Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
Introduction to the NCAA Amateurism Clearinghouse.
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
APR Improvement Plans April 2014 Lindsey McDonnell Director of Certification Curriculum National Association for Athletics Compliance.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Educational Session: NCAA Division I Hot Topics Thursday, January 16, :30 to 11:00 A.M.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
DIVISION II LEGISLATIVE AND INTERPRETIVE PROCESSES Amanda Conklin Jennifer Fraser.
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
NCAA DIVISION I ATHLETICS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM. The Purpose of Athletics Certification Athletics certification is meant to ensure the NCAA's fundamental.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Athletics Certification Orientation. Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
History-Higher Education 2004 Office of Campus Police and Security (OCPS) created excellent practices in the prevention of crime.
The Accreditation Adventure Sink, Float, or Swim? Columbia College December 2009.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
CEO SEARCH PROCESS Board Leadership Services Presentation for a National Search for the Next Chancellor of Peralta Community College District, CA.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Athletics Certification Orientation
California Community Colleges
2010 Regional Rules Seminar
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
Interpretations process Kelly Brummett Kris richardson
Senate Meeting Summary
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation

Orientation Overview Program Purpose, Benefits and Objectives Athletics Certification Process Second Cycle Issues Measurable Standards Institutional Plans Technology Available Resources Questions

Origin of Athletics Certification Approved at the 1993 Convention. –Five-year cycle. Second cycle began in –10-year cycle.

Purpose Open up affairs of athletics to university community and public. Set standards, called operating principles, for operation of Division I athletics programs. Establish tough sanctions for failure to conduct a comprehensive self-study or correct problems.

Benefits Self-awareness Affirmation Opportunities to improve

Athletics certification is intended to help an institution identify issues and determine corrective actions. Objective

Committee Philosophy Assist institutions in identifying mechanisms to ensure intercollegiate athletics programs are operating to their fullest potential.

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification

15 members –College presidents –Athletics administrators –Faculty athletics representatives –Conference administrators

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team

Typical team: –Maximum of four members. –Chaired by CEO whenever possible. –Random selection approved by selection subcommittee. –Will not include peer reviewers with potential conflicts of interest.

Peer-Review Team –Verifying ccuracy of the self-study. –Verifying road-based participation. –Evaluating onformity with the operating principles. A B Responsible for: C

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team Steering Committee Self-Study Subcommittees Campus Liaison Chief Report Writer NCAA staff

Athletics Certification Process Step No. 1 Orientation visit and institution begins self-study process Report developed Months 1 – 7 Step No. 2 Peer-reviewers scheduled 6 months out Month 7 Step No. 3 Self-study report submitted via Web 12 weeks before CAC review Step No. 4 NCAA staff liaison reviews report for preliminary issues Months 8 & 9 Step Nos. 5 Full CAC approves issues Months 10 & 11 Step Nos. 6 Peer-review team conducts campus visit and writes report on Web-based system

Athletics Certification Process Step No. 7 PRT report styled at NCAA office Month 11 Step No. 8 PRT report sent to CEO for response on Web-based system Step Nos. 9 CAC deliberates and issues a final decision Month 12 This timeline shortens the process from approximately 24 months to 12 months.

The Certification Decision Two-step process: 2 2 Certification decision. 1 1 Adequacy of the report.

The Certification Decision Materials Reviewed During Deliberations –Self-study report. –Peer-review team report. –Institution’s written reaction to peer-review team’s report.

Certification Categories Certified Certified with Conditions Not Certified

Second Cycle Issues Implementation of required actions and plans from first cycle will be evaluated. Program area checklists will be used to evaluate gender-equity, minority-issues and student-athlete welfare areas. All institutional plans must include all required elements.

Second Cycle Issues Commitment to Equity area has been expanded to be Equity and Student-Athlete Welfare. Additions have been made to Academic Integrity operating principle.

Measurable Standards Clarifies expectations for each operating principle. Brings more consistency to the process.

Plans for Improvement Institutional plans for improvement must: –Be reasonable relative to the institution’s ability to reach prescribed goals. –Bring the institution in conformity with the applicable operating principle.

Plans for Improvement Institutional plans for improvement must: –Ensure that the institution remains in conformity with the applicable operating principle in the future. –Demonstrate the institution’s commitment to the intent of the plan.

Plans for Improvement Institutional plans for improvement must: –Identify all concerns and be developed as needed. –Maintain current level of quality in all programs.

Plans for Improvement Stand-alone and in writing Broad-based campus participation Issues/problems Measurable goals Steps to achieve the goals Specific timetable(s) Individuals/offices responsible for carrying out the specific actions Institutional approval

Technology Athletics Certification Web-based System –Benefits: »Increases efficiency. »Reduces costs. »Adds greater consistency Is ID and password-protected.

Available Resources NCAA staff liaison –Athletics certification link »Handbook (pdf. format) »Self-study instrument (pdf. format) »Frequently asked questions »Peer-reviewer candidate information »Orientation visit materials »Committee on Athletics Certification

Athletics Certification Questions?