SDR Transformation Initiative DoD WebSDR DLMS Change Proposals Information Exchange under the DLMS SDR Committee Meeting, Dec 6, 2006

2Discussion DLMS Change Process Relevant Approved DLMS Changes (ADCs) – IUID-related changes discussed separately Coordination of outstanding Proposed DLMS Changes (PDCs) New changes in draft and under development

3 Core Mission Responsibilities Facilitate continuous process improvements to logistics management and operations – Build consensus for business which support the needs of the DoD enterprise – Support the DoD logistics information exchange infrastructure – Publish detailed procedures identifying who does what, when, and how – Delineate organization responsibilities – Establish metrics – Prescribe information exchange formats – Standardize data elements and codes Business Process Transformation & Interoperability

4 DLMS Process Inputs & Outputs OSD Policy Guidance Trading Partner Requirements & SMEs DLMSO SMEs & Technical Expertise DAASC Technical Expertise DLMSO MANAGED TRANSFORMATION PROCESS INPUTS OUTPUTS Structured Collaboration Model Negotiation & Consensus Builders Fully Staffed & Approved Business Rules Business Objects Meta Data Functional Rqmts

5 Process Change Origination DLMSO Process Activation Policy Driven Processes, Business Rules, Objects and Data Agreement Functional Need Mandated Process Owner Driven

6 Process Review Committee (PRC) Chair receives/reviews/updates/ distributes Proposed DLMS Change (PDC) proposal Services/Agencies assess/ review/comment on PDC PRC Chair consolidates Comments/obtains component approval Change Implementation: resource/priority dependent PRC Chair issues implementation package Step 1 PRC Chair negotiates implementation date with Services/Agencies Change Process Prepare XML - X12 mirror image (EDISIM) - Context Inspired Component Architecture (CICA) Step 1 – Submit to X12 Step 2 – Monitor status and promote thru X12 process ANSI coordination Step 1 – Prepare X12 data maintenance (DM) action Step 2 – Submit to X12 Step 3 –Monitor status and promote thru X12 process BTA oversight for Implementation Convention (IC) structural changes Step 1 - Functional Working Groups (FWG) Step 2 - Compliance Check Step Step 3 - Electronic Data Interchange Standards Management Committee (EDISMC) / Federal EDI Standards Management Coordinating Committee (FESMCC)

7 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 144: Documents SDR transaction exchange business rules – Derived from recommendations during SDR IPT Meeting, April 13-14, 2004 Updates Joint Instruction to include DAAS/WebSDR processing and edits Updates Disposition/Reply Codes

8 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 158: Clarifies pre-positioned material receipt (PMR) requirements – Receiving DD required to submit SDR to ICP when new procurement material is received without prior PMR – Other unexpected material receipts, including returns and/or redistributions which are not ICP/IMM directed, and unscheduled returns to/from maintenance, may be reported by prior direction of the owner/manager Z3Distribution Depot Receipt Not Due-In

9 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 181A: Adds clarifying information for submission of FMS SDRs for Quality Deficiencies – Lists substantiating documentation for latent defects – Documents intent to process quality-related SDRs under PQDR procedures

10 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 184: Establishes new type R SDRs (properly routes discrepant Redistribution Order shipments identified at receipt to the DD that shipped the material). – Specific business rules for (1) short shipment, (2) over shipment, (3) wrong material shipment: Action copy to shipping DD Info/Reply to SoS – (4) the receiving depot identifies a DLA unique Q-series discrepancy or suspends the material into J, K, L or Q supply condition codes Action to SoS

11 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 187: Enhances system capability to forward SDRs sent to wrong action activity back through WebSDR to correct action activity – Additional addresses in transaction for distribution – Source of Supply (SoS) inserted at DD for reply – Procedures for Reply Code 504 Triggers new report to correct action activity and notifies submitter –Date forwarded, new action activity, the party forwarding the SDR

12 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 188: Establishes new Quality related discrepancy codes for DD to notify ICP regarding specific quality related issues (receipt & storage) Q11 = Returned or stock screen item, PQDR exhibit deficiency Q22 = New procurement receipt, customer return, redistribution order or stock screen item quality deficiency, contractual noncompliance Q33 = Returned, redistribution order, or stock screened item suspected material deficiency (DLA CRII items only) Q44 = New procurement receipt, customer return, redistribution order or stock screen item contracting deficiency, for specification and/or technical data deficient Q77 = New receipt, customer return, redistribution order or stock screen item identified as a Critical Safety Item (CSI) Q55 = Item under investigation Q66 = Customer return or stock screen item failed under use Q99 = New receipt item received for “First Article Test”

13 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 196: Establishes new rules and WebSDR capability to route SDRs resulting from DLA-directed lateral redistribution of NAMI-owned (AJ2) material to NAMI for initial processing – Phased implementation; programming in progress – Programmatic recognition of LRO under TAV with routing to NAMI

14 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 206: Establishes new discrepancy code for discrepant wood packaging material (WPM) – New code available September 1, 2006 – Report WPM which is not consistent with the international standards for the regulation of WPM transiting international boarders and Department of Agriculture regulations governing importation of regulated WPM. Compliant WPM must display certification marking as prescribed in reference. Use discrepancy code P215 and provide remarks as applicable. P215 Non-conformance to specified requirements for WPM – Corrective actions and options shall be based upon the circumstances of the quarantined/frustrated shipment, value and priority of the shipment, access to the shipment by DOD personnel, and location of the consignee. Alternatives include: (1) inspection, certification, and marking of compliant WPM; (2) replacement of the WPM; (3) consignee pick-up of the material only; (4) return to origin or designated location. Costs for repacking and appropriate disposal of the WPM will be the responsibility of the source of supply.

