Report of co-conveners WG1/WG2 meetings between TP1 and TP2 Group Name: Technical Plenary #2 Source: Omar Elloumi, Alcatel-Lucent, Laurent Laporte, Sprint, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: 7.2

Summary Working Groups 1 and 2 met jointly in the period between TP#1 and TP#2 – Fourteen meetings over eight weeks – Twenty eight hours of meeting time Work aimed at progressing three TRs – Benefits of oneM2M technology – Use Cases: a set of contributions are prepared for further consideration at TP2 WG1 meeting and possible inclusion in the draft TR – Architecture Review: two WG agreed contributions included in the draft TR Discussion around requirements based on several contributions © 2012 oneM2M Partners 2

Detailed report

Interim arrangements for document submission deadline Rationale: need to adapt document submission deadline to fit the tight schedule of the conference calls Document submission deadline is set for Friday 23:59 UTC for the conference calls taking place the week after Co-conveners suggested to utilise the discretion provided in Article 23 of the WPD to suggest that we operate with a slightly modified document contribution deadline until otherwise determined by the co-convened working group and only to apply in the interim period between TP#1 and TP#2. oneM2M-REQ R02: nloadimmediate/default.aspx?docID=296 nloadimmediate/default.aspx?docID=296

Working assumption A working assumption (based on 3GPP TS ) for the use of normative and non normative verbs has been made to allow guiding contributions This working assumption is captured in the following contribution: oneM2M-REQ R01 pp/downloadimmediate/default.aspx?docID=378 pp/downloadimmediate/default.aspx?docID=378 Further guidance will need to be provided by the Steering Committee/Technical Plenary ad-hoc group per decision in Steering Committee meeting #4

Benefits of oneM2M TR “Benefits of oneM2M Technology” was decided to be transferred to the Steering Committee Marketing Group – Several iterations of the document have been presented/discussed. The technical content of this document is well progressed and will be presented at TP#2 for further feedback before a transfer to the SC oneM2M-REQ R09 : ntapp/downloadLatestRevision/?docId=434 ntapp/downloadLatestRevision/?docId=434 – The decision point for this transfer was the use of the words “cost” and “price” in the elucidation of motivating/compelling factors for utilizing oneM2M standards – Participants were uncomfortable with a technical working group utilizing these terms © 2012 oneM2M Partners 6

Use Case TR related contributions Discussed iterations of the following documents : – oneM2M-REQ R06 : Street light automation – oneM2M-REQ R3 : Smart grid – oneM2M-REQ : Home energy management – oneM2M-REQ : Plug-in electric vehicle – oneM2M-REQ : Healthcare gateway All above contributions are proposed for Beijing WG1 further discussion and agreement © 2012 oneM2M Partners 7

Architecture Part I TR Agreed to incorporate the following contributions into an annex of TR as per oneM2M-ARC : – oneM2M-REQ R02: TIA architecture – oneM2M-REQ R01: ETSI architecture Discussed the following document: – oneM2M-REQ R01: security and device management for ETSI architecture – A revision of oneM2M-REQ R01 is expected for Beijing WG2 for further discussion and agreement Discussed oneM2M-ARC R01 which provides status of specification work in the SDOs Participants suggested the need to reassess the timelines for this TR (and possibly other related ones) © 2012 oneM2M Partners 8

Items for Decision TP to a agree to the working assumptions as per oneM2M-REQ R01 umentapp/downloadimmediate/default.aspx? docID=378 until a decision is made by the SC/TP umentapp/downloadimmediate/default.aspx? docID=378 © 2012 oneM2M Partners 9