Educational Benefit Educational Benefit Review Process is a process that will assist in examining & reflecting on the quality of IEP development to increase.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Measurable Annual IEP Goals
IEP SMART Goals to Improve Academics
Module 2: Creating Quality IEPs for Students with ASD
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
Standards-Based IEPs Aligning the IEP and Academic Content Standards to Improve Academic Achievement.
TEKS BASED IEPs PLAAFPS GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Individualized Education Program Present Level of Performance Training (General Education Curriculum) Division of Special Education Compliance Support.
PLAAFP: Activity #1 Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Isabel A review of informal checklist of social/emotional skills,
Clinical Components of The IEP: From Testing to Teaching Integrated Service Center Presented by: IEP Managers.
11 th Grade Michigan Merit Examination 2010 compared to 2012.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
Connections Present levels GoalsServicesLRE Connections Present levels GoalsServicesLRE.
1/12/09Module 6 - Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.1 Module 6: 2 Hours Developing Objectives Aligned to State Standards.
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
Chapter 3: Clinical Teaching SPED 561 1© Witzel, 2009.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Eva M. Kubinski, MS Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 2009 Children Come First Conference November 16, 2009.
Module 3 Differentiating Student Responses to Instruction.
CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN EDUCATION By:Jessica Frisch Laura Cerulli Leigh Hogwood Beth Waltrich SPED 563 ACCOMMODATIONS VERSUS MODIFICATIONS.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
10/8/20151 Focusing on the IEP Process Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
SAMANTHA SAMANTHA Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance A review of speech/language anecdotal log of observations indicate that.
COMPLIANT IEPs: Using Data and the IEP Process to make Appropriate Placement Decisions Cobb County School District DaVida Alston, Lisa Geiger, D’Nena Mock.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Susan Colvin 2011 SMCPS Susan Colvin 11/2011.  How comfortable are you with making modifications for students having difficulties?  What difficulties.
1 Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners Overview of the Individualized Education Program.
Special Education in the Gen Ed Classroom
1 Queens Integrated Service Center Presents Clinical Components of the IEP: Testing to Teaching.
IEP Review Project Presented by: Jennifer Overstreet Amy Fontaine Jen Irazabal Lauren Miano.
Annual Goals Carol Ann Cesark Karen Tedesco CFN 204 Administrators of Special Education.
ACCOMMODATIONS Using Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment in the classroom.
Accommodations and Modification in Grades Do NOT fundamentally alter or lower expectations or standards in instructional level, content, or performance.
Using Assessments to Monitor and Evaluate Student Progress 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
South San Antonio ISD Special Ed Department
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
Modifications and Accommodations – Making it Meaningful Heather Monaghan Special Education Curriculum Specialist Alvin ISD.
1 IEP Case Study: PLEPs, PLOPs, PLAFPs, and IEPs Week 7 and 8 (Combined)
The IEP: Progress Monitoring Process. Session Agenda Definition Rationale Prerequisites The Steps of Progress Monitoring 1.Data Collection –Unpack Existing.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Staten Island Integrated Service Center 1 VERIFY - NEVER LEAVE BLANK VERIFY Prior to writing on this line, contact your school’s Special Education Liaison.
 Participants will leave knowing how to determine if Kurzweil is appropriate for your students.  Participants will begin the discussion of how to.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
More Guidance on PLAAFP and Goals
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Prescriptive Teaching Plan
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Guided Math.
Presentation transcript:

Educational Benefit Educational Benefit Review Process is a process that will assist in examining & reflecting on the quality of IEP development to increase student access to, participation and progress in the general education curriculum by providing an appropriate education. Clarification: A properly written IEP provides the blueprint for teaching. It focuses upon the factors that tend to interfere with student achievement and utilizes students’ strengths to enhance learning. In order to bring this about, the IEP must cohesively link the assessment results to effective teaching strategies.

