Virtual Charter Schools Realities and Unknowns Daniela Torre UCEA Graduate Student Summit November 14, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT Use in Rural Schools Ok-choon Park Global Symposium on ICT in Education – Measuring Impact: Monitoring and Evaluation.
Advertisements

Integrating Library Resources into the Course Development Process at an Online College ©2009 The Sheridan Libraries of The Johns Hopkins University Inspiration,
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Sponsors: Agenda: National landscape of K12 online learning Key trends and implications Key issues to consider when starting an online program Questions.
Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.
VIRTUAL SCHOOLS & CLASSROOMS. QUESTION FOR THOUGHT: Is a progression toward virtual schools and classrooms a positive for the future of education?
Chapter 6 Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez CET_578.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
The Instructional Program
Considerations While Auditing Virtual Education Nancy Reeder, Audit Manager NSAA IT Conference – September 2012.
Charter Schools. Why? Where was the mandate? The “1%” policy Where’s the need? NZ schools are world-beating Where’s the evidence? Overseas evidence shows.
Implementing an Online Program of Success Sandi Atols, Ed.D. Manager of Distance Learning Chicago Public Schools Office of High School Programs.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
A serious domestic and international World Language Education Gap in the United States umd.edu.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
Ministry of Education: E-Learning October 2010 Update.
Virtual Schools are Virtually Here: Now What? A National Perspective Matthew Wicks Chief Operating Officer International Association for.
Different Types of Schools School Funding. Public Schools  Established by states (10 th Amendment)  Paid for by tax dollars  Usually run by local board.
BEST PRACTICES TO SUPPORT ONLINE LEARNING FOR STUDENTS AND EDUCATORS Online Learning.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
Serving Students with Disabilities in State-level Virtual K-12 Public School Programs.
 School choice gives parents the freedom to choose their child’s educational journey.  School choice offers parents a healthy alternative to the traditional.
Supplemental Education Services (SES) Gwendolyn Longmire, Ph.D. Zachary Community School District Federal Programs Director.
Rob Darrow CUE/ADEC Summit March 2010
Presentation to District XYZ Why Online Learning? May 7, 2012.
TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.
Supporting Critically At-Risk Students Through Blended & Online Learning November 13, 2014 – San Diego, CA SIATech Alternative Accountability.
Effective Teachers for All Schools Approaches, Lessons Learned & The Strategy of Madagascar.
Welcome & Introductions Christy Savakinas, NEIU  Educational Technology Coordinator   (570) Brian Dempsey,
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Los Angeles Virtual Academy A learning portal to the future.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
The Societal Acceptance of Online Degrees in the Arab World: Evidence from Two Countries Dr. Alaa Sadik, Sultan Qaboos University Sultanate of Oman
Virtual Education Reporting Presented by: Sally Roberts, Educational Policy Consultant Florida Department of Education.
The Achievement Gap and Equal Educational Opportunity Presented by July & Linda July 23, 2004.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Project Co-Sponsors: KU Center for Research on Learning CAST NASDSE Online Learning for Students with Disabilities: What.
Teachers and the Quality Imperative for EFA International Task Force on Teachers for EFA 6-7 July 2010 Amman, Jordan.
We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.
Reforms – improve teacher quality & School Curriculum standards (what students should know) If you have questions about yesterday’s material – ask now!!
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Home-School Connections in Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools Daniela Torre UCEA Graduate Student Summit November 15, 2012.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Future of Learning: A Global and National Perspective on Competency-based Learning Susan Patrick President & CEO.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
Meeting the Needs and Expectations of Court-Involved Youth.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Just-in-time learning for all from anywhere!
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Kenneth Grover Principal Innovations High School.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Virtual Schooling Mallory Buzun-Miller, Judith Considine, Will Puvalowski, Blair Sawyers.
Noor Hafizah Binti Abdullah M Sem /2013 KPT 6044.
Who we are Chance for Childhood is an international children’s charity which strengthens and empowers local communities to protect children facing the.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Educating the Digital Generation Randy Moczygemba.
Virtual Schooling: An Introduction Michael Barbour Assistant Professor Wayne State University.
Expand Your Online Course Catalogue with a Capacity Building Approach Barbara Treacy, EDC/EdTech Leaders Online Tracy Sanders, South Carolina Virtual School.
CAACE March 31, 2016 Greg Moore Account Executive
E-Rate and District Technology Plan By Gwen Davis.
Homeschool and Online Academy Report
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Delivering on the Promise: Equity and Quality of Educational Opportunities in Digital Learning Carolyn J. Heinrich Professor of Public Policy, Education.
Presentation transcript:

Virtual Charter Schools Realities and Unknowns Daniela Torre UCEA Graduate Student Summit November 14, 2012

What is a Virtual Charter School? Enhancement vs. replacement vs. blended (Means et al., 2010) Location: home, school, third place Instructor: parent, computer program, other adults Asynchronous vs. Synchronous “…wholly public educational organization that offers full-time instruction at the K-12 level at least partially through Internet-based methods, with time and/or distance separating the teacher and learner (Rhim & Kowal, 2010, p.4).

VCS Landscape Privatization & School Choice Provides incentives for providers to innovate Supports pluralism and parent choice Weakens government monopoly (Minow, 2003) Homeschooling movement Most extreme form of school choice Rapid growth since the 1990s Relationship to for-profit companies 75% of students enrolled in VCS attend school managed by a for profit company

VCS Growth Difficult to measure Failure to disaggregate online programs by authorizer type or distinguish between replacement and supplemental programs. Year# of VCS Nationwide

Who Enrolls in VCS? Students who were previously home-schooled Minorities may be underrepresented (Guarino, et al., 2005). High concentration of special needs students in some schools (Baker, Bouras, Hartwig & McNair, 2005).

Equitable Access Digital divide Race/ethnicity gap Urban/rural gap SES gap Home Support

Why VCS? Students and Families Individualized instruction Expand community of learners For former homeschooled children, less financial burden Part of a movement (Means et al., 2009) States or Districts Expand access to students Reduce geographic barriers of teacher labor force Expand choices for constituents Reduce costs and increase efficiency

Instruction Computer Variability in programs Ongoing assessment Teacher Work load Student teacher ratio Level of support Parent Level of support Role within program

The Costs of VCS Student funding How much? Who pays? Fixed costs Curriculum development $4,500 to more than $1,000,000 Server access and set up Variable costs Phones and phone service for teachers Computers Internet access Teacher compensation

VCS and Accountability Instructional hours and Enrollment Should be calculated over a longer span of time Alabama: Clock hours Florida: courses completed Quality of instruction Teacher certification mirrors that for charter schools Parent qualifications? Quality of student work Academic dishonesty Quality of assessments Constraints due to format Data collection Monitoring Contact between parents and students

VCS Outcomes Few empirical studies “Those making policy should be clear on this key point: there exists no evidence from research that full-time virtual schooling at the K-12 level is an adequate replacement for traditional face-to-face teaching and learning” (2011, p.5). Positive findings Blended learning Programs that explicitly teach time management Asynchronous learning Negative findings Student experiences High turnover and drop out rates Lower achievement on standardized assessments

Future Research Quantitative study of student achievement outcomes controlling for selection bias and other factors Qualitative study about the experiences of students and teachers within VCS The differential experiences of students in VCS depending on age. Study access to VCS by breaking down enrollment data according to race/ethnicity, gender, El status, special needs status.

Thank You Daniela Torre Vanderbilt University