North Dakota Principal and Teacher Evaluation. Welcome! What is your present status? Change! The Why and How of PTESS Update on PTESS progress and timeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

EFFECTIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA)
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Today’s website:
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
School Improvement Leadership: Implementation Chad Dumas February 12, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
Session Materials  Wiki
LEADING LEARNING CONFERENCE 5 June Leading Learning 1November 2005Management of complex change. The Knoster model. Leading Learning 2April/May 2006Developing.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
CHANCELLOR’S PRINCIPAL CONFERENCE WELCOME ADDRESS June 4, 2011.
CSA Retreat July 2012 LEADERSHIP AT THE TOP. Focus District leadership Building leadership Coaching of principals Developing a culture dedicated to improvement.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Hosted By: Janice Case NASSP Consultant Building Connections Among Principal, Counselor, and Students presented by Judith Richardson & Virginia Minshew.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Leadership Development Series
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Five Required Elements
State Board of Education Progress Update
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Presentation transcript:

North Dakota Principal and Teacher Evaluation

Welcome! What is your present status? Change! The Why and How of PTESS Update on PTESS progress and timeline Major Model Discussion People using Models Discussion and Q&A 2

Colored index cards as follows

What is the Purpose of Evaluation? 4

Present System (Feedback)? 5

Present System (Rating)? 6

Present System (Satisfaction)? 7

Present System (Satisfied)? 8

The first wildebeest to cross the river is more likely to be eaten!

Vision SkillsIncentives Resources Action Plan Leading Complex Change SkillsIncentives Resources Action Plan Vision Incentives Resources Action Plan Vision Skills Resources Action Plan Vision Skills Action Plan Incentives Resources Vision Skills Incentives Confusion Change Anxiety GradualChange Frustration False Start © Enterprise Management Ltd., 1987.

8 Steps for Leading Change Spiro 1. Goal: 2. Readiness : Low Readiness – High Structure High Readiness - Low Structure 3. Stakeholders: Who are the key stakeholders? Who are the Opinion Leaders? 4. Early Wins: 5. Anticipate Resistance : Match the readiness level with support, identify potential opponents and bring them on board or minimize their ability to derail plans, and celebrate short term wins and think about the benefits of the new system. 6. Collaborate Planning : Do we have the right people involved in the selection and implementation process? 7. Scale & Sustainability: If we start with a small group, how will we scale up? If we invest in tools and process, can we sustain the effort? 8. Build in on-going Monitoring /course corrections : Who does What by When, and monitor to make changes as needed.

Why are we doing this?

What does the data say?

Grade 4 NAEP Data

Grade 8 NAEP Data

%79.3%77.0%76.4%75.1%76.6%

Pair-Share How is your school feeling about the readiness for a new system ? 31

How are we doing this?

North Dakota AdvancED Principal Evaluation AdvancED Assurance and Indicators 2.6, 3.4 AdvancED Indicators 1.1, 1.2, 2.4, 2.5 Teacher Evaluation AdvancED Assurance and Indicators 2.6, 3.4 Professional Development/Learning AdvancED Indicators 3.5, 3.7, 3.11 North Dakota Common Core AdvancED Indicators 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 4.4 Assessment and SLDS AdvancED Indicators 3.10, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 Accreditation and School Imporovement AdvancED Assurance and Indicators 1.3, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 How does this FIT Together in North Dakota?

Where are you with AdvancED? Green Card if you are presently using AdvancED Red Card if not Yellow card if in the process of changing to AdvancED 34

Pair-Share How is your school doing in connecting all of the different state initiatives together ? 35

What are the new Guidelines?

Timelines Spring State finalize guidelines with approved models as examples Information on Guidelines and Examples provided by the State Schools develop or select model for principal evaluation by Nov, Schools begin implementation process of a model for principal evaluation by Feb, School develop or select model for teacher evaluation by June, Schools begin the implementation process for teacher model starting Sept, State monitor schools to see plans implemented 37

What was the Waiver and how does not doing the Waiver Effect us?

Unique to North Dakota Student Performance NOT Significant Portion of Evaluation Levels of Performance DO NOT have to be translated into State Levels DO NOT have to arrive at an OVERALL SINGLE PERFORMANCE LEVEL for teacher or principal Teacher Performance Levels DO NOT have to be shared with the State

Before & After: A Snapshot 40 BeforeComponentAfter Binary – Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory Performance Level Differentiation At least Four Different Levels Evaluation required twice yearly first three years, and yearly for after that Frequency of Evaluations No change: Evaluation required twice yearly first three years, and yearly for after that Not based on standards Standards Teachers based on InTASC Standards and Principals based on ISLLC Standards No existing requirement for Student Performance Data Student Performance Indicator Student Performance Data will be a portion of the teacher and principal evaluation

Before & After: A Snapshot 41 BeforeComponentAfter State does not require one model Model No change- the state will does not require one model.

Performance Levels

Typical Evaluation Cycle? Self- Assessment Goal Setting Evidence Collection & Observation Formative Reflection and Review Evidence Collection & Observation Summative Evaluation 45 Professional Development Planning Student Data Analysis

Principal Supervision Cycle ORIENTATION on PROCESS Formative March - August PRE-PLANNING by Principal Formative August GOAL SETTING CONFERENCE Formative Aug/Sept EVIDENCE COLLECTION and MONITORING OF Plan Formative Sept-March FORMATIVE CONFERENCING Oct-Feb END OF YEAR SUMMATIVE CONFERENCE Summative March

Share with your group What model are you using right now in teacher and principal evaluations ? 47

Models 48

Models Danielson 49 frameworks/danielson-framework/

Models Marzano 50 frameworks/marzano/

Models Marshall 51

Models Costs 52

Q and A?

Student Performance?

Student Performance Teacher A.Student achievement data literacy B.Instructional improvement: applies student achievement data to frame and measure standards-based curricular claims/student learning objectives. C.Student Growth: students demonstrate measureable growth and achievement on specified standardized and non-standardized measures.

Student Performance Principal A.Student achievement data literacy B.Data-driven leadership: evidences meaningful school- wide professional learning that emphasizes all types and reporting levels of student achievement data. C.Instructional improvement: guides teachers to apply student achievement data to frame and measure standards-based curricular claims/student learning objectives. D.Student Growth: students in the school demonstrate measureable growth and achievement on specified standardized and non-standardized measures.

Share with your table ? Questions or comments on Student Performance 58

Q and A Which evaluation if Superintendent / Principal? How to do evaluation in K-8 with no Superintendent? How do you do with Guidance Counselors? How do you do with Media Specialists? How do you do with Special Needs Teacher without classroom?

Regional PTESS Meetings May 5, Minot May 6, Mandan May 7, Grand Forks May 27, Tioga May 28, Dickinson May 29, Fargo May 30, 2014 – Jamestown

Additional Information Webinars on Models and Technology Website with Information Cost of Different Models Q & A Common Questions

Whip Around: One significant “ah-ha moment” today Take a few minutes and share with us – Plus: What was a real “plus” of today’s session? What went well and should be repeated? – Delta: Where is there room for improvement and change? 62 Whip Around and Plus/Delta Debrief