Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Advertisements

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY COLLEGE Education Council “Your voice on issues relevant to post- secondary education in the Pacific Northwest and the province”
“RAC 101” An Introduction to the AASHTO Research Advisory Committee 26 July 2010.
Faculty Evaluation Policy Why: – Needed to comply with SACS accreditation guidelines – Must comply with UL System requirements – Needed to improve the.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process  Streamline and Simplify it  No Annual Evals in Dossier Years  Electronic Dossier System  Senate Interface.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
5 Sept 2013 Graduate Studies Committee  Overall GSC  Curriculum Sub- Committee: Issues and Directions.
Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.
DEqC Mission The Diversity and Equity Committee (DEqC) utilizes the ombudsperson model, providing a systematic process for faculty to clarify situations.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Being a Successful Graduate Student  As a new graduate student, you are likely wondering:  What is graduate school like?  What should I expect?  Can.
A Presentation to Early Childhood Educators Spring 2010 The Academic Senate + You.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
1 How and Why to Share Governance at a College A Faculty Council of Community Colleges Presentation By Tina Good, FCCC President.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Curriculum Policies Universities should have a policy that enables the creation of new courses and the modification of existing courses in a way that ensures.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Report of the Teagle Group #2 on The Holistic Department Terry Weiner, Facilitator.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report.
FA Awarding of Supervisory Units. Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions.
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
Rachel L. Albert Teacher  Leader  Artist. Assumptions about the Position I understand that the ideal candidate for this position will be responsible.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
School Improvement Process
Faculty Well-Being North Carolina State University March 10, 2009 Committee on Faculty Well-Being.
Company LOGO Revised and Presented by Rob Coffman, CGMP and Patty Barron, CGMP Welcome To the 2015 Chapter Presidents’ Training Minneapolis – April 28,
STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS April
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former UK Personnel System or prior to 2004 in a Community College Grandfathered under Format.
New Faculty Orientation College of Graduate Studies and Graduate Education at Idaho.
COLLEGE PARTNERSHIP COMMITTEE HANDBOOK COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Departmental Actions Teams Panel Discussion
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Faculty mentoring in Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences
Faculty mentoring in Department of Agronomy
Delegation - Department Committees
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Director of Community Engagement, Office of the Provost
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Faculty Assembly Retreat September 19, 2012
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Delegation - Department Committees
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Delegation - Department Committees
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Faculty Evaluation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report

1. Strategic Planning (including a shared mission and vision for the department) [23] The PAC structure with subcommittees designed to give maximum voice for all faculty members. The departmental listserv will also aid in this. The PAC committee will give the chair advice in a more systematic manner.

2. Workload [21] The sub-committee structure will encourage more transparency and equity in teaching and other workload assignments. We recommend that guidelines for workload be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.

3. Need to Establish Shared Values (e.g. programs, direction of the department, professional relationships, etc.) [17] The sub-committee structure is meant to encourage all faculty to determine and affirm our shared values.

4. Clarification of Faculty Roles and Ranks [12] Recognizing that this is an important issue, we recommend that guidelines be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.

4. Clarification of Faculty Roles and Ranks [12]... continued Qualifications for Teaching Specific Courses: general education courses: graduate work in specific course. To teach beyond general education: Ph.D. in area of specialization ABD in specialty area Through scholarship and pedagogy have developed expertise in the area

5. Unprofessional Behavior [11] Issue of unprofessional behavior can be addressed by concerned faculty in the following manner: faculty who feel the need for facilitated conversations with colleagues should contact the Chair or Ansley Barton. We recommend that the sub-committees adopt and follow the “Discussion Guidelines” used by the FLTDiscussion Guidelines

6. Departmental Governance [10] We believe the PAC structure will serve the department well for the immediate future even as we consider its modifications in the next year.

6. Departmental Governance [10]... continued We recommend that PAC select one of its seven coordinators/directors to represent the department on the College Curriculum Committee and to serve as Chair of PAC when curricular issues are discussed. We recommend that we keep the current plan for the T & P committee with the understanding that anyone elected this year might serve only one year.

6. Departmental Governance [10]... continued Procedures for evaluating the PAC model will be developed by PAC in conjunction with the department as a whole and the Chair.

7. Clarification of Performance Expectations for Faculty [9] Recognizing that this is an important issue, we recommend that guidelines be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.

8. Developing Skills to Deal with Change More Effectively [8] No specific recommendation.

9. Low Morale [8] We believe the PAC structure and our development of a up-to-date departmental handbook will address larger departmental concerns, and that clear provisions for addressing individual differences will go a long way toward raising morale.