Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
NSSE 2014: Accolades and Action Items Faculty Senate Nov. 20, 2014 Patrick Barlow, Ph.D., Assessment Coordinator.
The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement Margaret Harrigan Office of Academic Planning and Analysis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
National Survey of Student Engagement
The University of Texas-Pan American
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20032 Where Do We Get Student Engagement Data From? The national survey of student engagement (NSSE); it assesses the extent to which first-year and senior students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development The NSSE survey is supported by grants from Lumina Foundation for Education and the Pew Charitable Trusts The NSSE study is co-sponsored by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and The Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning The UT System provides funds, in part, to cover the costs for IRP to help with the NSSE study for UTBTSC.

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20033 Who Is In this Analysis for 2002? (1) Freshman (N=85) Gender Males32% Females 68% Ethnicity Hispanic 100% Status Full-time 87% Less than full-time 13% Seniors (N=101) Gender Male 28% Females 72% Ethnicity Hispanic 95% American Indian 4% Asian American 1% Status Full-time 73% Less than Full-time 27% (1) The sample of 186 was eligible for this factor analysis from the original 320 respondents.

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20034 How Were the Students Selected? A list of freshman and seniors names and addresses were collected from the campus information system and sent to the NSSE Study Center. Organizers of the NSSE survey study randomly selected students from the sample list of students sent to them from UTBTSC. Surveys were mailed to the UTBTSC students from the NSSE Study Center.

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20035 What Information is Included? Primary factors, obtained from a factor analysis this office conducted, that make up freshman and seniors’ experiences, cognition, writing, enrichment, time usage, and personal growth while attending UTBTSC in Students’ evaluations (slides 13 and 14)

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20036 What Information is Excluded? Items not considered primary factors in my factor analysis were excluded (excepting the students evaluations shown on slides 13 and 14 ). If you would like to download the NSSE 2002 results for your analysis purposes, go to slide 15.

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20037 Primary Factors of Experiences Freshman 40% asked questions or contributed in class sometimes 40% worked with peers out of class to prepare class assignments sometimes 50% worked with peers during class projects sometimes 50% put together information from various courses to finish assignments sometimes Seniors 50% asked questions or contributed in class sometimes 40% worked with peers out of class to prepare class assignments sometimes 40% worked with peers during class projects sometimes 40% put together information from various classes to finish assignments sometimes

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20038 Primary Factors of Cognition Freshman 40% thought coursework emphasized memorizing quite a bit 40% thought coursework emphasized synthesizing quite a bit 42% thought coursework emphasized analyzing quite a bit Seniors 37% thought coursework emphasized memorizing quite a bit 45% thought coursework emphasized synthesizing quite a bit 44% thought coursework emphasized analyzing quite a bit

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/20039 Primary Factors of Writing Freshman One to four times 21% wrote documents of 20+ pages One to four times 15% wrote documents between 5-19 pages One to four times 39% wrote documents of fewer than 5 pages Seniors One to four times 24% wrote documents of 20+ pages One to four times 54% wrote documents between 5-19 pages One to four times 35% wrote documents of fewer than 5 pages

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Primary Factors of Enrichment Freshman 56% have taken or will take foreign language coursework 41% have taken or will take a culminating senior experience (e.g., comprehensive exam, capstone course, thesis, project, etc.) 36% have studied or will study abroad Seniors 36% have taken or will take foreign language coursework 46% have taken or will take a culminating senior experience (e.g., comprehensive exam, capstone course, thesis, project, etc.) 17% have studied or will study abroad

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Primary Factors of Time Usage Freshman 6% worked for pay on campus 1-5 hrs/wk 14% worked for pay off campus 30+ hrs/wk 29% gave care for dependent relatives 1-5 hrs/wk 50% prepared for class 1-5 hrs/wk Seniors 9% worked for pay on campus 1-5 hrs/wk 35% worked for pay off campus 30+ hrs/wk 28% gave care for dependent relatives 30+ hrs/wk 36% prepared for class 1-5 hrs/wk

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Primary Factors of Personal Growth Freshman 40% worked effectively with others quite a bit 35% solved complex, real- world issues quite a bit 31% contributed to the community’s welfare some 34% understood other ethnic groups very much 40% understood themselves very much 32% developed personal values and ethics very much Seniors 42% worked effectively with others quite a bit 33% solved complex, real- world issues quite a bit 33% contributed to the community’s welfare some 30% understood other ethnic groups very much 46% understood themselves very much 37% developed personal values and ethics very much

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Evaluations of Campus Relationships Freshman 41% sensed friendliness from peers 29% sensed some helpfulness from faculty 27% sensed a little helpfulness from administrative persons and offices Seniors 32% sensed friendliness from peers 32% sensed some helpfulness from faculty 20% sensed a little helpfulness from administrative persons and offices

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Evaluation of UTBTSC Freshman In evaluating their entire educational experience, 49% rated it as good If they were to start over, 52% probably would go to UTBTSC Seniors In evaluating their entire educational experience, 60% rated it as good If they were to start over, 54% probably would go to UTBTSC

Source: IRP at UTBTSC 2/ Citation of References Use the IRP office citation below when using this powerpoint presentation for your purposes. Institutional Research and Planning at UTBTSC. (February 2003). Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in [Data source: NSSE 2002] Powerpoint Presentation. Brownsville, TX: Author. Use the Indiana citation when using the NSSE report for UTBTSC for your purposes Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning (July 2002). Report on The National Survey of Student Engagement: The College Student Report for UTBTSC. Bloomington, IN: Author. The UTBTSC report is located at IRP's site. Simply click “IRP’s site, click “Students” and then, click “NSSE Copyright 2002”.IRP's site Call the IRP office at 8816 or click here to send an to give us your ideas, questions, or concerns about this study or presentation.here