Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 1 AC/GEO mole measurements Based on outcome from meeting 24/11 2005 and Installation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M 1 and M 2 – Masses of the two objects [kg] G – Universal gravitational constant G = 6.67x N m 2 /kg 2 or G = 3.439x10 -8 ft 4 /(lb s 4 ) r – distance.
Advertisements

CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.
THE ALIGNMENT OF THE LHC DURING THE SHUT-DOWN D. Missiaen.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
Software Quality Control Methods. Introduction Quality control methods have received a world wide surge of interest within the past couple of decades.
APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION 4. In Sections 2.2 and 2.4, we investigated infinite limits and vertical asymptotes.  There, we let x approach a number.
Multiple Regression Dr. Andy Field.
Enhancement of Single Stretched Wire Measurements of LHC Short Straight Sections Guy Deferne, Nikolay Smirnov, CERN Joe DiMarco, FNAL 14th International.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
Higher Biology Unit 1: Cell biology Unit 2: Genetics & Adaptations
Page 1 Christian Grefe, DESY FLC Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Annual EUDET Meeting Paris, Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Christian.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Even More SQA: CAPA Corrective and Preventive Actions.
Field Quality Working Group-14/12/04 - Stephane Sanfilippo AT-MTM-AS Field Quality measurements at cold. Standard program v.s extended tests. Presented.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Line graphs are a powerful tool in science.
LIMITS AND DERIVATIVES 2. In Sections 2.2 and 2.4, we investigated infinite limits and vertical asymptotes.  There, we let x approach a number.  The.
Updates to WISE for LHC run II Per Hagen May 2015.
Outline Highlight in background rates estimation (Liangjian and Chao) Impact of fine structures in reactor spectrum (Xin) Requirement in Energy resolution.
Results and plans of the new commissioning of the AC mole system AC mole review meeting 11 February 2005 Mirco Coccoli.
Follow-Up and Checkpoints of Harmonics in Collared Coils and Cold Masses E.Wildner AT-MAS-MA.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
Status of the Alignment 17/12/04 Dario Autiero. Measurements taken so far: 13/9 TT8 On the mounting arch 12/11 TT7 Standalone in the target 19/11 TT7.
MM planning for HiLumi-LHC L. Fiscarelli M. Buzio, O. Dunkel, T. Zickler 4 March 2015.
1 / 23 Workshop Chamonix XV January 2006, L'Esplanade du Lac, Divonne-les-Bains S. Sanfilippo Transfer Function of the.
GERB 4 Instrument Status GIST 25 23rd October 2006 Presenter: N Morris.
1 Self-Calibration and Neural Network Implementation of Photometric Stereo Yuji IWAHORI, Yumi WATANABE, Robert J. WOODHAM and Akira IWATA.
Airplane We have been discussing the “Scientific Method.” It is a way of figuring things out. Now we will focus on the “Experiment” or “Test” part of the.
Workshop Chamonix XIV, Elena Wildner AT/MAS1 E. Wildner Geometry of the Main Bends and the Short Straight Sections.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
1 Saw Tooth and remedies - Elena Wildner SAW TOOTH ElenaWildner and Natalia Emelianenko AT/MAS The saw tooth effect in the geometry measurements, possible.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG November 2007 Pasadena, California.
WGA 8 June 2004Jerome BEAUQUIS AT/MAS 1 Derived Parameters from Dipole Geometric Measurements Introduction “Miscellaneous” parameters “Stability” parameters.
“WISE” Simulation of optical imperfections in LHC P. Hagen AT/MCS Acknowledgements: Colleagues in AT/MAS, AT/MEL, AT/MTM, AB/ABP CERN, October 2006.
Magnetic Field Stability Measurements Joe DiMarco 23Oct07.
Review of the Tests of Superconducting Magnets in SM18 14-January Measurements of Special SSS during production N. Catalan Lasheras Review of the.
Saw Tooth Pattern Dipole Axis Measurements. Vertical Plane Natalia Emelianenko February 2006.
1) News on the long scale length calibration 2) Results of the two surveys performed on plane 7 Set 1: morning of 12/11/2004 Set 2: morning of 19/11/2004.
Warm-Cold Changes in the Sextupole Harmonic in the Quadrupole Magnets for the BEPC-II Luminosity Upgrade Animesh Jain Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Expected field quality in LHC magnets E. Todesco AT-MAS With contributions of S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, A. Lombardi, F. Schmidt (beam dynamics) N. Catalan-Lasheras,
Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Physics
Activities for Geometry, 18/03/05
Alignment and beam-based correction
Integration of Mathematica in the Large Hadron Collider geometry database Jerome Beauquis Elena Wildner IMS06, 20 June, 2006, Elena Wildner.
Multiple Regression Prof. Andy Field.
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
MSCB(MS) inter-axis in SSS
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
Update on the PSB Transfer Lines
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
FAIR magnets fiducialisation WP 7.5
Elena Wildner and Natalia Emelianenko AT/MAS
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE Visual Vocabulary.
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Magnetic axis tolerances for the SSS magnets
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Undulator Tuning Status
ESS MEBT Quadrupole magnets
Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement
Presentation transcript:

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 1 AC/GEO mole measurements Based on outcome from meeting 24/ and Installation data Elena Wildner J. Beauquis, L. Bottura, M. Buzio, D. Missiaen, P. Winkes

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 2 Background 1.There was a systematic difference of the data for the two measurement moles (AC from AT/MTM and GEO from TS/SU) for the geometric axis of the SSS of ~ 0.25 mm in the vertical plane, integrated over all measurement points for magnets 177, 154, 249, 349, SSS 14, 50, 74, 160, 162, 174 and 180 ( mm) have a similar problem 3.The observed systematic difference depends on the mole pair used 4.For magnets 49, 249 and 349 the AC mole was used for the install pack 5.For magnets 177 and 152 the GEO mole was used in the absence of the AC mole. 6.This triggered an investigation of the calibrations

