Value of information Marko Tainio Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio 21.3.2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Advertisements

Decision Making Under Risk Continued: Bayes’Theorem and Posterior Probabilities MGS Chapter 8 Slides 8c.
Decision Theory.
1 Decision Making A General Overview 10th ed.. 2 Why study decision making? -It is the most fundamental task performed by managers. -It is the underlying.
20- 1 Chapter Twenty McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 18 Statistical Decision Theory Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th.
LECTURE TWELVE Decision-Making UNDER UNCERTAINITY.
Chapter 21 Statistical Decision Theory
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Twenty An Introduction to Decision Making GOALS.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin An Introduction to Decision Making Chapter 20.
DSC 3120 Generalized Modeling Techniques with Applications
Part 3 Probabilistic Decision Models
ISMT 161: Introduction to Operations Management
6 - 1 Lecture 4 Analysis Using Spreadsheets. Five Categories of Spreadsheet Analysis Base-case analysis What-if analysis Breakeven analysis Optimization.
1 Chapter 12 Value of Information. 2 Chapter 12, Value of information Learning Objectives: Probability and Perfect Information The Expected Value of Information.
Chapter 14 Decision Making
Example 7.4 Selecting the Best Marketing Strategy at the Acme Company
Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
BA 452 Lesson C.4 The Value of Information ReadingsReadings Chapter 13 Decision Analysis.
Elements of Decision Problems
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of.
1 Imperfect Information / Utility Scott Matthews Courses: /
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Operations Management Decision-Making Tools Module A
Operational Decision-Making Tools: Decision Analysis
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 16-1 Chapter 16 Decision Making Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Non-parametric Bayesian value of information analysis Aim: To inform the efficient allocation of research resources Objectives: To use all the available.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Opportunity Engineering Harry Larsen The Boeing Company SCEA 2000 Conference.
Forecasting inflation; The Fan Chart CCBS/HKMA May 2004.
“ The one word that makes a good manager – decisiveness.”
An Introduction to Decision Theory (web only)
Portfolio Management Lecture: 26 Course Code: MBF702.
Value of Information Analysis Roger J. Lewis, MD, PhD Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute.
Decision Trees and Influence Diagrams Dr. Ayham Jaaron.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Operations Management, 6E (Heizer & Render) © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J A-1 Operations.
MBAD/F 619: Risk Analysis and Financial Modeling Instructor: Linda Leon Fall 2014
1 1 Slide Decision Theory Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Learning Objectives n Structuring the decision problem and decision trees n Types of decision making.
Chapter 5 Choice Under Uncertainty. Chapter 5Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Describing Risk Preferences Toward Risk Reducing Risk The Demand for Risky.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Advanced Project Management Project Risk Management Ghazala Amin.
Choice under uncertainty Assistant professor Bojan Georgievski PhD 1.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture 12.
Copyright © 2009 Cengage Learning 22.1 Chapter 22 Decision Analysis.
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc Chapter 23 Decision Analysis.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lecture 6 Decision Making.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Decision Theory Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
1 Decision Making A General Overview 10th ed.. 2 Why study decision making? -It is the most fundamental task performed by managers. -It is the underlying.
CAPITAL BUDGETING &FINANCIAL PLANNING. d. Now suppose this project has an investment timing option, since it can be delayed for a year. The cost will.
Fundamentals of Decision Theory Chapter 16 Mausam (Based on slides of someone from NPS, Maria Fasli)
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :葉麗雯 Date : 2005/10/27.
1 Chapter 8 Revising Judgments in the Light of New Information.
Decision Theory Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Money and Banking Lecture 11. Review of the Previous Lecture Application of Present Value Concept Internal Rate of Return Bond Pricing Real Vs Nominal.
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Analysis Using Spreadsheets
Chapter 19 Decision Making
Chapter 11: Project Risk Management
Operations Management
RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL PREVIEW
The Importance of Project Risk Management
Chapter 17 Decision Making
Presentation transcript:

Value of information Marko Tainio Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio

Outline of lecture Aim – To give an overview on what is VOI and in what situation it is useful. Content – What is Value of Information (VOI) analysis? – How to calculate VOI? – How and in what situation you can use VOI?

Different definitions Value of information (VOI) is the amount a decision maker would be willing to pay for information prior to making a decision. – Definition in Wikipedia ( Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is the price that one would be willing to pay in order to gain access to perfect information – 2nd definition in Wikipedia VOI is„a decision analytic technique that explicitly evaluates the benefits of collecting additional information to reduce or eliminate uncertainty” – Yokota and Thompson, 2004

Key elements of VOI Decision maker – VOI analysis is a decision analysis tool aimed to help in decision making Information that contains uncertainty – Originally VOI analysis is used in situation where there is 2 or more available decision options and their outcomes are uncertain For example: Should we vaccinate population or not Price for the information – VOI also assumes that gathering of more information is possible and that this information reduces or eliminates uncertainty!

Calculation of VOI (expected value of perfect information, EVPI)

Equation to calculate EVPI In the equation, s is the uncertain input, and f(s) represents the probability distribution representing prior belief about the likelihood of s. Yokota and Thompson (2004) Expected monetary value (EMV) Expected value given perfect information (EV|PI) EVPI = EV|PI - EMV

Example 1

Example with point values Example from wiki: Suppose you were going to make an investment into only one of three investment vehicles: stock, mutual fund, or certificate of deposit (CD). Further suppose, that the market has a 50% chance of increasing, a 30% chance of staying even, and a 20% chance of decreasing. – If the market increases the stock investment will earn $1500 and the mutual fund will earn $900. – If the market stays even the stock investment will earn $300 and the mutual fund will earn $600. – If the market decreases the stock investment will lose $800 and the mutual fund will lose $200. – The certificate of deposit will earn $500 independent of the market's fluctuation.

