Healthy Streams Basic WQ Total Ammonia Unionized NH 3 Nitrate Ortho-phosphate Turbidity TDS TSS pH departure Toxics Water and Sediment Metals PAHs pesticides.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Certain types of bacteria indicate animal and human waste pollution.
Advertisements

Regional Board Monitoring and Special Studies Related to 303d Listing and TMDLs Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Measuring Water Pollution
Surface Water & Groundwater & 7 TH GRADE SCIENCE BROOKVILLE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL MS. DRAKE.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Turtle Lake Water Quality Index
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Coastal San Luis Obispo County Water Quality Assessment May 15, 2008 Tamara Presser & Matt Thompson Storm Water Program Central Coast Regional Water Quality.
Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Issues in the Ambient Marine Environment of Central.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
A Central Coast Water Quality Report Card For Healthy Watersheds Karen R. Worcester, California Central Coast Water Board David M. Paradies, Central Coast.
` CCAMP.org “About CCAMP” wiki upgrade Replace old data navigator Include links to healthy watersheds, coastal confl., groundwater Central Coast Water.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program CCAMP  Summary of CCAMP Monitoring  How we make CCAMP happen  Making data available  Measuring performance.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
Draft Stormwater Monitoring and Assessment Strategy for the Puget Sound Region: Volume 1 Scientific Framework November 18, 2009 Jim Simmonds and Karen.
QUESTION 7a(i) What does the following term stand for? FAV.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
The Urban Watershed Unit 1, Topic 1. 1 Urban vs. Suburban vs. Rural.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
1 Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Water Board The Land to Sea Connection: Water quality impacts on watershed and ocean health.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
HomeAbout NESTNews & Project Updates NEST Exec. Mgmt. Team Participating Agencies Contact Us SDI Home ! Site Map ! NEST Policy Memo ! NEST EMT Terms of.
What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point, such as a river or a lake.
Cooperative Agricultural Monitoring on California’s Central Coast: An Integrated, Innovative Approach Karen Worcester, Staff Environmental Scientist Alison.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Presented to: Severn River Association 2008 State of the Severn Anne Arundel County Government Department of Public Works Ron Bowen, P.E. October 21, 2008.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Report Card Scoring Several options under consideration for scoring and aggregating data.
How does water quality within MBNMS compare to applicable water quality standards and relevant indicator parameters?
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Freshwater Discharges to Central Coast Marine Protected Areas and the Nearshore Environment Karen R. Worcester David M. Paradies Central Coast Ambient.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
All Sewers Lead to the Ocean Exploring and Measuring Stormwater Quality SciREN Coast February 12, 2015 Kellen Lauer and Kathleen Onorevole.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
CCAMP Approach to Healthy Watersheds Report Cards: a Look under the Hood Karen R. Worcester, California Central Coast Water Board David M. Paradies, Central.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
A Central Coast Water Quality Report Card For Healthy Watersheds Karen R. Worcester, California Central Coast Water Board David M. Paradies, Central Coast.
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Integrating surface water, groundwater and landscape stressor data into a regional assessment to support management decision-making Karen R. Worcester.
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Wetlands.
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Presentation transcript:

Healthy Streams Basic WQ Total Ammonia Unionized NH 3 Nitrate Ortho-phosphate Turbidity TDS TSS pH departure Toxics Water and Sediment Metals PAHs pesticides and PCBs other toxics Toxicity Invertebrate survival in water Invertebrate reproduction in water Invertebrate survival in sediment Fish survival Fish growth Algae survival-growth Biostimulation Oxygen Departure Predicted Oxygen Deficit NNE NNE or measured Benthic Algae Floating algae Chlorophyll a Bioassessment BMI CSCI Algae O/E or CSCI Habitat CRAM 4 Attributes Water Temperature Conductivity Turbidity Canopy (shade?) Habitat complexity Bank stability PHab (MMI or Herbst) USFW steelhead flow 1984 DFG flow for fish life stages Land management Pesticide Use Reports Impervious Surface Cover Impervious Cover Model Impervious cover per capita Stormwater volume / impervious ratio Agricultural Land Cover (NLCD) Urban (developed) Land Cover Flow? Surface Rec Fecal Coliform E. coli Pathogens Groundwater Drink Nitrate Salts, sodium, chloride conductivity Water Metals (incl. arsenic) Water PAHs Water pesticides PCBs Other toxics Water Quality Index Aquatic Life Aquatic Habitat Index Aquatic Toxicity Index Biostimulatory Risk Index Bioassessment Index Land Management Index Water Quality Index Human Health Groundwater Index Vision Goal 1 Healthy Aquatic Habitat Vision Goal 2 Proper Land Management Vision Goal 3 Clean Groundwater Cadmus % Natural cover Soil Infiltration Imperviousness Landscape Hydrologic Etc. R3 Ag Program Enrollment Implementation Metrics R3 Stormwater LID BMP Metrics Coastal Otter stories HAB stories Other Wetland CRAM Other stories Estuary Benthos Toxicity Bioaccumulation Boxes in this row are data usage anti-degradation of high quality waters background and upstream conditions relevant to TMDLs, conditions at compliance points, standards evaluation (turbidity, DO, pH, or salts), beneficial use considerations for riparian habitat and flood storage degree to which land use restrictions might affect water quality and watershed function Assess status of key indicators Determine % of aquatic habitat (by reach) in condition categories ranging from exceptional to highly degraded at reach, HUC-12, HUC-8 and Regional scales. Provide Regional context to facilitate prioritization of management action based on conditions at the HUC 12 scale. Evaluate relationships between landscape and habitat condition indicators Evaluate relationships between operational and condition indicators Assess Seasonal and Regional Trends in key indicators For municipal wells or local well subsets, determine % of wells in condition categories; at basin, HUC-12, HUC-8 and Regional scales. All of the same analyses as for WQ Aquatic Life Maps of Cadmus outputs with WQ indicators by site Maps of pesticide usage per watershed with WQ indicators by site Diagrams of key processes Maps of condition with pie symbols for sites and multi indicators Maps of trend by waterbody or site Histograms of key Indicators Regression graphs of condition versus operational measures Maps of pesticide usage per watershed and changes in use over time Maps of impervious surface area per watershed and changes in imperviousness over time Table data for indicators at levels of concern Maps of condition colored by reach These 5 indices address the single general objective and its composite aquatic life beneficial use. Surface Drink Nitrate Salts, conductivity Water Metals Water PAHs Water pesticides PCBs Other toxics Surface Fish BOG summaries BOG maps Groundwater Ag Salts, sodium, chloride conductivity Assess status and trends of key indicators Vision Goal 3A Surface Water Human Health Rounded boxes in this row are analyses to be done. Rounded boxes in this row are maps, graphics etc., to be done. Nancy Richard’s map of extent Shade map colors for data density and confidence Regression graphs of everything vs everything, with at least: Regression, Cond prob analysis Change point analysis Analysis of upstream probability sites to test assumption of high quality CDFs for differences between good and bad sites: use to evaluate standards Howard’s TMDL summary-type products to show success of TMDLs Parameters in bold are used in more than one index.

