DEER?  Database for Energy Efficient Resources -A listing of residential and non-residential energy efficiency measures located at:
APPLIANCE STANDARDS BIG SAVINGS COME FULL CIRCLE PRESENTERS Carrie Cobb, BPA Rob Carmichael, Cadeo Group Angie Lee, Navigant Ben Barrington, Cadeo Group.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Internal Use Only Page 1 Commercial Variable Speed Swimming Pool Pump Jason Wang Cal TF Work Paper Presentation October 23, 2014.
Grocery Measure: LEDs for Reach-In Display Cases Regional Technical Forum July 21 st, 2015 Mohit Singh-Chhabra.
LED Case Lighting With and Without Motion Sensors Michele Friedrich – Sr. Engineer PECI 1/5/2010.
1 Database for Energy Efficiency Resource Update Project Information and Final Results A DEER Presentation at CALMAC Meeting Pacific Energy Center, San.
Utility Rebates Services and Funding to Help Build “Green” Restaurants and Hospitality Facilities Tom Coughlin Program Manager.
1 Quality Control Review of E3 Calculator Inputs Comparison to DEER Database Brian Horii Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. November 16, 2006.
Climate & Usage, Health & Safety Lessons Learned ESAP Workshop #1 October 17, 2011.
PUBLIC SECTOR STANDARD & CUSTOM REBATE GUIDELINES Kate Tomford | DCEO Energy & Recycling Office DCEO Trade Ally Rally |
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
Vermont Electric Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Draft Findings April 10, 2006.
News from Engineering Criteria and Standards Development Katherine Delves Senior Standards Development Manager Office of Energy Efficiency, NRCan Toronto,
Efficiency Savings and Performance Incentive (ESPI) Mechanism Uncertain Measure List Katie Wu Integrated Demand Side Analysis, Energy Division.
Lighting Savings Calculations for Northwest Energy Star ® Homes David Baylon.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
Capacity Impacts of Energy Efficiency What We Know and What We Don’t Know March 11, 2014.
1 EE Evaluation Report on 2009 Bridge Funding Period California Public Utilities Commission November 22, 2010 Energy Division Energy Efficiency Evaluation.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Internal Use Only Page 1 Circulating Block Heater Alfredo Gutierrez Cal TF Work Paper Presentation October 23, 2014.
CITY OF LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Conservation Management Division How To Lower Your Utility Bill.
1 Retail Plug-Load Portfolio (RPP) Program Proposed Basic Tier Product UESs EM&V and Residential Program Teams September 24, 2015.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations Regional Technical Forum March 18, 2014.
EnergySmart Grocer Program Evaluation Findings Summary PWP, Inc.
Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California.
Grocery Measure: EC Motors for Display Cases Regional Technical Forum June 16 th, 2015 Mohit Singh-Chhabra.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
10/16/ Residential Sector Conservation Resource Assessment Technologies, Measures and Practices “Scouting Report” September 30, 2002.
RTF Small / Rural Subcommittee Tuesday, June 11, 9am – 10:30am.
10 Turn off Lights Not in Use Motion Sensors simple ways to go green
Ben Chou NRDC Water Program Clothes Washer Recycling Work Paper Abstract California Technical Forum October 23, 2014.
1 What is DEER?  A collection of data for Residential and Non-Residential energy efficiency measures.  It provides a common set of: Ex ante Savings values:
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Savings from Electric Water Heaters in Commercial Applications Danielle Gidding.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Residential Conservation Resource Assessment Overview of Analytical Process and Major Assumptions April 21, 2009.
Bill Savings Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2002 to 2004 Bill Savings Public Workshop April 15, San Diego.
1 Analysis of Cost and Savings Values for Revised Energy Star Dishwasher Specifications June 6, 2006.
11/23/ Residential Sector Load Forecast Impacts of Codes, Standards and Market Changes Preliminary Estimates June 19, 2002.
Residential New SF Energy Star Homes UES Measure Update December 17th, 2013.
T12 to HPT8 Change-outs Small/Rural request for development May 15, 2012.
Northwest Power Planning Council Residential Space Conditioning and Domestic Hot Water Conservation Resource Assessment Overview of Analytical Process.
Implementer’s Group May 2015 Meeting Debrief and Upcoming Meeting Prep May 19, 2015.
Commercial Clothes Washers UES Ryan Firestone Regional Technical Forum April 14, 2015.
Electric / Gas / Water Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: John Cavalli, Itron Beatrice Mayo, PG&E July 27, Express Efficiency Program.
Residential Refrigerator UES Measure Update Regional Technical Forum April 16, 2013.
D EEMED M EASURE U PDATES May 3, 2011 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Bob Tingleff SBW Consulting, Inc.
RTF Management Updates Jennifer Light Regional Technical Forum January 21, 2016.
1 Summary of Reviews: Workpapers Approved by the California Technical Forum Part 2 Meeting: California Technical Forum January 28, 2016 Jeff Hirsch/Kevin.
Exterior LED Area Lights
RTF Management Updates Jennifer Light Regional Technical Forum February 17, 2016.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
1 Potomac Electric Power Company Case 9155 & Delmarva Power & Light Case 9156 EmPOWER MARYLAND DRAFT NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND.
Seventh Plan Update RETAC September 23, Final Plan Update Review of Past Program Results Emerging Tech & New Measures Finance, Admin Cost, Line.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Heat Pump Water Heaters Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Draft SMECO EmPOWER Plans April 15, 2011.
2017 Commercial Energy Efficiency Program
Welcome to the Colorado Restaurant Association Pikes Peak Chapter Energy Efficiency in the Restaurant Industry.
Presentation transcript:

1 Database for Energy Efficiency Resource User Demonstration Jennifer Barnes Pacific Energy Center October 11, 2005

2 What is DEER?  A collection of data for Residential and Non-Residential energy efficiency measures.   It provides a common set of: Ex ante Savings values: kW, kWh, kBtu Measure Costs Effective Measure Life (a.k.a EUL)

3 Website Navigation  Measures categorized by Residential and non-residential Weather sensitive and non-weather sensitive Non-weather sensitive measure impacts determined through engineering calculations Savings do not vary by climate zone or vintage, only building type

4 Weather sensitive measures Weather sensitive measure impacts simulated using DOE2/eQUEST Single family, multifamily, mobile homes, and 22 non- residential building types Five building vintages 16 climate zones Two levels of savings Customer savings - for system savings and early replacement savings. “Above Code” Savings - for all measures affected by an energy code or standard (reportable savings for replace on burnout)

5 Common Units  Describes the normalizing unit Per ton, lamp, household, linear feet, cloths dryer, etc. The energy and cost common units are distinct Over 90% of cases, they are the same When different, distinctly identified

6 Measure Costs  Application – indicates if the cost is for: Retrofit (RET) - replacing a working system with a new technology or adding a technology Replace-on-burnout (ROB) - replacing a technology at the end of its useful life New construction or major renovation (NEW) - installing a technology in a new construction or major renovation  Cost Basis – indicates if the cost is: Incremental (INCR) - the differential cost between a base technology and an energy efficient technology Installed (FULL) - the full or installed cost of the measure including equipment, labor, overhead & profit (OH&P)

7 Notable Changes  Eliminated coin-operated high efficiency clothes washers and hot water heater tank wrap  T-12 removed from DEER as a base case because of new federal guidelines. However, it may be legitimate in lamp/ballast (only) change outs.  Programmable thermostats savings diminished:  Change in residential assumptions  Programmable thermostats or time clocks required by code since 1992 A/C savings reduced due to stricter code requirements

8 CFL Changes Integral versus modular Modular – hardwired ballast with replaceable lamp. 16 year life (res.) Integral – lamp and ballast are “fused.” 9.4 year life (res.) In service factor – applied to CFLs to account for units not in operation Non-res. CLF – “SPC” – assumes that all units are installed and operational Non-res. CFL – in service factor of.92 Residential CFL – in service factor of.9 No in service factor for table lamps and torchieres

