4-19-99Aggie Aquanauts2 Presentation Layout ( Problem Description and Identification ( Team Architecture and Group Responsibilities ( Technical Presentations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Advertisements

Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
Lesson 13: Aircraft Structures And Flight Controls
Propulsion PDR 1 Team 1 September 21, 2006.
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Team USYD National Aircraft Design-Build-Fly Competition.
Alex Funiciello Dan Graves Mike Hardbarger Jim Reepmeyer Brian Smaszcz May 14, 2010.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
PROPULSION PDR#1 Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review II October 17, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Advisor: Siva Thangam Group Members: Will Gerboth Jon Landis Scott Munro Harold Pahlck.
BATTAGLIA MARIO FACCIO PEDRO SALAZAR ANDRES 2015 SAE Aero Design East Competition Faculty Advisor: Dr. Dulikravich.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
Oklahoma State University Aerospace Capstone Orange Team Final Presentation “Shamu: A Whale of a Plane” April 16, 2001.
Replicating the 1903 Wright Flyer
Brian Martinez Chase Beatty Mohammed Ramadan Noe Caro.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Team 4 “Flying Wind Turbine” Jason Landry Bryan MacDonald Scott Montgomerie Daniel Pollock Robert Ringrose Dr. Dale Retallack Team Members Supervisor.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Student Unmanned Aerial System FAMU/FSU College of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department (1) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department (2)
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Design Chapter 8 Second half. Landing Gear Configuration Tailwheel –PROS simple to make & install added very little weight and drag –CONS complicates.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Team 5 Vehicle Propulsion QDR 2 Presented By: Maria Mullins James Roesch.
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
ES 100 Micro Air Vehicle Project Montgomery College Professor: Dr. Charles Kung Summer I 2012 Team Members: Andrew Joe Laura Mohammed Nathelie Noella Stephanie.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review September 28, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Warm-Up – 9/9 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the two most popular types of fuselage structures?
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
Aircraft Design Process
Conceptual Design Report
Key Performance Characteristics
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
Aerospace System Prototyping and Validation- Lecture 2
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Propulsion QDR 2 Team #3 Presented by: Greg Davidson Etan Karni.
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
Solo-1 ARF Airplane Team 4: Joshua Shawala (Team Leader) Darth Fitch
Cargo Airplane Challenge
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Warm-Up – 1/18 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the two most popular types of fuselage structures?
John Apostol, Chris Grupido, Douglas Klutzke
Presentation transcript:

Aggie Aquanauts2 Presentation Layout ( Problem Description and Identification ( Team Architecture and Group Responsibilities ( Technical Presentations Aero Group - David Jamison and Todd GreggAero Group - David Jamison and Todd Gregg Propulsion Group - Brian ClarkPropulsion Group - Brian Clark Structures Group - Mike BlacetStructures Group - Mike Blacet ( Financial Overview ( Highlight Video ( Questions and Comments

Aggie Aquanauts3 ( Competition Track: ( Contest Restrictions: 100 Feet for Takeoff100 Feet for Takeoff Wing Span Less Than 9 FeetWing Span Less Than 9 Feet Structure Must Withstand 2.5g LoadingStructure Must Withstand 2.5g Loading Must be Propeller Driven by Commercially Available Electric MotorMust be Propeller Driven by Commercially Available Electric Motor Aircraft Take Off Gross Weight May Not Exceed 55 lbs.Aircraft Take Off Gross Weight May Not Exceed 55 lbs. 500 ft. Contest Description and Restrictions

Aggie Aquanauts4 Problem Identification and Strategy Development ( Takeoff Deemed Critical Flight Phase ( How Much Weight Can We Lift? Design SpreadsheetDesign Spreadsheet Power Limit Feedback from the Propulsion GroupPower Limit Feedback from the Propulsion Group ( Selected Heavy Lift per Sortie Strategy Relatively Short Sortie PatternRelatively Short Sortie Pattern Land, Taxi, Unload, Reload, Clear, TakeoffLand, Taxi, Unload, Reload, Clear, Takeoff ( Landing Gear Became a Critical Component Able to Carry and Absorb Impact LoadingAble to Carry and Absorb Impact Loading Reduce Ground TimeReduce Ground Time

