Summary of MPWMD Local Desalination Project Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1
Advertisements

Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment ( )
1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Local Customization Chapter 2. Local Customization 2-2 Objectives Customization Considerations Types of Data Elements Location for Locally Defined Data.
Create an Application Title 1A - Adult Chapter 3.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Item 20- Discuss Water Supply Concepts, Including Reclamation MPWMD Board Meeting March 15, 2004 Staff Contact: Henrietta Stern.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Provide Policy Direction on Scope of ASR EIR Item 16 March 21, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Henrietta.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 11.Consider Proposed Agreement with California American Water Regarding Management and Operation of Aquifer.
1 Mitigation Program Summary Insures compliance with MPWMD Water Allocation Program EIR measures to mitigate for impacts from the extraction of water to.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
ACC 3200 Chapter 3: Process Costing Process Costing.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting September 18, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL RECYCLED WATER Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee May 13, 2014.
ppt Tularosa Basin National Desalination Research Center Feasibility Study Presented by Mike Hightower, Sandia National Laboratories Tom Jennings,
Policy Position Statement. The Community has struggled unsuccessfully for 35 years to find new sources of water Cal Am was mandated to cut back it use.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
An Application of Linear Programming Lesson 12 The Transportation Model.
Methow Valley Irrigation District Alternatives Evaluation Presented by Bob Montgomery, P.E. and David Rice, P.E. January 31, 2013.
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
VOORBLAD.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
CONTROL VISION Set-up. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 4.
Adding Up In Chunks.
City Council Meeting Agenda Items October 28, 2013.
Steve McLaughlin, PE Virginia Beach Public Works October 2012.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Subtraction: Adding UP
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Fundamentals of Cost Analysis for Decision Making
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
3 - 1 Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005 Markets Demand Defined Demand Graphed Changes in Demand Supply Defined Supply Graphed Changes in Supply Equilibrium.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project - Presentation to Monterey Co. Water Resources Agency June 25, 2012.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Quarterly Update on EIR for Long-Term Water Supply Project October 29, 2002 at 5:30 PM MPWMD Conference.
Policy Position Statement.  Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) - by Monterey Regional Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA) and Monterey Peninsula Water Management.
Jim Heitzman General Manager Marina Coast Water District
Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Technical Workshops on Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A July 26 & 27, 2012.
1 Update Ocean Desalination Feasibility Studies Karl Seckel Assistant General Manager.
South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project Dana Point/Doheny Beach, California November 2010 Status.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Presentation transcript:

Summary of MPWMD Local Desalination Project Proposal July 29, 2004 Board Workshop Monterey City Council Chambers Staff Contact: Henrietta Stern

Water Supply Project EIR Multi-year effort to identify proposed project, conduct engineering/technical studies and evaluate environmental effects. Board direction has changed over time. Other agencies and legislation affect process. Phased approach since early 2002: -- Phase 1: engineering evaluation of desal, ASR and other alternatives (max. sizes, best mix); -- Phase 2: more detailed engineering and prepare Draft EIR on proposed project.

Desal Terms: Intake/Disposal Radial beach well (vertical, with spokes). Offshore HDD well – horizontal directionally drilled; perpendicular to shoreline; blind hole method. Onshore HDD well – parallel to shore (along beach); pull-through method. Brine disposal through MRWPCA regional outfall pipeline.

Radial Collector Well

Offshore HDD Well (Perpendicular to Shoreline) Blind Hole Method of Construction (Single Entry and Exit Point)

Offshore HDD Plan View Ocean Beach

Onshore HDD Collector Well (Parallel to Shoreline) Pull Through Method with Separate Entry and Exit Points Ocean + 150’ Beach + 2,500’

Previous Board Direction on Local Desal Proposal Study 8,409 AFA Sand City desalination at project level of detail, including several intake/disposal options and plant sites. Sized to comply with SWRCB Order 95-10 at today’s demand and water rights; assume 500 AF less pumped from Seaside Basin by Cal-Am. Study alternative projects and yield goals at program level of detail.

Sand City Desalination Project Overview EIR Goal of 7.5 MGD (8,400 AFA) Treated Water Production. Up to 10 MGD (11,000 AFA) Production Assessed Brine Disposal Sites Former Ford Ord Plant Sites Sand City Seawater Intake Collector Sites Seaside

Seawater Collection Overview Seawater Collector Wells Need 15 MGD seawater for 7.5 MGD (8,400 AFA) treated water production Seawater source is Dune formation onshore or offshore Collector Well Options Radial collector well Offshore horizontal directionally drilled (HDD) collector wells Onshore HDD collector well

Brine Disposal Overview Two Options Evaluated in EIR Offshore HDD Disposal Wells at Former Fort Ord Similar concept/layout as collector wells Use of Outfall at Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Pipeline from plant through former Fort Ord to regional outfall

Early Yield Estimates “Review Draft” EIR (Dec 2003) is based on hydrologic data as of mid-2003. Potable water yield estimate was roughly 6,000 AFA with radial beach wells alone. Offshore HDD wells could potentially increase yield up to 11,000 AFA, but HDD has not been tried in local seawater setting; studies needed to confirm.

