This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing different treatments How can we decide?.
Advertisements

Assessment of the Cooperative Education Program in Relationship to the Program Outcomes of the Undergraduate Nursing and UHM Cooperative Education Programs.
Introduction to Emotional Intelligence
Healthy FE Kathryn James – Programme Development Manager
This outcome report is based on data from clients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry between.
Definitions Patient Experience Patient experience at NUH results from a range of activities that all impact upon patient care, access, safety and outcomes.
User Satisfaction Why? User Satisfaction Surveys are conducted to ensure we receive feedback from our customers in order to gauge.
Individual Treatment Plan Putting Together the Pieces of the Puzzle Gayla Oakley RN, FAACVPR Boone County Health Center Albion Nebraska Presented by Mark.
Living Well with Arthritis: A Self-Management Approach.
Not for Profit Business Association. Community-Based Progression Training Joan McCarthy Programme Development Officer National Learning Network.
Some Problems evaluating large programs or program going in many different directions 1. the objectives are too general; they are really goals many.
Jane Acton nature workshops. Aim 1 ‘to assess and investigate the impact of nature workshops on children’s self esteem, confidence and emotional literacy’
Study on the outcomes of teaching and learning about ‘race’ and racism Kish Bhatti-Sinclair (Division of Social Work Studies) Claire Bailey (Division of.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
This Outcome report is based on data from clients who completed a Pain Management Programme at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry between May.
Sheffield Health Trainer Service 12 th July 2013.
A Presentation by the American Chronic Pain Association
Gayla Oakley RN, FAACVPR Boone County Health Center Albion Nebraska
Second Legislated Review of Community Treatment Orders Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care November 9, 2012.
Oldham Social Services – NVQ Assessment Centre University of Salford – Centre for Social work Research An evaluation of the synthesis of new knowledge.
Support individual health and emotional wellbeing CHCICS303A.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Nancy Doyle C. Psychol. AFBPsS Using Coaching to improve Dyslexia and Dyspraxia in the Workplace.
A Presentation on Emotional Intelligence By E I S A emotional intelligence strategies and applications.
This Outcome report is based on data from patients who completed a Pain Management Programme at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry between November.
National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop
Training transfer from the classroom to the workplace
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Dear User, This presentation has been designed for you by the Hearts and Minds Support Team. It provides a template for presenting the results of the SAFE.
WELCOME TO THE RADIATION THERAPY STUDENTS! IT WILL BE GOOD TO WORK WITH YOU.
Museums and Galleries Education Programme 2 Final Report Centre for Education and Industry University of Warwick.
Outcome Data June Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) Higher score indicates greater difficulty controlling your eating. (lower self-efficacy) The.
Victory Physical EducationCopyright 2005 Physical Education Physical Education Principles of Training Principles of Training.
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
Welfare Reform, the journey A look at Croydon’s welfare reform approach.
Interpersonal Skills 4 detailed studies Health Psychology.
December_2009 Partnership maintenance. December_2009 Partnership maintenance $$ $ $
P2e Driving Performance through Evaluation Richard McMorn PROGRAMMEIMPACTREACTIONREFLECTIONLEARNINGACTION An Impact.
Long-term functional deficiencies of ICU-acquired weakness: a prospective study I Patsaki, G Sidiras, V Gerovasili, A Kouvarakos, E Polimerou, G Mitsiou,
Kerry Cleary An evaluation of the impact of Values Based Interviewing at the OUH Values Based Conversations and wider engagement strategies.
360 Degree Feedback Process Development Planning Session.
Personal Control over Development: Effects on the Perception and Emotional Evaluation of Personal Development in Adulthood.
By Ramona, Tejay, Mitch and Eliza.  Introduction Our health and sport have a great impact on everybody’s daily life. So what if you are disabled or even.
This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry.
INTRODUCTION Emotional distress and sense of burden are experienced by many caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). 1-8 Predicting which.
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment A guide for Parents and Carers Please use the SPACE bar to move this slideshow at your own.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Parents, Caregivers and Youth Information on BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale April 13, 2012.
iPPQ Team Report for Practitioners
This Is The Title Slide Learning from a whole family approach for parents with a mental illness and their children InterAct #GYCConference16 #awaretheycare.
Monitoring & Evaluating WHAT IS MEANT BY MONITORING AND EVALUATING?
Learning & Leisure Services Early Years and Childcare Promoting Attachment through the Solihull Approach.
EVALUATING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: A Guided Tour of Wisconsin’s Comprehensive ADRC Customer Service Evaluation Amy Flowers, Analytic Insight.
Welsh Public Health Conference 2013 October 2013 Carmarthenshire NERS Case Studies.
Managing Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Delivering an outcomes focused cCBT Service Key learnings
Macmillan Next Steps Cancer Rehabilitation
BROOKHAVEN HOSPITAL’S
Formal Feedback about the ‘Bridge’ (Internally collated)
A PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING GROUP FOR STROKE PATIENTS
NIH: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Ron D. Hays Functional Vision and Visual Function November 10, 2016, 8:55-9:15am.
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Meeting the Challenge of Chronic Pain
Tutor Staff Room Tutor Guide can be located here under Tutor/Trainer Course File and Learner Documents.
Friday 6 March 2015 etc. Venues Prospero House Conference Evaluation
Family Learning Future Leadership and Management Programme
Student Tracking of Progress With Special Education Students
South Staffordshire Council
Couple therapy for depression –effectiveness monitoring
Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Romania-Serbia
Clinical Progress Tracker: Plotting progress, measuring outcomes &
Presentation transcript:

This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry between November 2012 and November Pain related disability was reduced on average by 26% from start to completion of the FRP, and these improvements were maintained at a four week follow up. While FRP patients did not present with high levels of emotional distress as expected at the start, further gains were nevertheless achieved - with depression scores reducing by 14% on average and anxiety scores reducing by 11%. Positive outlook scores were improved by 17% on average. On average, functional ability improved by 27% from programme start to programme completion, and improvements of 39% were observed 4 weeks following programme completion, indicating further gains. 80% of patients who completed the FRP rated it as “Excellent” overall and another 20% rated the programme as “Good” overall. No patients rated the programme as “Average” or “Poor”. Most patients verbally reported meaningful positive changes in aspects of their functioning and quality of life Representative sample based on 35 patients

The Roland & Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a widely used health status measure for low back pain, providing self-ratings of the level of physical disability experienced by the patient as a consequence of the pain. Scores on the RMDQ range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating a greater level of pain related disability. Our data shows that for the clients in the Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) there was a significant average reduction of 26% in pain related disability scores between admission and discharge from the programme. Reducing Pain-Related Disability Real Health 2013 The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self –report measure used to assess the extent that back pain affects a patient’s ability to manage everyday life. Total scores are converted to a percentage with 0% representing the highest level of functioning. Scores under 20% are classified as minimal disability while scores of 20-40% are classified as moderate disability. Our clients showed an average reduction in ODI scores of 25% from the start of the FRP to programme completion, indicating a significant reduction in the impact of pain on everyday life.

Real Health 2013 The Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale is an 11-item scale specifically designed to assess mood and emotional outlook in chronic pain patients. The scale consists of three subscales: Depression (5 items), anxiety (3 items) and positive outlook (3 items). Reducing emotional problems As would be expected for patients selected for the Functional Restoration Programme, high levels of emotional distress were not present at the start of the FRP. However, marginal clinical improvements were nevertheless achieved: depression and anxiety scores were reduced by 14% and 11% respectively from start to completion of the FRP.

Reclaiming lost roles Analyses of our qualitative information based on patients’ feedback indicates meaningful improvements to aspects of life functioning. The highlights from the qualitative data are as follows: Most patients reported some improvement in their general well- being. Generally, patients reported increase in activity levels. Better ability to pace was often reported. Patients reported better interactions with other people. Most patients were able to progress goals relating to hobbies/ leisure. Patients reported being more confident of addressing and resolving work-related issues arising from their pain condition. regarding their work capacity Real Health 2013 Improving positive outlook As would be expected for patients selected for the FRP, their own perception of outlook was reasonably positive at the start of the programme. Nevertheless further marginal gains were achieved through the FRP with positive outlook increasing by 17% on average.

Improving functional ability Functional ability measures were taken to assess any improvements in strength, flexibility, co-ordination and self-confidence in activity over the course of the programme. Specific functional ability measures included timed walk, sit to stand, and step ups. These measures were taken at the start of the programme, on completion of the programme, and at a follow up four weeks after programme completion. Walking further Walking distance improved by 24% at the end of the programme with gains being maintained at follow-up, indicating a 21% improvement compared to the start of the programme. Real Health 2013

Climbing stairs There was a 18% average improvement in sit-to-stand ability by the end of the programme and further gains were observed at follow-up, indicating 45% improvement compared to the start. Moving better A 38% average improvement was noted at the end of the programme which had risen to 51% average improvement by follow-up, indicating patients were continuing to build on their gains. Real Health 2013

Rating of the FRP as a whole At the end of the FRP, patients were asked to rate the programme as a whole. The graph below shows that 80% of our patients rated the programme as excellent and 20% rated it as good. No patients out of a total of thirty-five who completed our FRP over the past twelve months rated the programme as average or poor. Real Health 2013

“I have really enjoyed the past two weeks. I have so much to take away with me and I am no longer scared of the future” What our patients have said: “Thank you so much for having me on the course. Really feel it has helped a lot in so many different ways!” “I am now clear on why I need to exercise regularly and the benefits this will bring.” Real Health 2013 “Great team, all singing from the same hymn sheet. Thank you all” “Expectation met above what I was expecting.” “I came with a totally open mind and have come away feeling more positive and confident about my future.” “Beyond expectations.” “I feel the programme has given me a new lease of life.” “Made me think about my lifestyle and has given me the tools to change.” “This programme has given me the confidence to take responsibility for managing my pain and general health so a very big thank you to everyone.” “Delivery was brilliant. Course content was relevant and empowering.” “Thank you all so much for all of your help! I’m a totally different person compared to when I started. Thanks to all at Real Health.”