Goal 1: Healthy Aquatic Habitat: By 2025, 80% of aquatic habitat is healthy, and the remaining 20% exhibits positive trends in key measures of aquatic health. Percent Healthy (to status) Percent Improving (to trends) Goal 2: Proper Land Management: By 2025, 80% of lands within any watershed is managed to maintain healthy watershed functions, and the remaining 20% will exhibit positive trends in key management indicators. Goal 3: Healthy Water for Human Uses: By 2025, 80% of surface and ground water is clean for drinking and swimming, and fish and shellfish are safe to eat. The remaining 20% will exhibit positive trends in key measures of human health. Home Trends Summary and Findings Technical Approach You can’t see it here, but there is a text box below this map for adding details. Goals are clickable. The crown menu is something we need to figure out (where I have put placeholders – trends, summary and findings, technical approach, etc.) Dave will adjust colors to blue, dk green, lt green, yellow, lt red, dk red

Water Quality Index Aquatic Life Aquatic Habitat Index Aquatic Toxicity Index Biostimulatory Risk Index Bioassessment Index Healthy Aquatic Habitat Text below contains basic descriptions of indices, each index is clickable Bar charts show what percent of the Region (or watershed) is healthy (and should mimic our color scheme)

Water Quality Index Total Ammonia Nitrate Ortho-phosphate Turbidity TDS TSS pH departure Text below contains basic descriptions of components of index, rationale for selection, each component is clickable to get a map of that analyte’s scoring, maybe a link to the data navigator, a link to the rule, etc. (See “About the Analyte on existing website”) – need to brainstorm Metals PAHs Pesticides PCBs Other toxics

Possible entry points How would you like to assess our information? Map Navigator Goals Assessment Questions Best and Worst Places Fish and Wildlife Waterbody Types Report Card (Indicators/Indices) Beneficial Uses

Icon lists Tiny map Assessment Questions? Fish, test tubes, etc. Best and Worst of the Central Coast (bad and good pics) Problems

Nearshore coastal waters Water Body Types streamslakes Estuaries Central Coast Portal link (website w/ loading context) Wetlands Pesticide Risk Upstream imperviousness Existing Studies Harbors CC loading Sea otter stories HABs and nutrients Pesticide discharge to MPAs BOG Maps and summaries Other issues – microcystin (Pinto, Lopez), eutrophication, etc. Postings, TMDLs: Nacimiento, Hernandez, Oso Flaco, Pinto, etc. Harbor Report MEQs for harbors data

Fish and Wildlife Steelhead Trout Benthic Inverts Sea ottersNearshore Fish Birds Shellfish Caspian Terns Egg shell thinning in condors Sand Crabs Commercial shellfish closures Mussels Sport shellfish closures from Red Tide Arrow Gobies - nonylphenol Rockfish - mercury Sablefish - DDT Tissue Chem – PBDE, PCB Bacterial Disease HABs – domoic acid, microcystin etc. Protozoal disease Harbor Study CCLEAN IBIs and O/E Base Flow Water Quality NOAA Critical Habitat* – overlay with healthy waters CEAM – Andy Gunther *

Links Water Quality Portal EPA Healthy Water Quality Recovery Potential SWAMP CCAMP Reports Regional WB/St Board

Technical Approach Index and Report Card Development Mapping and NHD stuff Lab and Field References Scoring and Grading Aggregating measures into Indices Scoring Indices Assessment Approach Assessment Questions Data Sources

Assessment Questions Text – List questions with short descriptive text, how we address it in the project

Data Sources CCAMP – include narrative description of program, level of QA, where to go for more info. SWAMP CCWQP 303(d)

Graphics