Analysis with Landcover and Habitat models Analysis with Landcover and Habitat models DataData SourceData Format Approximate Data Resolution Army Corps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aspen Falls Park Development Land Acquisition for Parks One Minute to Start.
Advertisements

Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Indiana State Land Office Digital Conversion Project Overview Justin P. Peters, GISP.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
The Wash and Fens Green Infrastructure Plan Paul Espin.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Meridian Township’s Land Preservation Program Meridian Township Land Preservation Advisory Board.
USDA Conservation Programs Sorting Out the Pieces: A Conference for Women Landowners Protecting Your Farm’s Soil & Water March 1, 2013.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Wildlife Conservation Lands Program Presentation Prepared by Kelly Douglass Forest Stewardship Biologist.
Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.
Dead Man’s Pond – Gould Property Puyallup City Council March 27, 2012
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
Protected Areas. The implementation of protected areas is an extension to the concept of protection if biodiversity IUCN (international Union for Conservation.
Public Land for the Taking A Disturbing Tale. Outline What is native prairie and what remains? Of what value native prairie? Stewardship of native prairie.
How Do I Know If There Is a Wetland Where I Want To Build? James Robb, Chief Wetlands & Storm Water Section Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 25 Rivers as a Legal Battleground Special Districts and Landowners Prepared by Elliott Mittler, Ph.D.
Texas Forest Legacy Program 2009 Application and Submission Form (for FY11 USFS Fiscal Year Funding) Submission Deadline August 31, 2009 Applicants are.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Protecting Working Lands: Through USDA Conservation Programs Denise Coleman National Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Manager USDA, Natural Resources.
A Regional Approach to Stewardship Mapping for the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Southwest Regional GAP Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico,
Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Stewardship Andrea E. Ernst Scott Schrader Veronica Lopez Julie Prior-Magee Kenneth Boykin Bruce Thompson Don Schrupp.
Transferring Existing CBRS Lines to DOQ Imagery CBRS boundaries are digitized and overlaid on horizontally-controlled DOQ aerial photography.
September 11, Description of Program The Mississippi Partners for Fish and Wildlife Partnership (MPFW) consists of 23 government and non-government.
Careers for Graduates of OSU ’ s Natural Resource Ecology and Management Department.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Water Control Structure Inventory U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata California with funding from the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, & Conservation.
Protecting Pinelands Sands Forest and Aquatic Habitats A landscape scale approach to habitat protection Thank you Mr. Chair: For the record, I am Richard.
Emergency Watershed Protection Program West Virginia Ron Wigal, EWP Program Coordinator, NRCS, West Virginia Gene Saurborn, Watershed Management Director,
Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS)
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Evan Fedorko West Virginia GIS Technical Center Jackie Strager Natural Resource.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
County & Regional Context State Parks & Urban Open Space Federal and National Parks - city to wildland social issues of St. Edward park.
T&E Species, Special Sites and HCVF! Sarah Crow ATFS Webinar Series May 16, 2013.
Chapter 18 Land Resources and Conservation. Vocabulary  Urban- city/high density  Rural- sparsely populated areas.
Locally Led Conservation Colorado State Conservation Board.
Integrating Parcels Into Farm Records Management Larry Cutforth WLIA Conference 2/23/04.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Growth and Land Use Planning Analysis for Washington County, Utah Presented by: Eric D Zimmerman.
1 US Fish and Wildlife Service Hurricane Preparedness Your agency’s data products that would be useful for hurricane preparedness and response * Federal.
Brigham Young University Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
MICHIGAN’S COASTAL AND ESTUARINE LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAM (CELCP) Alisa Gonzales-Pennington Matt Warner Michigan Coastal Management Program Environmental.
Chapter 7 Conservation Reserve Program 1. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Administration of CRP –The provisions of G.S (d) apply only.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
IOWA GAP ANALYSIS PROGRAM Northern Leopard Frog animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu American Goldfinch Map the land cover of.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wetlands Geodatabase Mitch Bergeson Cartographic Applications and Processing Program Water Resources Division, US Geological.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
INTRODUCTION TO GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE RSG620 Week 1, Lecture 2 April 11, 2012 Department of RS and GISc Institute of Space Technology, Karachi.
