Prevention and management of household waste in Flanders Helen Versluys, PhD OVAM (Flemish Public Waste Agency) 21.02.2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A review of policy instruments used in the recycling area Workshop on recycling of waste September in Tirana Birgitte Kjær, CRI.
Advertisements

Recycling for the Future – The Dublin Waste Management Plan Mary O’Reilly RPS Consulting Engineers.
Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority Our Aim is Zero Waste Councillor Neil Swannick North West Representative, UK Delegation EU Committee of the.
Landfill solutions in the Netherlands History and strategy of Dutch landfill minimization October 2009 © NVRD Erik de Baedts NVRD Managing Director MWE.
Waste Management and Resource Efficiency
Biodegradable Municipal Waste Management in Europe Gerry Carty The Parliamentary Sustainable Waste Group and Environmental Services Association 28th January.
Household waste management in Flanders
Eurostat UNECE/Eurostat/EEA Workshop on Waste Statistics 4 November 2013 Geneva Karin Blumenthal, European Commission, Eurostat.
Formation of tariff policy of household waste management in Flanders ETT – Kiev, Ukraine Christof Delatter Association of Flemish Cities.
INTEGRATED PLANNING: THE LINKS BETWEEN URBAN WASTE MANAGEMENT, SANITATION AND ENERGY.
The Changing Face of Environmental Legislation: New Policy Directions in the European Union Jeff Vickers (Presenter) Dr Carol Boyle International Centre.
„Business opportunities in waste treatment” Conference -Tel Aviv
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CITY OF COPENHAGEN COPENHAGEN WASTE MANAGEMENT.
Implementation of the Waste Framework Directive
Delft University of Technology Industrial Design Engineering Design for Sustainability Program Eco-Efficiency of Take-Back and Recycling A comprehensive.
Challenges of Resource Efficiency Karolina Fras European Commission – DG Environment 21 October 2009.
EU focus on waste management. European waste management is particularly challenging: environmental protection must be achieved without distroying the.
Waste Management Lesson 3. Learning Goals In this activity you will: Learn the process, benefits, and types of composting; Study the importance of reduce,
Reducing and recovering your waste: a winning strategy for SMEs and Industrial Areas Presentation of White Paper « Sustainable waste management best practice.
Thinking ahead Starter: Is recycling all its cracked up to be? What is better than recycling?
WELCOME TO NACKA MUNICIPALITY! Waste management in Nacka Jenny Andersson, Waste Manager Waste, Water & Sewage Management Department
The 3R’s.
Why Quality Matters Linda Crichton Head of Collections & Quality.
The plastic age Suggest 10 items made of plastics. What are they made of before the invention of plastics? - used as daily products - used as substitutes.
Pay As You Throw – An Incentive Based System Town of West Boylston, MA.
Jean-Jacques Dohogne, ACR+ June 2015 Flanders Towards a prevention, reuse & recycling society?
Rainer Kistler, Senior Advisor Environment, Health & Safety June Antigonish, Nova Scotia The Swiss Army Knife for Waste Management Zeroing In On.
The State of Play with Waste Management in Estonia Margit Rüütelmann Managing Director of EWMA.
Papatheochari Stavroula Environmental Scientist Ecological Recycling Society Zero Waste Systems’ Analysis.
Norwegian Pollution Control Authority
The end of recycling- as we know it (or, the next steps to zero waste) Peter Hunt Chairman WasteCare Group Passionate about recycling On behalf of Lets.
Flemish policy on sustainable public procurement & Case city of Ghent Frederik Claerbout Services for the General Government Policy Government of Flanders.
NEW RULES NEEDED TO GET TO ZERO WASTE R.V. Anthony Richard Anthony Associates, San Diego, California GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference Devens, Massachusetts.
Municipalities, Waste Management and Legislation In Resource Efficiency ISWA World Congress 7-11 October 2013, Vienna Vanya Veras Secretary General.
EPR Gateway to a Circular Economy Forum.
Nitty Gritty Recycling Stillwater Your Home Recycling System Solid Waste Management Hierarchy Recycling & Composting Resources Ilda T. Hershey OSU Coop.
EU waste and resource policies Andreas Versmann European Commission – DG Environment Zero waste – February 2009.
>> Focus on environment Waste management in the Netherlands Vibrant India Day Round Table meeting 22th October 2012 Nijenrode University
Driving Waste Management towards Recycling Estonia’s experience , Kiev TAIEX workshop Peeter Eek Waste Department, Ministry of the Environment.
Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik „System of waste management in Germany – turning waste into benefit (separate collection, recycling, reuse) – outlook.
Solid Domestic Waste By: Laya Bataineh & Yousser Louhaichi.
Workshop on Recycling of Waste Tirana, Albania September 20 – 21, 2011 Tsvetelina Borissova Filipova Senior Project Manager/Lawyer Environmental.
Waste Management in Estonia Margit Rüütelmann Managing Director of EWMA.
Solid and Hazardous Waste. Solid waste : any unwanted or discarded material we produce that is not a liquid or gas. Municipal solid waste (MSW): produced.
Information campaigns and motivational principles in household waste management in Flanders ETT – Kiev, Ukraine Christof Delatter Association.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme National Workshop Serbia Overview Of EU Waste Policy Belgrade, 8 th May 2008 Ruslan Zhechkov, REC
Grant Agreement Reference Number: LLP-ERA-IP-2011-LT-0580 Recycling in Denmark Agenda -Presentation of IP Project „Sustainable Design – Eco Friendly Products“
Workshop on recycling Tirana, September 2011 Waste management in Croatia Jasna Kufrin Head of Waste Department Croatian Environment Agency Teo Čolan.
Environmental Science CH. 24 Notes Solid and Hazardous Wastes.
Separate collection in the city of Gothenburg Henrik Kant,
Municipal waste WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY Martin Kubal
The European WEEE Directive International Seminar on Electronic Waste World Bank – infoDev Eric MUGNIER, Executive director ERNST & YOUNG.
Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Policy 2010 November 2012 Image: worradmu / FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
The EU waste Policy – Latest News Michel SPONAR - European Commission, DG Environment.
Recycling in the IVAR - region Sibiu, november 2009 Tron Ree, Chief engineer IVAR IKS.
TESC 211 The Science of Environmental Sustainability Autumn Quarter 2011 UWT.
Bilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working.
The Annual Report “Italy of recycling”
Waste and WEEE management in Flanders Technical Assistance for the EU-India APSF Environment Component Geel, Christof Delatter Association.
Product Stewardship in Wisconsin
Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority Our Aim is Zero Waste
Used lead batteries ESM, EU legal frame - experience and challenges of the Czech Republic Jaromír MANHART Regional workshop of experts to review Guidelines.
Regional Workshop on e-waste
Strand 2 Chapter 24 Sustainable and responsible living.
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Secondary Wastes Methods of data compilation and the effects on the comparability of results THE CONTRACTOR IS ACTING UNDER A FRAMEWORK CONTRACT CONCLUDED.
Waste Management in Sweden
Challenges of Resource Efficiency
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Presentation transcript:

