Elements of the Cohort Review Approach Harvey L. Marx, Jr. Lisa Schutzenhofer TB Program Controller TB Program Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOTS/ DOTS PLUS IMPLEMENTATION AND INTEGRATION Vaira Leimane State Centre of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases of Latvia Paris, October, 28.
Advertisements

FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Overview of current case and treatment outcome definitions Malgosia Grzemska TB Operations and Coordination Stop TB Department Consultation Impact of WHO-endorsed.
World Health Organization TB Case Definitions
Module 9 Part A: Monitoring and Evaluation *Image courtesy of: World Lung Foundation.
Development of extensive drug resistance in Multi-Drug resistant tuberculosis patients MSF anti-TB programmes in Abkhazia and Uzbekistan Authors: Cathy.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
Tuberculosis Follow up Care PA Department of Health Role Maxine Kopiec Community Health Nursing Supervisor April 24, 2015.
Developing Tools for the Random Selection Process Brian Baker (Cambridge Systematics) & Mike Redington (US DOT/Volpe Center) 1.
Module 10: Understanding Laboratory Data *Image courtesy of: World Lung Foundation.
An Overview of Tuberculosis Case Management For Nurses.
1 Meeting with Contacts for TB Assessment. Learning Objectives After this session, participants will be able to: 1.Explain why contact assessments are.
CONTACT INVESTIGATION EVALUATING NTIP OBJECTIVES: A CHICAGO EXAMPLE Margarita Reina, MPH Chicago Department of Public Health December 7, 2011.
RNTCP: DOTS Expansion and plans for DOTS-Plus
1 Epidemiology of Pediatric Tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2006 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Outbreak Investigations Branch Division of Tuberculosis.
Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance and Action in an Urban and Rural Setting Kristine Lykens, Ph.D. In collaboration with Anita Kurian, MPH, MBBS Patrick.
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Program.
Monitoring and Evaluation Module 12 – March 2010.
The Cohort Review Process The Cohort Review Process Kim Field RN, MSN WA State DOH Tuberculosis Program.
TB Control Program County of San Diego Challenges: Cross border Continuity of TB Care Response:CureTBUS/Mexico Tuberculosis Referral and Information Program.
Monitoring Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in Brazil through an Innovative Web-based Information System Dr. Luis Gustavo Bastos Management Sciences.
TB 101 Part II Brenda Mayes, R. N. March TREATMENT TB DISEASE MDR XDR LATENT TB INFECTION.
Progress of the Singapore TB Elimination Programme (STEP)
V IRGINIA C OHORT D ATA – 5 YEAR TRENDS AFTER 4 YEARS OF LOCAL COHORT REVIEW Virginia achievement on National TB Indicators for the past 5 years – where.
Orientation on HIV care and ART Recording and Reporting System.
2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 Figure 1. Number of Tuberculosis Cases: California,
Surveillance Data in Action: Tuberculosis Indicators Melissa Ehman, MPH Tuberculosis Control Branch (TBCB) Division of Communicable Disease Control Center.
Pursuing High Value Healthcare Optimizing Laboratory Testing Webinar #6 July 16,
Epidemiologic Studies Consortium Research CTCA meeting October 22, 2010 Lisa Pascopella, PhD, MPH California Department of Health Services.
Preparing for Cohort Review & Standard Forms for Cohort Presentation June 16, 2010 Kieran Hartsough.
NATIONAL TB 2012 INDICATOR ANALYSIS REPORT Presented by: Sandile Ginindza Lugogo Sun Hotel 05 th -7 th June 2013 Ministry of Health NTCP.
Beyond Sputum Cups and Four Drugs The Responsibility of the Practicing Clinician in the Community Control of Tuberculosis V. R. Koppaka, MD, PhD Division.
TB R&R System's strong points
Improving Initial Evaluation for Persons with Class A/B TB Conditions Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Infectious Disease Division.
COHORT REVIEW: Principles and Models The TB Cohort Review Process Manchester, NH June 16, 2010.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
11 Mayview Regional Service Area Plan (MRSAP) Tracking: Supporting Individuals in the Community June 18, 2008.
Number of Tuberculosis Cases: California, Number of Tuberculosis Cases.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Outbreak Investigations Branch Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Epidemiology.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Outbreak Investigations Branch Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Epidemiology.
Weston Outreach Clinic.  GP concern re numbers accessing tx  Patient group/local drug services pressure  Poor attendance Weston patients  Disadvantaged.
Sub module 3 Pre-ART and ART registers. Purpose of registers Key individual information for: Facilitating patient management by the identification of.
Introduction to Contact Investigation Process Amy Schmitt, BSN, RN Public Health Grand Rounds Tuberculosis November 19, 2015.
TB Prevention and Control in Correctional and Detention Facilities Mark Lobato, MD Division of TB Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Predictors of Failure in Timely TB Treatment Completion, United States Carla Winston,PhD TB PEN Focal Point Open Forum June 5,
Figure 1. Number of Tuberculosis Cases: California, Number of Tuberculosis Cases
Condition Add Condition View/Add/Edit Tests (Diagnostics) View/Add/Edit Symptoms View/Add/Edit Background Information View/Add/Edit Treatment View/Add/Edit.
Accident Investigation SGRP CD Slide # Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
 Pharmaceutical Care is a patient-centered, outcomes oriented pharmacy practice that requires the pharmacist to work in concert with the patient and.
Tuberculosis in Children: Treatment and Monitoring Module 10B - March 2010.
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
2018 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
2016 FIT FOR PERFORMANCE Weight Control Program
2017 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Two Groups Face-to-face meeting Remote communication.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
2019 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Effectively Training Parents in Behavior Analytic Interventions
New Hampshire Training Cohort
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Using Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis in California
2016 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
2012 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Monitoring and Evaluation: A Review of Terms
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