15 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 207: Establishes new discrepancy codes to identify discrepant hazardous material at receipt or in storage – Effective 1 October, 2006 CONDITION OF MATERIAL C1In a condition other than shown on supply document or on the supporting inspection/test certificate (if hazardous material use code H1) C2Expired shelf life item (if hazardous material use code H5) HAZARDOUS MATERIAL H1Hazardous item in a condition other than shown on supply document or on the supporting inspection/test certificate H3Lack of a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) in Hazardous Material Information Resource System (HMIRS) H4Non-radioactive item classified as radioactive, or non-hazardous item classified as hazardous H5 Expired hazardous shelf life item

16 Related Approved DLMS Changes ADC 210: Enhances web-entry for specific user groups: – Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service (DRMS): Gives DRMS capability to distinguish different types of SDRs, e.g., sales, donations, demil – National Inventory Management Strategy (NIMS): Allows NIMS sites to properly identify their submissions for DD/ICP processing – Non-DSS DD: Allows storage sites to submit type 8, 9, R (depot receipt type) SDRs directly into WebSDR to be routed electronically to the owner/manger/shipper as applicable

17 Related Proposed DLMS Changes PDC 230: Establishes new discrepancy codes for discrepancies related to passive RFID tags – Improper Markings. Prepare a SDR to r eport any omitted, incomplete, illegible, or misplaced markings, packing documentation, or other identification. Report improper identification of containers or items which requires the container to be opened or which results in improper storage of the material regardless of cost. Improper marking includes discrepancies related to passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tags as follows: Report all missing, damaged, or unreadable passive RFID tags when such tags are required by contract provisions, DoD policy, or specified by prior shipment notice/status reflecting passive RFID content. Report duplication of tag identification associated with a previously processed receipt. SDRs may be used to report a tag read which does relate to an advance shipment notification containing passive RFID content when such advance shipment notification is required by contract provisions or DoD policy. P314 Passive RFID tag is missing P315 Passive RFID tag is visibly damaged and unreadable P316 Passive RFID tag is present but unreadable (not visibility damaged) P317 Passive RFID tag read has no corresponding advance shipment notification P318 Passive RFID tag read duplicates previously used tag identification

18 Related Proposed DLMS Changes PDC 231A: Modifies and adds Disposition/Status Codes available for use in SDR replies. Current: 126Stock not available for reshipment. Your requisition has been reinstated and will be placed on backorder. Proposed: 126Stock not available will not be reshipped in response to SDR. 150Your requisition will be reinstated and placed on backorder. 151Replacement/revised disposition/status; prior response is superseded. 932Transaction rejected. Missing or invalid wrong item information.

19 Related Proposed DLMS Changes PDC 240: Creates a trigger to obtain an information copy from DOD WebSDR – WebSDR/DAAS creation/ transmission of information copy SDR in response to an SDR reply reject code sent to DAAS. The reject condition is applicable when the source of supply (SoS) is DLA (Routing Identifier SMS); the Distribution Depot (DD) is the action activity; and DLA cannot process the DD reply due to lack of a record establishing the basic report. If report found in WebSDR database, an information copy will be sent to the organization submitting the reject reply.

20 Related Proposed DLMS Changes DRAFT PDC 176A: Requires mandatory use of four- character packaging discrepancy codes for USAF Material – Implementation options: Applicable to USAF customers Applicable to USAF-directed shipments Applicable DoD-wide to automated SDR submissions

21 Related Proposed DLMS Changes DRAFT PDC 212: DAAS edit to systemically reject SDRs with invalid document numbers back to submitter or submitting system (establishes duplicate criteria) –Requires WebSDR/DAAS to validate the Document number field when it is manually entered into WebSDR or when it is received from another system Standard document number edits Duplicate document number edit – What is a duplicate?

22 Related Proposed DLMS Changes PDC under development for new DLA requirement – Provides a query to identify/measure DLA Customer Interaction Center input on behalf of customer using hard copy or other reporting method.

23 Related Proposed DLMS Changes PDC under development for new USAF requirement – Creation of a drop down menu which would trigger info copy of SDRs to the appropriate Logistics Support Centers (LSC) – Several USAF bases and Forward Supply Locations have cited examples of receiving duplicate shipments or receipts not due-in as a result of shipments directed by one of the RSSs or LSCs. Generally these shipments are connected to MICAPs, and when one does get messed up, the receiving activity submits an SDR via WebSDR to the shipping activity. Generally the shipping activity is another Air Force Base or a depot, and that activity really didn't do anything wrong…it's usually a simple case of the RSS or LSC not running the SPR for the receiving base.