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
FIT ProposalApril 29, 2015 Levee & Dike Inventory Data Development and Creation of Statewide Geodatabase Photo: Outlier Solutions Inc. and Lighthawk Steve.
OPEN FIELDS & WATERS PROGRAM A PUBLIC ACCESS PROGRAM FOR HUNTERS AND ANGLERS OFFERED BY THE NEBRASKA GAME & PARKS COMMISSION OFFERED BY THE NEBRASKA GAME.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Island County Planning and Community Development Permitting 101.
Sarah McCabe October 2014 Penn State Advisor: Joe Bishop.
Soil & Water Conservation Districts HELPING LAND OWNERS PROTECT, MAINTAIN, AND ENHANCE THEIR NATURAL RESOURCES.
Agriculture has an important role Well-managed livestock grazing and other traditional ranching practices are not considered major threats to sage-grouse.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
California Department of Fish and Game Inland Desert - Region 6 San Jacinto Wildlife Area A Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission March.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
Grassland Water District Role Play Your Role: Water Managers of the Grassland Water District Instructions: 1)Read the following background information.
Will fire suppression alter plant communities of the Edwards Plateau, Texas? Jill M. Noel Department of Plant Biology University of Texas at Austin.
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Chapter 55 Conservation Biology.
Ology Conservation Biology.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis with Landcover and Habitat models Analysis with Landcover and Habitat models DataData SourceData Format Approximate Data Resolution Army Corps of Engineers (ACE)-Wildlife Management Areas, Forest Reserves, Refuge, Reservoirs and Pools,Easements ACE Omaha District Rock Island District St. Paul District IDNR Arc coverage Shapefile 1: :24000 County Conservation Boards (CCB) -There are 99 separate CCBs across the state Individual CCBs IDNR FSA Aerial Photos Shapefile DOQQ DRG County Auditor Plats Shapefile 1: : : :24000 Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) - State Parks, Preserves, Wildlife Management Areas IDNRShapefile1:24000 Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation (INHF)INHFShapefile1:24000 The Nature Conservancy (TNC)TNCShapefile1:24000 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)-Refuges, Easements and Waterfowl Production Areas USFWS IDNR ACE Arc coverage Shapefile FSA Aerial Photo Shapefile Arc coverage 1: : : :12000 State PreservesIDNRShapefile1:24000 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) – EWRP,WRP,CRP NRCS/IDNR Individual CCBs Shapefile See Individual CCBs 1:24000 Iowa GAP Stewardship Introduction The goal of IAGAP was to compile a comprehensive stewardship map detailing the geographic boundaries of a majority of the public and private conservation lands in Iowa. IAGAP uses the term stewardship because in many cases the organization or agency managing an area is different than the legal owner of a parcel of land. Over 100 county, state and federal agencies were identified as possible contributors of ownership boundaries for Iowa’s stewardship map. In addition to collecting the geographic boundary of managed areas information about the owner, manager and a measure of intent to maintain biodiversity was also collected. The intent of the land stewardship component of IAGAP is to provide an indicator for the protection of biodiversity throughout the state. When used in conjunction with the habitat modeling and landcover components the map of land stewardship also provides agencies, organizations and private land owners the basic information to evaluate their land in the context of the entire conservation system of the state. Data Acquisition The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) was invaluable in obtaining data. Their work with federal and county agencies throughout the state yielded many pieces of the stewardship puzzle in existing GIS data formats. After identifying other key organizations managing land in Iowa requests for data were made to the appropriate individuals. Data was available in a variety of formats and resolutions. The table below shows the data acquired for a particular agency, the source, format and approximate resolution. Data Acquisition Input and Reconcile data sources Input and Reconcile data sources Attribute Data Attribute Data Data Input and Reconciliation Reconciliation of existing GIS data Much of Iowa’s conservation network was represented in a variety of existing GIS formats already. Pieces of existing GIS data received