MFOLFOX-bevacizumab or XELOX-bevacizumab then bevacizumab alone or with erlotinib in 1st line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer :

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

The Very Best, Most Perfect Possible Way to Treat Advanced Colorectal Cancer in 2005: Agent Choice and Ideal Sequencing Charles D. Blanke, M.D. OHSU Cancer.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Intermittent versus Continuous Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer PRO: Continue Systemic Therapy Deb Schrag, MD, MPH Presentation in “Great.
Have the OPTIMOX-2, CAIRO-3, COIN, DREAM and other recent trials settled the question of maintenance versus observation in advanced CRC? Yes Deborah Schrag,
AVADO PFS Analysis (ITT Population) All P values vs. placebo Adapted from Miles et al. ASCO 2008, abstract LBA 1011.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Definition of oxaliplatin sensitivity in pts with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy A. de Gramont, B. Chibaudel,
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Case presented by Dr Schwartz 44 yo woman with 4 mo hx of abdominal pain –Imaging = pancreatic.
Therapeutic Significance of D-dimer Cut-off Level of more than 3 µg/ml in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Standard Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab.
Standard Management of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Start and Stop, Maintenance, Chemotherapy Holidays Jeffrey Meyerhardt, MD, MPH Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with XELOX or FOLFOX-4: updated efficacy results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial in first-line metastatic.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
2013 ASCO CRC Poster Discussion (Old Dog, New Tricks) Weijing Sun, MD, FACP University of Pittsburgh.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Minimal versus Intense Upfront Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Paulo M. Hoff, MD, FACP Hospital Sirio Libanes Sao Paulo, Brazil Centro.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
ASCO - Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Orlando (FL), January 2008 First-line Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and Infusional 5FU/LV (FOLFOXIRI) in combination.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
XELOX vs. FOLFOX4: survival and response results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy, following induction first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Who can benefit from chemotherapy holidays after first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer ? N. Perez-Staub, B. Chibaudel, A. Figer, A. Cervantes,
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
F. Maindrault-Gœbel, G. LLedo, B. Chibaudel, L. Mineur, T. André, M. Bennamoun, M. Mabro, P.Artru, C. Louvet, A. de Gramont OPTIMOX2, a large randomized.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by CapeOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
A three-arm randomized phase III trial of FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab vs XELOX + bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III.
Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation (PACCE) Update Authors: Hecht et al at ASCO GI 2008 Date posted: April
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
Y-K Kang, A Ohtsu, E Van Cutsem, SY Rha, A Sawaki SR Park, H-Y Lim, J Wu, B Langer, MA Shah on behalf of AVAGAST investigators AVAGAST: a randomized, double-blind.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007
or other irinotecan-based regimens
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Optimizing Conventional Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

mFOLFOX-bevacizumab or XELOX-bevacizumab then bevacizumab alone or with erlotinib in 1st line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer : Interim safety analysis of DREAM study. C. Tournigand1, B. Samson2, W. Scheithauer3, C. Louvet1, T. Andre4, G. Lledo5, J. Latreille2, F. Viret6, B. Chibaudel7, A. de Gramont1; 1Hopital Saint Antoine, Paris, France; 2Hopital Charles Lemoyne, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada; 3University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 4Hopital Pitié-Salpetrière, Paris, France; 5Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France; 6Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France; 7Gercor, Paris, France

