BICON / HYBRID COMPARISON Performed by members of the TCB Council ANSI C63 SC 1 April 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conducted Immunity IEC
Advertisements

1 Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und Messtechnik Sven Fisahn Cost 286 Workshop onEMC Aspects of Wireless Communications in Transport Systems.
Interface and cabling characterization for SKA Paul van der Merwe Prof. HC Reader Stellenbosch University.
GTEM CABLE EMISSION STUDIES MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY LIMITED JUNE 29 TH 2010 Dr. Zaid Muhi-Eldeen Al-Daher Dr. Angela Nothofer Prof. Christos Christopoulos.
A Proposal for RF Coupling Experiments ANSI C63.19 Working Group Submitted for discussion by Stephen Julstrom February 3, 2008.
Mathematical Models Chapter 2
Technician Licensing Class Supplement T4, Questions Only Amateur Radio Practices 2 Exam Questions, 2 Groups.
1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate Licence Course Carl Thomson G3PEM Slide Set 9: v1.2, 31-May-2009 Antennas & Feeders Chelmsford Amateur.
RTCA DO-160 Section 20 Working Group Billy M. Martin Cessna Aircraft.
5/9/2015TCB Council1 TCB Sharing of FCC KDBs Michael Derby TCB Council Chairman 9 th April 2014.
® 04/29/2002 CISPR 22, Amendment 1 Ferrite Clamps Ghery S. Pettit, NCE Intel Corporation Corporate Product Regulations.
CORRELATION BETWEEN RADIATED IMMUNITY AND COUPLING ATTENUATION
University of Split, FESB Short Term Scientific Mission of COST 286 Beneficiary: Jacek Skrzypczynski, Wroclaw University of Technology Host: Vesna Roje,
COST286 meeting Barcelona 14/15 April BUTE Part 1 Conducted and radiated disturbance regulations for PLC devices János Löcher; György Varjú BUTE.
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Field Strength Measurements Relative to ARRL Concerns Regarding BPL October 16, 2003 Steve Martin Technical Research Branch Federal Communications Commission.
ESTeem Training Class Antenna Fundamentals. Decibels (dB) Used for all mathematical calculations in the radio world. – dB is a logarithmic number dB =10.
Technician License Course Chapter 2 Radio and Electronics Fundamentals
Strategies for the Selection of Substitute Meteorological Data Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 14 th Annual RETS-REMP.
Technician Licensing Class Antennas Section 18. Antennas T9A3 A simple dipole mounted so the conductor is parallel to the Earth's surface is a horizontally.
CPE 169 Digital Design Laboratory Digilent Inc. Nexys Development Board.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD How to List a Test Site.
Investigating EMC policies for the SKA Paul van der Merwe Prof. HC Reader Stellenbosch University.
Copyright 2005 International EMC Standards Activity 1 EMC International Standards Update CISPR SC A and I Activity Don Heirman Don HEIRMAN Consultants.
Lecture 16 In this lecture we will discuss comparisons between theoretical predictions of radiation and actual measurements. The experiments consider simple.
PREPARING FOR AND RUNNING MEETINGS 8.1.  Establish meeting schedule for entire year at first meeting.  Same time on the same day each month?  Sett.
USCEL Third Run EMI Round Robin Roland Gubisch Intertek.
A Critical Look at Standards and Specifications Colin Brench
Senior Project – Electrical Engineering Amateur Radio Repeater Daniel Harkenrider Advisor – Professor James Hedrick Abstract There are a number.
RFI Mitigation for Electronic and Natural SKA Environment Philip Kibet Prof HC Reader Stellenbosch University SKA Postgraduate Bursary and Postdoctoral.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Experimental Method. METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY 1.Experimental Method 2.Observation Method 3.Clinical Method.
Oct. 23, 2006 Midterm Marked. –Average: 73%. 6 below, 9 above –Answer Key posted: s/nten216/Tests/NTEN216_Midterm1WithAns.
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
© Copyright 2002 TEM Consulting, LP - All Rights Reserved Presentation To Portland & Seattle EMCS ChaptersRev – 04/25/02 - HSB Revision of ANSI C63.4 -
NO ACTIVITY C SC1 - Oct 2011 PINS inactive Published 15 December 2009 (Reaffirmation of 1996 edition)
Receive Antenna Performance Comparison. Receive Antenna Monitoring The receive antenna was installed in its permanent location inside the chamber A spectrum.
1 Archiving and Restoring Machine Waypoints 2015.
A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS
Lets Build a Vertical or J-pole
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
1 A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS “VOLTAGE STANDING WAVE RATIOS (VSWR): WHY IT DOES NOT MEAN AS MUCH AS YOU THINK” PRESENTED TO: ARASWF.
FCARC Jan 11,2016. Repeaters FCARC January 11, 2016 Al Woodhull N1AW FCARC operates two repeaters..., one on 2 meters, located at Frizzell Hill in Leyden,
Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB
1 A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS “HOW FAR CAN YOU TALK ON A 2 METER HANDHELD RADIO” PRESENTED TO: ARASWF Naples, FL MARCH 2015.
Doc.: t Submission September 2007 Anthony Maida, 3eTI, Inc.Slide 1 Recommendations for Comments on COAT Section Date: Authors:
Dr.F. Arteche EMC DEPFET Project: A general overview.
Status of TRIUMF Prototype Studies Christopher Hearty University of British Columbia/IPP May 31, 2010.
PXD – DEPFET PS noise emission tests Mateo Iglesias Fernando Arteche.
Antenna Basics.
ACTIVE ANTENNA. 5 INTRODUCTION way of implementing compact broadband antennas. based on the idea that drastically shortening the dipole length of an.
Piero Belforte, CSELT 1999: AEI_EMC_, EMC basics by Flavio Maggioni.
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6)
A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS
ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS Measurement of Radiation Pattern Gain
Guide Strawman Approach 27 April 2017
Anechoic Chamber Horizontal plane dBm at -66o dBm at 0o
Overview Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators
CReSIS Electromagnetic Anechoic Chamber at the University of Kansas
Novel Method to Measure the Gain of UHF Directional Antennas
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Roadmap for the TCB Certification Program
Cancelation of ambient
Recommendations for Comments on COAT Section
Open Rack Specification 2.1 Update
Recommendations for Comments on COAT Section
What is Radiated Emission Limits?
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
Presentation transcript:

