IAFA/ACCA Seminar University College Dublin 22 November 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Advertisements

Corporate Governance and Administration Conference Jury’s Hotel, Ballsbridge 30 March 2004.
Inquiry, Inspection & investigation, Compounding
1 Insolvency Regulation in Ireland Presentation to IAIR Insolvency Workshop Prague, 7 October 2004 Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement in Ireland.
Institute of Directors in Ireland Conference on Corporate Governance 29 November 2001.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Reports Chapter 3.
Ten most common corporate governance sins And how to avoid them CIMA Dublin & District Branch Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
Discussion on SA-500 – AUDIT EVIDENCE
Presentation to MBS in Accounting Students, Dublin City University 23 October 2012.
The Role & Powers of the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Presentation to the Dublin City University MBA Association Corporate Governance.
The Special Investigations Unit Act Presentation to Ad-hoc Committee on the President’s response to the Public Protector.
An Introduction to Assurance and Financial Statement Auditing
Dublin Chamber of Commerce ‘Bright and Early’ Briefing 24 April 2002 “Your Company and the Law” Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement.
Auditors’ Reports. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved We have audited the accompanying balance sheet.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia by Gay & Simnett Slides prepared by Roger Simnett.
Certification of Accounts. Certification of accounts » Audit Report on Financial (Attest) Audit is about expression of Auditor’s Opinion on the Financial.
Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 [Chapter VI of Finance Act, 2013] Amnesty Scheme – Updated with Department Clarification.
PWC Audit Seminar CityWest Hotel 9 October Issues on the Audit Front Initial Experiences of the ODCE Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement.
Thursday Network Group Seminar, Conrad Hotel, 12 March 2002 “Compliance – Building Business on a Solid Foundation” Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement.
1 driven by knowledge and experience 1 CHARITIES ACT 2009 ELECTORAL ACTS 1997 – 2002 PRESENTATION BY JOE O’MALLEY Partner At OPEN on 29 June 2011.
TCD School of Law Conference on Recent Developments in Regulation and Compliance Trinity College, Dublin 6 May 2006.
Corporate Governance in a Hospital Environment Presentation to Dublin Hospital CEO’s Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
IPA/CIPFA 2003 Conference - Regulation, Audit & Inspection Company Law Regulation – Initial Impacts Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement 16 December.
The ODCE – Setting the standard Presentation to Diploma in Corporate Governance Class Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
Corporate Governance and Administration Conference Jury’s Hotel, Ballsbridge 25 March 2003.
Are you acting as an unpaid banker for your ratepayers? Liquidation and Bankruptcy – the rates collection alternative to sale of land under the LGA.
Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators Annual Conference October 2005.
ICAI Conference ‘Regulation – Achieving the Balance’ 25 November 2005.
Chapter 4: Legal Liability
MBA Association of Ireland Western Chapter ‘Guest Speaker’ Event 10 November 2005.
Public Affairs Ireland Conference Governance, Accountability and Financial Management in the Public Sector in Ireland 10 November 2004.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
CIMA Breakfast Briefing Shelbourne Hotel, Dublin 2 3 November 2004.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 4: Legal Liability.
Governing the Corporation Conference Queen’s University, Belfast 21 September 2004.
Presentation Audit Committee Institute Ireland Conrad Hotel, Dublin 2 7 September 2004.
The Role & Powers of the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Presentation to the Institute of Directors’ Corporate Governance Regulatory Update.
MBA Association of Ireland ‘Guest Speaker’ Event 23 November 2004.
Part Eleven Reporting on Financial Statements 1. 2 Structure of Seminar 1.Standards of Reporting 2.Types of Audit Opinions 3.Other Reporting Considerations.
MSc in Executive Leadership Irish Times Training 17 September 2008.
Cork Chamber of Commmerce Breakfast Briefing 12 December 2002.
The Role & Powers of the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Presentation to the Institute of Incorporated Public Accountants Monday 25 th.
Presentation Irish Venture Capital Association Merrion Hall, Sandymount, Dublin 4 11 May 2004.
S21: Reporting. Audit Reporting » The main objective is to ensure clear and informative reporting to the users of financial statements. » Audit Reports.
Irish Centre for Commercial Law Studies Seminar 5 December 2002.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Insolvency review An ODCE perspective Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
1. Object and Usefulness of Secretarial Audit “Secretarial Audit of a company conducted by a Practising Company Secretary on the same lines as financial.
COMPANIES ACT,2013 section 143 Advocate Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Law Chambers Advocates & Attorneys , New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, New.
McCann Fitzgerald Solicitors Corporate Department Conference 19 September 2003.
THE ROLE OF THE AUDITOR- GENERAL RP MOSAKA Business Executive: Parliamentary Services OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL.
Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators Annual Conference October 2003.
Finance Directors Business Strategy Meeting 2003 Berkeley Court Hotel 18 February 2003.
May 5, 2016 May 5, Reporting obligations for  Investment banks,  Stockbrokers and dealers  FM and Investment advisers 2. Publication financial.
 Statutory declarations on disclosures  Use of proceeds  Independence of Note Trustee  Management Commentary  Signed agreements between issuer.
Irish Centre for Commercial Law Studies Seminar 5 December 2002.
Corporate & Business Law ( ENG). 2 Section H: Governance & Ethical Issues Relating To Business Designed to give you knowledge and application of: H1.
2016 CAIRP Forum OSB Debtor Compliance Program Overview Building a prosperous and innovative Canada.
Financial Management Chapter 1- Introduction to Accounting & Finance Session Number N1.
Roles and Responsibilities of Company Directors
Auditing & Investigations I
Auditing & Investigations II
Roles and Responsibilities of Company Directors
(Auditing & Accounting) Bill, 2003
Auditing & Investigations II
LATIHAN MID SEMINAR AUDIT hiday.
Enforcement under the Companies Act ODCE Update Kevin Prendergast Head of Enforcement, ODCE
OBJECTIVE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Lecture 2.
Presentation transcript:

IAFA/ACCA Seminar University College Dublin 22 November 2003

Initial Experiences in Company Law Investigations and Enforcement Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement

Outline of Presentation Brief Introduction to the ODCE Reporting Obligations of Auditors Public Complaints and Other Information Sources Reporting Obligations of Liquidators Approaches Taken to Investigations Quality of Financial Reporting Concluding Comment

Introduction (1) What is the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement? Remit is focused on the Companies Acts Multi-disciplinary agency comprising administrative, legal, accounting and Garda staff Budget of €3.8 million in 2003

Introduction (2) The ODCE’s Goals Encourage Compliance with Company Law Uncover Suspected Breaches Prosecute Detected Breaches Sanction Improper Conduct in Insolvent Companies Deliver Quality Customer Services

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (1) “ Where, in the course of, and by virtue of, their carrying out an audit of the accounts of the company, information comes into the possession of the auditors of a company that leads them to form the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company or an officer or agent of it has committed an indictable offence under the Companies Acts, the auditors shall, forthwith after having formed it, notify that opinion to the Director and provide the Director with details of the grounds on which they have formed that opinion. ” -S.74(e), Company Law Enforcement Act 2001

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (2) Start Date of Obligation was 28 November 2001 Scope covers about 128 indictable offences ODCE Consultation Paper issued in February 2002 First Auditor Reports received in March 2002 Joint Guidance published in July 2002 by ODCE, CCAB-I and APB Copy available at

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (3) Reports: 400 in 2002; 1,357 in 2003 so far Issues:79% relate to Filing/Directors’ Residence 14% are about Directors’ Loans 5% deal with Failing to hold EGMs 2% relate to Inadequate Books <0.01% concern Unqualified Auditors/ AGM Problems/Disclosure Defaults/Fraud Actions:Filing Offences referred to the CRO Most of the rest are under investigation