9 Website Navigation – Opening Screen

10 Website Navigation – Browse Measures

11 Website Navigation – Select Subcategory

12 Website Navigation – Review Summary Page - Top

13 Run ID String variable of fixed length of 13 with the format: ABBB1122CCCCC where: A = Sector Code. ‘R’ = Residential and ‘C’ = Commercial BBB = Building type abbreviation (see codes under Building Type) 11 = Climate zone (see codes under Climate Zone) 22 = Vintage (see codes under Vintage) CCCCC = Measure abbreviation Measure ID - String variable of fixed length of 7 (example: D03-001)

14 Website Navigation – Review Summary Page - Bottom

15 Website Navigation – Detailed Measure Information

16 Website Navigation – Detailed Measure information - Top

17 Website Navigation – Detailed Measure information - Bottom

18 Supporting Documents Section  Website Users Guide  Net-to-Gross Ratios Table (Use.8 if in doubt)  Access Tables  Glossary  Cost Data  Cost Data User’s Guide  New EUL Estimates (SERA Report)  Consolidated Measure Data

19 Supporting Documents Section – Consolidated Measure Data

20 Questions/Comments?

21 DEER Measure Cost Detail

22 Defining Cost Parameters Measure Cost Specifications (Cont.)  Cost data is first cost only -- life cycle or O&M costs/cost savings not included  Pricing reflects commonly available “standard” products and excludes specialty, high-end items  Some price observations (outliers) were excluded to assume a rational purchasing policy would be used (“who would pay THAT?”)  Equipment and labor prices are specific to California to extent possible but average across state

23 Defining Cost Parameters Key Cost Definitions  Cost Observation – a single price point for an individual measure or measure configuration Cost values are what a program participant would pay to implement the measure consistent with definitions in the CA Standard Practice Manual (initial capital cost)  Cost units ($ / ton, $ / HP, $ / square foot, etc.) Mostly the same although different for some measures Distinct field in detailed cost data; appended to Cost Basis designator in measure detail

24 Data Collection and Analysis Process Labor Cost Estimates  Labor cost estimates generally base on manhours required to complete task times appropriate wage rate  Wage rate based on trade (electrician, plumber, etc.) and geographic location of activity  RS Means used to provide wage rate and location adjustment multipliers

25 1. Website and on-site cost surveys of retailers 2. Cost quotes from manufacturers, manufacturers sales representatives, and distributors 3. Cost surveys of contractors and design professionals. 4. Cost data from in California DSM program files, particularly local programs 5. Secondary sources and reports Data Collection and Analysis Process Cost Data Sources

26 Data Collection and Analysis Process Cost Analysis Workbooks  Excel based cost analysis workbook developed for each measure.  Each workbook has 5 sections:

27 Data Collection and Analysis Process Cost Analysis Workbooks – Raw Data  Example of the ‘Raw Data’ section of the High Efficiency Electric Clothes Dryer workbook

28 Data Collection and Analysis Process Cost Analysis Workbooks – Cost Results  Example of the ‘Results’ section of the High Efficiency Electric Clothes Dryer workbook

29 Data Collection and Analysis Process Cost Analysis Workbooks – Statistical Summary  Example of the ‘Statistical Summary’ section of the High Efficiency Electric Clothes Dryer workbook

30  How to find the most applicable cost information? Measure detail pages for each run ID - the per unit equipment measure cost of $13.65 for all 90% residential furnaces This provides an average cost based on a 100,000 Btu furnace The ‘Cost Data’ file under ‘Supporting Documents’ provides prices on a range of furnace sizes This provides a range of costs for 90% AFUE furnaces from 60,000 Btu to 140,000 Btu. Per unit costs ($/KBtu) ranges from $21.53 to $12.13, respectively The cost workbook section – Can use either statistical summary or individual price observations For example, the per unit equipment measure cost for 90% AFUE 100,000 furnaces ranges from to $12.31 to $16.52 based on 9 observations Cost Data Defining Cost Parameters

31 DEER Non-weather Sensitive Measure Detail

32 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  CFL Lighting  Refrigerators  Clothes Washers & Dryers  Dishwashers  Water Heating  Swimming Pool Pumps