Educational Benefit: Present Levels of Performance Test Scores This information is recorded within the grid located in the middle of page three of the IEP Standardized and/or informal testing completed within the last year Scores must indicate instructional level or range

Present Levels of Performance Results of evaluations, as expressed in an IEP, must be interpreted and described in language that is understandable by teachers and parents. Do NOT use clinical language on the IEP. Describe the tasks performed Describe the level of performance obtained Describe any relevant specific behaviors observed during testing Project a description of how weaknesses may affect classroom performance; e.g. Student’s weakness in auditory processing interferes with her ability to take useful notes. This projection makes it much easier to select pivotal skills goals! *For a partial list of applicable reading assessment measures see the “Practitioner’s Guide”, Fall 2007, P

Present Levels of Performance Example 1: (Gary is an eighth grader.) On the calculation subtest, Gary demonstrated mastery of addition and subtraction of four digit numbers, with regrouping. He has mastered the 2, 3, 5 and 10 multiplication tables for single digits. He struggles with long division, which affects his ability to solve algebraic equations. Test results show that Gary has trouble with sequential memory. This affects his ability to easily recall basic math facts, and slows down his completion of assignments.

Present Levels of Performance Example 2: On the reading comprehension subtest, on which he was required to provide correct answers to questions related to a passage read silently, Gary demonstrated the ability to comprehend reading material on the fifth grade level. His weakness in organizing information appears to affect comprehension. His teacher reports that Gary struggles to understand content area reading assignments, and he takes a long time to complete tests.

Present Levels of Performance Example 3: Gary’s frustration with his difficulties in reading comprehension interferes with his ability to stay engaged during silent reading assignments in the classroom, and when his peers are responding to teacher questions related to reading material. He often attempts to distract his peers by making jokes, tries to initiate conversation, and looks for reasons to leave his desk. His behaviors escalate when rebuffed by his peers.

Present Levels of Performance Parental and student input helps to identify student strengths, interests and preferences. Example 4: Gary’s parents report that he enjoys building models and helping his father with home maintenance. Gary stated that he likes playing action video games. He says that he learns best when doing things with his hands. Gary says that he wants to learn how to build and fix computers as a possible career.* * This is an example of a transition statement, required on IEPs for students 14 and older. Gary will turn 15 during this school year.

Present Levels of Performance It is important to include information about which teaching and learning strategies have been successful with Gary and which ones have not. Example 5: Teachers report that Gary does not respond well to independent class activities. He does not like to work alone. He operates best during small group activities in which he has opportunities to share information with and learn from his peers.

Academic Management Needs This section appears on the bottom of page three of the IEP, and is critical for cohesively linking assessment results to effective teaching practices on a daily basis. Indicate the instructional modifications and resources to enable the student to succeed, e.g. visual aids learning styles (visual, audio, etc.) graphic organizers / lesson outlines books on tape/peer reader manipulatives calculator (frequent) breaks checklists content area picklists simplify task directions multi-sensory approach hands-on activities preferential seating

Academic Management Needs While remedial programs are underway, a student must have immediate access to curriculum via accommodations and modifications. Example: Gary will be permitted to use a calculator in class when required to solve algebraic equations. He will use a teacher-designed graphic organizer when reading content area text. Gary needs to be located near the teacher during content area reading activities, for prompts and reminders to stay on task. Whenever possible, Gary should have the option to present his completed assignments in alternate modes, agreed upon with the teacher, e.g. models (including digital) and posters. Whenever possible, Gary should participate in a small group for classroom activities. Reduction of task size or extra time allocated to accommodate slow processing in reading comprehension and math.

Matching Present Levels of Performance to Annual Goals All areas of student needs on the IEP page 3, Present Levels of Performance, MUST be addressed on the IEP page 6 Goals.