Elements of the Cohort Review Approach Harvey L. Marx, Jr. Lisa Schutzenhofer TB Program Controller TB Program Manager

Reasons for Implementation 2005 CDC Cooperative Agreement Increase learning Improve case management at the state and local levels Use cohort review as a tool to conduct program evaluation Improve documentation in clinic records

What is Cohort Review (1) Cohort review is a systematic review of patients with tuberculosis (TB) disease and their contacts. A “cohort” is a group of TB cases identified over a specific period of time, usually 3 months. The cases are reviewed approximately 6 months after they are reported, so that many of the patients have completed or are nearing the end of treatment.

What is Cohort Review (2) TB cases are reviewed in a group setting with the following information presented on each case by the case manager: Patient's demographic information Patient’s status: clinical, lab, radiology Drug regimen, adherence, completion Results of contact investigation Individual outcomes are assessed.

What is Cohort Review (3) Group outcomes are also assessed. Indicators track progress toward national, state, and local program objectives. Everyone leaves the meeting knowing the results.

Cohort Review Process DHSS Public Health Sernior Nurses (PHSNs) continually work with local health agencies (LHAs) to prepare for cohort review sessions LHA staff or CHNs will present cases During session, TB Controller and Program Manager ask questions and provide input

Cohort Review Process Health Program Rep uses TIMS (or other databases) and cohort review forms Health Program Rep presents final analyses of previous cohort of cases and contacts at beginning of session Health Program Rep presents preliminary analyses of cases being reviewed

Roles

Timeline 1 ST QUARTER JAN FEB MAR 2 ND QUARTER APR MAY JUN 3 RD QUARTER JUL AUG SEP 4 TH QUARTER OCT NOV DEC 1 ST QUARTER JAN FEB MAR 2 ND QUARTER APR MAY JUN TB cases identified Treatment started Contact investigation initiated Ongoing treatment of patients with TB disease Contacts evaluated and started on treatment, as necessary TB disease treatment completed Infected contacts continue on treatment for LTBI 1 st quarter contacts complete treatment COHORT REVIEW SESSION Begin follow up on issues identified Continue follow up on issues identified during cohort review session Treatment completion rate presented for contacts of cases from previous 1 st quarter

Timeline Example of a Cohort Review Schedule Quarter Case IdentifiedQuarter Case Reviewed 1 st (Jan-Mar 07) 3rd (Jul-Sep 07) 2 nd (Apr-Jun 07) 4th (Oct-Dec 07) 3 rd (Jul-Sep 07) 1st (Jan-Mar 08) 4 th (Oct-Dec 07) 2nd (Apr-Jun 08)

Essential Elements Cohort Review Process PreparationPresentationFollow up

Essential Elements Cohort Review Process Preparation 1.Shared objectives 2.Case management 3.TB registry 4.Preparation of cases for presentation PresentationFollow up

CDC National Objectives At least 90% of confirmed TB cases will complete treatment within 365 days At least 90% of sputum AFB-smear positive TB cases will have contacts identified At least 95% of contacts to sputum AFB- smear positive TB cases will be evaluated At least 85% of infected contacts who are started on treatment for latent TB infection will complete treatment within 365 days

Example of State Objectives Persons with TB disease will be interviewed within 3 business days of case notification. Contact investigations will be completed within 21 days.

