Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Existing & Future Earthquake Information Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena LA Financial Services Sector Regional Recovery Coalition Meeting 17 November.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Seismic sensors and networks: Hawaii Earthquake Preparedness Workshop La Serena, Chile December,
March 25, 2002EarthScope CSIT Workshop Data Archiving and IT Issues for PBO Douglas Neuhauser UC Berkeley Seismological Lab Northern California Earthquake.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Earthquake Early Warning Research and Development in California, USA Hauksson E., Boese M., Heaton T., Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review Craig Weaver David Oppenheimer May 16, 2007.
Brief Overview, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Tom Heaton Caltech Geophysics and Civil Engineering.
August 14, 2006 Seismic Monitoring in the Utah Region — Status and Needs Walter Arabasz.
TIC Working Group E Evolutionary System Architecture Walter Arabasz & David Oppenheimer March 3, 2005.
Structural Monitoring and Evaluation Tools at Caltech: Instrumentation and Real-Time Data Analysis S C Bradford, T H Heaton, J L Beck California Institute.
Progress Report TIC Working Group E Evolutionary System Architecture Walter Arabasz & David Oppenheimer November 19, 2004.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Southern California Seismic Network (USGS/SCSN) Prepared by Gary Cone.
National Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data Build on, expand and further integrate the Engineering Data Center developed under CISN (CGS and USGS)
Victor Wong Ortega Seismology Department Earth Sciences Division - CICESE October 10-11, 2013.
May 25, 2004CSMIP Processing, Shakal et al1 CSMIP Strong Motion Data Processing Anthony Shakal, Moh Huang and Vladimir Graizer California Strong Motion.
U.S. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENGINEERING STRONG MOTION DATA (NCESMD) Hamid Haddadi, Anthony Shakal and Moh Huang California Geological Survey and Woody Savage.
CISN Earthquake Early Warning UC BerkeleyCaltechSCEC/USC U.S. Geological Survey Real-time testing of algorithms statewide Richard Allen, UC Berkeley.
Use of ShakeMap in Emergency Management Loren Turner Caltrans, Division of Research & Innovation.
Ken Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey 22 November 2013
CISN Outreach: Transferring Real-Time Information Products to Users A Report to the CISN Steering and Advisory Committees Sacramento, October 19, 2004.
CISN Outreach: Transferring Real-Time Information Products to Users A Report to the CISN Steering and Advisory Committees Jim Goltz Earthquake and Tsunami.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Tony Shakal – CGS David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park Peggy Hellweg.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee 8 th Meeting Ivan B. DeLoatch, ADC Co-Chair, Sherpa Report on Tasks DA and DI Boulder, Colorado September.
Meeting the ANSS Performance Standards & Future CISN Infrastructure CISN-PMG Egill Hauksson, Caltech Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees.
Federation of Digital Broad-Band Seismograph Networks The FDSN and Sustainable Seismic Networks Tim Ahern FDSN Archive for Continuous Data.
A U.S. Sponsored Observing System of the Global Earth Observing System of Systems  Focus on the Network –Data Management –Products Global Seismographic.
Erol Kalkan, PhD, PE U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Instrumentation of Veteran Administration Medical Centers.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Doug Given – USGS Pasadena Egill Hauksson - Caltech Peggy Hellweg &
Overview of CISN Operations and Products David Oppenheimer USGS Menlo Park, CA.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
ANSS Interaction and NetQuakes Update David Oppenheimer U.S.G.S Menlo Park CISN Steering and Advisory Committees 28 January 2008.
PG&E and CISN: An Earthquake Country Partnership Stu Nishenko CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting October 13, 2010 Sacramento CA.
Napa Earthquake - Results Strong shaking in epicentral area, low-level shaking throughout Bay area Recorded strong motion: 340 ground response stations.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Real-time GPS integration for prototype earthquake.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101.
Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.
CISN Ability to Detect Induced Earthquakes Egill Hauksson & Thomas Goebel, Caltech 10 October 2014.
ANSS and the CISN Organizing, modernizing, and standardizing national, regional and urban earthquake seismic monitoring David Oppenheimer Presented to.
Caltech CE Seminar - Jan. 25, 2007 The November 13, 2008 ShakeOut Exercise (GG’08) Threat to Roadway Lifelines: M w 7.8 on the Southern San Andreas Fault.
California Earthquake Early Warning System (CEEWS) MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
Natural Disaster Reduction and Risk Assessment – Role of USGS Tim Cohn Science Advisor for Hazards U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismic Network Egill Hauksson, Caltech & Doug Given, USGS Pasadena CISN Meeting, Sacramento, 14 December 2011.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Climate Response Network Bill Cunningham Office of Ground Water January 29, 2007 U. S. Geological.
ORFEUS Torild van Eck & Chad Trabant Why is ORFEUS interested in distributed OO computing? Presentation ORFEUS Present status Orfeus Data Center ORFEUS.
Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) Update March 25, 2013 CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting.
An overview of Uganda Seismological Network and current activities
Dr. David Wald United States Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado & Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado Dr. David Wald
Earthquake early warning summit April 4-5, 2011, UC Berkeley Delivering earthquake warnings to the U.S. west coast.
Understanding SEED Headers. SEED is an international standard for the exchange of digital seismological data SEED was designed for use by the earthquake.
ShakeAlert Performance Testing System Overview CISN Testing Center (top right) retrieves a daily earthquake catalog from ANSS Data Center (bottom right)
A “Next-Generation” Seismic Hazards Alert/Analysis Tool for the Modern EOC Disaster Resistant California 2004 Hugo Rico Jr.Margaret Vinci Project CoordinatorMgr.
Earthquake Forecasting and Prediction. Parkfield, CA.
DWR/O&M Earthquake Engineering Section FY2006 Update James D. Agnew, M.S. Senior Seismologist 17 Nov 2005.
USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review
DamageMap Prototype Using Real-time GPS Point Positioning
Margaret Hellweg, Richard Allen, Maren Böse,
California Earthquake Early Warning System (CEEWS)
United States Coast Guard
CISN Steering and Advisory Committees
EPOS – ORFEUS Seismology Workshop Seismic Infrastructure in Spain:
Integrated K12-UNR Seismic Network
Growing importance of metadata for synthetics: Calculating and Sharing Synthetic Seismic Data Dogan Seber University of California, San Diego San Diego.
Earthquake and Tsunami Program Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Presentation transcript:

Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park

What is the CISN? The California Integrated Seismic Network is a collaborative effort to integrate existing, separate California earthquake monitoring networks into a single seismic monitoring system. The CISN provides the organizational framework to coordinate these earthquake-monitoring operations. The CISN constitutes the California region within Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS).

Who is the CISN? Core members have primary responsibility for the recording and monitoring of earthquakes and the creation of CISN products –California Geological Survey –U.C. Berkeley Seismological Laboratory –Caltech Seismological Laboratory –Menlo Park USGS –Pasadena USGS –USGS National Strong Motion Program

Who is the CISN? UC Santa Barbara UC San Diego University of Nevada Reno CA Department of Water Resources Lawrence Livermore National Labs Calpine Cal Energy Lawrence Berkeley National Labs PG&E Plate Boundary Observatory Participating members contribute to CISN activities through data exchange.

CISN Goals Operate a reliable and robust statewide system to record earthquake ground motions over the relevant range of frequencies and shaking levels Distribute information about earthquakes rapidly after their occurrence for emergency response and public information Create an easily accessible archive of California earthquake data for engineering and seismological research, including waveform data and derived products

Brief History 11/2000 – core members sign MOA 2000 – Initial ANSS funding 2001 – Initial State funding 2003 – NC begins adoption of TriNet software 2003 – M6.5 San Simeon 2004 – CISN Display released 2004 – M6.0 Parkfield 2008 – ANSS endorses AQMS software 2008 – CESMD supersedes EDC 2009 – CISN runs common software M7.2 Baja

CISN Funding Total ~$16M

CISN Expenditures Expenditures for California Seismic Monitoring 7% 15% 47% 9% 12% 10% Process improvement new products New/Upgraded stations Operate and maintain stations DataCenters Real-time operations and response Management

Current Software Activities Earthquake Early Warning Metadata management Improved exchange of data with CESMD Station/Quake XML Improved analyst review Statewide ML analysis National support of AQMS

NetQuakes 106 Instruments installed in NC; 50 more to be installed Partnership with EBMUD for 7 dams National support for 135 instruments Siting Plan for 400 instruments in NC

ARRA Upgrades 48 dataloggers by UC Berkeley 8 dataloggers by the NCSN

The SCSN ARRA Project includes upgrades at 178 stations. As of 1 October 2010, we have completed work on more than 93 stations. - Cumulative histogram is shown below - White circles on the map represent stations that have been upgraded -Project completion date is 14 Sept Datalogger & Sensor types Listed above

More info at