Prevention and management of household waste in Flanders Helen Versluys, PhD OVAM (Flemish Public Waste Agency)

Helen Versluys 3 Overview  Responsibility for household waste management  Household waste treatment in Flanders  Flemish household waste management according to the waste hierarchy  prevention and re-use  selective collection and recycling  residual waste treatment: incineration and landfilling

Helen Versluys 4 Responsibility for household waste management  Flanders: one of the three Belgian regions  Waste management = regional competence  OVAM is the regional authority responsible for making policy on waste in Flanders  Municipalities are responsible for the collection and treatment of household waste

Helen Versluys 5 Household waste treatment in Flanders

Helen Versluys 6 Prevention and re-use: Flemish initiatives  Re-use centres and shops  99 shops and 33 centres  7.19 kg/inhabitant collected in 2007  almost half of the collected goods are resold  furniture, EEE, toys, clothes, etc.  susidies for re-use centres and shops

Helen Versluys 7 Prevention and re-use: Flemish initiatives (continued)  Home composting  25% of the Flemish households (mainly in rural areas)  5 compost masters per 10,000 inhabitants  communication campaigns, training and household waste charging are crucial

Helen Versluys 8 Prevention and re-use: Flemish initiatives (continued)  ‘Please no publicity’ stickers  Communication campaigns on waste prevention  Financial support for local authorities which launch waste prevention initiatives (e.g. re-usable diapers, drinking fountains, lunch boxes)  Cooperation agreements containing prevention measures between local authorities and the OVAM

Helen Versluys 9 Prevention and re-use: Flemish initiatives (continued)  Promotion of ecodesign  ecodesign awards for students and professionals  ecolizer  Eco-efficiency scan  Green procurement (office supplies and cleaning products)

Helen Versluys 10 Prevention and re-use: future objectives  Increase sustainable production and consumption in absolute and relative terms  more innovation  retail sector offers and sells more sustainable products by 2015  more sustainable products consumed by 2015  central role of the government in sustainable consumption via green public procurement

