Results Ground work for this project to become a reality is complete Reasoning, cost, and need have been expressed to target audience Next phase of project will be to secure funding Once funding is in place, will be able to move into implementation stage of project Include hiring of additional staff, training, and ordinance revisions Once new staff is totally trained, will be time to attempt to license, inspect, and educate businesses and citizens of San Antonio Conclusion\Expected Outcomes Success of this project relies solely on securing additional funding from City of San Antonio If funding cannot be secured from city, we will continue to look for additional funds from State of Texas and available grant opportunities Behavior Over Time Graph Introduction The citizens and leadership of the city of San Antonio have long made famous the idea of a big city with small town charm, however, in a time when the environment and climate are changing so fast it’s almost impossible to keep up with, it is imperative for people to try to make our city a healthier place to live. Over the previous five to ten years, the metro area has grown in astronomical proportions in regards to population and housing development. Along with the explosion of growth, more construction and more people mean more pollution. Two main issues that come with a region suffering from poor air quality are extremely poor health effects and the EPA rating of a non- attainment city. The poor health effects will contribute major problems to persons with asthma, emphysema, and overall poor respiratory functions. The point of focus will be toward educating the public and private industry regarding the effects of becoming a non-attainment city. These ideas and any action, of course, will require support from city, county, and state leaders as well as the Alamo Area Council of Governments. Project Goals and Objectives Program Goal: Improve Air Quality in San Antonio Metro Area Health Problem: Various health effects that come with an area suffering with poor air quality are increasingly high number of reported cases in regards to asthma or respiratory related issues Outcome Objectives: By end of fiscal year 2007, try to secure addition funding to improve current Air Pollution Program for City of San Antonio Determinant: Main hold up securing additional funding for staff and training Impact Objective: Secure funding for an expanded air pollution program for the city of San Antonio within FY08-FY09 Acknowledgments Center of Disease and Control ~ The National Environmental Public Health Leadership Institute ~ Lisa Conti, DVM, MPH, ACVPM, CEHP Director Division of Environmental Health, Florida Department of Health Project Logic Model What Can Be Done to Improve Air Quality in San Antonio? Monty J. McGuffin, BS, RS Senior Sanitarian Food & Environmental Division, San Antonio, Texas ~ San Antonio Metropolitan Health Department References cited Carl Osaki, RA, MSPH, Northwest Center for Pubic Health Practice, Essential Services of Environmental Health, Available at: 09_11/documents/Tab11_OsakiPresentation.pdf Robert H. Friis, Essentials of Environmental Health, 1st ed., Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Peter M. Senge, Art Kleiner, Charlotte Roberts, Richard B. Ross, Bryan J. Smith, The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook, Currency Doubleday, Figure 1. Photograph of petroleum refinery For further information Please contact Mr. Monty J. McGuffin, BS, RS at More information on this and related projects can be obtained at: Figure 5. Behavior Over Time Graph Figure 2. Lone Star Brewery Manufacturing Facility Casual Loop Diagram Figure 3: Project Logic Model Figure 4: Fixes that backfire Unregulated facilities that produce omissions Modify ordinance to include unregulated facilities Lack of staff to inspect and regulate facilities TCEQ taking lead on monitoring and inspection of facilities in Metro area - program was reduced to current status In the past, amount of monies going into Air Pollution Program was equivalent with facilities located within City of San Antonio With current there is a rise in number of facilities and a decrease in funding and staffing in Air Inspections Program Limits of Growth Planning ~ Inspection = Growth Process Inspections ~ Training = Limiting Process Growth Process ~ Limiting Process = Actual Performance Figure 6: Staff and Funding Flow of Resource/Inputs thru Short/Long Term Outcomes and Impacts