SOURCE OF MONOCHROMATIC PHOTONS DRIVEN BY POSITRON IN-FLIGHT ANNIHILATION USING INTERNAL TARGET OF THE STORAGE RING VEPP-3 L.Z. Dzhilavyan 1, S.I. Mishnev.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSI – 13 March – 2004 ELISe collaboration Photonuclear Reactions at Storage Rings V. Nedorezov Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow,
Advertisements

The charmonium mass spectrum
Types of Radiation Interactions All or Nothing Many Small There is a finite probability per unit length that the radiation is absorbed. If not, there is.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Particle Interactions
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Quantum Physics Study Questions PHYS 252 Dr. Varriano.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
PHY206: Atomic Spectra  Lecturer: Dr Stathes Paganis  Office: D29, Hicks Building  Phone: 
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
VNIIA neutron generators for thermonuclear research
abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.
FLAR project S.L. Yakovenko JINR, Dubna,Russia. 2 Contents 1.FlAIR project 2.AD facility at CERN 3.Antyhydrogen and Positronium in-flight at FLAIR 4.LEPTA.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
The tensor analysing power component T 21 of the exclusive π - - meson photoproduction on deuteron in the resonance region. V.N.Stibunov 1, L.M. Barkov.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
16 June, 2015 В.И. Тельнов 1 Two-photon experiments with detector MD1 at VEPP-4 Valery Telnov Budker INP and Novosibirsk St. Univ. PHOTON 2015, June 16,
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
A. Bondarevskaya Highly charged ion beam polarization and its application to the search for the parity nonconservation effects in ions
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
1 Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia XIV International.
UCLA Positron Production Experiments at SABER Presented by Devon Johnson 3/15/06.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
The Polarized Internal Target at ANKE: First Results Kirill Grigoryev Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich PhD student from Petersburg Nuclear.
B. Azadegan, S. A. Mahdipour Hakim Sabzevari University
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Bremsstrahlung of fast electron on graphene
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
V.Aulchenko 1,2, L.Shekhtman 1,2, B.Tolochko 3,2, V.Zhulanov 1,2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, , Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University,
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Absorption of Nuclear Radiation & Radiation Effects on Matter: Atomic and Nuclear Physics Dr. David Roelant.
Silicon microstrip detector for imaging of fast processes at high intensity synchrotron radiation beam. Budker INP V.Aulchenko1,2, L.Shekhtman1,2, B.Tolochko3,2,
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
MC generator for the process e+e-  with RC pro mille accuracy
Beam based measurements
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Cross section of the process
High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
PHL424: γ-decay γ-decay is an electromagnetic process where the nucleus decreases in excitation energy, but does not change proton or neutron numbers This.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

SOURCE OF MONOCHROMATIC PHOTONS DRIVEN BY POSITRON IN-FLIGHT ANNIHILATION USING INTERNAL TARGET OF THE STORAGE RING VEPP-3 L.Z. Dzhilavyan 1, S.I. Mishnev 2, V.G. Nedorezov 1, D.M. Nikolenko 2, I.A. Rachek 2, D.K. Toporkov 2,3 1 Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow, Russia 2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia 3 Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

The project combines two main components: A. The method to produce quasimonochromatic photons using for positron beams with narrow energy spreads and small transverse emittances annihilation in flight in relatively thin targets with low Z. Method "A" was realized on the extracted beams of accelerators in a number of scientific centers, including the INR RAS (Moscow). B. The method to use in positron (electron) storage rings internal super-thin targets with possibility to achieve their effective thicknesses up to (0.1  0.2)X 0 and with keeping very high qualities of beams, circulated through these targets. Method "B" is under development and realization in the INP SB RAS (Novosibirsk).