Helen Versluys 11 Prevention and re-use: future objectives (continued)  Far-reaching decoupling between economic growth and household waste production by 2010  i.e. stabilisation of household waste generation compared to 2000 at 560 kg/inhabitant (150 kg/inhabitant residual waste)  2% prevention (dry fraction) per year  10 kg/inhabitant is collected for re-use and 5 kg/inhabitant is effectively re-used  stabilisation of the number of households and increase in the number of companies participating in selective collection

Helen Versluys 12 Selective collection and recycling  Selective collection schemes to allow for separation at the source  kerbside collection  municipal recycling yards  collection via retailers  Polluter pays principle  household waste charging based on volume or weight  recycling fees  extended producer responsibility  Differentiated tarification  = mixed household waste is more expensive to discard than selectively collected waste

Helen Versluys 13 Selective collection and recycling: kerbside collection  Kerbside collection  mixed waste (charged)  plastic bottles, metal packaging and drinking cartons (€ per 60 l bag)  paper and cardboard (free)  glass bottles (free)  vegetable, fruit and garden waste (charged)  bulky waste (free or charged)  Others  bottle banks (free)  textile containers (free)

Helen Versluys 14 Selective collection and recycling: charges for mixed household waste collection  Bag (60 l): between € 0 and € 2.5  Container (120 l)  taxation per volume: € € 3.76  taxation per weight: € € 0.2/kg  taxation per offer: € € 1

Helen Versluys 15 Selective collection and recycling: correlation between price and amount of waste generated

Helen Versluys 16 Selective collection and recycling: illegal and evasive behaviour  5 to 10 % of the population is responsible for illegal behaviour (dumping, burning waste at home, producing street litter, pollution of selectively offered waste, discarding waste in other municipalities or at the work place, etc.)  75 % of the illegally disposed waste consists of waste without municipal taxation => no link between ‘expensive’ waste bag or container and illegal behaviour  Municipalities need to punish illegal behaviour  ‘Waste tourism’ can be avoided by using the same tariffs in neighbouring municipalities

Helen Versluys 17 Selective collection and recycling: recycling yards  337 recycling yards that collect 50% of the household waste  A wide range of waste streams are separately collected in those yards: construction and demolition waste, cooking oils, batteries and accumulators, polystyrene, WEEE, paper and cardboard, PE foils, metals, fluorescent tubes, light bulbs, wood, green waste, car tyres, bicycle tyres, asbestos, gypsum, bitumen, hazardous waste and non-recyclable combustible wastes

Helen Versluys 18 Selective collection and recycling: collection at retailers  WEEE  batteries and accumulators  pharmaceuticals  car tyres

Helen Versluys 19 Selective collection and recycling: extended producer responsibility  Producers are financially responsible for the collection and treatment of their products once they have become waste  Printed paper, batteries and accumulators, waste pharmaceuticals, end-of-life vehicles, waste tyres, waste electrical and electronic appliances, lighting equipment, waste industrial and cooking oils

Helen Versluys 20

Helen Versluys 21 Selective collection and recycling: future objectives  Limit residual household waste to 150 kg/inhabitant/year for the whole of Flanders  Each individual municipality has less than 180 kg residual waste per year per inhabitant  By % of the household waste is collected selectively for the purpose of re-use and recycling

Helen Versluys 22 Residual waste treatment: landfill ban  It is prohibited to landfill:  unsorted household (and industrial) waste  wastes that were selectively collected for the purpose of recovery  combustible residues from the sorting of household waste (or comparable industrial waste)  waste pharmaceuticals  Motivated derogation possible

Helen Versluys 23 Residual waste treatment: incineration ban  It is prohibited to incinerate:  selectively collected wastes that can be recycled  with the exception of some high calorific wastes for renewable energy purposes  unsorted household waste  (unsorted industrial waste)  Motivated derogation possible

Helen Versluys 24 Residual waste treatment: steering of landfill and incineration costs  ‘Smart’ taxes  make landfilling more expensive than incineration  make (co)incineration more expensive than recycling  steer the market towards the treatment option with the lowest environmental impact  Restrictive permitting policy for landfills increases landfilling costs

Helen Versluys 25 Residual waste treatment: examples of landfilling and incineration costs

Helen Versluys 26 Conclusions  Flanders ‘champion’ with regard to selective collection  Prevention of waste is the main challenge for the coming years

Helen Versluys 27 Conclusions (continued) Lessons from the Flemish experience:  Work on all levels of the waste hierarchy  Source separation of crucial importance  communication campaigns  selective collection schemes  polluter pays principle  Limit residual waste treatment capacity to the minimum  Make landfilling expensive and ban it for as many wastes as possible

Helen Versluys 28 Thank you for your attention Helen Versluys OVAM