Hydrogeologic Studies Geotechnical (4 test wells) and geophysical (offshore/onshore subsurface soundings) studies conducted to better characterize coastal dune aquifer; affects HDD feasibility and plant yield. Field work and analysis conducted in Fall 2003 and Winter 2004. Presentation to Board on March 31, 2004 along with Technical Report.

Drilling Test Well #1 at Fort Ord

Geophysical (seismic) testing on the beach

Previous Picture of Subsurface Clay Layer Separating Dune Sand aquifer from Paso Robles Drinking Water Aquifer Uncertainty in Onshore and Offshore Extent of Dune Sand Aquifer – limited coastal data Sand Dune Dune Sand Aquifer Sea Level Clay Layer Paso Robles (Drinking Water) ? ? ?

Revised Picture - Sand City Area Dune Sand aquifer eroded offshore Replaced with unconsolidated marine sediments Suitable for onshore collector Not suitable for offshore collector Sand Dune Marine Sediment Dune Sand Aquifer Sea Level Clay Layer Silt/Sand Paso Robles (Drinking Water)

Revised Picture - Fort Ord Clay Layer Absent Beneath Former Fort Ord Onshore collector options feasible Brine disposal infeasible due to aquifer connection with lower Paso Robles aquifer Sand Dune Marine Sediment Dune Sand Aquifer Sea Level Silt/Sand Paso Robles (Drinking Water)

Seawater Intake Options – Radial Wells Construction Feasible - Land-based operations Collector Yield: Up to 10 MGD (11,200 AFA) using intake from four collectors Supports 5 MGD plant producing 5,600 AFA treated water Expansion on former Fort Ord possible to get additional 2,800 AFA (8,400 AFA) production or more

Seawater Intake Using Offshore HDD Collection Infeasible at Sand City Unsuitable drilling conditions with high potential for drilling muds escaping to Monterey Bay Yield for Offshore HDD not estimated

Seawater Intake Options – Onshore HDD Collection Feasible - Land-based operations, where drilling muds can be contained Collector Yield: 15 MGD (16,800 AFA; supports 7.5 MGD Plant producing 8,000 AFA) 2500-foot long collector Need additional length or modified configuration to provide 8,400 AFA year-round Expansion Beyond 8,400 AFA Considerations Extend to north - potential contamination from former landfill? Construction more complex due to limited beach width

Implications for Brine Disposal Using Wells Offshore HDD Disposal Wells at Former Fort Ord Technically feasible due to thicker Sand Dunes formation but limited to area beneath dunes Potentially institutionally infeasible -- brine disposal in aquifer connected to drinking water aquifer Brine disposal through regional outfall best option (possibly only option)

Summary Onshore HDD well at Sand City  plant production of 8,000 AFA Expansion on Fort Ord or re-configuration needed to get 8,400 AFA firm capacity or more Radial wells in Sand City  plant production of up to 5,600 AFA with 4 wells Expansion on Fort Ord to get 8,400 AFA firm capacity or more

Summary - Continued Expansion to 10 MGD (11,000 AFA) would require hybrid Project with combination onshore HDD and radial wells or onshore HDD wells Brine discharge likely limited to single option using outfall at regional wastewater treatment facility

Facilities Analyzed in Current EIR Local Desalination Plant in Sand City - 8,400 AFA Three sites Seawater Collection System with Pipelines Radial wells at Seaside Beach Offshore HDD wells at Seaside Beach and former Fort Ord Brine Disposal System with Pipelines Offshore HDD wells at former Fort Ord Brine pipeline to MRWPCA outfall (three routes) Treated Water Delivery Pipelines Two routes Monterey9_30_00

Alternatives Included in Draft EIR – Program Level of Detail No Project Continuation of existing conditions Enforcement of SWRCB Order WR 95-10 Large ASR with Sand City Desalination Plant Carmel River Dam and Reservoir Moss Landing Desalination Plant (CPUC “Plan B”) Monterey9_30_00

