Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured? Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration of Sisyphus 5 th FSF Conference Nicosia, CyprusMay 15-16, 2014 ADRIAN CIORANU Director General
What – Why – When – How Safety Indicators Focus: ICAO Annex 14 Economic development Status quo Solutions
Safety indicators: High level Quantitative or qualitative, leading (proactive) or lagging (reactive) Accidents/serious incidents Statistics regard commercial ops, aircraft MTOW >2’250kg Global safety reporting culture (ICAO ADREP) ICAO USOAP: SARPs implementation Effective State oversight capability Source: ICAO, STA10, SKYbrary
ICAO Annex 14 & National Regulations
Accidents: Airports 21% Deficiencies in regulatory oversight 23% Threats related to airport facilities : Contaminated runways/taxiways: 79% Inadequate RESA: 7% Poor signage, faint markings: 7% Airport perimeter control/fencing: 7% Source: IATA, Safety Report 2012
Source: ICAO State of Global Aviation Safety 2013
Source: ACI Economics Report 2013
Economic development
AiMS Swiss company International team of experts Leverage strengths & core activity Foster technical cooperation Avoid duplication, unnecessary competition Innovative solutions Tangible results
Solutions and profit for States & Airports Cost clarity and cost savings Simplify oversight Evaluate compliance (CMA) Manage corrective/preventive actions Track progress Optimize resources Enable technical cooperation
Increase safety & manage costs Measure. Correct. Monitor. Achieve. AiMS. Increase safety & manage costs Measure. Correct. Monitor. Achieve. AiMS.
© Copyright AiMS 2014