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 3 List of Actions made 1. Calibrations of the moles used for the batch (AC4, GEO13) 2. The GEO mole 13 was found to have an offset of mm. The GEO mole has been repaired, not necessarily drift, uncontrollable mechanical effect 3. The AC mole has been re-calibrated the calibration difference was 0.09 mm. 4. Cross calibration is going on between the two mole: 1. Results are not yet conclusive. Measurement conditions need to be better controlled. 2. A better test bench will be set up 3. The center of a calibrated tube will be measured in the metrology lab (3D measurements, 20  precision), the AC-mole and the GEO-mole will be used to measure the center

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 4 Calibrations checks, Future I The operator software will be changed. A warning will be given if the integrated (over the SSS) difference of the two mole is > 0.2 mm. In this case both moles will be changed and the magnet re-measured. The old moles will go for calibration and maintenance. May be iterated. Concerns 10% of the measurements. The AC mole will always be the reference for the GA if the AC mole data is correctly measured. To calculate GA with AC mole was originally decided due to the fact that only one measurement made for both magnetic and geometric axes. The geo- mole is there to cross check. The GEO mole is used to check that the AC mole is not completely out which happens from time to time. Extensive efforts have been made to certify the AC-mole: AC mole 6 is used in the reference: Magnetic and mechanical axis of Short Straight Sections in the arcs: a summary of the results of the first 111 warm and cold series tests. L.Bottura et al. Note 373 The magnet will always be measured using both moles. Both measurements will be given in the shift tool. In addition: weekly calibrations and checks of both moles will be made, and tracked in the data base. A common calibration bench will be set up.

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 5 Other checks, saw tooth 1. For the SSS, there are no important saw tooth phenomena. This is only a problem for dipoles. 2. The saw tooth will be checked. 1. The distance to the Leica will be taken into account in the plots (only information, no recalculations). 2. TS/SU will check the influence on the GA-calculation of weighing of the measurement points. From this a decision will be taken. 3. If the saw tooth is constant over the measurement, re- calibration or re-measurement may be required. I don’t agree with this. It can also be a problem of relocation of the station 2 wrt to station 1

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 6 Statistics, difference GEO-AC, point by point/integrated dx averagedx stdevdz averagedz stdev dx averagedx stdevdz averagedz stdev Statistics, difference GEO-AC, point by point Statistics, difference GEO-AC, integrated dx maxdx mindz maxdz min sigma tail: 37 points h, 39 points v 3 sigma tail: no points dx maxdx mindz maxdz min

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 7 Statistics, histogram for individual points, interpolated

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 8 Statistics of difference GEO-AC

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 9 AC #6 GEO #13 AC #4 GEO #13 AC #6 GEO #3 AC #3 GEO #3 Statistics of difference GEO-AC, zoom and details

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 10 SSS 49 and 349 Diff GEO –AC as measured AP1_DXAP1_DZAP2_DXAP2_DZ SSS / /-0.23 SSS / Diff GEO –AC corrected using best estimates of calibrations AP1_DXAP1_DZAP2_DXAP2_DZ SSS / /-0.04 SSS / After correction by Patrick

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 11 Recent measurements, not corrected mole mole 13/ mole 13/ Sep Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Nov Nov Nov Nov H V Difference of AC and GEO: mean for mole combination

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 12 Conclusions for the batch Estimated accuracy 0.2 mm. For the batch from MEB 102: For magnet 49, 349: use existing AC mole data with the calibration of offset of mm. Magnet 152, 177 and 249 will be re-measured, no AC mole data available for 152 and 177, 249 will be re-checked and scanned at the ends, to see which mole is closest to flange. Only one magnet has to be remeasured, conclusion drawned and decision taken if we have to remeasure the others

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 13 Suggestions for calibrations and checks The calibrations and maintenance of the moles have to be followed up for all moles used, for all magnets, also in industry To keep an overall track of this in the data base is offered We have to estimate how the offsets in calibration and saw tooth influence the statistics for correctors, due to shift in GA and also classification at WP08 (dipole). Development of a “derived data” package for SSS as for the dipole will be made to estimate important quality criteria. Magnetic mole calibrations to be revisited as well Check impact of flange positions for SSS

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 14 Installation info (I) 1. There are no predefined install packs in the data base for the SSS. The slot showing the choice for GA calculation is used as install pack. No other install pack is possible unless a new reference measurement is chosen and a new GA is calculated for all valid measurements. This must remain an exception since the reference measurement is chosen by measurement specialists. 2. If several measurements from the same measurement device are available in the database (re-measurements), only one is valid. The others are not accessible (only specialists can access). 3. We will add a slot “install pack” for the SSS. When this slot is filled it will be checked that the install pack chosen by ABP is the same as the measurement used for GA calculation. If this is not the case the filling of shifts and install pack will not be possible. This is to check that no ambiguity exists for validating the shift.

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 15 Installation info (II) 1. A list of installation data from the installation data base ( views asked from EDMS team) and the MAS data base will be produced to show slots and magnets with the shift data and fiducials will be produced (web based). 2. For the Dipole, the default for install pack (last measurement) that was implemented according to demands by AB/ABP, will be obsolete. 3. Only one set of fiducial data available for a valid measurement set (mag, mech, fid, SSW) 4. Only once all calculations are made and all measurements are expressed in the same reference system, the certification can be made by looking at all measurements together (MAS). 5. We can add both measurements, AC and GEO, in the shift tool if wanted.

Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 16 Installation info overview web page