Audience Poll Annual Goals Which statement is false? A.Annual goals must address the needs of the student as described in the present levels of performance. B.Annual goals should focus on pivotal skills, based on weaknesses described in the present levels of performance. C.All annual goals must be based on 80% criterion of accuracy. D.Annual goals are written in measurable terms that focus on one year of instruction and must be formulated to be achievable by the student.

Annual Goals Goals Address the needs of the student, as stated in the Present Levels of Performance Are written in measurable terms that focus on one year of instruction and must be formulated to be achievable by the student Must be relevant to class activities, and improve classroom performance Based on pivotal skills based on weaknesses described in the Present Levels of Performance Include clear and specific methods of measurement

Annual Goals Annual Goals need to be SMART! S – Specific M – Measurable A – Achievable R – Relevant T – Time related

Annual Goals : SMART! S pecific: Describe what the student will do one year from now that s/he cannot do today. Example: In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions, as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy.

Annual Goals : SMART! M easurable: Describe the criteria to be used to measure successful achievement of the goal. Example: In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy.

Annual Goals : SMART! A chievable: Looking at the student’s present levels of performance, project a goal that is attainable by the student in one year. Example: In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy.

Annual Goals : SMART! R elevant: The goal must be related to class activities and improve classroom performance. Example: In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy.

Annual Goals : SMART! T ime Related: Describe how long the goal will take to achieve, and, when possible, embed the schedule for assessment. Example: In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy.

Annual Goals: Transition Transition should be addressed in the page 3 Present Levels of Performance, on page 6 Annual Goals, and on page 10 Transition for students 14 and older Indicate the student’s needs, preferences and interests, relating to the transition (14 and older) from school to post-secondary outcomes. Example: In one year, Gary will read twenty articles from computer trade magazines, as measured by a poster chart that he will create, referencing the publications and articles, with a brief topic summary relating to each publication. Progress will be assessed quarterly by the teacher’s review of the chart.

Testing Accommodations Testing accommodations are changes made in the administration of the test in order to remove obstacles that are presented by the disability without changing the construct of the test. Not all students with IEPs require test accommodations. The rationale must appear in the Present Levels of Performance. Example: Gary will participate in State and City-wide tests with accommodations: Time and one-half will be permitted on all assessments.* * This aligns with information found in Gary’s Present Levels of Performance (page 3).

Educational Benefit Now let’s see how all of this is linked together, resulting in “Educational Benefit” for Gary, and providing a blueprint for instruction.

Present Levels of Performance Needs & Concerns Annual GoalsAccommodations & Modifications Services & Placement Progress Toward Goals Gary is an 8 th grader Reading comprehension 5 th grade level, slows reading tasks Decoding 8 th grade Mastery of addition and subtraction with regrouping to 4 digits Sequential memory deficits affect recall of math facts for multiplication and division, slows processing of algebraic equations 8th grade math reasoning Likes working with his hands Wants to be a computer builder/technician Reading comprehension 5 th grade level, slows reading tasks Sequential memory deficits affect recall of math facts for multiplication and division, slows processing of algebraic equations Gary tends to attempt to distract classmates when he is facing tasks that he perceives as difficult In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly comprehension tests with 90% accuracy. In one year, given specific memory- increasing strategies and frequent practice with application of the skills, Gary will write all multiplication tables in three consecutive timed weekly quizzes with 100% accuracy. Gary will be permitted to use a calculator in class when required to solve algebraic equations. He will use a teacher- designed graphic organizer when reading content area text. Whenever possible, Gary can have the option to present his completed assignments in alternate modes, agreed upon by the teacher, e.g. models (including digital) and posters. Whenever possible, should participate in a small group for classroom activities. Reduction of task size, or extra time allocated, to accommodate slow processing in reading comprehension and math. Testing: Time and one-half ? Will be noted on page 6 Note how strengths are incorporated into accommodations in order to “push” Gary toward achievement while goals are being implemented.