Decision tree Stock Mutual fund Certificate $500 (+) 50% (-) 20% (+/-) 30% $1500 $900 $300 $600 -$800 -$200 What are the expectations for each vehicle?

Continuation of example Expectation for each vehicle: – Exp stock = 0.5 * * * ( − 800) = 680 – Exp mutualfund = 0.5 * * * ( − 200) = 590 – Exp certificateofdeposit = 500 The maximum of these expectations is the stock vehicle. Not knowing which direction the market will go (only knowing the probability of the directions), we expect to make the most money with the stock vehicle. Expected monetary value (EMV) = 680

Continuation of example (3/3) On the other hand, consider if we did know ahead of time which way the market would turn. Given the knowledge of the direction of the market we would (potentially) make a different investment vehicle decision. Expectation for maximizing profit given the state of the market: – EV | PI = 0.5 * * * (500) = 1030 That is, given each market direction, we choose the investment vehicle that maximizes the profit. Hence = EVPI = EV|PI –EMV = 1030 – 680 = $350

Example 2

Decision situation Lets assume that you can spend time either in Helsinki or in Kuopio; Only thing you care is temperature (you want to be in warmer place all the time); Lets also assume that every morning you could decide in which city you are (you have magic); What is the value of information for you to know the exact temperature of every day vs. knowing average temperature?

Decision before new information At the moment you know that average temperatures for these cities are: – Helsinki: -15 Celsius (range to -19.3) – Kuopio: -16 Celsius (range to -19.9) Which city you would choose if you care only from temperature and you have this data? In previous equation, this is EMV (Expected monetary value) In next phase we add more data for the decision situation!

Temperature data for January Difference in average temperature is 1 Celsius degree so based on that knowledge you would prefer Helsinki However, Helsinki is not warmer in every day! And since you have magic, you can choose every morning in which city you are! Therefore you might want to calculate in which days Helsinki is warmer and in which days Kuopio is warmer to optimise your decision every morning.

Temperature data for January 9 out of 31 days Kuopio was warmer than Helsinki. If you take the higher temperature for each day and calculate the average temperature, you find out that average temperature was Celsius degree Now, what is the value of information? Before exact data you would have stayed all the time in Helsinki and enjoyed average temperature of -15. With the exact data you can change the city each day to warmer one and experience average temperature of Therefore you gained 0.6 Celsius degree! Thus, the value of information is: 0.6!

How to calculate VOI in Monte Carlo? Calculation of EVPI in Monte Carlo model is done similarly as in previous example with following modifications: - We assume that each iteration is an individual data point; - We consider each iteration as a separate decision and then we maximize the benefit similarly as in temperature example; - The calculation is simple and can be done e.g. with Excel (when the result sample is known).

Different variations of VOI

Expected value of perfect information Expected value of perfect information assumes that uncertainty is reduced to zero Two analyses: – The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) – Expected value of perfect X information (EVPXI) EVPI consider whole model while EVPXI calculates VOI for individual parameter – E.g. the EVPXI can be calculated separately for dose-response function, exposure estimates etc.

Example 1: Which decision option is better, A or B Costs Probability density AB How certain you are that A is better than B?

Example 1: Which decision option is better, A or B Costs Probability density AB How certain you are that A is better than B?

Imperfect information Expected value of imperfect information (EVSI) Expected value of imperfect X information (EVPXI) – Imperfect information assumes that uncertainty can be reduced but not eliminated (example 1 vs. Example 2) Imperfect information is more realistic assumption than perfect information!

Example 2: Which decision option is better, A or B Costs Probability density AB How certain you are that A is better than B?

Example 2: Which decision option is better, A or B Costs Probability density AB How certain you are that A is better than B?

How to use VOI in risk assessment & management?

Requirements for VOI analysis To be able to perform a VOI analysis a modeller needs information on the – (i) available decision options; – (ii) the consequences of each options; – (iii) uncertainties and reliability of the data. In addition to these, both gains and losses of the actions must be qualified with common metrics (monetary or non-monetary).

(i) Decision options Decision options depend on the purpose of the assessment In environmental health field decision options could be e.g.: – Choice between different decision options to reduce emissions of pollutants Who defines the decision options depends on the case – Authorities that ordered assessment, modeller himself, stakeholders etc.

(ii) Consequences of each options This one is the assessment model that you have defined during the assessment We will not go to detailes in this lecture

(iii) uncertainties and reliability of the data In VOI analysis we reduce uncertainty so the assessment should have uncertain parameters Identifying and assessing uncertainties have been considered in other lectures.

Two possible ways of using VOI in assessment 1/2 Guide the information gathering and model building – The decisions can be made based on available information or wait and collect more information – VOI analysis can be used to inform decision maker on the possible benefits of collecting additional information – However, in the field of environmental health and risk assessment, situations, where decision maker is known, the decision maker has possibility to allocate more funding for additional research, and more data can be collected, are rare and this kind of exploitation of VOI analysis is more an exception than rule

Two possible ways of using VOI in assessment 2/2 Guide the process of model building – the decision maker is the modeller him/herself or the research team who makes the decisions of the modelling work – Thus, VOI analysis can be used like sensitivity analysis – The decisions that can be addressed are e.g. (i) should the model define uncertainties (ii) what are the key input parameters or assumptions in the model (iii) which parts of the model should be specified more detailed

Further reading Morgan M.G. and Henrion M. (1998). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analyses. Cambridge University Press. 332 pp. Yokota F. and Thompson K.M. (2004). Value of information literature analysis: A review of applications in health risk management. Medical Decision Making, 24 (3), pp Yokota F. and Thompson K.M. (2004) Value of information analysis in environmental health risk management decisions: Past, present, and future. Risk Analysis, 24 (3), pp