In LS for two-photon annihilation and bremsstrahlung there are presented below: designations for used values: r 0 -”classical radius” of electron E  E pos - total positron energy;  - electron rest energy;  E/  ; E  - photon energy; k a  E  /  ; (k a - photon energy in  - units for annihilation photons, k a1 - and k a2 - for “hard” and “soft” annihilation photons, emitted in the same act of two-photon annihilation); k b - photon energy in  - units for bremsstrahlung photons;   - (and d  -) angle (and element of solid angle) of photon emission with respect to positron direction;  a, (  a1,  a2 ) angles of annihilation photon emission;  b - angle of bremsstrahlung photon emission;   ch  (1/  )- characteristic angle for both processes of photon emission; relations between energies and angles of annihilation photons: k a  /[    0.5 cos  a ] ; (1) {so it is possible to change continuously k a, changing  (or  a )} k a max  1/{1  [(  1)/(  1)] 0.5 } .  k b max  1.5; k a min  1/{1  [(  1)/(  1)] 0.5 } .  It is possible to tag the event, caused by the “hard” photon, using registration of the “soft” photon k a1  k a2 ; (k a1  k a2 )  (   1)  2k a symm ;  a1   a2  ; cross sections for annihilation in comparison with those for bremsstrahlung: d  a /d  a )  [(r 0 ) 2 /2][(  )/(  )] 0.5 {  [2/(  (  2  ) 0.5 cos  a ) 2 ]  [(  )/((  )(  (    ) 0.5 cos  a ))]   [(  (    ) 0.5 cos  a )/((  )(  (    ) 0.5 cos  a ))] 2 } ; (2) or approximately: at  a  ~(  /  ) (d  a /d  a )  (r 0 ) 2  /(  2 (  a ) 2 ), (2) at  a  b  0 (d  a /d  a )~ , while (d  b /d  b ) grows steeper than  2 (2  ) at (1/  )  (2/  ) 0.5 : (d  a /d  a )  [(r 0 ) 2 /  (  a ) 2 )], while (  b /d  b )~1/(  b ) 4 ), (2  ) {so off-axial collimation helps to reduce relatively background from bremsstrahlung}.

for annihilation cross sections: (d  a /dk a )  [(  (r 0 ) 2 )/(    )]{  2  [(  )/(k a  k a  )]  [  /(k a  k a  )] 2 }. (3) Photons with k a  k a max  0.5 are emitted at  a  1/ , when (d  a /dk a ){k a  k a max  0.5}  0.5(d  a /dk a ){k a max } and this sets the level of “monochromaticity” of the method: at any E  intrinsic width ~ 250 keV, and, for example, for photon energies of ~600 MeV, this width is better in about an order of magnitude than the energy spreads in competitive methods of "photon monochromatization". in LS at k a symm  k'  k a1  k''  k a max, we have integral annihilation cross section:  a ( ,k',k'')  [(  (r 0 ) 2 )/(    )]{  (k''  k')[2  (1/k'k'')  (1/((  k')(  k'')))]   ((    )/(  ))ln[(k''(  k'))/(k'(  k''))]}; (4) at axial collimation, i.e. if k''  k a max and k'  k a max  k, we have:  a ( ,k'  k a max  k,k''  k a max )  [(  (r 0 ) 2 )/(    )]   {  2·  k[  [(    0.5 )/(  k(  2  0.5 ))]  [(    0.5 )/(  k(  2  0.5 ))]]   ((    )/(  ))ln[(  k(  2  0.5 ))/(  k(  2  0.5 ))]}; (4') at  1 and  k  (~1):  a ( ,k'  k a max  k,k''  k a max )  [(  (r 0 ) 2 )/k a max ]ln[  2(k a max  k')]; (4  ) at  k  (1/2):  a ( ,k'  k a max  (1/2),k''  k a max )  [(  (r 0 ) 2 ln2)/  ]. (4  ) All presented above cross sections for positron annihilation are for a single electron. The cross sections per atom are proportional to Z, while the cross sections of positron bremsstrahlung per atom are roughly proportional to Z(Z  ). So the best element for annihilation targets is hydrogen.