Aggie Aquanauts5 Introduction of Group Leaders Chief Engineer - Mark Freeman Aero LeaderPropulsion LeaderStructures Leader David Jamison Scott St. John Mike Blacet

Aggie Aquanauts6 Aerodynamics Group ( Group Members ( Responsibilities Design of the AircraftDesign of the Aircraft –Wing / Airfoil Design and Selection –Control Surface Sizing and Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance in ALL Flight PhasesAircraft Performance in ALL Flight Phases MonokotingMonokoting David JamisonTodd Gregg

Aggie Aquanauts7 Propulsion Group ( Group Members ( Group Responsibilities Selection and Testing of All Propulsive ElementsSelection and Testing of All Propulsive Elements –Motor, Gearbox, Propeller, and Batteries Equipment Maintenance, Break-In, and AdjustmentEquipment Maintenance, Break-In, and Adjustment Scott St. John Brian ClarkPrasad Perera Roshani Jayasekara Mohammed Ali

Aggie Aquanauts8 Structures Group ( Group Members Mike Blacet Tiong Hoe LimWei Kian LimKok Leong ChooKek-Yau Tan Eng Miau ChewEng Sheng NgoiAmanda Myers

Aggie Aquanauts9 Structures Group ( Group Responsibilities Structural Design and AnalysisStructural Design and Analysis Selection of Construction MaterialsSelection of Construction Materials Internal Layout and Component PlacementInternal Layout and Component Placement Preparation of Construction DrawingsPreparation of Construction Drawings Primary Construction GroupPrimary Construction Group

Aerodynamics Presentation: Todd Gregg and David Jamison

Aggie Aquanauts11 Aerodynamics Presentation ( Conceptual Design Conceptual Sketches Conceptual Sketches Rating the DesignsRating the Designs ( Spreadsheet Analysis ( Tail Configurations ( Stability and Control Surface Sizing ( Detailed Design and Refinements

Aggie Aquanauts12 Conceptual Design ( Conceptual Sketches Sketches ( Rating the Designs

Aggie Aquanauts13 Power Required vs. Total Weight Spreadsheet Analysis ( Design Spreadsheet Output Trend: Increase Weight - Increase Required PowerTrend: Increase Weight - Increase Required Power Propulsion Power Approximation ~ 1000 WattsPropulsion Power Approximation ~ 1000 Watts

Aggie Aquanauts14 Tail Configurations ( Sketches ( Rating the Designs

Aggie Aquanauts15 Stability and Control Surface Sizing ( Stability and Control LongitudinalLongitudinal LateralLateral ( Control Surface Sizing ElevatorElevator AileronsAilerons RudderRudder Elevator Rudder

Aggie Aquanauts16 Detail Design and Refinements ( NACA Scoops Provide Cooling Air ForProvide Cooling Air ForBatteries ( Wing Tip Plates Scoop Reduce Vortex Shedding Reduce Vortex Shedding Improve Efficiency of Wing Improve Efficiency of Wing

Aggie Aquanauts17 Detailed Design and Refinements ( Aerodynamically Balanced Rudder Reduce Hinge MomentReduce Hinge Moment Decrease Servo SizeDecrease Servo Size ( Graphic Design and Monokote Good VisibilityGood Visibility AttractiveAttractive

Propulsion Presentation: Brian Clark

Aggie Aquanauts19 Propulsion Presentation ( Introduction Propulsive RestrictionsPropulsive Restrictions Preliminary Analysis and ResearchPreliminary Analysis and Research ( Motor Selection ( Selected Motor’s Characteristics ( Battery Selection ( Propeller Selection ( System Modifications

Aggie Aquanauts20Introduction ( Propulsive Restrictions Propeller Driven by Electric MotorPropeller Driven by Electric Motor Nickel Cadmium Battery Energy SourceNickel Cadmium Battery Energy Source ( Preliminary Analysis and Research Internet and Literature SurveyInternet and Literature Survey Preliminary Trade Studies - ElectricalcPreliminary Trade Studies - Electricalc