ABSTRACT Background : Anti-VEGF or EGFR inhibitors demonstrated clinical activity in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in mCRC. The DREAM trial compares, after an induction CT of 6 cy of FOLFOX-Bev or XELOX-Bev, a maintenance with Bev +/- Erlotinib. We report here a pre-planned safety analysis of induction (I) and maintenance (M) phase for the first 200 patients. Methods : Patients (pts) with untreated mCRC were randomly assigned to 2 arms (I): mFOLFOX+Bev (n=100), or mXELOX+Bev (n=100). mFOLFOX-Bev: LV 400 mg/m², Oxaliplatin (ox) 100 mg/m², B 5 mg/kg d1, 5FU ci 2.4g/m² 46h, q2w, mXELOX-Bev: Ox 100 mg/m² d1, capecitabine 2.5 g/m² d1-7, Bev 5mg/kg, q2w. To date, 117 pts with a disease control after 6 cy have had a 2nd randomisation (M): Bev alone (7.5 mg/kg q3w, n=56) or Bev+Erlotinib 150 mg/d (n=61) until PD. Results : Pts characteristics were: sex: 124M/76F, median age: 62.4 years (26-80), primary tumors: colon 152, rectum 53, synchronous metastases: 150 pts, > 1 metastase site: 115, PS 0/1: 134/66, Alk. Ph.>UNL: 87 pts, and LDH>UNL: 88pts. For I, 92 pts in mFOLFOX-Bev and 93 in XELOX-Bev were evaluable for toxicity (tox). Tox (%) for mFOLFOX-Bev/XELOX-Bev were: any toxicity grade (gr) 3 or 4: 21/30; neutropenia gr 3 6/1, gr 4 0/2; febrile neutropenia gr 3 1/1, gr 4 0/1; thrombopenia gr 3 0/1, gr 4 0/2; anemia gr 2 8/15, gr 3 2/1; nausea gr 2 17/15, gr 3 4/6; vomiting gr 2 10/12, gr 3 2/5; mucositis gr 2 6/6, gr 3 0/4; diarrhea gr 2 8/12, gr 3 5/20, gr 4 0/1; neuropathy gr 2 23/17 gr 3 3/1; HFS gr 2 0/7, gr 3 0/2; hypertension gr 2 2/3, gr 3 1/0; proteinuria gr 2 1/5; SAEs 14/25. For Maintenance, 56 pts in B and 61 pts in Bev+Erlotinib were evaluable. Tox (% Bev/Bev+Erlotinib) were: neutropenia gr 2 0/3; thrombopenia gr 2 2/0; nausea gr 2 2/2, gr 3 2/0; vomiting gr 3 2/0; mucositis gr 2 2/3; diarrhea gr 2 0/6, gr 3 2/6; skin tox gr 1 9/31, gr 2 0/38, gr 3 0/16, gr 4 0/2; proteinuria gr 2 5/5; hypertension gr 1 9/15, gr 2 3/8, gr 3 3/0.  Conclusion : This interim safety analysis demonstrated that induction with mFOLFOX-Bev or XELOX-Bev as well as maintenance with Bev or Bev + Erlotinib appears to be well-tolerated, without unexpected side effects. The DREAM study is ongoing, with a prolonged induction phase of 6 months (3 mo with ox then 3 mo with fluoropyrimidines-B) before randomisation for maintenance therapy.  

INTRODUCTION OPTIMOX1 and 2 studies validated the "stop and go strategy" or stopping oxaliplatin after 6 cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer. (Tournigand et al. JCO 2006, Maindrault-Goebel, ASCO 2007) Bevacizumab increases PFS in combination with first-line chemotherapy. (Saltz et al., JCO 2008) A modified XELOX regimen (7 days on, 7 days off) demonstrated a good therapeutic ratio (Scheithauer et al., JCO 2003) Erlotinib is an orally active, selective inhibitor of HER1/EGFR tyrosine-kinase. In preclinical models, administration of EGFR inhibitors in combination with antiangiogenic agents has shown additive cytotoxicity. (Ciardello et al. Clinical Cancer Res 2000, 2004)

DREAM study (Phase III) RANDOMI SAT ION RANDOMI SAT ION mFOLFOX7 + bevacizumab x6 cycles bevacizumab + erlotinib until PD PR or SD mXELOX + bevacizumab X6 cycles bevacizumab until PD N=640 INDUCTION MAINTENANCE