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (4) Features of Reporting to date Only 9 of 128 possible offences reported to date Most reports relate to matters disclosable elsewhere –Filing Defaults/Directors’ Residence (on the CRO’s record) –Directors’ Loans (in Notes to Financial Statements) –Failure to hold EGM (Obligation to do so stated in Auditor’s Report) –Failure to keep proper books (in Auditor’s Report)

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (5) Performances/Interpretations by Auditors Reporting improvement after ODCE contacts Differences in approach on non-filing offences, e.g., ‘wilful knowledge’ offences One firm’s reports account for >80% of all reports of one offence Quality of information supplied is variable

Auditors’ Reporting Obligations (6) Overall Views Good Awareness by Auditors of Obligations Uniform Interpretation of Obligations not yet achieved Reporting of Few Offence Types is disappointing Filing Defaults should not be reported to ODCE at all Culture Change in Auditor/Client Relations Positive Impact on Auditor Independence Positive Impact in reinforcing Compliance Message

Public and Other Complaints (1) Public Complaints Reports: 200 in 2002; 270 so far in 2003 Issues: 35% disclose no Company Law Issues 21% relate to Civil Matters/Debt Issues 15% are filing defaults 29% cover a range of issues (e.g., AGMs) Actions:Many closed, others being assessed

Public and Other Complaints (2) Matters of Public Record Tribunal of Inquiry/Inspector Reports Media Disclosures CRO Database Inter-Agency Co-operation Garda Siochana MOUs planned with Revenue, IFSRA, etc.

Public and Other Complaints (3) Overall Views Many Public Complaints are resource-intensive Relevant Complaints disclose real concerns Information-sharing yet to be fully exploited

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (1) “(1) A liquidator of an insolvent company shall, within 6 months after his or her appointment or the commencement of this section, whichever is the later, and at intervals as required by the Director thereafter, provide to the Director a report in the prescribed form. (2) A liquidator of an insolvent company shall, not earlier than 3 months nor later than 5 months (or such later time as the court may allow and advises the Director) after the date on which he or she has provided to the Director a report under subsection (1), apply to the court for the restriction under section 150 of the Act of 1990 of each of the directors of the company, unless the Director has relieved the liquidator of the obligation to make such an application.” - S.56(1) and (2), Company Law Enforcement Act 2001

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (2) What gives rise to restriction? Where the High Court is not satisfied that a director has acted honestly and responsibly in conducting the company’s affairs. What is the effect of restriction? A person may not act, directly or indirectly, as a director, etc., unless the company is adequately capitalised. For a private company, the minimum paid-up share capital sum is €63,487. The equivalent figure for a public company is €317,435. Both must be fully paid for in cash. What is the effect of disqualification? Disqualification involves an absolute ban for five years or more.

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (3) Phased Commencement 1 June 2002: insolvent companies to which a liquidator was newly appointed or was appointed on or after 1 July June 2003: insolvent companies to which a liquidator was appointed on or after 1 January 2000

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (4) Volumes so far Liquidator Reports Cases Determined Full Relief (53%) Partial Relief - 24 (4.5%) Relief at this time - 31 (5.8%) No Relief (35%)

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (5) Character of Liquidator Reports (Sample of 300) recommended restriction. Examples: Continued trading, where there was no reasonable prospect of the company’s survival Failure to keep proper books of account Excessive directors’ loans About 50 of these also suggested serious misconduct, e.g: Fraudulent trading/fraudulent preference Removal of property, etc.

