How well-connected are we as a nation? James McConnaughey, Chief Economist Office of Policy Analysis and DevelopmentSHLB Conference Arlington, VA Karen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Draft of Lithuanian Information Society Development Strategy for
Advertisements

1 Measuring ICT4D: ITUs Focus on Household and Individual Market, Economics & Finance Unit Telecommunication Development Bureau.
Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
A Brief History Outcomes of the March 2010 summit, “Social Media and Social Change,” related to access and digital literacy Course-based student studies.
Section 706 Broadband Progress Reports September 27, 2012.
Gen X / Y: What IGCs Need to Know to Profit from the New Gardener.
Family Involvement 1a.  a broadly defined concept that includes activities connecting children’s home and classroom learning experiences, as well as.
Learner Link – Durham County Increasing Access to Early Childhood College Courses Durham’s Partnership for Children Child Care Services Association Durham.
Data Dissemination Transformation SDC/CIC Annual Meeting March 5, 2014 Steven J. Jost, Chief Strategist, Office of the Director.
Broadband’s Impact on Citizen Engagement Susannah Fox FCC: The State of Broadband Adoption and Utilization August 19, 2009.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Broadband Technology Opportunities.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Made Possible by the Broadband.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Local Governments and Digital.
THE CONTINUUM CONTINUES A Broad Look at Barriers to Internet Access and Use Among American Adolescents Cyberworld Unlimited? Digital Inequality & News.
Measuring Internet Access Substitutes and Service Gaps By: Catherine J.K. Sandoval Assistant Professor Santa Clara University School of Law Presentation.
Strategic Overview. CPUC ORDERED ESTABLISHMENT OF CALIFORNIA EMERGING TECHNOLOGY FUND  Condition of approval of 2005 mergers of SBC-AT&T and Verizon-MCI.
0ictQATAR October 13, 2008 Qatar’s ICT Statistical Information Areas Tariq Gulrez.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR IN-UNIT ACCESS FOR HUD RESIDENTS Dina Lehmann-Kim Program Manager HUD/Office of Public Housing Investments Amber.
A service of Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Health Care. Women of Color Get It September 8, 2012.
Neighborhood-Level Change in Internet Use: Chicago’s Smart Communities BTOP Program Karen Mossberger, Ph.D Arizona State University Caroline Tolbert, Ph.D.
Socio-Economic & Demographic Data Tools for Proactive Planning Robin Blakely-Armitage STATE OF NEW YORK CITIES: Creative Responses to Fiscal Stress March.
Solutions to Digital Inequality Possible solutions to bridge the gap of digital inequality in `the state of Ohio.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
David Keyes Derrick Hall Delia Burke Vicky Yuki Community Technology Program Ensuring digital inclusion for all… SO Residents.
What Have We Learned? Spillover Benefits for Society Urban and metro areas have high potential for innovation and social benefits across policy areas Inequality.
State Broadband Initiatives August 2010 Bill Price Department of Management Services.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
Advancing equity through Thrive MSP 2040 Equity: The Superior Growth Model.
Labor Market Information in the Americas: the United States Workshop On Labor Migration and Labor Market Information Systems Inter-American Network for.
BTOP Strategies Workshop April 18 – 19, 2011 Creating Value for Sustainability Cindy B. Menges Western Sullivan Public Library, PCC Director Catskill Professional.
Economy 2030 (Let’s just round up from 2022…) Where we’ve been; where we’re going. Kara Markley Regional Economist U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics July.
Karen Mossberger, University of Illinois at Chicago Caroline J. Tolbert, University of Iowa William Franko, University of Iowa Allison Hamilton, University.
Digital Literacy Workgroup of the Minnesota Learning Commons Mary Ann Van Cura, Workgroup Chair State Library Services, Minnesota Department of Education.
