K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Advertisements

Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
CA Math & Science Partnership Grant (CaMSP) Partnership for Student Achievement.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Brandywine School District Race to the Top Scope of Work Overview Presentation.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Math in the Middle What are we learning about rural mathematics education? Ruth Heaton and Jim Lewis University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
School Administrators of Iowa Annual Conference August 5-6, 2014.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
In what ways do you contribute to students’ learning in mathematics? What do you think is the role of the district in improving math achievement?
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Plenary Session 7: Technologies and Principles of Learning in Support of Teaching Delwyn L. Harnisch University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
RAISING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH DISTRIBUTIVE LEADERSHIP A System for Coaching Janna Stevens, District Administrator Crystal Hintzman, Director of Curriculum,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
The following is a prepared presentation for UMELA. It does not reflect the views or opinions of anyone, really. This content may not be reproduced in.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Rationale 2003 Legislature and Gates Foundation provides funding for College Readiness Standards (CRS) –55% of all students.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
HCS Elementary Education Department
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009

Project PRIME Partnership of Rapid City Area Schools, Black Hills State University, TIE, & Inverness Research Funded by National Science Foundation - Math and Science Partnership Cohort 1; Began fall 2002; Funded through summer 2010

Project Goals 1. Improve student achievement for all K-12 students in RCAS 2. Increase and sustain the quality of K-12 teachers of mathematics

Objectives 1. Raise student achievement 2. Reduce achievement gap between American Indian and non-American Indian students 3. Reduce number of students taking non-college prep / Increase number taking upper-level math 4. Improve K-12 mathematics instruction 5. Improve teacher preparation at BHSU

PRIME's Approach Professional Development (100 hrs) Building-based Support – Elementary Teacher Leaders – Secondary Math Coaches District-wide Classes – Deepening teacher content knowledge – Understanding student thinking – Instructional materials

Professional Development Changes in teacher beliefs, content knowledge, and understanding of student thinking Changes in Classroom Practice Improved Student Attitudes, Increased Achievement, Pursuit of Higher-level Math Classes

Additional Components Family Nights Professional development for principals Focus on data

Session Overview Inverness Report Additional Data District Perspectives

Inverness Research Associates National leader in the evaluation of K-12 mathematics In-depth studies of hundreds of district improvement efforts nationwide Called to testify before Congress; author of authoritative reports for National Science Foundation and other national audiences

PRIME Leadership & Evaluation Meeting Inverness Research Becky Carroll & Pam Tambe August 17, 2009 Edited for Presentation to RCAS School Board November 5, 2009

Meeting Overview Purposes 1) To present a multi-year perspective on the contributions of the PRIME Project and the capacities that remain 2) To consider implications for sustaining the accomplishments and future improvement efforts

Data Sources Spring 2009 Site Visit - 5 Elementary, 2 Middle, 2 High Schools - 34 Classroom Observations - Teacher Focus Groups - Administrator Interviews - Parent Meeting Previous Site Visits back to Classroom observations - Student focus groups - Interviews

Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Elementary Level 2004 Characteristics: Range of instruction Mix and uneven use of instructional materials Range of school contexts and supports Less emphasis on student thinking and conceptual development Some engagement in meaningful work Some opportunity for students to clarify and articulate their mathematical thinking 2009 Characteristics: Consistent, effective, purposeful instruction Strong implementation of Investigations Students actively engaged in content and problem solving Students demonstrating conceptual understanding, number skill, fluency Sophisticated problem solvers

Classroom Observation Protocol Developed for evaluation of projects funded by National Science Foundation Trained and calibrated researchers Scale: 1 - Ineffective Instruction 5 - Exemplary Instruction

Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Elementary Classroom Observation Ratings

Comparison Ratings

Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Secondary Level 2005 Characteristics: Range in lesson quality Some attempts at more student centered classrooms Mostly teacher-centered instruction and student worksheets as a central component of the lessons 2009 Characteristics: Range in lesson quality More instances of students working in groups and focus on student thinking Increased use of Standards-based instructional materials

Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Secondary Classroom Observation Ratings

Comparison Ratings

Multi-year Perspective K-12 Mathematics Teaching Summary At the elementary level -consistent, steady progress towards a coherent K-5 program with effective and accomplished mathematics teaching and learning -focus now on sustainability At the secondary level -some progress has been made -there are pockets of effective, constructivist teaching -reaching a critical juncture

The Relationship between Lesson Quality and District Capacity a clear vision for elementary mathematics teaching and learning consistent with national standards and research, a direct and explicit message from top district administrators about the nature and direction of elementary mathematics, the adoption and implementation of high-quality, research-based curriculum materials, professional development for classroom teachers and on-going classroom support from teacher leaders around mathematics content, pedagogy, and the specific instructional materials, ongoing professional development and support for teacher leaders led by the elementary math coordinator, and principals knowledgeable about and supportive of math improvement efforts.

Current District Capacity for Improving Mathematics Education Vision Leadership -Administrators -Math Coordinators -Teacher Leaders and Math Coaches Instructional Materials & Assessments Professional Development Partnerships

Summary PRIME has resulted in critical capacities at all levels of the system that can be sustained and capitalized on. Much progress has been made Still work to be done to build a coherent K-12 mathematics program Opportune time for the district

Implications How do we sustain and build on the work of PRIME? How does the PRIME effort transition from an outside-funded project to an ongoing program infrastructure supporting the improvement of K-12 mathematics?

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth Vision - a clear, coherent message about the direction and qualities of K-12 mathematics teaching and learning Leadership - To be sustained and built on: Administrators Math Coordinators Teacher Leaders and Math Coaches

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth Leadership Areas for potential future investment: - same level of investment and focus on building level support at secondary - additional support for building-level administrators on instructional leadership for mathematics

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth (continued) Instructional Materials & Assessments To be sustained and built on: - Investigations at elementary - refine the elementary report card Areas for potential future investment: - clear direction for materials at secondary (adoption in two years – critical time)

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth (continued) Professional Development To be sustained and built on: - classes that help teachers learn how to teach with specific curricular materials - classes that help teachers continue to develop their own knowledge of mathematics and how students learn mathematics

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth (continued) Professional Development Areas for potential future investment: - classes that help teachers best serve Native American students in mathematics - supports for continued professional development for teacher leaders and coaches, and for new hires

Key Elements to Sustainability and Continued Growth (continued) Partnerships To be sustained and built on: - expertise of TIE and BHSU in ways that support the vision and direction of K-12 mathematics

Sample of 46 teachers having completed 80 hours of PRIME coursework, on average, between pre and post-tests. Cohen's effect size = 1.0 (0.2 is small, 0.5 medium, 0.8 large)

District Perspectives The challenge of change A road map for the future Taking action Striving for system improvement Cause for optimism

Comments & Questions