Aggie Aquanauts21 Motor Selection ( Initial Target Power Output Watts Design Spreadsheet for Target Weight/Wing AreaDesign Spreadsheet for Target Weight/Wing Area Assume 50% System EfficiencyAssume 50% System Efficiency ( Motor Alternatives Considered Aveox 1817/3YAveox 1817/3Y Astro 90Astro 90

Aggie Aquanauts22 Selected Motor’s Characteristics ( Target Motor Parameters Motor Efficiency vs. Current and VoltageMotor Efficiency vs. Current and Voltage Heat Loss = I 2 RHeat Loss = I 2 R

Aggie Aquanauts23 Battery Selection ( Considerations for Battery Selection WeightWeight Battery EfficiencyBattery Efficiency Amount of Useful Power SuppliedAmount of Useful Power Supplied ( Battery Alternatives Considered Capacitance: 3000 mAh mAh mAh mAh mAhCapacitance: 3000 mAh mAh mAh mAh mAh

Aggie Aquanauts24 Battery Power vs. Weight Selected Capacitance

Aggie Aquanauts25 Battery Efficiency vs. Cell Capacitance Selected Capacity

Aggie Aquanauts26 Propeller Selection ( Propeller Characteristics and Efficiency P/D - Pitch to Diameter ratioP/D - Pitch to Diameter ratio J - Advance Ratio Efficiency vs. Advance Ratio

Aggie Aquanauts27 System Modifications ( Initial Performance Motor Power Input:Motor Power Input: – RPM, Drawing 33 Amps ( Available Solutions Change the amount gear reductionChange the amount gear reduction Increase the propeller diameterIncrease the propeller diameter Advance the timing of the motorAdvance the timing of the motor

Aggie Aquanauts28 System Modifications ( Comparison of various solutions ( Selected Solution Reduced gear ratio from 2.7:1 to 2.3:1Reduced gear ratio from 2.7:1 to 2.3:1 Advanced the motor timing to 15 degreesAdvanced the motor timing to 15 degrees ( Results Motor Power Input:Motor Power Input: – RPM, Drawing 50 Amps

Structures Presentation: Mike Blacet

Aggie Aquanauts30 Structures Presentation ( Introduction Preliminary Analysis and ResearchPreliminary Analysis and Research Structures Group ArchitectureStructures Group Architecture ( Fuselage Design ( Wing Design ( Landing Gear Design

Aggie Aquanauts31Introduction ( Preliminary Analysis and Research Internet and Literature SurveyInternet and Literature Survey Construction, Analysis, and Testing of Kit AirplaneConstruction, Analysis, and Testing of Kit Airplane Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Design AlternativesAnalysis of Trade-Offs Between Design Alternatives ( Structures Group Architecture Fuselage TeamFuselage Team Wing TeamWing Team Landing Gear TeamLanding Gear Team

Aggie Aquanauts32 Fuselage Design ( Longerons SpruceSpruce Carbon FiberCarbon Fiber ( Skins 1/8 in. Balsa Sheet Carbon Fiber

Aggie Aquanauts33 Fuselage Design ( Wingbox LoadingLoading Permanent Attachment to Center Wing SectionPermanent Attachment to Center Wing Section Foam/Carbon Fiber

Aggie Aquanauts34 Wing Design ( Spars Double SparDouble Spar SpruceSpruce Carbon FiberCarbon Fiber ( Shear Webs Foam/Carbon Fiber ( Center Wing Section

Aggie Aquanauts35 Landing Gear ( Critical Component Magnitude of LoadMagnitude of Load Ground HandlingGround Handling ( Main Gear Rectangular Aluminum ShaftRectangular Aluminum Shaft Compression SpringCompression Spring Located in WingLocated in Wing Hard Rubber Wheels with BearingsHard Rubber Wheels with Bearings

Aggie Aquanauts36 Landing Gear ( Nose Gear Circular Aluminum ShaftsCircular Aluminum Shafts Compression SpringCompression Spring Tilted Forward at 7° AngleTilted Forward at 7° Angle SteeringSteering BrakingBraking

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Financial Overview: Mark Freeman

Aggie Aquanauts38 Expenditure Review ( Cost by Category