Present Levels of Performance Needs & Concerns Annual GoalsAccommodations & Modifications Services & Placement Progress Toward Goals Gary works best during small group activities in which he has opportunities to share information with and learn from his peers. Gary tends to attempt to distract classmates when he is facing tasks that he perceives as difficult Gary tends to attempt to distract classmates when he is facing tasks that he perceives as difficult : In one year, Gary will read twenty articles from computer trade magazines, as measured by a poster chart that he will create, referencing the publications and articles, with a brief topic summary relating to each publication. Progress will be assessed quarterly by the teacher’s review of the chart. Given implementation of BIP strategies, Gary will remain on task during reading comprehension class activities as measured by 15 consecutive daily behavior chart recordings of 100% compliance with class rules of conduct. Gary’s behavioral issue is further addressed in the attached FBA Gary needs to be located near the teacher during content area reading activities, for prompts and reminders to stay on task. reasonably calculatededucational benefit Was the student’s program reasonably calculated to result in educational benefit? YES or NO?

Present Levels of Performance Needs & Concerns Goals & ObjectivesAccommodations & Modifications Services & Placement Progress Toward Goals Gary is an 8 th grader Reading comprehension 5 th grade level, slows reading tasks Decoding 8 th grade Mastery of addition and subtraction with regrouping to 4 digits Sequential memory deficits affect recall of math facts for multiplication and division, slows processing of algebraic equations 8th grade math reasoning Likes working with his hands Wants to be a computer builder/technician Reading comprehension 5 th grade level, slows reading tasks Sequential memory deficits affect recall of math facts for multiplication and division, slows processing of algebraic equations Gary tends to attempt to distract classmates when he is facing tasks that he perceives as difficult In one year, using a sequential reading comprehension improvement program, and given a three-paragraph passage written on a sixth grade level, Gary will answer comprehension questions as measured by five consecutive weekly assessments, with 90% accuracy. In one year, given specific memory- increasing strategies and frequent practice with application of the skills, Gary will write all multiplication tables in three consecutive timed weekly quizzes with 100% accuracy. Gary will be permitted to use a calculator in class when required to solve algebraic equations. He will use a teacher- designed graphic organizer when reading content area text. Whenever possible, Gary can have the option to present his completed assignments in alternate modes, agreed upon by the teacher, e.g. models (including digital) and posters. Whenever possible, should participate in a small group for classroom activities. Reduction of task size, or extra time allocated, to accommodate slow processing in reading comprehension and math. Testing: Time and one-half Will be noted on page 6

26 Educational Benefit: Outcome Improving Performance & Academic Achievement Progress toward goals Improved scores on district/statewide assessments/alternative assessment Advancement from grade to grade Progress in the General Education curriculum Transition connection OVERALL: Increased movement toward LRE Staten Island Integrated Service Center (ISC)

27 When reviewing Educational Benefit, consider whether or not it is in the student’s best interest to continue the current mandated related services. Is there justification for removing the student from classroom instruction in order to receive related services? How long (duration, frequency, group size, etc.) has the student been receiving the same related service? Is there another option for the student to receive additional assistance/enrichment in place of the related service - Advisory, CBO, AIS, etc.? Can the student’s need be addressed in the classroom environment without the related service? Educational Benefit: Related Services

Hyperlink Resources Standard Operating Procedures Manual Creating A Quality IEP (IEP Manual) Practitioner’s Guide with Primary Emphasis on Assessing Achievement as Part of an Evaluation for Special Education – fall Testing Test Access and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: Policy and Tools to Guide Decision-Making and Implementation; New York State Education Department; May To access Archived Webcasts at LEARNING TIMES click the link below. Or, click the following link to participate in live webcasts:

Suggested Reading How To Differentiate Instruction In Mixed-Ability Classrooms, Carol Ann Tomlinson Pre-referral Intervention Manual,Stephen B. McCarney Better IEPs, Barbara Bateman From Gobbledygook to Clearly-Written Annual Goals, Barbara Bateman