Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 30% e+ Poalarization 1 Physics with an initial positron polarisation of ≈30% Sabine Riemann (DESY)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Advertisements

5 th Rencontres du Vietnam - Aug. 7, 2004 Polarized Positrons…E166 A.W.Weidemann 1 Introduction (What, who) Motivation (Why) Experiment and Polarimetry.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
WIN'05, June A. Klier - Muon Collider Physics1 Physics at a Future Muon Collider Amit Klier University of California, Riverside WIN’05 – Delphi,
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Model-independent WIMP searches at ILC with single photon Andrii Chaus (CEA/DESY), Jenny List (DESY), Maxim Titov (CEA) BSM Session, Belgrade, Serbia,
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Systematic Errors Studies in the RHIC/AGS Proton-Carbon CNI Polarimeters Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory The RHIC/AGS Polarimetry Group:
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
Parameters 2003 mandate questions to working groups summary of answers preliminary conclusions R.-D. Heuer for the members of the ‘parameter group’ : S.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
Measurements of Transverse Spin Effects with the Forward Pion Detector of STAR Larisa Nogach Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino for the STAR collaboration.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Projected performance of NPDGamma and new systematics introduced by SM polarizer Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting.
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.
Spin Control and Transportation O. Adeyemi*, M. Beckmann**, V. Kovalenko*, L. Malysheva*, G. Moortgat-Pick*, S. Riemann**, A. Schälicke**, A. Ushakov**
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
Laser Based Polarized e + e + Source for ILC 8th ACFA Daegu 11-14/Jul/2005 Tsunehiko OMORI (KEK)
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Polarized positrons at the ILC: physics goal and source requirements EuCARD Workshop “Spin optimization at lepton accelerators” 13 February 2014 Sabine.
RHIC Run11 Summary May 6, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang Luminosity Availability Polarization RHIC setup issues.
IWLC10, Geneva, 20/10/10 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 1 Impact of polarized positrons for top/QCD and electroweak physics Gudrid Moortgat-Pick Hamburg University.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
LCWS 05 1 Experimental studies of Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in gauge boson scattering and three gauge boson production P.Krstonosic Work done.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Exclusive Vector Meson Electroproduction at 12 GeV Paul Stoler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Polarized positrons at low energies: Physics goal and source requirements Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen Outline: ILC as Higgs factory At the top-quark threshold.
Positron polarization at the ILC: RDR vs. SB2009 Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, Geneva October 25-29, 2010.
Transverse polarization for energy calibration at Z-peak M. Koratzinos With valuable input from Alain Blondel ICFA HF2014, Sunday, 12/10/2014.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
Status of MEG-I physics analysis
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Model-independent WIMP searches at ILC with single photon
MC generator for the process e+e-  with RC pro mille accuracy
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Overview of Polarimetry
Triple Gauge Couplings and Polarization at the ILC
High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Gordon Cates, Xiaochao Zheng, Yuxiang Zhao LOI
At a Future Linear Collider
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Presentation transcript:

Beijing, Feb 3 rd, % e+ Poalarization 1 Physics with an initial positron polarisation of ≈30% Sabine Riemann (DESY)

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 2 Outline Low positron polarization Physics Case ? Utilization of P e+ ≈ 30%  fast or slow helicity reversal  requirements Summary and outlook

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 3 Physics case Refer to previous talks given by Gudi and others: e+ polarization  improves accuracy of SM measurements  increases sensitivity to physics beyond SM  decisively to find out what the underlying physics is With e+ polarization processes can be enhanced or suppressed; clean initial states with known helicities

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 4 Advantage: e+ Polarization No doubts: 60% e+ polarization are needed What about ~30% for the beginning?

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 5 Utilization of P=~30% Better physics? see next slides remember: first LC studies were done also with a (60%, 40%) option !! 30%  test of facilities during the first years of operation

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 6 Baseline Machine Physics between 200 GeV and 500 GeV Luminosity: Running year zero for commissioning Year 1-4: L int = 500 fb -1 : 1. year 10%  L int ≈ 50 fb year 30%  L int ≈ 150 fb Year 60%  L int ≈ 300 fb year 100%  L int ≈ 500 fb -1  expected statistics: few 10 4 ee  HZ at 350 GeV (mH≈120 GeV) 10 5 ee  tt at 350 GeV 5·10 5 (1·10 5 ) ee  qq (  ) at 500 GeV 10 6 ee  WW at 500 GeV  statistical cross section uncertainties at per-mille level !!  e+ polarization will help (beginning of LC studies: L int ~ 50 fb -1 )