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (6) Initial Impact of Regime Several hundred directors are currently facing restriction proceedings by the liquidator Up to 30% are acquiescing in the restriction A majority of those who defend the proceedings are convincing the Court that they should not be restricted

Liquidators’ Reporting Obligations (7) Overall Views Different Character to Liquidators Reports/Few S.299 Reports Creditors report success – directors investing funds to avoid the restriction process Some evidence also of directors seeking to evade accountability ODCE countering this trend with planned actions against the directors of unliquidated insolvent and ‘struck-off’ companies High Court decisions laying more emphasis on dishonesty than irresponsibility of directors’ conduct

Investigation Approaches (1) Approaches to Investigation Correspondence/Discussions Seeking Original Documents Taking of Statements Non-Legal Outcomes to Investigations File Closure Referral to Other Authorities Warning Letter

Investigation Approaches (2) Warning Letters re Failure to Hold EGMs 700 will issue next week to the directors, auditors and company secretaries of 95 companies Variable Approach planned on Directors’ Loans Last main area for concerted attention Some Individual Issues absorb Time/Resources

Investigation Approaches (3) Legal Powers Used so far Search Warrants 5 10 Bankers’ Books 7 13 Arrests - 7 Detentions - 4

Investigation Approaches (4) Civil Enforcement so far Compliance Orders -10 Disqualifications - 1 Property Seizures - 1 Seeking Information 2 - Judicial Review 1 1

Investigation Approaches (5) Criminal Enforcement so far Convictions: Offences: Failing to Keep Proper Books Falsification of Documents Undischarged Bankrupts Directors’ Loans Unqualified Auditor

Investigation Approaches (6) Pipeline Cases (by type) Directors’ Loans Inadequate Books Falsification of Documents Disqualified Auditors Undischarged Bankrupts Restricted Directors Trading while Dissolved External Companies

Quality of Financial Reporting (1) ODCE Role We enforce the obligations in company law Overall legal standard is a ‘true and fair view’ We depend on company auditors to identify breaches We rely on auditors to help prosecute those breaches We do not police compliance with accounting/auditing standards, but we have met occasional problems

Quality of Financial Reporting (2) Accounts that should be qualified and aren’t “Basis of Opinion …the evidence available to us was limited because the company’s turnover comprises cash sales over which there was no system of control on which we could rely for the purposes of our audit. There were no other satisfactory audit procedures that we could adopt to confirm cash sales were properly recorded. Opinion …In our opinion proper books of account have been kept by the company…”

Quality of Financial Reporting (3) Non-Standard Opinion “In our opinion the financial statements give as true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 st March 2002 as was possible with the books that we received… (There followed a statement of the problem issues and the representations made by the directors.) Subject to the above being accurate, we have obtained all the information and explanations that we consider necessary for the purposes of our audit. In our opinion, there wasn’t proper books of account kept by the Company. However, the financial statements are in agreement with the books of account at present within reason, there are items such as creditors and cash that cannot be pinpointed down, as well as stock…”

Quality of Financial Reporting (4) Inadequate Audit Reports Cases where the failure to ascertain the company’s title to substantial investments attracted a qualified audit opinion one year and no qualification the next Case of insolvent company with no opinion expressed on its “going concern” prospects, notwithstanding a substantial continuing deficit

Quality of Financial Reporting (5) Fundamental Uncertainty/Going Concern Issue Case where a company made a trading loss in 1999 and 2000, had cumulative losses and where its current liabilities exceeded its current assets in each year by over £800K and £1 million. Two months before the company went into liquidation, the auditor reported as follows: “…The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, the validity of which depends upon future funding being available. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that would result from a failure to obtain funding. Our opinion is not qualified in this respect.”

Quality of Financial Reporting (6) Overall Views Audit is a valuable discipline and assurance Satisfied as to the integrity of most accounts/audits Our work has identified some lapses Many examples given now subject to investigation Have/Will relay issues to accountancy bodies Any audit exemption change should be measured ODCE/IAASA co-operation desirable in the future

Concluding Comment (1) Active Compliance Agenda/Enhanced Profile Concluded about 75% of Reports/Complaints About 100 ODCE Cases heading for Court New Insolvency Regime successfully launched Positive Feedback on Customer Services

Concluding Comment (2) Further information on the ODCE and its work is available from Thank You