Mapping Science Philadelphia, Dec 1-2, 2005 André Skupin Dept. of Geography San Diego State University
Mapping Science premise/promise of geogr., cartogr., GIScience past results current projects future plans
Premise/Promise of Geography, Cartography, GIScience Perspectives on: –Conceptualization discrete objects vs. continuous fields –Metaphors place, region, scale –Methods labeling scale-dependence visualizing change –Technology GIS
Past Results AAG Meeting 1999: Self-Organizing Map + Hierarchical Clustering + Cluster Labeling
Past Results AAG Meeting 1999: SOM + Term Dominance Landscape + K-means Cluster Labeling
Current Projects AbstractMap Problems addressed: –source data –loose coupling –interactivity AbstractMap System AM Manager data input, preprocessing, DB mgmt. AM Viewer interactive exploration, queries AM Analyzer visual domain analysis, incl. temporal
Current Projects AbstractMap AbstractMap Viewer
Current Projects AAG Conference Abstracts
data set –AAG Meetings –# abstracts: 24,000+ –source data: MS Word, PDF spatialization 22,089 abstracts 2,586 terms 100x100 (10,000) neuron SOM 100,000 training runs approx. 1 week on Dual 2.2 GHz Xeon PC
AAG Meeting 1993 – 2002: Term Dominance Landscape
AAG Meeting 1993 – 2002: Term Dom. Landscape + Neuron Label Clusters
NAS Workshop on Uncertainty Visualization: 3 sessions w/ 3-4 speakers + 1 discussant
Current Projects / Future Plans Change Trajectory vs. Change Surface Michael Goodchild (UC Santa Barbara) [’85-’94] minus [’80-’89]
Another Interesting Question What’s “interactivity” anyway?
AAG Abstract Database – Future Work –Tool development and deployment AbstractMap System –AbstractMap Manager –AbstractMap Viewer scalability to large data sets? –Tool application time / geographic space / attribute space –cluster emergence/growth/abandonment –disciplinary evolution –institutional evolution –author trajectories / surfaces –links between conference site and topics integrate across disciplines –map of science