Introduction to Performance Measures GES 400H UMBC Fall 2010 Megan Wiley Rivera.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Passage Based Reading for the Sat
Advertisements

Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
Climate Change and Municipal Water Supplies Presented by Lorna Stickel Portland Water Bureau and Regional Water Providers Consortium Project Manager.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
The Public, Wildlife, and Wildlife Viewing Presented at the 2007 Watchable Wildlife Conference Wednesday, October 3, 2007 Mark Damian Duda Responsive Management.
Theoretical Probability Distributions We have talked about the idea of frequency distributions as a way to see what is happening with our data. We have.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Skiatook Lake Drought Issues and Management.
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
CCOT  This essay deals specifically with analysis of continuities and changes over time covering at least one of the periods in the course outline. 
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE – ACF Operations Bailey Crane Water Management USACE, Mobile District.
Background and Motivation. ENSO (El Niño Southern Oscillation) the water year for which the December to February Sea Surface Temperature in the NINO 3.4.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Flood (and drought) prediction ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N What.
Regional Climate Change Water Supply Planning Tools for Central Puget Sound Austin Polebitski and Richard Palmer Department of Civil and Environmental.
Abstract The Upper Klamath Basin is culturally diverse and home to many socioeconomic groups with different interests. There are Native peoples and also.
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
We Are in a Drought: The View from the Lower Flint River (Better days)
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
Lake Sidney Lanier Water Supply for Atlanta, Georgia Field Photos 11/19/07 by J. Ebert.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
WATER RIGHTS AND ENDANGERED FISH FINDING SOLUTIONS FOR FLOWS UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Statistical Analysis. Basic Calculations Mean - Average Median - Middle Mode – Most often Range – Diff. b/w the highest and lowest.
International Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Study New Study Release Today Study Board Offers Three New Options for Regulating Water Flowing From Lake.
Preserving Resources: Why Should I Care? This unit will focus around this essential question.
Cost Allocation Studies for the MP Region Bureau of Reclamation April 29, 2008 Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study Update Public Meeting #2: October.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: Cumulative Impact Indicators and Thresholds Presented by: Salmo Consulting Inc. and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
Youghiogheny River Lake Storage ReAllocation for Downstream Water Supply by Werner C. Loehlein, P.E.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Chapter 11: Applications of Chi-Square. Count or Frequency Data Many problems for which the data is categorized and the results shown by way of counts.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Savannah River Basin Drought Workshop October 24-25, 2012.
St. Johns River Water Management District Special Publication SJ97-SP8 Water Management Alternatives: Effects on Lake Levels and Wetlands in the Orange.
Sept., 2007 European CF&S Kick Off Meeting 1 Plan for a Value Engineering Study T. Lackowski.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
Modern-Day Factors Affecting the Management of the Chequamegon- Nicolet National Forest April 12, 2011Paul Strong, Forest Supervisor.
Water Demands in the Jackson Blue Spring Basin.
AN EVALUATION OF THE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN NAVIGATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM THE ACF RESERVOIR SYSTEM.
1. 2 Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (ICPRB) ICPRB represents 5 states. Mission: enhance, protect and conserve the water and associated.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Brief Introduction to Computer Aided Negotiations Megan Wiley Rivera Fall 2008 UMBC GES 400H.
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AICE Global Perspectives and Research.
Intro to the Delaware River Basin Megan Wiley Rivera HydroLogics, Inc Sept 13, 2010.
Lake Sydney Lanier Northeast Georgia Chris McCurdy & Andrea D. Roche.
USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Real-Time Conservation Pool Storage Accounting for the Falls Lake Project.
PCWA MFP Operations Model All Models are Wrong But Some Models are Useful.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Steve Leitman 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference.
Fish and Climate Change Climate Change Vulnerability Analysis Lauren Wyman Environmental Defense Fund Dr. Stacy Small.
Spring 2012 Writing 20:Ocean Acidification February 21, 2011 researching & developing a claim for MP2 Much of this material is compiled from:
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Reservoir Operating Criteria Proposed Modifications Lovell, Wyoming July 29, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Savannah River Projects
Water Supply Context: Alabama, Florida and Georgia
Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper
Introduction to Performance Measures
Environmental Impact Reports
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
What you need to do for the Assignment
Summary of Chesdin Reservoir Reliability
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Performance Measures GES 400H UMBC Fall 2010 Megan Wiley Rivera

