ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO 80220 Ph. 303-399-3218 www.JFA-Associates.com Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Advertisements

AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
The 3-Strikes Law California, U.S.A. March 7, 1994.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Mass Incarceration Civic Academy Crime and Punishment in Louisiana Statewide Issues Conference Saturday, February 15, 2014.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Sentencing and Punishment
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.
BOPPPS W&M Presentation - 1 Key Performance Measure #1 Parole Recidivism  Percentage of Matrix Inmates (applies to offenders whose crime(s) were.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Oregon Presented by: Office of Economic Analysis Date: September 22, 2009 Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
CANADA’S PRISON SYSTEM. Entering Prison Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure – Data Analysis.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Chapter 9 Flashcards. citation a legal document roughly equivalent to a traffic ticket.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Chapter 10 Looking Toward the Future Overcrowded Prisons, Drugs, Laws, and Race 7 million Americans under correctional supervision; 2 million in prison.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Baseline Prison, Parole & Probation Projections with Act 570 Impacts 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more jails, more sentences, throw people in.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Chapter 18 Incarceration Trends.
Women in Oregon’s Criminal Justice System
Sentencing.
Use Of Risk Assessments in Utah Sentencing
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
1 Panel 2, Position 5 Jack D. Ripper.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012

2

Louisiana vs. United States 4 KEY INDICATORSUnited StatesLouisiana STATE POPULATION Total Population (7/1/11)311,591,9174,574, year change (7/1/01 – 7/1/11)9%3% CRIME RATE (2010 Rate per 100,000) Total3, ,197 Violent Property2, , year change ( )-19%-23% PRISON POPULATION Total Inmates (State Prisons Only) 20121,402,62440, year change ( )13% State Incarceration Rate 2011 (per 100,000 pop) Inmates by Crime Type Violent53%49% Drug18%23% Property19%20% % Of State Inmates In Local Jails (2012)6%55% PAROLE POPULATION (2010)717,06626,202 Rate per 100,000 Adult Population PROBATION POPULATION (2010)4,032,81143,913 Rate per 100,000 Adult Population1,7111,285

5

6

7

PRISON ADMISSIONS PER POPULATION AND ARRESTS US VS. LOUISIANA

9

11

12

13

Prison Releases by Earning Class & Length of Stay 2011

New Legislation House Bill 994 increases the amount of diminution of sentence allowed from 35/30 goodtime days per month to 1 and a half good time days eared for every one day served. Projected to save ~4,000 beds in previous projected bedspace assessment. House Bill 1026 decreases the amount of time required for offenders convicted of a 2 nd felony before being eligible for parole release. Prior to the law, offenders convicted of a felony for the 2 nd time were eligible for parole release at 50% of sentenced served. Under HB 1026, these offenders will be eligible for releases at 33% sentenced served. Offenders convicted of a crime of violence, a sex crime or as habitual offender are not eligible for parole. Projected to save ~550 beds in previous projected bedspace assessment. House Bill 228 allows for CTPPT credits to be earned by habitual, non-sex and non-violent offenders House Bill 543 and SB 321 allow for more parole eligibility for life offenders. House Bill 1068 waives the mandatory minimum serving time for non-violent, non-sex offenders. 16

17

Population Growth Drivers Low use of probation/increasing use of prison – Suggestions: Increased supervision options/components Judicial consensus/education meetings Large number of revocations returned to prison – Suggestions: Supervision graduated sanctions matrix Earned goodtime on supervision Low proportion of people released via parole – Suggestions: Expedited parole case review 6 months prior to eligibility Parole release risk instrument 18

Nevada AB 510 Bill Components Increasing in monthly goodtime eligibility Increase in lump sum credit eligibility Goodtime credits count toward faster parole eligibility Day for day credit eligibility while on supervision Parole risk release instrument and board training Results (4 years post implementation) 13.7% decrease in new court commitments to prison 12% decrease in violators admitted to prison Parole board release rate increase from 57% to 63% Prison population decrease 4.2% 19

Arkansas ACT Bill Components Increased sentencing guidelines departure reporting Reassessment of drug weight and property amounts Intermediate sanction grid for supervision violators Day for day credit eligibility while on supervision Parole risk release instrument/parole release from jail Results (6 months post implementation) 8.6% decrease in commitments to prison 30% decrease in parole violators admitted to prison 15% decrease in probation violators admitted to prison Parole board release rate increase from 43% to 52% Average prison sentence length decrease 8.4 months 70% and 50% violent offender admissions decrease 34.5% 7.1% decrease in prison population