© 2010 AMPO 1029 Vermont Ave., NW, Suite 710 Washington, DC 20005 tel: 202.296.7051 fax: 202.296.7054 Performance Based Planning AMPO Management & Operations.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,

Advertisements

Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.

MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

An Overview of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings And TAM Plans MAP-21 National Performance Management Measures.

Gabe Rousseau Federal Highway Administration Office of Human Environment.

Workshop on Transportation Corridor Evaluation With a focus on Economic and Community Development.

PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6,

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.

California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.

Moving Toward a Performance- based Federal-aid Highway Program Integrating Maintenance AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Peter Stephanos.

The Role of Universities in Advancing Advanced Transit Alain L. Kornhauser Chairman, Advanced Transit Association (ATRA) Professor, Operations Research.

© 2015 AMPO 444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 345 Washington, DC tel: fax: Washington Update MAP-21 Reauthorization, Highway.

I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.

AASHTO/FHWA Executive Roundtable on Performance-based Planning & Programming Strawman Framework for National Performance-based Program October 22, 2009.

Canada’s Drug Strategy. 2 Purpose Provide an overview of Canada’s renewed National Drug Strategy  Historical context  Impetus for change  Renewed National.

U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Performance Management and Performance-Based Planning and.

U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.

FHWA Research and Technology Federal Highway Administration Nice to do or NEED TO DO Debra Elston Federal Highway Administration Turner-Fairbank Highway.

MAKING WORK ZONES WORK BETTER BY LINKING PLANNING and OPERATIONS Steven Gayle, Chair FHWA Working Group on Linking Planning and Operations.

FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.

Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.

Sustaining Places Bruce A. Knight FAICP President American Planning Association.

U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.

Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,

Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University

California’s Climate Future: Discussion Draft of the Governor’s Environmental Goals and Policy Report Louise Bedsworth, Deputy Director Governor’s Office.

FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.

A M O T I A A N N U A L M E E T I N G 2 3 S E P T E M B E R N A S H V I L L E, T N 1 A View from the State DOTs Joung H. Lee Associate Director.

Getting Started with the State Pre-Planning Process.

NRTSI/NRC Project Framework for the Assessment of the State, Performance and Management of Canada’s CPI.

Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO.

© 2010 AMPO 1029 Vermont Ave., NW, Suite 710 Washington, DC tel: fax: Washington Update AMPO Management & Operations Work.

MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.

Climate Change, Policy, Priorities Bozor Rakhmonov Committee for Environment Protection under the Government of Tajikistan Almaty, September, 2012.

The Future of Freight and High Speed Rail in Today’s Economy SASHTO Annual Conference – Biloxi, MS Shayne Gill Program Manager Aviation, Passenger Rail.

1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.

Planning and Environment Linkages Program OARC January 22, 2010 Noel Mehlo – FHWA Ohio Division.

Transit-MPO Partnerships in Planning for Livable and Sustainable Communities Charles R. Goodman Director, Systems Planning Federal Transit Administration.

Reid Harvey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Climate Economics Branch Climate Change Division 6 th Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum.

Industrial System Natural System Industrial System.

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.

Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.

Capital Project Prioritization and Selection – MBTA Process & Plans Eric Waaramaa Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority July 22,

Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.

National Transportation Operations Coalition (NTOC) Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration NAWG Meeting.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Overview on Performance Management National Forum on Performance-Based.

AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING BILOXI, MS OCTOBER 30, 2010 Potential Changes to STAA Planning Process and Performance Measurement.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Key Themes from Day 2 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based.

A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning by Deb Miller, Kansas DOT Secretary National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September.

Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.

Freight Partnerships = Economic Development and Freight Performance Pete Rahn Missouri Department of Transportation AASHTO 2009 Annual Meeting Palm Desert,

The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.

2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.

U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.

Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.

Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.

UW - Madison Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) David L. Kopacz, P.E. Wisconsin Division Office February 20, 2015.

Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.

1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.

Performance-Based Planning and Programming 1 Session AMPO Annual Meeting, October, 2014.

Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.

Perspectives on a Performance-Based Federal-aid Highway Program Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration January 12, 2010.

Nevada Transportation Conference

Climate Change Policy in Victoria

Charles R. Goodman Director, Systems Planning

AASHTO Waterborne Freight

AMPO Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) Working Group

Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes

Performance based planning and programming

Presentation transcript:

© 2010 AMPO 1029 Vermont Ave., NW, Suite 710 Washington, DC tel: fax: Performance Based Planning AMPO Management & Operations Work Group Meeting Boston MPO July 26-27, 2010

Surface Transportation Authorization Act released in 2009 by Chairman Oberstar, House T&I Committee Does include language on developing measures and statistics for key programs. Does not include cross-cutting national performance targets for measuring the success or failure of federal transportation investment. Planning Section: –MPOs shall implement a system of performance management. –Measure the degree to which the LRTP reduces congestion, improves mobility and safety, increases state of good repair, decreases GHGs, consistent with land use plans, and more. –Establish target levels of performance. –Certification of the plan is dependent on meeting the performance measures. July 26, STAA on Performance Measures

July 26, Performance Measures - AMPO AMPO is partnering with AASHTO, APTA, NADO, FHWA, FTA, and TRB to conduct a national forum on performance-based planning in September –How does the current planning process incorporate performance and accountability? –What are the effective approaches and evolving changes needed to realize a performance-based, outcome-driven planning and programming process? –How do we synchronize transportation planning with plans and policies related to housing, the economy, energy, environment, and climate change? –What federal, state, and local relationships and roles and responsibilities support a performance-driven planning process? –How do we get there?

July 26, Research Insights Early Insights from Volpe –Significant evolution underway. –Of the areas studied, none has a complete integrated framework in place. –Common disconnects or gaps in frameworks exist. –Significant challenges have been encountered.  Appropriate data and measures.  Evaluation of overall performance planning priorities. –Identification of the agency being held directly responsible is difficult for topics of livability, sustainability, health, economics.

July 26, Key Issues Need to develop a working definition of performance-based planning (key goal of September National Forum). How will this change the way we do currently do transportation planning and programming? Goal in using performance measures should be continuous improvement, not punishment. –European scan highlighted several methods that focused on incentives system, and show positive trends to target over time. Identify what the public wants to see, not what engineers and planners want to see. –Concerns about technocratic overkill and onerous steps that make a program difficult to administer. KISS!

July 26, Key Issues Some things are easier to measure. Others are more difficult (quality of life, economic, environmental) –Qualitative “measures” are ok. –Balance data-driven and qualitative-driven decision-making. How do we provide a strong vision and national policy goals, yet allow state/regional/local development of the correct performance measures? Focus on a few good measures. Performance measurement is one of many parts of the decision-making process. Federal government should fund capacity building and research to improve models and data.

July 26, Key Issues ARRA can serve as a pilot for what works in reporting. USDOT should approve the process of developing performance measures, not the targets themselves. Recognize that it takes a few authorization cycles before we get where we want to be.

July 26, Thank You! AMPO 1029 Vermont Ave., NW Suite 710 Washington, DC Rich Denbow