33 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  CFL Lighting Measure Impact = (delta watts/unit * hours/day * days/year * In Service Rate) / 1000 watts/kWh Demand Impact = delta watts/unit * In Service Rate * Peak Hour Load Share The “In Service Factor” is an estimate of the percentage of lamps that are actually used. It is a rough estimate based on utility experience. . 9 to be used for all residential CFL programs .92 to be used for non-residential rebate or giveaway programs  1.0 to be used for verified installation programs. Labeled “SPC” in measure name Hours of Operation/Day” and “Peak Hour Load Share” from KEMA CFL Metering Study

34 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  CFL Lighting – Example (14W CFL replace 60W Inc) Measure Impact = (46W * 2.34 hours/day * 365 days/year * 0.9) / 1000 watts/kWh = 35.4 kWh Demand Impact = 46W * 0.9 * = 3.35 W

35 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Refrigerators Used the Energy Star calculator available on-line at: Key Input values for the calculator: Refrigerator Type (top, side, or bottom mount freezer) Ice through the door (yes or no) Refrigerator fresh volume (cubic feet) Refrigerator freezer volume (cubic feet)

36 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Clothes Washers Utilized the three recommended Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) Tiers for Modified Energy Factor: Used the Energy Star calculator (that utilizes an EF rather than MEF) on-line at: Estimated the equivalent EF value for CEE MEF values from Energy Star list of approved washers Other key Energy Star variables include: Number of wash cycles/year (E Star value is 392 cycles) Washer capacity (three sizes – 1.5, 2.65, and 3.5 cubic feet) Further disaggregated impacts by water heat and clothes dryer fuel types Fuel impact disagreegations based on ‘Efficiency Vermont” estimates Demand impact based on a energy/peak factor of This is carryover from previous 2001 DEER

37 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Clothes Washer – Example (Tier cu.ft) Measure Impact = (cycles/year * capacity / base EF) – (cycles/year * capacity / measure EF) = (392 * 2.65 / 1.58) – (392 * 2.65 / 4.94) = 447 kWh Demand Impact = Measure Impact * energy/peak factor = 447 kWh * = W

38 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Clothes Dryer 1993 National Appliance Energy Conservation Act (NAECA) minimum efficiency used for base technology: EF = 3.01 for electric dryers EF = 2.67 for gas dryers Used DOE test procedure guidelines for: Drying cycles per year = 416 UEC of 2.33 kWh/cycle for electric (969 kWh/year) UEC of 8.95 kBtu/cycle for gas (37.2 therms/year) Assumed 416 cycles represented Single Family Assumed 250 cycles for Multi-Family (CEC estimate of 60% less use by MF) Energy savings 5% of energy use. This is a carryover from previous 2001 DEER Demand impact based on a energy/peak factor of This is carryover from previous 2001 DEER

39 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Clothes Dryer – Example (SF electric) Measure Impact = Electric base use * Savings Percentage = 969 kWh * 0.05 = 48 kWh Demand Impact = Measure Impact * energy/peak factor = 48 kWh * = 17.8 W

40 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Dishwasher Used the Energy Star calculator available on-line at: Key Input values for the calculator: Base Energy Factor (EF) = 0.46 Measure Energy Factor = 0.58 Annual wash cycle (DOE test procedure) = 215 (assume SF) MF wash cycles (assumed to be ~75% of SF) = 160 Demand impact based on a energy/peak factor of This is carryover from previous 2001 DEER

41 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Water Heating Measures: High efficiency water heater (electric EF=0.93, gas EF=0.63) Heat pump water heater (EF=2.9) Point of use water heater low flow showerhead (from 2.5 to 2.0 gallons per minute) Pipe wrap Faucet aerators  Note: Removed water heater blankets because they’re obsolete on models made after Savings expressed as % of base use Base use varied by utility service area (same method as 2001) Demand impact based on a energy/peak factor of This is carryover from previous 2001 DEER

42 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Water Heating Measure Saving %: High efficiency water heater – electric - 5.4% High efficiency water heater – gas - 5.0% Heat pump water heater – 69.7% Point of use water heater – 15.0% low flow showerhead – 4.0% Pipe wrap – 4.0% Faucet aerators – 3.0%