Other Water Sources and Production Goals – Program Level Other water supply sources Wastewater reclamation Storm water reuse Off-stream storage Small ASR project Alternative water production goals (desalination and other sources) 17,641 AFA (pre-Order 95-10 allocation) 18,941 AFA (legal lots of record) Monterey9_30_00

Major Environmental Issues Construction Habitat disturbance - dunes and beach Traffic and utilities disruption Visual changes - treatment plant and well sites Construction noise and vibration - cumulatively significant and unavoidable Construction air emissions - cumulatively significant and unavoidable Monterey9_30_00

Major Environmental Issues Operations Increased flows and sediment movement in Carmel River Improvement in Carmel River aquatic and riparian habitat Expansion of potential bullfrog habitat in Carmel River Increases in ocean salinity – offshore HDD wells and MRWPCA outfall Effects on marine life from salinity increases Monterey9_30_00

Major Environmental Issues (cont.) Localized changes in water levels and flow patterns in shallow dune aquifer along coast Potential effect on collector system of small desalination plant proposed by City of Sand City Noise increase at desalination plant site > 6,400 kw net increase in electricity demand from RO plant and well operation Monterey9_30_00

Policy Decisions Regarding Continuation of the CEQA Process Complete EIR with removal of offshore HDD Update EIR to incorporate onshore HDD and remove offshore HDD Expand EIR (onshore HDD) to include: Moss Landing desalination projects and/or Carmel River Dam Consider Moss Landing or Carmel River Dam higher yields Defer action on EIR pending resolution of Moss Landing project and potential partnerships End EIR process Monterey9_30_00

Option 1A - Local Desalination Using 3 Radial Wells Facilities 3 radial wells at Seaside Beach 7,800 AFA (feedwater collected) Desalination plant at Sand City 3,900 AFA (treated water) Disposal through MRWPCA outfall 3,900 AFA (brine) Total potable water production 3,900 AFA Schedule and cost factors CEQA - $25-30 K engineering - $5-10 K 3.5 months Total cost - $30-40 K Monterey9_30_00

Option 1B – Local Desalination Using 4 Radial Wells Facilities 4 radial wells Seaside Beach: 3 wells Fort Ord: 1 well 11,200 AFA (feedwater collected) Desalination plant at Sand City 5,600 AFA (treated water) Disposal through MRWPCA outfall 5,600 AFA (brine) Total potable water production 5,600 AFA Schedule and cost factors CEQA - $50-60 K Engineering – $10-15 K 4 months Total cost - $60-75 K Monterey9_30_00

Option 2 - Local Desalination Using Radial Wells and ASR at Fort Ord Facilities 3-4 radial wells at Seaside Beach 7,800-11,200 AFA (feedwater collected) Desalination plant at Sand City 3,900-5,600 AFA (treated water) ASR 700 AFA Disposal through MRWPCA outfall 3,900-5,600 AFA (brine) Total potable water production 4,600-6,300 AFA Schedule and cost factors CEQA - $90-150 K engineering - $20-30 K 7 months Total cost - $110-180 K Monterey9_30_00

Option 3 – Local Desalination Using Onshore HDD Well Facilities Onshore HDD well on Seaside Beach 16,800 AFA (feedwater collected) Desalination plant at Sand City 8,400 AFA (treated water) Disposal through MRWPCA outfall 8,400 AFA (brine) Total potable water production 8,400 AFA Schedule and cost factors CEQA - $50-60 K Engineering - $20-30 K 5 months Total cost - $70-90 K Monterey9_30_00

Option 4 - Local Desalination Using Onshore HDD Well and ASR at Fort Ord Facilities Onshore HDD well on Seaside Beach 16,800 AFA (feedwater collected) Desalination plant at Sand City 8,400 AFA (treated water) ASR at Fort Ord 700 AFA Disposal through MRWPCA outfall 8,400 AFA (brine) Total potable water production: 9,100 AFA Schedule and cost factors CEQA - $90-150 K engineering - $20-30 K 7 months Total cost - $110-180 K Monterey9_30_00

Status of EIR and Project December 15, 2003: “Board Review Draft” EIR received; delay EIR circulation until hydrogeologic reports presented in March 2004; assess feasibility of yields above 8,409 AFA. March 31, 2004: Hydrogeologic results and revised yield estimates received; delay EIR circulation until more information on Moss Landing desalination obtained. June 21, 2004: No funds budgeted to complete and circulate Draft EIR on local desal project; but no formal action taken to terminate EIR.

Suggested Next Steps Formally investigate and assess Moss Landing desalination options and MRWPCA recycled water availability, including partnership opportunities. Consider completing Draft EIR based on Board-determined supply alternatives at Strategic Planning Workshop in September 2004.