ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010 METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg, on behalf of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ‘Cross-border Metropolitan Regions’ Initiative (IMeG) in its multi-level dimension Dr. Gerd Hager Regionalverband Mittlerer Oberrhein, Germany.
Advertisements

Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Regions for Economic Change – Building Sustainable Growth May 2010 in Bruxelles Workshop on Cooperation and Capitalisation Processes: Knowledge Management.
The political framework
The network of major European cities Territorial Cohesion: what scales of policy intervention Brussels 12 March 2010.
Projekt Universität der Großregion Projet « Université de la Grande Région » Project University of the Greater Region 9th European Week of Regions.
Knowledge Management of European cooperation Programmes - some thoughts from a Member State Sabine Stölb Regions for Economic Change Brussels, 20th May.
Administrative, morphological and functional urban regions And Metropolitan governance Christian Vandermotten Urbact, Lille, 12 th February 2010 Institut.
JOINING FORCES Metropolitan governance & competitiveness of European cities Lille CityLab – Workshop 2 : Economic development & labour markets across boundaries.
. Metropolisation & Polycentric Development in Central Europe Development of Urban Regions in Europe: Key Drivers & Perspectives ESPON Seminar: European.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Targeted Analyses.
OPEN DAYS 13 October 2011 in Bruxelles The ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Projects Peter Mehlbye, Director of ESPON CU.
ESPON Seminar November 2010 in Liège The ESPON 2013 Programme: The Next Steps.
JOINING FORCES Metropolitan governance & competitiveness of European cities conclusions & recommendations presentation to the CoR commission on EU budget.
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Second Interim Report Prepared for the Luxembourg Seminar May 2005 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
ESPON Open Seminar (Gödöllö) Metropolisation and Polycentric Development in Central Europe (POLYCE) Lead Partner: Vienna University of Technology Project.
Workshop 1.A Building and using Integrated Territorial Strategies ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to.
The activities under the Luxembourgish Presidency on Territorial Cohesion and Urban Policy in the framework of the Presidency Trio IT-LV-LU.
METROBORDER Cross-Border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions
Regional Integrated Strategies In Europe RISE. Stakeholders: Birmingham City Council (Lead Stakeholder); Regional Council of Västerbotten; Region Zealand;
The role, specific situation and potentials of urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development ESPON Project Lead partner Nordregio Third interim.
ESPON Urban-rural relations in Europe Lead Partner Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CURS) Helsinki University of Technology (HUT)
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Preliminary Results from the project ‘Services of General Interest’ (SeGI) Daniel Rauhut, KTH ESPON Seminar, Krakow, November 2011 Regional Policy Options.
Territorial impacts of globalization on European Regions Van Hamme Gilles IGEAT-ULB Liege meeting November 2010.
Smart specialisation, integrated strategies and territorial cohesion: tension or synergies 27 September Brussels ESPON 2013 Programme: The territorial.
ESPON 2013 Programme European Observation Network on Territorial Development and Cohesion TIGER - Kick-off meeting 11 May 2010.
ESPON The Role of Small and Medium Sized Towns.
ESPON Workshops 5 and 6 October 2010 in Bruxelles The ESPON 2013 Programme: Achievements and Prospects.
Key messages for territorial policy from ESPON 2013.
Belgian Presidency Programme in the field of spatial planning and territorial cohesion.
Conference of the Upper Rhine The T rinational Metropolitan Region Upper Rhine - A laboratory for Territorial Cohesion in Europe - Dr. Joachim Beck, Euro-Institute.
How to use ESPON DATABASE and related tools (HYPERATLAS & OLAP Cube) ? Séminaire ESPON Belgique Comment l’échelle européenne peut-elle contribuer aux stratégies.
1 Jacek Szlachta ET2050 Eastern Europe (EE) macroregion Brussels 19 March 2012.
1 st December 2011 FIDIBE Final Conference, Székesfehérvár, Mid Pannon, Hungary WP3.1 Innovative capabilities of the FIDIBE participation regions 1 st.
Baltic Sea - & Nordic and Northern Peripheries Region Dense web of co- operative relationships and interlocking institutions with various memberships,
ESPON / Social Preparatory Study on Social Aspects of EU Territorial Development Status: Interim Report Erich Dallhammer (ÖIR)
Indicators on Territorial Cohesion – The ESPON INTERCO project 1 Open Days | European Week of Regions and Cities Regional and Local Economies in a Changing.
ESPON INFO DAY 10 February 2011 in Bruxelles ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.
Expectations, Ideas, Thoughts ECPs in ESPON II Seminar Espoo 14./15. November 2006 Christian Muschwitz, University of Trier, TAURUS ECP Luxembourg.
Erasmus University Rotterdam Global Urban Competitiveness Project iUrban Conference Barcelona and the new inclusive growth strategy Joan Trullén Institut.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
Lesley Bassett Growth Strategy Programme Manager Cheshire West and Chester Council.
Strategic Spatial Planning and the Promotion of Territorial Cohesion. Prof. Gordon Dabinett Department of Town & Regional Planning University of Sheffield,
ESPON Seminar Aalborg – 13 June 2012
ESPON Partner States Workshop 11 March 2014, Brussels Dr Kai Böhme Spatial Foresight Potentials and Challenges for Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Targeted Analysis A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
The ESPON Programme Peter Mehlbye European Parliament – REGI Committee 4 November 2009 in Bruxelles.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
ESPON Seminar November 2006 Espoo Chair: Phaedon Enotiades, MC, Cyprus Rapporteur: Janne Antikainen, Ministry of the Interior Workshop 1 – Polycentricity.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
August 31, 2003 ESPON action “Enlargement” Matera October 2003 Lars Olof Persson.
Cross-border Metropolitan Regions in Europe: integration, governance and rescaling Bernard Reitel, Professor of geography François Moullé, assistant-professor.
Mobilise Final Conference Rabat, 15&16 September 2015 Royaume du Maroc Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de la Formation.
ESPON Seminar Liège – 17 November 2010 Erik Gløersen Department of Geography – University of Geneva.
> Balancing urban redevelopment with urban expansion > Integrating transport, land use and infrastructure > Sustaining the vitality and viability of city.
INTERCO Workshop Investigating storylines on territorial cohesion MC meeting Liege ESPON Seminar , Liege ESPON Seminar ,
ESPON Open Seminar 14 June 2012, Aalborg Hy Dao, Pauline Plagnat Cantoreggi, Vanessa Rousseaux University of Geneva INTERCO Indicators of Territorial Cohesion.
Progress by the ESPON 2013 Programme in relation to the First Action Plan (Actions 4.1 and 4.2 plus) Meeting of General Directors on Territorial Cohesion.
October 2004 Metropolitan governance in Lyon Capacity to act and perspectives.
ESPON project Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society TPG TPG: Department of Social Geography and Regional Development,
Wrap-up of Workshop 2 - Innovation and Competitiveness
SPIMA Targeted Analysis
University of Liege
ESPON 2013 Programme Working Party / Meeting
Espon project 143 “Study on Urban Functions»
ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network
JOINING FORCES Metropolitan governance & competitiveness of European cities conclusions & recommendations presentation to the City of tomorrow working.
ESPON POLICY OBJECTIVES
// Alps 2050 ESPON seminar Iași “The role of functional areas for territorial cohesion”
Presentation transcript:

ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg, on behalf of the TPG

CU C oordination Unit MC Monitoring Committee ARE Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung (Leadpartner) MAT Ministère de l’Intérieur et de l’Aménagement du territoire du Grand Duché du Luxembourg DIACT Délégation interministérielle à l'aménagement et à la compétitivité des territoires BMVBS Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland DGATLP Ministère der Région Wallone, Direction générale de l'Aménagement du territoire, du Logement et du Patrimoine ULUniversité du Luxembourg (Leadpartner) CEGUM Centre de Recherches en Géographie - Université de Metz CEPS Centre d'Etudes de Populations, Pauvreté et Politiques Socio-Ec. ETHZ Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich IGEATUniversité Libre de Bruxelles RegBasRegio Basiliensis UHAUniversité de Haute Alsace USBUniversität des Saarlandes Researcher Stakeholder ESPON programme The METROBORDER project

WP 1 Analysis on European level WP 2 Case Studies: Greater Region & Upper Rhine WP 3 Strategy Building WP 4 Dissemination ‚Cross-Border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions‘ (CBPMR): Where are they? What is their position? How can their governance be improved?... The METROBORDER project

FUAs and MUAs within the two case study regions 1. New regions?

The spatial setting: The Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) of the cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions (CBPMRs)

right: core spaces for increased cross-border cooperation in the case study region – results from a Delphi study, differentiated for the national backgrounds of the responding experts left: cross-border institutions and their perimeter within the Upper Rhine region 1. New regions?

2. Metropolitan regions? VI = Vienna: alpha city (in 4 th of ten world city categories) GN = Geneva: beta city (6/10) CP = Copenhagen: beta city (6/10) LX = Luxembourg: beta city (6/10) BV = Bratislava: gamma-plus city (8/10) (Basel and Strasbourg are mentioned as showing “sufficiency” but are not included in this map) CBPMR-cities in the GaWC-monitor (marked in red) each square indicates a metropolis, and its position roughly represents the position on the world map (source: GaWC 2008; own graphic).

Economic control in CBPMRs – applying the FOCI approach: -diversity of cases -polycentric structure -asymmetric metropolitan quality in all cases 2. Metropolitan regions?

Metropolitan accessibility? Number of flights per day and airport for the two case study regions and their surrounding areas 2. Metropolitan regions?

3. cross-border regions ? Fig. 3 (p. 38): Cross-border commuters in metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2006 (sources and spatial units: see appendix, chapter 9)

3. cross-border regions ? Commuting flows in the Upper Rhine Commuting is an overall domestic phenomenon... can override border effects, but does not always do.

3. cross-border regions ? (postal survey 2009/10, University of the Saarland; n=75) Economy: the example of the automotive industry in the Greater Region -relatively even distribution of economic activities in this sector in all subregions -hardly cross-border cooperation on regional level -mostely due to lack of information)

What role for the EU? Results from the Delphi study (n GR= 156, n UR =89) 4. Political conclusions?

Institutional Mapping of CBPMRs x-axis: institutional level y-axis: geographical scope (CEPS/ Instead 2010)

The five most important barriers for an enhanced cross-border cooperation in both case study regions (Delphi study) 4. Political conclusions?

The most relevant policies for increased cross-border cooperation (Delphi Study) 4. Political conclusions?

Bruxelles Lille Aachen- Liège- Maastricht Rhein/Main Lux. Strasbourg Nancy Kaiserslautern Arlon Lux. Core FUA Neighbouring domestic metropolises Main Institutional focus CBPMR Neighbouring CBPMRs Central CBPMR Cities Metropolitan Corridors Neighbouring FUA Surrounding FUA Functional Urban Areas Saarbrücken Thionville Metz Trier B F D L

ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg, on behalf of the TPG