SE Team Agenda Review work being done by Dwayne –Review Sect 4.4.X for DAG – being processed –SEP Guide – being processed; seen as OK –Technical Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

DOD Parts Management Industry Day May 8, 2007 A discussion of Parts Management policy and implementation proposals.
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Parts Management Reengineering TLCSM Executive Council Update Gregory Saunders, Director Defense Standardization Program Office 05 Oct 06.
1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
EMIS Chapter 6. EMIS Chapter 6 EMIS Chapter 6 Fig 6.2 shows where the SEMP fits into the earliest program stages. Fig 6.5 has an.
Systems Engineering Management
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)
Systems Engineering and Parts Management
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Lecture 2.3: The Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
DoD Parts Management Reengineering Defense Standardization Program Office Industry Day, 8 May 2007 PMRWG Final Report.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies R&M Engineering 08/16/11 Page 1 DTM R&M Engineering.
1 Lecture 5.2a: SEF Ch 8 SE Outputs Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
Parts Standardization & Management Committee (PSMC) Meeting Oct 22, 2007 San Diego, CA Parts Management Reengineering Implementation Process Team (PMRIPT)
“New and Improved” PSMC Systems Engineering Team Out Brief to PSMC 25 Oct 2007.
Refined ECSS Software Process Model Elements SD-TN-AI-0570, Issue 5 APPENDIX D.
Defense Acquisition University Defense Logistics Agency Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Materiel Shortages (DMSMS) Training for the DoD Workforce Mr.
CAPT Joe Spruill Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Logistics) September 29, 2005 Managing Obsolescence within a Performance Based Logistics.
DMSMS Subcommittee Breakout Session PSMC Spring 2007 Conference McLean, Virginia Parts Standardization & Management Committee.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
Learn. Perform. Succeed. LOG 204 Configuration Management Curriculum Review Presented to the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team.
Parts Management Reengineering Implementation Team Major Recommendation: Make Parts Management a Policy and Contractual Requirement. DSPO Consultant.
DoD Parts Management Reengineering Status Briefing Defense Standardization Conference 25 May 2006 Donna McMurry, DSPO.
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Defense Business Systems (CLE077) Sprint November 9, 2015 DRAFT1 Sprint Working Group Toni Freeland Kevin Hamilton Lee Hewitt Tom Hickok Len Nale Bob Ramsey.
Industry Day DoD Parts Management Reengineering LMI McLean, VA May 8, 2007 Parts Standardization and Management Committee (PSMC )
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
1 Systems Engineering Initiatives 26 June 2007 Dr. Don Gelosh Sr. Systems Engineering Consultant OSD(AT&L)/SSE/ED.
1 Overview of SAE’s AS6500 “Manufacturing Management Program” David Karr Technical Advisor for Mfg/QA AFLCMC/EZSM
LOG204 (DL) Configuration Management Bruce Hatlem Logistics Functional IPT June 26, 2007.
Integration of DTM “Reliability Planning, Analysis, Tracking and Reporting” into LOG 103 and other DAU Life Cycle Logistics Learning Assets.
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Supportability Design Considerations
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
DMSMS Management at NAVICP
DAG Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Design Considerations
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
LOGISTICS ACQUISITION, AN EMPHASIS ON PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE
DAU Hot Topics Forum February 15, 2017
Production Considerations
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
PMRIPT Portal Team.
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
DAU Hot Topics Forum February 15, 2017
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Systems Engineering Team
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Relationship between MRLs and AS6500
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DMSMS Management at NAVICP
EMIS 7307 Chapter 6.
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
POLICY, CONTRACTING, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, and EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE SUMMARY PSMC Meeting April 20 – 23, 2010 LMI, McLean, VA.
PSS verification and validation
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

SE Team Agenda Review work being done by Dwayne –Review Sect 4.4.X for DAG – being processed –SEP Guide – being processed; seen as OK –Technical Reviews Checklists PDR & CDR recommended; adequate or not? Additions? –Injection of “reliability” as rationale for parts management is universal recommendation Help Contracting Team with MIL-STD-PARTS and issuance of Policy Letter Discuss Exit Strategy with entire PMR IPT