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 7 P eff Increase of effective polarization: P e- / P e For comparison: old LC studies: (60%,40%)  P eff =0.8

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 8  P eff Decrease of error on  P eff (error propagation) 30%: Improvement by factor 2 (1.5)

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 9 Enhancement /suppression of initial state polarization Example: suppression factors for WW production Complicated mixture of , Z exchange Large LR asymmetry depending on production angle P e- P e

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 10 Transverse polarization does NOT work with e- polarization only sensitivity to new physics (CP violation, graviton) Rizzo M H =1.5 TeV, E=500 GeV, L=500 fb -1

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 11 (90%, 0%)  (80%, 30%) ? same size of –Suppression of undesired hel. states for some processes –effective polarization (~0.9) BUT:  P eff (90%; 0%) = 2…1.4 ·  P eff (80%; 30%) (uncor…correlated) Is (90%,30%) an alternative to (80%, 60%) ? No - due to less significant physics goals

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 12 Physics goal

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 13 Physics goal

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 14 e+ helicity reversal e- trains e+ trains % spent to ‘wrong’ helicity pairing  gain due to xs enhancement for J=1 processes by e+ pol is lost improvement of  P eff remains – if systematic errors are small enough asymmetries can be measured, systematic effects are largely cancelled out If the e+ helicity will be switched quite frequently this scheme corresponds to a ‘slow’ Blondel scheme with luminosity ratio 1/1/1/1 for  ++ /  +- /  -+ /  -- Can use annihilation data for polarization measurement (see POWER report and work done by K. Moenig)

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 15 Helicity reversal: Blondel Scheme Perform 4 independent measurements (s-channel vector exch.) Can determine P e+ and P e- simultaneously (A LR ≠0) need polarimeters at IP for measuring polarization differences  P e-,  P e+ between + and – states   P

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 16 Helicity reversal: Blondel Scheme this technique measures directly lumi-wted polarizations any depolarization effect properly taken into account (?) Polarization differences have to be measured with high accuracy Estimated accuracy needed for the first 4 years:  dP/P ≤0.3% (0.5%) Long-term intensity stability  correction and additional syst. error

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 17 Helicity reversal Frequency of e+ reversal: + and – helicity with equal ratio  No reversal during the first year(s) is not an option at all! often enough to avoid unknown systematic (time dependent) uncertainties Tolerances: Intensity asymmetry: desired 0.1% (?) at the beginning 1% is more realistic polarization asymmetry: <1%  desired (at least for the ~60% e+ pol): train-by-train Low reversal frequencies (days): each measurement is done separately  large luminosity/intensity corrections  Need accurate measured lumi and intensities etc.  Further studies are needed …

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 18 Remarks Need to understand relative detector efficiency for ‘+ -’ and ‘- +’ modes at level of few 10 -3, later Need to measure polarization difference, P e+ (-) - P e+ (+) at level of <10 -2 later To reach the high accuracy will be difficult unless can measure these modes simultaneously, ie. can switch positron polarization randomly train-to-train Note: even if positrons are nominally unpolarized, need to verify this!  Positron polarimeter at the IP is needed anyway.

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 19 Layout of positron damping ring system showing the parallel spin rotation beam lines for randomly selecting positron polarization direction. A pair of kicker magnets is turned on between pulse-trains to deflect the beam to the spin rotation solenoids with negative B- field. space for spin rotators must be foreseen K. Moffeit et al., SLAC-TN

Beijing, Feb 3 rd S. Riemann, 30% e+ Polarization 20 Summary & Conclusion 30% is benefit for physics we could have a polarized machine from the beginning! Allows test of operation with both beams polarized  should be used for physics – otherwise it has to be destroyed (see also slides from L. Malysheva / I. Bailey) Utilization of low e+ polarization needs - Positron polarization measurement - Spin rotation frequency? Desired: train-by-train proposed scheme exists: spin rotators before (LTR) and after the DR (RTL) are needed (see SLAC-TN , EUROTeV-Report ) other solutions for helicity reversal? no reversal is worse than no polarization! Further design & simulation work has to be done and should include the ~30% option (depolarisation, polarimeter, spin-flip-frquency etc.)