from GAP participants contained similar geographic information and attributes that required edge-matching or conflation. Another problem was contradictory information about ownership or management. Prior to construction of the final dataset these issues had to be resolved. Digitizing Almost all of the property owned/managed within the 99 County Conservation Boards (CCB) had to be digitized. Data was obtained on FSA aerial photos or paper maps directly from a CCB. In cases where no data was submitted information was transferred to aerial photos from information at the county Auditor’s Office. The photos were then scanned and referenced to allow on-screen digitization of property boundaries. Attribute Data Each land unit was attributed with a minimum of a place name, owner, manager and associated stewardship codes as well as a management status code. Additionally if available the land unit was designated with its place name or equivalent. Stewardship Codes IAGAP uses a set of 4-digit codes similar to other GAP programs to differentiate the different owners and managers in a state’s conservation system. A list of all GAP stewardship codes can be seen at The first two digits identify the agency with the last two digits representing the management type. GAP Status Code The GAP status code is a measure of the level of commitment a land unit provides for maintaining biodiversity. The status code is based on the permanence of protection from a natural to unnatural state, the amount of landcover within a landunit that is managed for natural cover, inclusiveness of management—species versus ecosystem and type of management— allows or mimics disturbance events. Status 1 -Permanent protection from conversion through a management plan or intent, allow or mimic disturbance events Status 2 -Permanent protection from conversion through a management plan or intent, suppression of natural disturbance or management practices that may degrade the quality of natural communities Status 3 -Permanent protection but may be subject to extractive or intensive uses Status 4 -No known institutional mandate or legal restrictions to prevent the conversion of natural areas, area generally allows conversion to unnatural landcover Status 5 -Not managed for biodiversity Mapped Land Units Each property boundary identified as having a unique combination of land owner, land manager and biodiversity protection became a distinct land unit in the final database. The Iowa Gap Analysis Project would like to thank the following agencies and organizations for their contribution to IAGAP: Iowa Department of Natural Resources Iowa Association of County Conservation Boards The individual County Conservation Boards of Iowa Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation Natural Resources Conservation Service The Nature Conservancy U.S Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers For more information contact: Patrick Brown *includes private flow easements **The County Conservation Board system involves 99 separate managing agencies. *** includes ACE easements Iowa GAP Stewardship data mapped according to owner Analysis Completion of the stewardship map will allow the examination of stewardship and the level of protection offered throughout the conservation network in Iowa. Basic reporting will include tabulating the level of protection (Status 1,2,3,4) by steward. An analysis of conservation ‘gaps’ will also be performed using data from the vertebrate modeling component of IAGAP. Some preliminary analyses of the stewardship data can be seen below, as well as a preliminary representation of the final stewardship map in the large box. Preliminary analysis of the IAGAP map units (landcover type) protected within conservation areas in Iowa. IAGAP Map Unit Open Water Upland Deciduous Forest Cool Season Grass Cropland Seasonally Flooded Forested Wetland Warm Season Grass/Perennial Forbs Temp Flooded Forested Wetland Grassland w/ Sparse Trees Sparsely Vegetated/Barren Semi-perm Flooded Wetland Upland Deciduous Woodland Permanently Flooded Wetland Mixed Evergreen/Deciduous Forest Temp Flooded Wetland Seasonally Flooded Wetland Seasonally Flooded Shrub Evergreen Forest Upland Shrub Artificial/High Vegetation Eastern Red Cedar Forest Temp Flooded Shrub Pine Forest Artificial/Low Vegetation Semi-perm Flooded Shrub Eastern Red Cedar Woodland Barren/Mixed Vegetation Mixed Evergreen/Deciduous Woodland Saturated Wetland Saturated Shrub Acres Acres The IAGAP stewardship map contains over 2250 uniquely named areas. Manager ACE* CCB system** City FWS IDNR INHF Local Gov. NPS Private*** TNC