2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
Advertisements

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
The University of Texas-Pan American
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009

Points to Cover What is NSSE? Benchmarks Comparisons within UVU UVU’s strengths & weaknesses Comparison of NSSE with FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA)

Response Rate 2009 – First Year Students – 32% (812) 2008 response rate – 18% (200) Peer response rates ranged from 20% - 26% – Seniors – 47% (1,180) 2008 response rate – 31% (569) Peer response rates ranged from 29% - 37%

What is NSSE? National Survey of Student Engagement – Collects information annually from samples of first-year and senior students about the nature and quality of their undergraduate experience. – Introduced in 1999, nearly 1400 baccalaureate- granting colleges & universities in the U.S. and Canada have participated, including 8 in Utah.

Data Groups UVU 2008 UVU 2009 UVU Peers – Selected Peers for 2009 Carnegie-Engaged – Selected Carnegie-Engaged institutions for 2009 Bacc/Assoc College – Selected Bacc/Assoc institutions for 2009 NSSE 2009 Median

NSSE Benchmark Categories Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE) Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)

First Year Students NSSE Benchmark Scores

Seniors NSSE Benchmark Scores

Full Time vs Part Time Students

First Year vs Seniors

Benchmark Scores by Sex

First Year Students Lowest 10 Items – Part 1 Item% Responses Response Scale UVU Peers Carnegie- Engaged Number of written papers or reports of 20 PAGES OR MORE 6%answered 5 or more6%5% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework 12%answered Often/Very Often 10%15% Participated in a community- based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course 12%answered Often/Very Often 11%14% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 13%answered Often/Very Often 10%15% Hours per 7-day week spent participating in co-curricular activities 14%answered 6 or more hours 17%32%

First Year Students Lowest 10 Items – Part 2 Item% Responses Response Scale UVU Peers Carnegie- Engaged Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 19%answered Often/Very Often 19%20% Independent study or self- designed major 5%have done this4%3% Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements 3%have done this5% Study abroad 2%have done this3%2% Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) 36%plan to do this40%47%

First Year Students Top 10 Items – Part 1 Item% Responses Response Scale UVU PeersCarnegie- Engaged Select the circle that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work. 81% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 82%84% Quality of relationships with other students 72% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 72%78% Quality of relationships with faculty members 73% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 72%70% Quality of relationships with administrative personnel and offices 56% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 52%46% Hours per 7-day week spent preparing for class 13%answered 21 or more hours 16%21%

First Year Students Top 10 Items – Part 2 Item% Responses Response Scale UVU PeersCarnegie- Engaged Hours per 7-day week spent relaxing and socializing 20% answered 16 or more hours 25%28% If you could start over again, would you go to the SAME INSTITUTION you are now attending? 90% answered Probably Yes/Definitely Yes 81%85% How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? 89% answered Good/Excellent 85%88% Using computers in academic work 81% answered Quite a bit/Very Much 84%86% Thinking critically and analytically 81%answered Quite a bit/Very Much 78%82%

Seniors Lowest 10 Items - Part 1 Item% ResponsesResponse Scale UVU PeersCarnegie- Engaged Number of written papers or reports of 20 PAGES OR MORE 7% answered 5 or more 11%9% Hours per 7-day week spent participating in co-curricular activities 5% answered 16 or more hours 6%9% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework 16% answered Often/Very Often 18%21% Participated in a community- based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course 18% answered Often/Very Often 18%19% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 22% answered Often/Very Often 22%20%

Seniors Lowest 10 Items - Part 2 Item% ResponsesResponse Scale UVU PeersCarnegie- Engaged Developing a deepened sense of spirituality 26% answered Quite a bit/Very Much 21%26% Helping you cope with your non- academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 25% answered Quite a bit/Very Much 25%26% Attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theater, or other performance 23% answered Often/Very Often 21%24% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 27% answered Often/Very Often 25%26% Study Abroad 7% have done this 9%16%

Seniors Top 10 Items – Part 1 Item% Responses Response Scale UVU Peers Carnegie- Engaged Your relationships with other students 83% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 82%81% Select the circle that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work. 84% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 83%82% Your relationships with faculty members 81% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 82%78% Your relationships with administrative personnel and offices 58% selected 5-7 on a 7 point scale 49%54% Hours per 7-day week spent preparing for class 35% answered 16 or more hours 36%40%

Item% Responses Response Scale UVU Peers Carnegie- Engaged Hours per 7-day week spent providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) 43% answered 11 or more hours 40%20% Institutional emphasis: Using computers in academic work 86% answered Quite a bit/Very Much 89%90% If you could start over again, would you go to the SAME INSTITUTION you are now attending? 88% answered Probably Yes/Definitely Yes 81%82% How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? 89% answered Good/Excellent 83%86% Institutional contribution: Thinking critically and analytically 84% answered Quite a bit/Very Much 85%89% Seniors Top 10 Items – Part 2

First Year Students Student Faculty Interaction

Seniors Student Faculty Interaction

FSSE Scores For These Items Percentage of Instructors who said that half or more of their students did the following:

FSSE, NSSE and Research 56% of Lower Division instructors and 67% of Upper Division instructors indicated that having students work on research projects with faculty outside of class is ‘Important’ or ‘Very Important’. Compare to 13% of Seniors and 5% of First Year students who have done research with faculty outside of class.

First Year Student Participation in Extra Curricular Events

Senior Student Participation in Extra Curricular Events

% of First Year Students Answering Often/Very Often Using computing & information technology 64%67%73%74%75% Working effectively with others 63%66%68%72%71% Solving complex real-world problems 50%54%49%58%55% UVU 2008UVU 2009UVU PeersCarnegieBacc/Assoc Using Computers in Academic Work 83%81%84%86%79% Acquiring a broad general education 76%79%75%82%77% Acquiring job or work-related knowledge & skills 53%61%59%63%59% Writing clearly & effectively 69%76%74%73%75% Speaking clearly & effectively 57%67%65%64%68% Thinking critically & analytically 78%82%78%82%81% Analyzing quantitative problems 55%67%66%62%68% Using computing & information technology 64%67%73%74%75% Working effectively with others 63%66%68%72%71% Solving complex real-world problems 50%54%49%58%55%

% of Seniors Answering Often/Very Often UVU 2008UVU 2009UVU PeersCarnegieBacc/Assoc Using Computers in Academic Work 87%86%89%90%86% Acquiring a broad general education 82%79%81%83% Acquiring job or work-related knowledge & skills 79%75%76%73%80% Writing clearly & effectively 76%74%75%76%81% Speaking clearly & effectively 69%66%69%71%77% Thinking critically & analytically 84% 85%87%86% Analyzing quantitative problems 72%74% 75%78% Using computing & information technology 80%79%82%80%83% Working effectively with others 76%75%73%78%83% Solving complex real-world problems 62%59% 63%67%

Voluntary System of Accountability

Seniors – Active Learning Experiences

Seniors – Group Learning Experiences

Seniors – Commitment to Student Learning & Success

Seniors– Student Interaction with Faculty & Staff

Seniors– Experiences with Diverse Groups of People & Ideas

Seniors Student Satisfaction

Next Steps Support Leadership in Identifying Action Plans for Improvement Support Assessment of Action Plans Create College-Specific reports

Where to Find This Presentation From the IRI site, ‘Completed Research’ -> ‘Student Engagement’ -> ‘National Survey of Student Engagement’ -> ‘NSSE, 2009’