Logan Anbinder, Amy Cordell, Gretchen Downey, Kelly Freudenberger, Shabaab Kamal, Nikko Khuc, Josh Lacey, Caitlin Moore, Emmarie Myers, Andrea Schmidt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Widening the Research Pipeline Update to NSF/CISE BPC Evaluation Workshop December 7, 2006.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
How To Impact Your Research: An Overview of Research Support Services Quincy J. Byrdsong, Terri Hagan, and Alice Owens-Gatlin Research Services Consultants.
WSFCS Parent Advisory Committee Meeting: Elementary Gifted Services Overview November 20, 2012.
Strategic Scholarship Coordination at IUPUI Presented to the IUPUI Enrollment Management Group October 28, 2005 Beth Barnette, Director Office of Student.
New Animal Ethics Application Web Form Go Live – 12 December 2012 Research Branch adelaide.edu.au.
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
COURSE PROPOSAL: METHODS IN CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH Primary Instructor: Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, PhD Professor of Biostatistics, Dept. of Public Health.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
BCERC Message Testing Study Kami J. Silk, PhD Department of Communication COTC, Michigan State University.
Roadmap of Responsibilities and Program Timeline Noah Clayton, M.A. Project Manager Office of Research and Economic Development.
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
Happy semester with best wishes from all nursing staff Dr Naiema Gaber
1 Dissertation & Comprehensive Exam Process Dissertation Process Comprehensive Exam.
Presentation on CCELP. For more information: Presented to Bay Area Funders By: Members of.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Building a Peer Mentoring Program For Transfer Students From the Ground Up Presented by Mary Von Kaenel, Associate Director for Transfer Academic Programs.
The Promise of Developmental Summer Bridge Programs Elisabeth Barnett, Thomas Bailey, and the NCPR Team IES Conference June 2010.
A Coach’s Communication Strategy and its Relationship to a Collegiate Player’s Motivation to Perform as an Athlete Dana Neil, Andrea Pendergast, Amy Schmidt,
Support for Writing Grants at UNL  SSP Core Facility  Office of Research February 22, 2008.
Integration of the Family Nurse Practitioner in a School Based Setting
1 Working with Contractors for Indicator 14: Tips and Strategies Capacity Building Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008.
Allen Grundy, M. Ed, Consultant Veterans Educational Resource Centers in Higher Education (CVERCHE) “MILITARY FRIENDLY” OR IS IT?
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
HIDALGO COUNTY ASSET MAPPING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING PROJECT Kickoff Meeting
FAEIS Project User Opinion Survey 2005 Thursday, June 23, 2005 Washington, D.C. H. Dean SutphinYasamin Miller ProfessorDirector, SRI Agriculture & Extension.
The US CLIVAR SSC is undertaking an examination of progress made and priority science questions and research needs remaining to be addressed to: – improve.
“Keeping your money in your pocket, where it belongs.” Chart of Accounts Update Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers - New Clerk Academy March 13, 2014.
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update August 25, 2015 Presenters: Amy Kearney, BA Director, Research and Analysis Team Thomas Miller, MA.
Rate Reform Research and Communications Committee April 7, 2011.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
Davenport University Strategic Planning, Goal Development and Budget Process December 15, 2009.
Effective Decision Making – Part 2. Effective Decision Making Key components: Service Standards (Part 1) Transit Improvement Program (TIPs) Three Year.
0 iNEMI Board and System Manufacturing Test TIG Update Phil Geiger 2008 IEEE Board Test Workshop Sep 08.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
COUNTRY PRESENTATION: INDONESIA COUNTRY PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION OF ALL ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Logan Anbinder, Amy Cordell, Gretchen Downey, Kelly Freudenberger, Shabaab Kamal, Nikko Khuc, Josh Lacey, Caitlin Moore, Emmarie Myers, Sam Roman, Andrea.
Using Evaluation for Continuous Program Improvement: A Conversation with the Accelerating Opportunity Evaluators Lauren Eyster and Maureen Conway National.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Does the Support Personnel Accountability Report Card (SPARC) Make a Difference? California Association of School Counselors (CASC) Presentation March.
VA Indian Health Service BCMA Effort Chris L. Tucker Director, Bar Code Resource Office VHA OIA, Health Informatics.
Approach to Research Papers Pardis Esmaeili, B.S. Valcour Lab Mentoring Toolbox Valcour Lab Mentoring Toolbox2015.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
CII RT204 THEOWNERSROLETHEOWNERSROLE RT 204 The Owner’s Role in Project Success 2005 Jim Vicknair – WorleyParsons.
RTF Subcommittee Meeting RTF Technical Support Needs for Small & Rural Utilities October 27,
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Draft Report Overview: March 20, 2003 Prepared for: Planning Team Meeting Western Regional Air Partnership Presented by: Doug Jeavons — BBC Research &
 Chabot College Accreditation Meeting April 29, :00-1:30 PM Pres Presented by: Jim Mathews Dr. Stacy Thompson.
By Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Objectives At the end of the lecture student should be able to –  Explain types of examination  Discuss different types of.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Caitlin Carpenter Sheri Denning Alan Elmore Patricia Oliver Samarah Shakir.
Region Collegiate Team TF FY13 BOD4 Update Allison Lunde, Chair June 14, 2013.
PRC Author Rights November 2008 Business GfK NOP Author Rights Copyright Project GfK Business.
Hannah Marshall January 2015 Preliminary Findings: A Comparative Study Of User- And Cataloger- Assigned Subject Terms.
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Lessons Learned from a Multi-Year Community-Based Participatory Research Project Lead by Undergraduate Students Rebecca.
Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.
LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Group Projects Pre-Project Kickoff
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee
Presentation transcript:

Logan Anbinder, Amy Cordell, Gretchen Downey, Kelly Freudenberger, Shabaab Kamal, Nikko Khuc, Josh Lacey, Caitlin Moore, Emmarie Myers, Andrea Schmidt Mentor: Dr. Kaci Thompson

Research Questions How does enrichment implementation vary among zoological institutions? What is the impact of instituting a comprehensive enrichment schedule on endocrine measures of stress?

Why?  The primary purposes of zoos are education, conservation, and research. Captive animals are better representations of their wild counterparts when they exhibit natural behaviors.  Felids are especially susceptible to illness and reduced fecundity when subjected to high levels of stress.

Why?  There is variability among zoos in their financial and human resources, and therefore their enrichment programs. A zoo with less resources may not be able to give felids the most effective enrichments. Without enrichment, stress levels increase.

Prediction  We expect to see an initial difference between the patterns of fecal corticoid levels of the felids at a small zoo (Catoctin) vs. those at a zoo with more resources (the National Zoo).  Following implementation of the National Zoo’s enrichment at the Catoctin Zoo, we expect the patterns of fecal corticoids to be comparable between the felids of both zoos.

Methodology Overall comparison and global recommendation Analysis of Catoctin Zoo Implement enrichment at Catoctin Zoo Survey Zoos nationwide Compare hormone levels to enrichment schedules Collect and analyze National Zoo data

Summer 2010  Collected fecal samples from 3 lions and 2 tigers at the National Zoo  Obtained enrichment logs for the felids Type of enrichment Weekly schedule  Modified the methodology Focus on cross-institutional comparison Established contact with Catoctin Zoo

Current Status  Lyophilizing samples at the National Zoo which will be sent to and analyzed at the Smithsonian Biology Conservation Institute.  Drafting a survey to be sent to zoos nationwide regarding common enrichment techniques.

Future Plans  Fall 2010: send out survey by December 18  Spring 2011: - begin analyzing endocrine data - analyze results from the survey starting in March - determine enrichment(s) we will implement at the Catoctin Zoo

Future Plans  Summer 2011: - collect baseline data from the Catoctin felids - implement enrichment at the Catoctin Zoo and collect fecal samples - analyze fecal samples to determine patterns and effects of enrichments

Timeline

Goals  Receive feedback from 75% of survey recipients  Recommend easily implementable enrichment for small zoos  Publish findings in a zoological journal

Challenges  Collaboration with the zoo  Obtaining funding for fecal analysis

Team Roles  Zoo liaisons National Zoo – Logan Catoctin Zoo – Gretchen Front Royal – Caitlin  Financial liaison – Kelly  Team Liaison – Logan  Secretary – Amy  “Enforcer” – Josh  Technology coordinator – Shabaab

Committees  Literature Review Nikko, Andrea, Emmarie  Grants Caitlin, Gretchen, Josh  Editing Amy, Emmarie, Kelly  Survey Josh, Logan, Kelly, Nikko

Advice for Freshmen  Establish communication with collaborators early  Don’t become complacent – your project may change  Start applying for grants early  Be persistent- phone calls are better than s  Implement and enforce team structure

Conclusion  We are in the process of analyzing samples for fecal corticoid levels  We are creating a survey to distribute  We are finalizing our methodology with the Catoctin Zoo