BICON / HYBRID COMPARISON Performed by members of the TCB Council ANSI C63 SC 1 April 18, 2012

Description of the Study The purpose of the study is to have members of the TCBC provide more data to further the discussions in SC1 regarding the suitability of hybrid (aka bilog or biconolog) antennas for final compliance measurements. The participants in the study agreed to the following: Perform the measurements as outlined by Zhong in his to C63 of Oct 10, dB attenuators will be used on both bicon and hybrid antennas 2. Every effort will be made to minimize variables. For any configuration (3 or 10m, horizontal or vertical) we only want to know the delta in field strength using a bicon vs. a hybrid antenna. The same test site, attenuator, cable, preamp, connectors, test operator, etc. should be used. 3. Only antennas calibrated to ANSI C63.5:2006 will be used. Those antenna factors are applied to each measurement for the antenna that is being used to determine field strength. 4. Include a brief description the test site e.g. OATS vs Chamber, dimensions of the ground screen or of the chamber (LxWxH), and confirmation that it meets site attenuation requirements. Note that no LPA measurements were discussed. No concerns were expressed about using hybrids above 200 MHz.

Zhong Chen - Procedure We have heard a lot of discussions on whether to allow/disallow hybrid antennas for emissions measurements. Data from different people seems to show conflicting results, and we seem to be at an impasse. I would like to propose a method to “quantify” how much a hybrid antenna does/or doesn’t affect the measurement. I know that is what everyone was trying to do with a reference source (Comb generator or a broadband noise source). But there are a lot of questions with regard to noise floor, and pre-selection etc. I want to propose an alternative method. This requires a couple of NSA-like measurements. 1. First, measure inside the chamber for product testing with a pair of bicons. Set up is h1=1m, h2=1- 4m scan, horizontal polarization (d=3 or 10 m depending on your intended use). The result is the s21 of the two bicons. I will call it S21bb. 2. Keep the transmit bicon antenna intact, and replace the receive antenna with the hybrid antenna you intend to use for the product testing. Repeat the NSA test. The result is between a bicon and a hybrid, referred as S21bh. 3. Compare results from 2 and 1. From step 1, Ebb=S21bb+FSAF_bicon. And From step 2, Ebh=S21bh+FSAF_hybrid. Delta E = Ebh – Ebb (all in dB). 4. Repeat the test for a vertical polarization, e.g. with h1=1 m in vertical pol. The results are the differences a bicon or a hybrid will measure from the same emission source (a bicon in this case). You can use pads on the antennas, but the same must be done in the product testing.

Laboratory Information Lab 1 – 10 meter Chamber Lab 2 – 10 meter Chamber Lab 3 – 10 meter Chamber Lab 4 – 10 meter Chamber Lab 5 – 5 meter Chamber (3 meter test distance) Lab 6 – 3 meter Chamber Lab 7 – 3 meter Chamber Lab 8 – 5 meter Chamber (3 meter test distance) Lab 8 – 10 meter Chamber

3-meter Horizontal

3-meter Vertical

10-meter Horizontal

10-meter Vertical

Hybrid Antenna SWR – No Input Attenuation

Hybrid Antenna SWR – Attenuation Comparison