Erlotinib 150 mg/day, continuous CHEMOTHERAPY D1 D2 mFolfox7 LV 400 5-FU 2.4 g/m² oxali 100 bev. 5 Every 2 weeks INDUCTION D1 D7 mXELOX Capecitabine 2500 mg/m²/d oxali 100 Every 2 weeks bev. 5 erlotinib bev. 7.5 Every 3 weeks MAINTENANCE Erlotinib 150 mg/day, continuous

Inclusion criteria Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum. Unresectable metastatic disease, i.e. non suitable for complete carcinological surgical resection. No previous chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for metastatic disease. In case of previous adjuvant chemotherapy, progression-free interval from end of previous adjuvant chemotherapy > 6 months (2 years if oxaliplatin or CPT11 received as adjuvant therapy) Measurable lesion or non measurable lesions Age 18 years - 80 years. WHO (ECOG) performance status 0-2 . Hematological status: Neutrophils  1,5 109/L Platelets  100 109/L Haemoglobin > 9 g/dL (may be transfused to maintain or exceed this level) International Normalized Ratio (INR)  1.5; APPT <1.5 x UNL Adequate renal function, No proteinuria at baseline. Hepatic function: Total bilirubin < 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL), ALP :< 3 x ULN Neurologic status: no peripheral sensory neuropathy (NCI grade 0).

Patients Characteristics n=200 Sex ratio 124 M / 76 F Median Age 62.4 years (26-80yrs) WHO PS 0 vs 1 134 vs 66 pts Colon vs rectum 152 vs 53 pts Synchronous mets 150 pts >1 metastatic site 115 pts Alk Phosphatase >UNL 87 pts LDH>UNL 88 pts

INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY Hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4) FOLFOX-Bevacizumab N=92 % XELOX-Bevacizumab N=93 Neutropenia grade 3 grade 4 6 1 2 Thrombocytopenia Anemia grade 2 8 15 Febrile neutropenia

INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY Non-Hematologic toxicity FOLFOX-Bevacizumab N=92 % XELOX-Bevacizumab N=93 Nausea grade 3 grade 2 4 17 6 15 Vomiting 2 10 5 12 Mucositis Diarrhea grade 3-4 8 21 Neuropathy grade 3 grade 2 3 23 1 17 Hand-Foot syndrome 2 7

INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY Bevacizumab-related toxicity FOLFOX- Bevacizumab N=92 % XELOX- N=93 HTA grade 3 grade 2 1 2 3 Proteinuria 5

MAINTENANCE : toxicity Bevacizumab N=56 % Bevacizumab – Erlotinib N=61 Nausea grade 3 grade 2 2 Vomiting Mucositis 3 Diarrhea 6 Neutropenia grade 2 3 Thrombocytopenia 2

Bevacizumab – Erlotinib MAINTENANCE toxicity Bevacizumab N=56 % Bevacizumab – Erlotinib N=61 Cutaneous toxicity Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 9 31 38 16 2 HTA Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 9 3 15 8 Proteinuria 5

Conclusion Both mFOLFOX7-bevacizumab and mXELOX-bevacizumab are well tolerated as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer As expected, the main toxicity of the association of bevacizumab and erlotinib is cutaneous (18% grade 3-4) Considering the recent results of OPTIMOX2, a prolongation of the maintenance phase from 3 months to 6 months before maintenance therapy has been adopted in the study KRAS status will be available for all patients 18% verif Acknowledgement : Roche for financial support of the DREAM study

DREAM study (Phase III) FOLFIRI – bevacizumab 6 months New design REGI STRAT ION RANDOMI SAT ION mFOLFOX7 + bevacizumab X6 cycles mLV5FU2 + bevacizumab 3 months bevacizumab + erlotinib until PD Or1 CR2 or PR SD mXELOX + bevacizumab x6 cycles capecitabine + bevacizumab 3 months bevacizumab until PD Or1 FOLFIRI – bevacizumab 6 months Inclusion criteria : IP 0 – 2 Alk Ph < 5xN 1 investigator’s choice 2without surgery