Supreme Court Case Review Rights Checks and Balances Equal Treatment under the Law

Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina

The Necessary and Proper Clause was Interpreted to include creation of a National Bank in the case Marbury v.Madison McCulloch v. Maryland State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina

The ability to review laws and declare them unconstitutional is called Veto power Apportionment Judicial Review Impeachment

The Elastic Clause is also known as Judicial Review Executive Order Implied Powers Clause Writ of Habeas Corpus

Leandro v. North Carolina Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools The Case in which the NC Supreme Court required schools to provide an “equal basic education” State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools Baker v. Carr

State Supremacy over local laws was established in the case State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland

Leandro v. North Carolina National Supremacy over State Laws was upheld in the case involving the National Bank called Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina

“Separate but Equal” as a doctrine was declared unconstitutional in the case Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools

Voting Districts should be of equal population according to Marbury v. Madison Korematsu v. United States Reynolds v. Simms Baker v. Carr

Gerrymandering to benefit a racial group is unconstitutional Baker v. Carr Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States Reynolds v. Simms

The amendment that requires states to ensure equal treatment under the law and due process of the law 10 14 22 17

Freedom from a bill of attainder Freedom from double jeopardy Which right of Japanese American citizens was suspended according to the case Korematsu v. United States Freedom of speech Writ of Habeas Corpus Freedom from a bill of attainder Freedom from double jeopardy

Burning a flag as a form of symbolic speech was protected in Texas v. Johnson Tinker v. Des Moines Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier Gitlow v. New York

Which case protects a student’s right to symbolic speech? Texas v. Johnson Tinker v. Des Moines Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier 4. New Jersey v. TLO

Student Search Rights were reviewed in the case Texas v. Johnson Tinker v. Des Moines Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier New Jersey v. TLO

To be considered by the jury To be considered by the judge According to the decision in Mapp v. Ohio, any evidence seized without a warrant To be considered by the jury To be considered by the judge To be excluded from the court To be held in an evidence locker for 10 years

Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona A person’s right to remain silent was extended by requiring that police explain a person’s right in Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona

Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona States must appoint an attorney for those who cannot afford one according to Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona

The “separation of church and state” is upheld in the decision Tinker v. Des Moines Wisconsin v. Yoder Wallace v. Jaffree Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

What is Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier about? Student’s right to free press Use of prior restraint by a school official Limited rights of students in order to protect privacy rights and a learning environment All of the above

Freedom of religious expression Freedom from religious establishment When a local government placed a nativity scene on the courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said they violated Freedom of religious expression Freedom from religious establishment

Freedom of Religious Expression Includes Choosing one’s own faith Choosing to practice religious rituals that are not harmful to others Choosing to symbolically express one’s religious faith All of the above

Freedom from Religious Establishment includes Government may not promote or establish a religion for the people Government may not establish the religious rituals for people such as prayer time, Bible readings, holiday rituals Government may not promote symbolically a religion All of the above

According to Lemon V. Kurtzman a government could give $ to a parochial (religious) school if The $ was not for a religious purpose intentionally The $ would not promote a religious purpose Giving the money would not cause an “excessive entanglement” between church and state All of the above

To hire teachers in a religious school In Everson v. Board of Education, tax dollars spent for this did not violate the establishment clause To hire teachers in a religious school To pay for religious texts in a school To pay for bus fare for students to attend school To pay for religious symbols in the school

Schenck v. United States West Virginia v. Barnette Alleghany v. ACLU Forcing someone to say the pledge was found to be a violation of a person’s freedom to religious expression in Abbingdon v. Schempp Schenck v. United States West Virginia v. Barnette Alleghany v. ACLU

U.S. v. Nixon U.S. v. New York Times The President’s use of “Executive Privilege” (to keep a secret) was limited by the Supreme Court Ruling in U.S. v. Nixon U.S. v. New York Times

US v. Nixon US v. New York Times The U.S. government’s ability to use prior restraint was limited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in US v. Nixon US v. New York Times

What is prior restraint? Ability of a government official to prevent something from being published Ability of a government to punish someone for publishing information that violated national security (treason)

When can the government use prior restraint? Whenever it wants When the information to be published would harm national security