For annihilation and bremsstrahlung photons

d  a /dk a ){k a }  solid lines. For curves 1; 2 and 3, respectively,   20; 40 and 60. For   60 it is shown also non-uniform axis of abscissae – the axis  a. Dashed curve – (d  a /dk a ){k a max }  2  (r 0 ) 2 /k a max

There are radiation losses in magnetic fields in a storage ring. To compensate radiation energy losses and (if necessary) to accelerate additionally positrons (electrons) HF resonator, operating at a frequency f R  k R f 0 (f 0  frequency of beam revolution, k R – integer), is installed. In a storage ring with super-thin target positrons (electrons) perform damped oscillations with their times T D >>T 0  (1/ f 0 ). This leads to contraction of a beam (having its lifetime T L >>T D ) in a rather small region of trajectory space. In many nuclear physics experiments it is possible to consider such a beam as continuous one. Usually for precision studies in nuclear physics with positrons (electrons) it is necessary to have small thicknesses of targets (typically ~10  3 X 0 ). With supper-thin targets it is possible to win up to two orders of magnitude for target thicknesses, keeping very high quality of beams. It is known about studies of electron scattering on atomic nuclei with inclusive (e,e') and exclusive (e,e'X) reactions carried out at storage rings with internal super-thin targets (INP SB RAS (Novosibirsk)). These experiments were permanently in the spotlight of the Seminar EMIN (see, e.g., report by Dr. I.A.Rachek in the present Seminar). It is possible to study also electronuclear reactions, in which only emitted in such reactions particles X are registered. It is important that internal super-thin targets are very "transparent" for low-energy charged particles X, if it is necessary to detect them in electronuclear or (e,e'X) reactions. Moreover, on the electron beam in storage ring ADONE in Frascati with the internal argon-jet target there has been realized one of additional directions of internal super- thin target applications, namely, production of tagged bremsstrahlung photons with usage of nearest to internal target one of the bending magnets of this storage ring. It should also be pointed out that at least in one work, performed in the INP (Novosibirsk), the part of the accumulated “statistics” was received in this way.

But until now using of internal super-thin targets in storage rings for production of annihilation photons was not carried out, although it is very interesting to examine the possibilities of such direction of their applications. Expected advantages: If the transverse and energy acceptances of the used circular accelerator-injector for a storage ring are sufficiently large (as for the new positron source at VEPP-3), then due to "radiative cooling", providing growth of the positron density in the trajectory space, the current of injected positrons with the desired geometrical and energy parameters, can be significantly increased in comparison with the current from the injector, where there is no such a growth. Due to the "radiative cooling" in the storage ring itself effective thicknesses of annihilation targets and coefficients of conversion from positrons to quasimonochromatic annihilation photons increase significantly. The produced beam of annihilation photons acquires a quasicontinuous character, which can facilitate the work of the used "electronics". Strongly improved background conditions are provided. The most "attractive" targets for the best relationship between annihilation and bremsstrahlung, namely, pure hydrogen targets become possible. In this method expected profits are several orders of magnitude in intensity of the quasimonochromatic photons and several times in ratio of the intensities of annihilation and bremsstrahlung photons produced in targets with different Z. According to estimations the VEPP-3 answers in a great extent to demands for such a source. The table lists some important parameters for this project

central orbit perimeter , m frequency of beam revolution f 0, MHz4.03 period of beam revolution T 0, ns frequency of HF resonator f R1, MHz8.06 frequency of HF resonator f R2, MHz72.54 time of injection, s12 stored positron current I, mA~60~60 energy of positrons E, MeV~600 damping time of beam oscillations T D, s for vertical betatron oscillations; for radial betatron oscillations; for phase oscillations 0.161; 0.175; H - target thickness X H, atoms/cm positron beam lifetime T L, s~30 average luminosity L, cm  2 ~6  flux of annihilation photons N , s  1 at    3 mrad at 5   10 mrad ~2  10 5 In one sub-cycle of injection with duration ~2 s there will be injected in VEPP-3 ~2  positrons with energy ~500 MeV, what will give current ~10 mA in VEPP-3. So it will take 12 s for the full cycle of injection to reach the positron current I~60 mA. Positrons will be additionally accelerated up to energies ( ) MeV during time about 10 s. The positron lifetime in the VEPP-3 with H-target, having the thickness atoms/cm 2, is ~30 s. In these conditions the optimal time for the data measurement is ~33 s, taking into account also the time ~5 s for returning to the injection energy. After that the total cycle of operation starts again. But even in these conditions “macroscopic” duty factor is on the level of tens percents. At injection of positrons, which already have necessary energies, this duty factor can be essentially increased. In pointed out conditions the average over the total cycle of operation positron current will be ~13.3 mA, and the average luminosity L  8  cm  2. In the table the values of N  are given for the positron energy E  600 MeV. Table. Parameters of VEPP-3, target and beams

