Voter Experience with Alternative Voting Systems in the 2008 Colorado Presidential Election Robert M. Stein Rice University Testimony Prepared for the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voting and Elections CP Political Systems.
Advertisements

Voter Experience with Election Day Vote Centers in the 2008 Lubbock, Texas Presidential Election Robert M. Stein Greg Vonnahme Rice University University.
Vote Centers: The Future of California Elections? December 11, 2014 Presented to the CACEO New Law Conference.
2014 Colorado Election Survey Robert M. Stein Andrew Menger Rice University and Greg Vonnahme University of Missouri-Kansas City Prepared for presentation.
The Citizen in Government Electing Leaders ~~~~~ The Right to Vote
Vote Centers – Virginia 2013 Asking The Right Questions.
Electrons Chapter 7 Section 2.
Counting Your Ballots By Barb Agnew Burnet County Elections Administrator.
Election Administration during Natural Disasters and Emergencies: Hurricane Sandy and the 2012 Election Robert M. Stein Rice University Prepared for presentation.
Feb. 14, How could the electoral college be reformed? -Electoral votes based on the % of the popular vote.
Long Lines at Polling Places Presidential Commission on Election Administration Philadelphia, PA September 2013.
Evaluating Website Quality. Website/Portal Quality Is it important? Why? How could we measure it? Who would be in the best position to evaluate a website?
Does School Uniform Change Different Aged Children’s Behavior? BySai.
Vote By Mail A County Perspective Dolores Gilmore, Elections Manager
ONE-STOP VOTING IN 2014 GEORGE McCUE State Board of Elections December 2013 Training Conference.
Voting and Elections Dennis & Patten Participation in Government Mepham High School.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
2012 Survey of the Performance of American Elections* Charles Stewart III MIT *A first look.
Michael Perry DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. 199,900 + Registered Voters 57 Polling Locations TYPECOUNT% School2544% Church1628% Other59% Park Rec.
Evaluating Election Administration in the 2006 Midterm Elections Professor Rick Hasen Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Charles Stewart III Page Survey of the Performance of American Elections Charles Stewart III MIT July 19, 2009.
Electronic Voting Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.
Presidential Preference Primary North Carolina Then ~ Now.
California Secretary of State Voting Systems Testing Summit November 28 & 29, 2005, Sacramento, California Remarks by Kim Alexander, President, California.
ISFED/GORBI Study of Citizen Attitudes and Knowledge on Election Issues Funded by The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) Technical Assistance Provided.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
THE ELECTORAL CYCLE Charles Lasham Centre for Parliamentary Studies Seminar 9 th – 13 th July 2012.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
Vicki McGahee PAVA Coordinator.  Polling Place Accessibility Survey  Data collection  Survey results  Post survey.
Election Reforms: What Should We Prioritize for 2013 and Beyond? CACEO Priorities: 1. Unfunded State Mandates – AGAIN Permanent Vote-by-Mail Vote-by-Mail.
Some Empirical Evidence on Provisional Voting Prepared for the Presidential Commission on Election Administration Daron Shaw University of Texas at Austin.
How to Count Your Ballots Christina Worrell Adkins Election Law Seminar December 2015.
Stewart Elementary Votes For President November 4, 2008 Precinct 7013 Hitchcock, Texas HISD.
Elections Task Force As requested by the Board of Supervisors, staff has conducted an evaluation of the election process with specific focus on identifying.
WHAT WERE THE NUMBERS AND WHAT DO THEY MEAN? PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARIES 1976, 1988 AND LOOKING TO 2016.
VVPAT Building Confidence in U.S. Elections. WHAT IS VVPAT ? Voter-verifiable paper audit trail Requires the voting system to print a paper ballot containing.
Chapter 10 Section 2. Political parties exist for one reason: to nominate and elect candidates to office. Parties must be organized well at the local,
American Government and Organization PS1301 Tuesday, 2 November.
Warm Up In the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when certain state required preclearance, what needed to happen before a state could change its voting laws?
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
Amending the Florida Constitution K Stafford MBMS 2014.
WHAT METHODS ARE USED TO CHOSE CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE? The nominating process is the process of candidate selection. Nomination – the naming of those.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting Meeting June 12, 2017
Sanford Creek Elementary School (Precinct 19-19)
The Presidential Election
Voting and Elections.
Political Ideology and Public Opinion
Election Audit?? What in the world?.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
2015 All-Mailed Ballot Election Overview
Political Party Organization
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Voting and Elections.
The Voters Choice Act (SB 450) Modernizing The Voting Experience
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Larimer county 101 Angela Myers Larimer County: clerk & recorder
October 15 October 30 by 5:00 p.m. November 3 by 5:00 p.m. November 6
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Slide Deck: The Voting Process (Municipal Elections)
Certification Phase: Closeout Agency Head: Maggie Toulouse Oliver
Recorders Panel for the Arizona Municipal Clerk’s Conference
The Voters Choice Act (SB 450) Modernizing The Voting Experience
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Voting and Elections.
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
ELECTION DAY REGISTRATION NOVEMBER 8, 2016
CE 5e Chapter 10 Section 1 Mr. Collins and Mrs. Kozlik
Presentation transcript:

Voter Experience with Alternative Voting Systems in the 2008 Colorado Presidential Election Robert M. Stein Rice University Testimony Prepared for the Colorado Election Reform Commission December 16, 2008 Support for this research was provided by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the JHET Foundation

Study Topics Voter experience with, and evaluation of, DRE and paper-ballot voting systems. Voter experience with, and evaluation of, Election Day vote centers. Effect of voting place characteristics on voter experience with alternative voting systems.

Study Design Exit poll of 3,703 Election Day voters Field work conducted by Ciruli and Associates of Denver, Colorado Sampling units and method – 25 Counties (13 EDVC, 12 Precinct, 1 Consolidated) – 59 Election Day polling places – Exit polls conducted during morning, afternoon and late afternoon periods. – 64% of Election Day voters used a paper ballot. – 36% of Election Day voters used a DRE.

Usability of Voting Systems (5-point scale, Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree) I thought the voting system was easy to use. I think that I would like to use this system again. I found the voting system unnecessarily complex. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to use the system. I felt confident using the system. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the system.

Voting Experience ( 5-point scale, where applicable, Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree) I am confident that my vote will be counted accurately. How long did you wait in line to vote? It is important to me that there is a paper record of my vote.

Rating of Voting Place ( 5-point scale, Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree) The location was easy for me to find. I had to go far out of my way to vote. It was easy for me to find a place to park. The poll workers were helpful.

System Was Easy to Use

Would Use System Again

System Unnecessarily Complex

Need Technical Support

Confident Using the System

Need To Learn More About System

Confident My Vote Will Be Counted Accurately

Important To Have Paper Record of Vote

Time To Vote

Ratings of Voting Places (Percent Strongly Agree or Strongly Disagree)

Ratings of Voting Systems by Voting Place (percent strongly agree or strongly disagree)

Conclusions Election Day voters in Colorado positively evaluated paper and electronic voting systems in their respective counties.

Conclusions In excess of 80% of all Election Day voters reported that the voting system they used: – Was easy to use – Was not unnecessarily complex – Would not require technical support to use. – Made them feel very confident voting. – Did not require them to ‘learn a lot’ before using the system. – Would be one they would like to use again.

Conclusions Ratings of paper and electronic voting systems are largely indistinguishable, with only small differences between voters’ ratings of each system. Election Day vote centers appear to have a positive effect on voter experience and evaluation of alternative voting systems, especially electronic voting.