ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Introduction C Neumeyer July 26, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3F7XHR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

Beta Testing: The Contractor’s Perspective Trns·port User Group Meeting October 2005.
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Lab 09: Performance Test 1 Advanced Energy Vehicle.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Integration with Interfacing Systems C Neumeyer July 28, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3M3P5Y.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
The shield block is a modular system made up of austenitic steel SS316 LN-IG whose main function is to provide thermal and nuclear shielding of outer components.
Meeting Management Kellogg School 2 October 2002.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
COMP 208/214/215/216 Lecture 2 Teams and Meetings.
Module 1 Session 1.1 Visual 1 Managing the Implementation of Development Projects Course Overview and Introduction.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review PDR Checklist Items C Neumeyer July 28, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3MAZCX.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review INTRODUCTION C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Insert Procurement Event Name Here Procurement Plan Presentation.
DICOM and ISO/TC215 Hidenori Shinoda Charles Parisot.
Process Assessment Method
Project Management Models
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
NCSX NCSX Design Review Guide May 27, 2005 Wayne Reiersen NCSX.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
ITER- TBM Planning and Costing Activity DCLL TBM Mechanical Design ( ) & TBM-Port Interface ( ) Presented by Mo Dagher December
ITPA12 Diagnostics - PPPL - 3/26-30/07 1 US ITER Project Plans David Johnson Diagnostics Team Leader March 26, 2007 ITPA12 Design Basis US Scope Port Plugs.
NSTX Response to the Lessons Learned Report NSTX TF Coil Repair Review September 3-4, 2003 Al von Halle.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
ERCOT Comments TNT Transition Plan Ray Giuliani TAC Meeting October 6, 2005.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
Quality Assurance at CMM Level 2 Copyright, 2000 © Jerzy R. Nawrocki Requirements.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
1 WBS 1 Preparation for FDRs NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting March 17, 2003 What establishes the plan? What are near term deliverables? How will we status.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
©© 2013 SAP AG. All rights reserved. Product Development Scenario Overview Open Legend Project Manager Scenario Description The following business roles.
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
Why do we audit? PSCI Audits are designed to assess a supplier's performance against the PSCI Principles as well as against international standards and.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Scope of PCP Phase 1: Solution Design of Q4 First-of-a-kind prototype QUACO Bid Conference, CERN, 07 th July 2016 Arnaud Foussat, CERN TE MSC-LMF Helene.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
CAD/PAD Development Process
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Co-Sponsors: China, Japan, EU and US 59th Session GRSP May 9-13, 2016
Safety Documentation EHN1
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
COMP 208/214/215/216 Lecture 2 Teams and Meetings.
Product Development Scenario Overview
Before During After Follow-up Resolve Review Pre-review Familiarize
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Engineering Processes
PSS verification and validation
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
CEN/WS XBRL PT kick-off meeting
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Introduction C Neumeyer July 26, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3F7XHR

Outline Scope Objectives Procedure Chits Presentations Context Issues and Resolution Plan Summary July 26-28, 20102ITER_D_3F7XHR

Scope (1) This review covers work scope defined in Task Agreement “Support for Preliminary Design of the ITER In-Vessel Coils”, Task Number C15TD70FU, ITER_D_3CNGUTITER_D_3CNGUT – Advance the design of the IVC toward preliminary design review readiness SRD completion Design drawings complete to PDR level Interfaces defined and documented CDR chits resolved Analysis and R&D at PDR level RH assessment Failure Modes & Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) – Work description Continuation of design development and integration Neutronics/thermal/hydraulic/structural/EM analysis Development of Stainless Steel jacketed Mineral Insulated Conductor (SSMIC) Water erosion studies Coil-feeder joint – welding process development – Bolted feeder joint backup C18150 Copper alloy stress relieving/re-aging studies Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Final Task Report July 26-28, 20103ITER_D_3F7XHR

Scope (2) Scope of task (and this review) includes coils and feeders Scope of task (and this review) does not include: – DC bus bars – power supplies – cooling water systems – I&C However, in some cases (e.g. electrical) it is necessary to develop a concept for out-of-scope items to reach closure on design of in-scope items July 26-28, 20104ITER_D_3F7XHR

Objectives – The review shall assess progress and determine if the IVC design team is on track for a formal PDR in Oct/Nov; – The assessment of progress shall be with respect to the specific areas defined in the Task Agreement; – The determination of the readiness for the PDR shall be based on a comparison against the IO Design Review Procedure, ITER_D_2832CF.ITER_D_2832CF July 26-28, 20105ITER_D_3F7XHR

Procedure – The review will be informal but will be structured according to the framework of the IO Design Review Procedure including participants and roles as follows: Design Approver will approve this agenda and the summary report – Gary Johnson Design Coordinator will coordinate the review and define the objectives – Ed Daly Design Developer will prepare the documentation required for the review and follow-up on action items (chits) – Charles Neumeyer Design Review Secretary will upload documentation and presentations into IDM and will record the minutes of the meeting including the collection of chits and preparation of a chit summary spreadsheet – Skip Schoen Design Review Chairman will be a technically qualified person not directly involved in the development of the design – Doug Loesser – Design Review Panel will be the group of peers on the IVC design team and other key experts July 26-28, 20106ITER_D_3F7XHR

Chits Please submit chits via to Skip Schoen Please include just one issue per chit July 26-28, 20107ITER_D_3F7XHR

Presentations July 26-28, 20108ITER_D_3F7XHR

Context MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNov TA Design point Conductor R&D Contracts Established Phase 1 Design & Analysis 500MCM Sample Tests IDR Prototype Conductor Fabrication Supporting R&D Phase 2 Design & Analysis PDR Final Report July 26-28, 20109ITER_D_3F7XHR

Issues and Resolution Plan Presentations will include summary at conclusion to facilitate objective of PDR feasibility assessment issue IssueResolutionPre/Post October July 26-28, ITER_D_3F7XHR