Arrangement of equipment for production of quasimonochromatic annihilation photons at VEPP-3: the dipole (D1-D3) and quadrupole (Q1-Q3) magnets; the elements of the vacuum chamber; several turbo-molecular pumps with pumping speed (1  2)  10 3 l/s; the elements of beam diagnostics; two high-vacuum valves; etc.; hatched region may be used for targets and detectors in carried out physics researches; at off-axial collimation targets for physics researches having central holes may be useful to exclude main part of background from bremsstrahlung, produced by positrons in internal target itself

Estimated spectrum of bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons at   <3 mrad for: positron energy E  600 MeV; luminosity L  6  cm -2 s -1 ; binning width keV

Such a spectrum may be essential for solving tasks, connected with searches for narrow resonances in photonuclear processes (see, e.g., report by professor L.V.Fil’kov in the present Seminar). At estimations of energy spreads of real annihilation photon beams, except for the pointed out above intrinsic spread ~  /2, it is necessary from different possible spreads for super-thin target to take into account, first of all, energy (~3  10  4 E) and angular (horizontal  ~7  10  4 rad and vertical  ~1.5  10  4 rad) spreads of circulating in VEPP-3 positron beams. Taking into account expression of interdependence (1) (from which at  ~(1/  ) we have  k  [  2 (  ) 2 /2]) we receive in these estimations instead of the intrinsic spread ~250 keV at E  600 MeV the resulting characteristic energy spread of real annihilation photon beam in VEPP-3 ~350 keV (still rather good!).

Estimated flux of bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons at   <3 mrad for: positron energy E  600 MeV; luminosity L  6  cm -2 s -1 ; binning width keV

The grave shortcomings of the shown the spectrum and the flux of the expected photons are connected with the relatively high level of bremsstrahlung background. However, influence of this background may be essentially decreased at off-axial collimation.

Estimated spectrum of bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons for: off- axal collimation with   from 5 to 10 mrad; positron energy E  600 MeV; luminosity L  6  cm -2 s -1 ; binning width keV

Estimated flux of bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons for: off-axal collimation with   from 5 to 10 mrad; positron energy E  600 MeV; luminosity L  6  cm -2 s -1 ; binning width keV

Presented in figures and in table beam characteristics are suitable for solving different problems: Searches for narrow structures in cross sections of photo-processes. Researches of  -mesic nuclei, described, in particular, in the present Seminar in report by Valeriy Polyanskiy. Studies of the virtual photon spectra, produced in processes with relatively small transfers of energy and impulse and accompanied by reactions of photofission, for example, 238 U( ,F), at energies of incident photons in the region of hundreds MeV, where for fission of nuclei-actinides there was found in joint experiment of INR RAS (Moscow) and INP SB RAS (Novosibirsk), that total cross sections are essentially higher than, what are predicted by so-called “universal curve”, in result, as it is supposed, of influence of unlinear effects of quantum electrodynamics in photonuclear processes, what promises good perspectives for interesting investigations. In such investigations acts of fission in relatively thin detector of fission fragments are registered in coincidence with signals from spectrometer of total absorption from photons (or, maybe, together with electrons and/or positrons), emitted in the forward direction. For detector of fission fragments it is suggested to use parallel-plate gas detectors. Measurements of total photofission cross sections of nuclei-actinides, for example, 238 U. In these cases it is possible to use detectors of fission fragments on the base of thin polycarbonate films with automatized counting of tracks from fission fragments. ___________________________________________________________________ It is important to point out that the proposed scheme for a photon source is almost completely identical to the sceme of installation for search of a new vector boson А' in the experiment, which was also proposed for the VEPP-3.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !