Stage 2 Philosophy Argument Analysis I think. Therefore I am. I think I think… Therefore I might be.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific Inquiry.
Advertisements

1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength and Cogency Goal: Learn the terms used to evaluate inductive and deductive arguments.
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking Objective & Subjective Claims Fact & Opinion Issue & Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise & Conclusion Cognitive Biases Belief.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 6 Preparing to Evaluate Arguments.
Reasoning Automated Deduction. Reasonable Arguments Argument: An attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion from the truth of a set of premises.
Philosophy of Science Psychology is the science of behavior. Science is the study of alternative explanations. We need to understand the concept of an.
THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE. Assumptions  Nature is real, understandable, knowable through observation  Nature is orderly and uniform  Measurements yield.
III. Some Basic Concepts of Logic Clarity  Definition -- lexical and stipulative -- ostensive -- definition by examples -- definition by a synonym --
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 1 John Rosson Thursday January 18.
Knowledge & Faith Dr. Carl J. Wenning Department of Physics Illinois State University.
Christianity, Belief & Science. Strengths  The scientific method is rational, and objective.  It is a logical process which can be repeated by others.
+ The Process of Life Scientific Method. + Observation Scientists believe: That nature is orderly and measurable That natural laws do not change over.
MA 110: Finite Math Dr. Maria Byrne Instructional Laboratory 0345 When you enter, pick up a quiz and complete it at your desk.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
The Scientific Method Chpt. 5 Summary. Objectives Describe the order of steps in the scientific method Describe the order of steps in the scientific method.
1-1 What Is Science? Slide 1 of 21 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Thinking Like a Scientist: The Scientific Method is a series of steps scientist follow.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
 Review: an argument can have an unstated premise. ◦ For example, “No motorcycles are allowed in the park because the regulations state that motor vehicles.
Deductive Reasoning Section 2-4. Deductive reasoning uses a rule to make a conclusion. Inductive reasoning uses examples to make a conjecture or rule.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Proof and Probability (can be applied to arguments for the existence of God)
Research Skills Mr. BETA Aim: How do you conduct proper research for a paper or project? Do Now: In your notebooks, Define: * Argument *
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning involves an observer to look at the evidence around them and draw a conclusion about said evidence.
Types of reasoning… Deductive Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link.
Scientific Method Science philosophy involves itself in the methodology of science. Empirical knowledge – by observation - The Enlightenment (16-17 th.
The construction of a formal argument
The Scientific Method Area 1: Belief and Science.
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Chapter 1 Section 2 Review
The Nature of Science and The Scientific Method Chemistry – Lincoln High School Mrs. Cameron.
Section 3.6 Reasoning and Patterns. Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, which we know to be true. Then from that rule,
Theory Building Some highlights. THEORY A coherent set of general propositions used as principles of explanation of the apparent relationships of certain.
Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
1-1 What Is Science? Slide 1 of 21 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Thinking Like a Scientist: The Scientific Method is a series of steps scientist follow.
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
Scientific Method. Science: Further Info Science cannot provide certain (100%) proof – just the ‘best’ working theories based on the evidence that we.
Part 4 Reading Critically
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Scientific Method.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning Section 2-4.
Chapter 1 Definition Theory Causality
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Stainless Steel Water Well Casing.
Deduction: Reasoning from general principles to specific conclusions.
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE Essential Questions
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
MG3117 Issues and Controversies in Accounting
Captain Argument – loves agreeing and disagreeing
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Stage 2 Philosophy Argument Analysis I think. Therefore I am. I think I think… Therefore I might be.

Types of propositions Metaphysical God exists. All is determined. Opinion That picture was great. Analytical All bachelors are unmarried men. Triangles… Empirical Everest is the highest mountain.

A Clean Slate Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria… Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel, but lasts less than 14 hours on copper. A Clean Slate Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria… Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel, but lasts less than 14 hours on copper. C Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. A Clean Slate Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria… Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel, but lasts less than 14 hours on copper. P1 The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria. A Clean Slate Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria… Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel, but lasts less than 14 hours on copper. P2 Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel. A Clean Slate Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. The stainless steel surfaces often used in the food industry are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria… Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel, but lasts less than 14 hours on copper. P3 Research… has shown that at 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive less than 14 hours on copper. P1 Stainless steel surfaces are pitted with microscopic scratches which can harbour bacteria. P2 At 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive for 35 days on stainless steel. P3 At 4 degrees C the common bacterium E. Coli 0157 can survive less than 14 hours on copper. UP4 Bacterium E. Coli 0157 is potentially fatal. UP5 Food is usually prepared on stainless steel surfaces. C Preparing food on copper surfaces could prevent thousands of potentially fatal cases of poisoning each year. Analysing arguments

How do we think? Inductive thinking Deductive thinking

Inductive thinking

What conclusion can you draw from the phone calls? What explanation can you give for the phone calls? Induction to a generalisation Induction to an explanation

Inductive thinking Induction to a generalisation Student have put rubbish in the bin really well all this week. I’m sure they will tomorrow as well. P1 - Last week I boiled some water and it boiled at 100c. P2 - Yesterday I boiled some more and it boiled at 100c too. P3 - Today when I boiled some water, it boiled at 100c. C - I guess the same thing will happen every time I boil water. Last week I boiled some water and it boiled at 100c. Then yesterday I boiled some more and it boiled at 100c too. Even today when I boiled some water, it boiled at 100c. I guess the same thing will happen every time I boil water.

Inductive thinking Induction to the best explanation

Deductive thinking Syllogism P1 - I am eating an apple. P2 - All apples are fruit. C - I am eating fruit. Fruit Apples X P1 - Water boils at 100c P2 - I am going to boil this jug of water. C - This water will boil at 100c P1 – The earth is a sphere. P2 – A Planet is a sphere. C - The earth is a planet

Arguments Premises – True or False Conclusion Arguments Cogency – An argument is cogent if the premises lead to the conclusion. (Valid/Invalid) Arguments can be Sound or Not Sound Equivocation & Begging the Question Rationally Compelling

Equivocation P1 John is tall. P2 Tall is an adjective. C John is an adjective. Victorian attitude BANNING breastfeeding in parliament – sounds a bit Victorian to me. Paul Harrington Blair Athol

Arguments Premises – True of False Conclusion Arguments Cogency – An argument is cogent if the premises lead to the conclusion. (Valid/Invalid) Arguments can be Sound or Not Sound Equivocation & Begging the Question Rationally Compelling

Reasoning in developing Scientific knowledge Observations Theories or laws Falsification Induction Deduction

Building scientific knowledge P1 When I drop this pen it falls. P2 When I drop this chair it falls. P3 When I drop this book it falls. P4 When I drop this paper it falls. C When I drop things, they fall. Scientific knowledge is built inductively.

Testing scientific knowledge P1 When I drop things, they fall. P2 I am dropping this helium filled balloon. C The balloon will fall. Scientific knowledge is tested deductively P1 Scientific law or theory P2 Specific instance C Result of the law or theory