World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Scope of protection of geographical indications PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
International Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Trademarks and Geographical Indications Cynthia Henderson, Attorney-Advisor.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
International Intellectual Property Law
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Alexander Anton Attorney-at-Law German Dairy Association (MIV), Brussels Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Generics in cheeses.
Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Generic Names – Conflict or Coexistence Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June 27 to 29, 2005.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Intellectual Property
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Geographical Indicators Daniel Pick Economic Research Service.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Russian Federation, September 2012 Susan Hainsworth, ITTC.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
EXAMPLES OF TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE  one of the main TBT issue at the moment is labelling (see Tuna report)  brief overview of marks and rules of.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
Current trends in EPA negotiations in relation to IPRs Fleur Claessens.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
Trademarks and Brands The Role of WIPO
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti Istanbul, Turkey May, 2011 Current Situation on Nation Branding Issues in Georgia.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
…around the World Click to edit Master text styles Protecting Geographical Indications... …around the World Click to edit Master text styles Second.
IP Protection under the WTO
Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Economy
Presentation transcript:

World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009 Marcus Höpperger

WHAT DO THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS HAVE IN COMMON?

The Indication “Switzerland”

AND WHAT MAKES THEM DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER? QUALITY?ORIGIN? cheese chocolate knives watches

Geographical Indication In a non-technical sense: an indication that a given product originates in a given place (country, region, town, etc)

Geographical Indications Interrelation between product and origin «Terroir» theory Wine and spirits Cheese, ham and cigars Watches and knives Not owned privately

Direct Reference Cognac Scotch Havana Grappa Porto Champagne Darjeeling

Indirect reference

Acquired Geographical Meaning Muscadet (?) Basmati (?) Vodka (?)

Industrial Property … has as its object … “indications of source” or “appellations of origin” (Article 1(2) PC)

Industrial Property … “shall apply likewise to agricultural industries […] and to natural products, for example wines, grain, tobacco, leaf, fruit, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, beer, flowers and flour”. (Article 1(3) PC)

World Intellectual Property Organization TERMINOLOGY

Indication of Source “Indication referring to a country or to a place situated therein as being the country or place of origin of a product”

MEMBERS OF THE PARIS CONVENTION (173)

Paris Convention Article 1(2) and (3) –Indications of source or appellations of origin –“manufactured or natural products, for example, wines, grain, tobacco leaf, fruit, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, beer, flowers, and flour.” Article 6ter (State emblems) Article 7bis (Collective marks) Article 10 (Indications of source) Article 10bis (Unfair competition)

MADRID AGREEMENT (Indications of Source ) (35)

Appellation of Origin “The geographical name of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality and characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors” (Lisbon)

STATES PARTY TO THE LISBON AGREEMENT (26)

Lisbon Agreement Protection of appellations of origin and their international registration Definition of subject matter Scope of protection 813 registrations in force –of 887 originally registered

Geographical Indication “Indication which identifies a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin” (TRIPS)

The TRIPS Agreement WTO Members (152) Protection of Geographical Indications –TRIPS Article 22 to 24 Negotiations –Article 23.4 –Doha Round

Relationship (i)

Appellation of Origin (Lisbon) Geographical Indication (TRIPS) Indication of Source (Paris) Relationship (ii)

Generic Designation An indication of a place where a given product was originally produced, and which has become the common name of that product. Determination under national law.

National Protection in the absence of any international agreement appreciation in accordance with national law and perception by the local consumers geographical indication may be –distinctive –generic

Types of Protection protection against unfair competition (passing off) Collective or certification marks sui generis protection administrative systems of protection

Unfair Competition Passing Off showing of an acquired reputation likelihood of confusion (misappropriation of reputation) damage

Trademark Law Collective Mark Certification Mark

Collective Mark

Certification Mark

Sui Generis Systems Protected Appellations of Origin –e.g., France Registered Geographical Indications –e.g., EU, Australia, Switzerland

Administrative Systems E.g., U.S. (labeling requirements of BATF for wines and spirits)

Geographical Indications Collective rights No individual owner No assignment Enforcement

International Protection International Treaties: bilateral treaties multilateral treaties

Bilateral International Treaties long tradition (e.g., France since 1895) –exchange of lists with protected g.i. –conditions for protection bind only contracting countries

Multilateral International Treaties Paris Convention (1883) Madrid Agreement (1891) –for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods Lisbon Agreement (1958) –for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration TRIPS Agreement (1994)

The Issue Distinctive signs for collective use –How is the use attributed? –Who has the right to administer attribution? –Can it be monopolized by an individual? Collective use –Who defines conditions of use? –Who looks after it? Quality control? Enforcement?

The Specification Boundaries of use Conditions of use –Raw materials –Processing Control of use Investment Enforcement

The Big Challenge Regulation of collective use at local, national and international levels –Fair and equitable manner –Prior users –Prior rights Enable producers –To trade on emotion –To improve products Important spin-off effects –Gastro tourism, regional identification, preservation of traditional knowledge

GIs - Under Construction WTO (TRIPS Agreement Article 23.4) WTO (Doha Round) WIPO (SCT) WIPO – Lisbon Agreement Codex Alimentarius Commission Bilateral Agreements National Developments Policy choices

World Intellectual Property Organization Thank You!