2010 © Connect Ohio ®. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Copy Without Written Permission. Connect Ohio Technology Assessment Executive Summary
TIES Conference December 11,  Provide update on Minnesota digital literacy & equity efforts in order to:  Make K-12 aware of resources & tools.
Oregon Broadband Outreach and Strategic Planning Project Chris Tamarin Oregon Business Development Department SHLB Coalition Annual Conference – May 8,
Broadband Adoption: Trends & Consequences Presented at National Association for Regulatory Utility Commissioners meeting New York, July 17, 2007 John B.
1 Current Funding Streams in New York State The 2008 Equity Symposium Comprehensive Educational Equity: Overcoming the Socioeconomic Barriers to School.
The Digital Divide.
ONE ECONOMY/BROADBAND OPPORTUNITY COALITION EVALUATION PLAN JUNE 27, 2011 Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
Increasing Broadband Demand and Adoption David Keyes City of Seattle.
Modernization and Reengineering of the Census of Governments Presented at the State Data Center Annual Training Conference Lisa Blumerman Governments Division.
San Francisco Broadband Opportunity Program State of California Office of the CIO Grantee Meeting November 2, 2010 Brian Roberts Policy Analyst, Department.
American Sociological Association August 11, 2009 San Francisco, California Organizer: William H. Frey August 11, 2009 Teaching Quantitative Literacy in.
Key Perspectives on Adult Literacy Erik Jacobson Montclair State University New Jersey Association for Lifelong Learning.
Karen Mossberger, Ph.D Univ. of IL at Chicago EVALUATING BROADBAND USE FOR BUILDING SMART COMMUNITIES Funded by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,
Y490 Politics of the Internet February 1, Digital Divide   Gap in computer and Internet use across various social groups   Who is included and.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for BTOP grants: the UW iSchool approach Samantha Becker Research Project Manager U.S. IMPACT Study 1UW iSchool evaluation.
SENIOR FOCUS GROUP MEETING July Welcome and Introduction CN Goals Metrics Resident Survey Findings Mapping Discussion on Data Collected Discussion.
What are Connected Communities?
PewInternet.org Broadband From Federal Perspectives to Local Impact Missouri Broadband Summit October 27, 2010 Jefferson City Lee Rainie: Director, Pew.
Broadband Adoption and Older Adults: Opportunities and Challenges Debra Berlyn Executive Director The Project to Get Older Adults onLine (GOAL)
Are We Really A Nation Online? Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Access to Technology and Their Consequences Robert W. Fairlie University of California,
LSTA Grant Workshop Jennifer Peacock, Administrative Services Bureau Director David Collins, Grant Programs Director Mississippi Library Commission September.
BTOP Funding: The Freedom Rings Partnership American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding: Broadband Technology Opportunities Program $18 million to.
BRIDGING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE IN KANSAS CITY. Internet Benefits Low Income Families  Increased educational success at all levels  Online jobs search and.
California Telehealth Network eHealth Broadband Adoption Grant National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) Broadband Technology Opportunities.
Digital Inclusion & Readiness: Role of Libraries John B. Horrigan, PhD Pew Research Center June 2015.
Cloud Computing for the Grassroots A presentation for the Phennd Quarterly Meeting October 5, 2010 Michele Masucci, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geography.
Edge: Where People Connect, Communities Achieve Craig Gerhart, Facilitator International City County Management Association / Edge Initiative Joyce Wilson,
April, Stronger Economies Together Webinar.
Welcome to November’s Inquiry Group, Bridging the Digital Divide.
Global Connect & Community Well-Being: An Opportunity for Synergy Mei Lin Fung May
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program
California Telehealth Network eHealth Broadband Adoption Grant
Opportunity through Internet Access
Figure 1. Basic Logic Model Structure
The Digital Divide COM 160.
Measuring City of Seattle’s progress on Digital Equity
Presentation transcript:

How well-connected are we as a nation? James McConnaughey, Chief Economist Office of Policy Analysis and DevelopmentSHLB Conference Arlington, VA Karen Hanson, Federal Program OfficerMay 23, 2012 Broadband Technology Opportunities Program

NTIA Data Products  Availability  Adoption  Program Efficacy

Availability: National Broadband Map  NTIA partnership with the FCC and state and territorial governments  Granular data mapping availability for approximately 1,800 broadband providers  Visit broadbandmap.gov to explore map or download complete dataset

Adoption: What is meaningful?  Access is not adoption  Subscriptions don’t tell the whole story  Need to know who, where, why, and how of actual use

CPS Computer and Internet Use Supplement Data collected since 1994 How do we measure broadband adoption?

Data Collections and Reports Falling Through the Net:November 1994 October 1997 December 1998 August 2000 A Nation Online:September 2001 October 2003 Networked Nation: October 2007 Digital Nation:October 2009 October 2010 July 2011

Comprehensive Metrics  54,000 households  Data collection by Census Bureau  Focus on meaningful adoption

Extensive Characteristics  Demographics: Income, Age, Education, Gender, Race, Disability, Employment, Household Type  Geography: Population Density, States, Regions, U.S.  Technology: Connection Type, Devices Used

Baseline Questions  At home, does anyone in this household access the Internet using… [cable, DSL, etc.]?  Do you access the Internet at any of the following locations outside the home? [work, school, etc.]  What is the main reason that you do not have high-speed Internet access at home? [not interested, too expensive, etc.]

New in 2011  When you use your cellular phone or smartphone, do you… [browse, , social networking, etc.]?  Do you rely on the Internet for… [work, entertainment, finance, etc.]?  Which is your PRIMARY source of news or other information? [TV, Internet, etc.]

Meaningful Broadband Adoption  Uses: rural telemedicine, urban telework, employment searches, job training  Challenges: privacy, child online safety  Motivating Factors: reasons for going online, reasons for switching providers

Flashback “The 1998 data demonstrate that community access centers are particularly well used by those groups who lack access at home or at work. These same groups (such as those with lower incomes and education levels, certain minorities, and the unemployed) are also using the Internet at higher rates to search for jobs or take courses. Providing public access to the Internet will help these groups advance economically, as well as provide them the technical skills to compete professionally in today's digital economy.” -- NTIA, Falling Through the Net (1999) “…residents of households with no broadband primarily accessed the internet at work, school, or the public library.” -- NTIA + ESA, Exploring the Digital Nation (2011)

Data-Driven Policy: Implications of Our Research  “Don’t Need / Not Interested”  Consumer education, digital literacy  “Too Expensive”  Targeted support (e.g., USF)  “No / Inadequate Computer”  BTOP Public Computer Centers, recycled equipment

BTOP Goals  Programmatic goals Moving people along the adoption continuum > competent, confident users Focused training and skill-building  Data collection and assessment goals What’s working? Which audiences? How? What are the barriers?

What will BTOP teach us about adoption?  SBA data collection: Quarterly and Annual reports  ASR Analytics: case studies, best practices, and economic/social impacts  Grantee-funded evaluations (program impact, differences among methods)

BTOP Quarterly and Annual Reports  Training offered: types, hours, and participants  Subscribers  Equipment purchased  Barriers to adoption  Lessons learned www2.ntia.doc.gov

BTOP Programmatic Evaluation  ASR Analytics evaluation contract  Goal: to identify impacts and socioeconomic outcomes of BTOP investment  Uses case studies as well as longitudinal econometric analysis  Update: Round 1 PCC/SBA case studies nearly complete

BTOP Grantee Strategies  Common survey questions (e.g. UAC and City of Philadelphia; Connected Living)  Common reporting platforms (e.g. CETF, One Community)  Comparative studies (One Economy)

How are grantees measuring meaningful broadband adoption?  Health  Employment  Family  Civic engagement

Sharing Data with the Field  Regular conferences and TA activities  Wiki for exchange of documents  NTIA Broadband Data Working Group

Wish List  Harness evaluators’ and grantees’ collective wisdom: gather and disseminate tools and data sets  Agree on “common indicators” for PCC and SBA projects  Evaluation Working Group  Using the new public dataset that “locates” and describes BTOP investments (Connecting America’s Communities map):