LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TYPE TEXT HERE On July 4, 2012, scientists at CERN announced the discovery of an essential part of the Standard Model of particle physics: the Higgs.
Advertisements

31/03/00 CMS(UK)Glenn Patrick What is the CMS(UK) Data Model? Assume that CMS software is available at every UK institute connected by some infrastructure.
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Randall Sobie The ATLAS Experiment Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN Laboratory ATLAS.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
FPCP 2003 : 3-6 June 2003 Ecole Polytechnique, Paris Status and Prospects of ATLAS and CMS for B Physics and CP Violation Fairouz Ohlsson-Malek LPSC-Grenoble/IN2P3/ATLAS.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
1 Developing Countries Access to Scientific Knowledge Ian Willers CERN, Switzerland.
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment V.Kolosov, I.Korolko, S.Makarychev ITEP Moscow.
V.Gavrilov 1, I.Golutvin 2, V.Ilyin 3, O.Kodolova 3, V.Korenkov 2, L.Levchuk 4, E.Tikhonenko 2, S.Shmatov 2,V.Zhiltsov 2 1- Institute of Theoretical and.
V.Gavrilov 1, I.Golutvin 2, V.Ilyin 3, O.Kodolova 3, V.Korenkov 2, E.Tikhonenko 2, S.Shmatov 2 1- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow,
ITEP participation in the EGEE project NEC’2005, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
V.Gavrilov 1, I.Golutvin 2, O.Kodolova 3, V.Korenkov 2, L.Levchuk 4, E.Tikhonenko 2, S.Shmatov 2,V.Zhiltsov 2 1- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental.
Preparation of KIPT (Kharkov) computing facilities for CMS data analysis L. Levchuk Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology (KIPT), Kharkov, Ukraine.
Task 6.1 Installing and testing components of the LCG infrastructure to achieve full-scale functionality CERN-INTAS , 25 June, 2006, Dubna V.A.
1 Kittikul Kovitanggoon*, Burin Asavapibhop, Narumon Suwonjandee, Gurpreet Singh Chulalongkorn University, Thailand July 23, 2015 Workshop on e-Science.
LHCb computing in Russia Russia-CERN JWGC, March 2007.
Data Import Data Export Mass Storage & Disk Servers Database Servers Tapes Network from CERN Network from Tier 2 and simulation centers Physics Software.
Monitoring system of the LHCb electromagnetic calorimeter NEC’2007, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
LHC Computing Review - Resources ATLAS Resource Issues John Huth Harvard University.
Finnish DataGrid meeting, CSC, Otaniemi, V. Karimäki (HIP) DataGrid meeting, CSC V. Karimäki (HIP) V. Karimäki (HIP) Otaniemi, 28 August, 2000.
ICHEP06, 29 July 2006, Moscow RDIG The Russian Grid for LHC physics analysis V.A. Ilyin, SINP MSU V.V. Korenkov, JINR A.A. Soldatov, RRC KI LCG.
А.Минаенко Совещание по физике и компьютингу, 03 февраля 2010 г. НИИЯФ МГУ, Москва Текущее состояние и ближайшие перспективы компьютинга для АТЛАСа в России.
V.Gavrilov 1, I.Golutvin 2, V.Ilyin 3, O.Kodolova 3, V.Korenkov 2, E.Tikhonenko 2, S.Shmatov 2,V.Zhiltsov 2 1- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
V.Ilyin, V.Gavrilov, O.Kodolova, V.Korenkov, E.Tikhonenko Meeting of Russia-CERN JWG on LHC computing CERN, March 14, 2007 RDMS CMS Computing.
Silicon Module Tests The modules are tested in the production labs. HIP is is participating in the rod quality tests at CERN. The plan of HIP CMS is to.
The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October.
V.Gavrilov 1, I.Golutvin 2, V.Ilyin 3, O.Kodolova 3, V.Korenkov 2, E.Tikhonenko 2, S.Shmatov 2,V.Zhiltsov 2 1- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
V.A. Ilyin, ICFA DDW’06, Cracow, 11 October 2006 Networking and Grid in Russia V.A. Ilyin DDW’06, Cracow 11 October 2006.
Status report of the KLOE offline G. Venanzoni – LNF LNF Scientific Committee Frascati, 9 November 2004.
ITEP participation in the EGEE project NEC’2007, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
Russia-CERN Joint Working Group on LHC Computing Russia-CERN Joint Working Group on LHC Computing, 19 March, 2004, CERN V.A. Ilyin 1.Some about JWGC 2.Russia.
Outline: The LHCb Computing Model Philippe Charpentier, CERN ICFA workshop on Grid activities, Sinaia, Romania, October
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment Viktor Kolosov (ITEP Moscow) Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
CMS Computing Model summary UKI Monthly Operations Meeting Olivier van der Aa.
David Stickland CMS Core Software and Computing
Computing Issues for the ATLAS SWT2. What is SWT2? SWT2 is the U.S. ATLAS Southwestern Tier 2 Consortium UTA is lead institution, along with University.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
14/03/2007A.Minaenko1 ATLAS computing in Russia A.Minaenko Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino JWGC meeting 14/03/07.
LHCb system for distributed MC production (data analysis) and its use in Russia NEC’2005, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
L. Perini DATAGRID WP8 Use-cases 19 Dec ATLAS short term grid use-cases The “production” activities foreseen till mid-2001 and the tools to be used.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS (RuTier-2 model) Russia-CERN JWGC meeting A.Minaenko IHEP (Protvino)
LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi Roma, January 23, 2001.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Grid technologies for large-scale projects N. S. Astakhov, A. S. Baginyan, S. D. Belov, A. G. Dolbilov, A. O. Golunov, I. N. Gorbunov, N. I. Gromova, I.
LHCb Simulation LHCC Computing Manpower Review 3 September 2003 F.Ranjard / CERN.
ATLAS – statements of interest (1) A degree of hierarchy between the different computing facilities, with distinct roles at each level –Event filter Online.
LHCb report G. Passaleva (INFN – Florence)
Russian Regional Center for LHC Data Analysis
LHCb computing in Russia
LHCb Computing Model and Data Handling Angelo Carbone 5° workshop italiano sulla fisica p-p ad LHC 31st January 2008.
Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group
for ATLAS data taking and data analysis
Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2
R. Graciani for LHCb Mumbay, Feb 2006
LHCb thinking on Regional Centres and Related activities (GRIDs)
Development of LHCb Computing Model F Harris
The LHCb Computing Data Challenge DC06
Presentation transcript:

LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005

LHCb in numbers LHCb nominal Luminosity→ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 rate of p-p interactions→ 2x10 7 per second HLT output→ 2000 Hz RAW data per year→ 2x10 10 events (500 TB) Events with b quarks → 10 5 per second (!) acceptance for b-events → 5-10% Br. for CP channels → ~10 -5 Number of CP channels → ~50 ~5 signal events in every second of LHCb operation – GREAT! Have to select them from 1.5x10 7 background events Signature of LHCb signals is not very bright (P t, vertex) Estimation of S/B ratio is a REAL CHALLENGE

LHCb computing documents LHCb computing modelLHCb LHCb computing TDRCERN/LHCC

LHCb computing model (1) 1. RAW data → 2x10 10 events/year 25 kB/event, 500 TB/year 1 copy stored at CERN and 1 copy in Tier1 centers 2. Reconstruction → 2.4 kSI2k.sec/event 2 times per year → 7 months and 2 months CPU needs : 12MSI2k.years storage: 500 TB (rDST data for stripping) 1 copy stored across CERN and Tier1 centers

4. Analysis → 0.3 kSI2k.s/event 140 physicists, 2 jobs/week, 3x10 6 events CPU needs : x(n-1) MSI2k storage: 200 TB run at CERN, Tier1 and some Tier2 centres LHCb computing model (2) 3. Stripping → 2.1x10 9 events/year kB/event, 139 TB/year (DST) 4 times per year (1 month) stored at CERN, Tier1 and some Tier2 centres

LHCb computing model (3) 5. MC production → 4x10 9 events/year ~50 kSI2k.sec/event (8 MSI2k.years) 400 kB/event 160 TB to store only triggered events (4x10 8 ) produced at Tier2 centres stored at CERN and Tier1 centres LHCb trigger differs significantly from ATLAS and CMS

Russian participation in LHCb IHEP(Protvino), INP (Novosibirsk), INR (Troitsk), ITEP (Moscow), PNPI (St.Petersburg) SPD and Preshower, ECAL, HCAL, MUON system and RICH mirrors Design, construction and maintenance of detectors Development of reconstruction algorithms Historical interests in B physics

Russian participation in LHCb Physics interests of Russian scientists: Studies of CP violation with B and D hadrons Rare (forbidden) decays of B and D hadrons Radiative penguin decays pf B mesons (non SM physics) Spectroscopy of B hadrons High P t jets (W and Z bosons, t quarks, Higgs, exotica) Canonical users in Russian institutes: IHEP-7, INP-5, INR-5, ITEP-7, PNPI-6

What to “compute” in Russia ? There are 2 main tasks: 1. Provide facilities for LHCb data analysis in all participating Russian institutes. 2. Fulfill collaboration requirements

Computing in Russia (1) 1. Partially store reconstructed data (rDST) most recent copy for the current year 1 copy for all previous years storage: x(n-1) TB(b inclusive) 2. Store stripped data (DST) most recent copy for the current year 1 copy for all previous years storage: x(n-1) TB

Computing in Russia (2) 3. Run stripping jobs on stored rDST B-inclusive sample – 9x10 9 events/year CPU needs : 0.06 MSI2k.years CPU power : 0.72 MSI2k.years (finish in one month) data reduction factor ~100 TAG:9 + 9x(n-1) TB 4 stripping passes per year→0.3 MSI2k.years rerun stripping during first years of LHCb operation

4. Run analysis jobs(20% of LHCb) Computing in Russia (3) CPU→ x(n-1) MSI2k.years storage: x(n-1) TB MC analysis also requires some resources B-exclusive dimuonD*B-inclusive physicists

Computing in Russia (4) 5. MC production(~10% of LHCb) CPU→0.8 MSI2k.years storage: 3 TB 6. Calibration, reconstruction algorithms CPU→0.2 MSI2k.years storage: 30 TB (hard to estimate now)

LHCb Tier2 cluster in Russia CPU MSI2k disks TB tapes TB partial Tier1 functionality (DST stripping, analysis)

History of LHCb DCs in Russia K events, 1% contribution only one centre (ITEP) M events, 3% contribution all 4 our centers (IHEP,ITEP,JINR,MSU) M events, 5% contribution started to use LCG 2005 PNPI and INR have joined

Plans MC production for the collaboration routine task (running in 5 Russian centers) participation in DC06 Distributed analysis extensive tests of GANGA (CERN, Tier1) deployment of GANGA in Russia participation in SC Significant increase of resources in 2006 learn how to operate much larger centers