Guidance Policy Elements of SE Policy, Guidance, E&T and Assessment DoDD DoDI DAG (Ch 4) Supplemental Guides (select topics e.g., SEP, risk, SoS) Related Industry Standards E&T resources Assessment Tech Review Checklist DAPS SPRDE Courses CLE CLMs Parts Management SD-19 DoDI MIL-STD-PARTSMGMT DI-SDMP-80526E ?? Key Key SE docs To add Parts Mgt content

4.4.Systems Engineering Decisions: Important Design Considerations 4.4.xx.Parts Management Parts management is a design strategy that seeks to reduce the number of unique or specialized parts used in a system (or across systems) in order to reduce the logistic footprint and lower total life cycle costs. In addition, it also may aid in mitigating parts obsolescence due to diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages (DMSMS). Parts management is an important design consideration and should be used whenever parts are not defined based on open systems design interfaces or Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) items, as described in sections and , respectively. A part is one piece, or two or more pieces joined together, which is not normally subject to disassembly without destruction or impairment of intended design use. A part is the lowest configuration item of the system design that would be implemented and verified. Parts are defined in performance-based terms by their form, fit, function and interfaces. The parts management strategy should cover the entire life cycle of a system and be based on the fundamental systems engineering processes described in sections and The parts management strategy should also be evaluated at the technical reviews described in section 4.3., in particular the Preliminary Design Review and Critical Design Review. The Systems Engineering Plan should address the parts management strategy, including the need for a parts management plan. A parts management plan typically includes: Specification of parts selection criteria based on objectives in the Acquisition Strategy Report and overall support strategy; Identification of a preferred parts list; Definition of the processes for conducting trade-off analysis, parts selection, inclusion of configuration identification status and related change decisions in the technical baseline, and approval and documentation of non-preferred parts; and Discussion of how parts management considerations will flow down to suppliers. Parts selection should be based on trade-off and cost-benefit analyses that are conducted in accordance with the program’s parts strategy and management plan, as derived from the overall acquisition and sustainment strategies. Selected parts should be documented in a parts list, which is under configuration management of the overall technical baseline. See MIL-HDBK-512A, DoD Handbook for Parts Management, SD-19: Life Cycle Cost Savings Through Parts Management, and related industry specifications, such as AIA and ANSI/AIAA-R-100 and ANSI/EIA-4899, for more details on recommended parts management practices. Reduce Program Costs: Through Parts Management provides details for conducting a business case for having a Parts Management Program. Addition information is on the Parts Standardization & Management Committee web site.MIL-HDBK-512A, DoD Handbook for Parts ManagementSD-19: Life Cycle Cost Savings Through Parts ManagementReduce Program Costs: Through Parts ManagementParts Standardization & Management Committee

4.4.Systems Engineering Decisions: Important Design Considerations 4.4.xx.Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Materiel Shortages (DMSMS) is the loss, or impending loss, of manufacturers of items or suppliers of items or raw materials. The military loses a manufacturer when that manufacturer discontinues (or plans to discontinue) production of needed components or raw materials. This situation may cause shortages that endanger the life cycle support and capability of the weapon system or equipment. An effective approach to such a pervasive problem hinges on being proactive so that potential availability problems are resolved before they cause some crises in readiness or spending. SD-22, DMSMS Guidebook provides more information on related design considerations.SD-22, DMSMS Guidebook While DMSMS can have a huge impact on total life cycle cost, Parts Management is a strategy for mitigation or avoiding DMSMS problems. System Engineering Plans should include a robust section on Parts Management. SD-19: Life Cycle Cost Savings Through Parts Management provides more detailed information on the application.SD-19: Life Cycle Cost Savings Through Parts Management

Risk Checklists - ITR

Risk Checklists - SRR

Risk Checklists - CDR

Risk Checklists - PDR

PMR IPT Exit Strategy Recommend PSMC Meeting in San Diego for official handoff of PMR responsibilities –Plan: DSPO & PSMC continue to develop policies, advocacy, tools, etc. for Parts Mgt. –Policy letter should be signed & articles in popular literature should be prepared to seek out new interest and members. –The synergy between DSPO, GIDEP/DLA, TLSCM (or whatever it becomes next), and the PSMC (DoD-sponsored government- industry forum) should provide the direction and turtlepower to take the effort to the next level.