2 The CAN Process 1.Develop performance measures 2.Reach consensus on the scientific data to be used in evaluating alternatives scientific methods and assumptions to be used the nature of alternatives to consider and how to structure the evaluations 3.Create and evaluate alternatives in a collaborative setting with other stakeholders

3 What Is A Performance Measure? A display Compares alternatives for one or more management objective Needs only to distinguish "better" and "worse" Water management is multi-objective Multiple performance measures are required

4 Multiple PMs are needed Water resources problems are multi-objective Some possible areas –Water supply reliability –Water quality –Recreation –Power generation –Navigation –Environmental Measures

5 Why are PMs so important Without PMs parties tend to focus on abstract portions of rules, e.g. the minimum flow requirement, the level of the summer pool rule curve With PMs parties can focus on overall outcomes Creating PMs forces parties to think about what they really care about and how to measure it

6 Performance Measure Notes HydroLogics rarely tries to commensurate performance measures –Single scores are not informative IMHO If it is not possible to evaluate a particular performance measure directly, we use surrogates

7 Process for Developing Performance Measures

8 Scientific Rationale No habitat if lake stage exceeds 15 feet No forage if lake stage reverses by more than 6 inches

9 Performance Measure First Attempt

10 Performance Measure Revised

11 Performance Measures - Surrogates

12 Some Examples from the Apalachicola Chattahoochee Flint

13 Currently no CAN process It’s been attempted (SVP), but the tri-state water wars go on (litigation) A lot of activity recently because of an ongoing drought in the region The US Fish and Wildlife Service put out a set of “performance measures” to assess whether or not the Army Corps’ proposed Interim Operation Plan violated the Endangered Species Act (Sept 2006 Biological Opinion, posted in course documents)

14 Lowest flow each year

15 Mussels Are Affected at Low Flows How much and at what flows is up for debate Generally thought that they get too hot (lethal) at flows < 5000 cfs They are strained at somewhat higher flows: 6000, 6500, 7000—depends who you ask Time is an issue –they can handle x number of days, and after y number of days, it may not matter any more (ones who will die have died) –We don’t know what x or y equal

16 Number of consecutive low-flow days in the worst year

17 Number of Low-Flow Days in Median Year

18 Sturgeon Habitat Available during Spawning Season

19 Note: Higher Flows Do Not Necessarily Mean More Habitat Sweet spot at more important site

20 Note: Higher Flows Do Not Necessarily Mean More Habitat Sweet spot at more important site 1.Another example of counter-intuitive results—trying to get as much water as possible does not necessarily translate into better spawning habitat 2.Opportunity to write rules that target these flows during spawning season

21 Other examples from hypothetical basin Most of these have been biological performance measures An aside, there is a “sister process” to CAN in which biological performance measures are created by a group of stakeholders (Savannah Process) –In at least one case, once they started modeling, found that biological PMs never scored well; not enough water in system, too coarse to recognize small improvements –In some recent processes, model used during development (recall that I suggested models should not even be chosen until you know what you’re evaluating) –We will be using two sets of data as we develop our performance measures to make sure they are reasonable: historical and “current operations” model results What about other stakeholders?

22 Number of Days of Recreation Impact during the period of record

23 Frequency of Impact Days

24 Number of Years with Extended Recreation Impact

25 Number of Days of Recreation Impact during the period of record

26 Water Supply

27 Water Supply Ideas Frequency of years that drought conservation measures are taken (economic and political ramifications) Compare to some measure of water supply reliability –< 5% probability of storage falling below some threshold –System never “empties” (include margin of safety) based on historic hydrology NYC group will need to talk with operators about their measures of reliability NYC gets about 50% of water from this source, so there is also room to play with how they utilize other sources