43 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Residential Measures  Pool Pumps Single speed and two speed included Relied on PG&E and SCE engineers for calculating impacts: General assumptions: Average pool size of 25,000 gallons Average water turnover rate of 6-8 hours Average pump motor demand of 1.75 kVA Typical filtration time of 4 to 6 hours For single speed motors, motor downsizing and runtime reductions assumed

44 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Interior Lighting  Exterior Lighting  Cooking  Copy Machine  Water Heating  Vending Machine Controls  High Efficiency Motors  Agriculture

45 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Interior Lighting Measures: CFL screw-in lamps CFL hardwire fixtures High intensity discharge (HID) lamps Premium T8 lamps Dimming Ballasts De-lamping fluorescent 4 ft and 8 ft fixtures  Note: T-12 removed from DEER as a base case because of new federal guidelines. However, it may be legitimate in lamp/ballast (only) change outs.

46 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Interior Lighting – Basic Methodology Measure Impact = (delta watts/unit * hours/day * days/year * In Service Rate) / 1000 watts/kWh Demand Impact = delta watts/unit * In Service Rate * Peak Hour Load Share

47 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Exterior Lighting & Exit Signs High intensity discharge (HID) lamps Exit Signs Timeclocks Photocells

48 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Exterior Lighting & Exit Signs Methodology HID lamps : delta watts saved * hours of use (4,100 hours) no peak impacts Exit Signs : delta watts saved * 8760 hours * Interactive Effects peak = delta watts * Interactive effects * 1.0 (coincidence factor) Timeclocks & Photocells : watts controlled * hours of control no peak impacts

49 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Cooking High efficiency fryers (gas & electric) High efficiency griddle (gas) Hot food holding cabinet Connectionless steamer

50 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures Cooking - Methodology Relied primarily on the PG&E technology briefs For each of these measures, the energy savings calculation methodology is of the form: Savings = (APECRBase – APECREfficient) * Daily Hours * Days Where : APECR = The Average Production Energy Consumption Rate/hour Daily Hours = 12 Days = 365

51 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Copy Machines – three sizes 0-20 copies/minute copies/minute over 45 copies/minute Methodology assumptions from Energy Star calculator

52 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Vending Machine Controls Characterized in two measures by being installed in: Cold drink vending machines Uncooled snack vending machines Measure savings and characterization from the Pacific Northwest Regional Technical Forum database Methodology assumes operated during off-peak hours, thereforeno demand savings

53 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Water Heating Savings expressed as % of base use Base use varies by building type. Come from the 1994 DEER study Measures: High efficiency gas water heater (7.1% savings) Point of use water heater (10% savings) Water circulation pump time clock (6% savings)

54 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  High Efficiency Motors Meet premium efficiency standards established by the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) Base efficiency meets Energy Policy Act (EPACT) minimum Motor sizes range from 1 HP to 200 HP Motor hours of operation vary by industry sector Motor loading from US DOE Motor Master software Peak demand based on a coincidence factor of 0.75

55 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  High Efficiency Motors - Calculation Energy savings (kWh) = (Motor HP / EPACT motor efficiency) * kW/HP * hours of operation * motor loading – (motor HP / premium motor efficiency) * kW/HP * hours of operation * motor loading Peak (kW) = (motor HP * kW/HP * coincidence factor / EPACT motor efficiency) - (motor HP * kW/HP * coincidence factor / premium motor efficiency)

56 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Agricultural Measures Low pressure irrigation sprinkler nozzle Sprinkler irrigation to micro irrigation conversion Infrared film for greenhouses Greenhouse heat curtain Variable frequency drive for dairy pumps Ventilation fans or box fans High volume, low speed fans

57 Non-Weather Sensitive Measures Non-Residential Measures  Agricultural Measures  Methodology taken from Express Agricultural Work Papers  Irrigation savings varied by crop type Citrus trees Deciduous trees Field/vegetable Grapes  And water source Well Non-well