Case Management Every TB disease case and contact in Missouri has an assigned case manager Staff follow written protocols for case management and contact investigation Supervisors communicate periodically with staff to make sure everything is proceeding OK All participate in case review meetings to make sure a complete job is done

TB Registry National (TIMS) or locally developed (.NET)database containing: –General patient information –Medical and treatment history –Contacts info and status Used to generate line listing: –Preliminary cohort list (5 mos. before) –Final cohort list (2 mos. before review)

Preparation of Cases for Presentation Starts when case is identified Improved by –“N visits/consultation” –case management meetings Use standard formats

Essential Elements Cohort Review Process Preparation Presentation 1.Detailed case review 2.Immediate analysis of outcomes Follow up

Detailed Case Review Program Manager asks questions to make sure that: Details are consistent Regimen is appropriate Treatment is completed Contact investigation is thorough

Collect Information Data analysts in this cohort review! Analyze data on outcomes Obtain missing or update incorrect data

Immediate Analysis of Outcomes Patient is cured –Measurable result is completion of Tx –Other outcomes Contact investigation –Measurable results are # of contacts identified, tested, evaluated, started, and completed Tx for LTBI

Cohort Review Indicators Completion index at time of review Completion index without MDRTB cases Completion index including those “Likely to Complete”

Cohort Review Indicators (2) DOT coverage Default rate Death rate Timeliness of interview

Cohort Review Indicators (3) Contact index for pulmonary cases Contact evaluation index % contacts starting treatment Treatment completion index for infected contacts

Of those who had treatment discontinued: Refused to continue treatment Adverse reaction to treatment Lost Moved Died Contacts

Index of Completion If you exclude those who could not complete by today (MDRTB cases) Formula: ____________Completed______________________ # Counted - (# death + # MDR + # Died)

Index of Completion without MDRTB cases Formula: _______Completed_+_Likely to Complete________ # Counted - (# death + # MDR + # Died)

Index of Completion including those who are likely to complete Formula: _____Completed_+_Likely to Complete___ # Counted - (# death + # Died)

Death Rate: (# Died + # Death) # Counted Default Rate: _______________ # Lost_______________ (# Counted - # Died - # Death) Total Cohort Failure Rate ______(# Lost + # Cohort Failures)_______ (# Counted - # Died - # Death)

Essential Elements Cohort Review Process PreparationPresentation Follow up 1. Timely follow up of identified problems

Timely Follow Up of Identified Problems Different items need follow up by: Supervisors, nurses and case managers TB Program Manager Data Analyst

Six Case Presentations Typical Case Likely to Complete Died Completion after 365 Days Source Case Investigation The Global Village

“A Typical Case”

Key Points Contacts with documented history of prior positive TST are evaluated but not re-tested. Use twice weekly DOT when possible

“Likely to Complete”

Key Points Patients likely to complete treatment within 365 days have actual outcomes reviewed at a future presentation Contacts of extra-pulmonary cases not obtained

“Died”

Key Point Despite death of patient, contact investigation still conducted

“Completion after 365 Days”

Key Points Treatment must be completed  365 days of start on  2 anti-TB meds Still responsible for case despite patient moving to another jurisdiction Importance of interstate follow-up

“Source Case Investigation”

Key Point All children have source case/contact investigations conducted

“The Global Village”

Key Points More foreign-born TB patients coming to Missouri to receive treatment Notification of airlines and expanded contact tracing needed sometimes Cases with MDRTB removed from the calculations, as they cannot complete treatment  365 days

Cohort Review Approach Most important meeting of TB program Low tech, can be done by hand Closely linked to CDC objectives Group process Every one leaves meeting knowing results (or soon afterwards) Teaching opportunity Gives TB Program a sense of current issues