Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many people who end up working in the juvenile probation field never imagined they’d have a job as a juvenile probation officer. Sometimes it takes coming.
Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
R ACIAL D ISPARITIES IN THE C RIMINAL J USTICE S YSTEM.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
A merican C ivicsHOLT HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law Section 1:Crime in the United States Section 2:The Criminal Justice.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Unit 5 – Juvenile Justice
Roosevelt High School Teen Court
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform : System-wide Criminal Justice Spending June 3, 2015.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Criminal Law and Procedure February 25. The System Adversarial –People v. Defendant –Link to Criminal then to Self-help criminal-then.
Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.
Juvenile Justice: The Psychology of Juvenile Offenders in A Court Setting Intern/Mentorship Program County Mission Statement: “The High School.
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges Law enforcement agencies Serves the purposes of: Supporting a system for the trial and punishment of.
Hennepin County School/Shared Social Work Project Social Work Project May 16, 2013 Mark Griffin Senior Assistant County Attorney.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Basic Supervision Funding We will receive the following amounts in basic supervision: FY 2008 FY 2009 $105,744,392 $107,326,403 Currently we are receiving.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2009 General Assembly.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Grants to States for Workplace and Community Transition Training for Incarcerated Youth Offenders “ Youth Offender Program”
Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Causes of Youth Violence Complex interplay of factors Correlations, not predictions Accumulation of risk Number of resources.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
JUVENILE COURT WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO. DELINQUENCY CASES THE JUVENILE COURT HANDLES CRIMINAL CASES ABOVE CLASS B MISDEMEANORS TO CAPITAL MURDER FOR.
Juvenile Justice Ch. 16.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile System. CHILD SAVERS Child Savers: Wealthy, civic minded citizens who were concerned with the welfare of disadvantaged children.
Presentation to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. February 22, 2011.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
ARIZONA’S FISCHER REPORT DATA DRIVEN DECISIONS ELIZABETH ORTIZ ARIZONA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS’ ADVISORY COUNCIL MARCH 5, 2014.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Chapter 5 Police and the Juvenile Offender. Juvenile Justice: Theory, Systems, and Organization Houston/Barton Prentice Hall © 2005 Pearson Education,
Juvenile Justice System.  Organized structurally on a state and local level  Private and individual agencies  58 county probation offices in 62 different.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Courts Systems Guided Notes. Texas Judicial System A. Consists of : 1)Courts 2)Judges 3)Law enforcement agencies B. Serves the purposes.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 CIVICS IN PRACTICE HOLT Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law Section 1:Crime in the United States Crime in the United StatesCrime.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Office of Juvenile Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice protects the public by providing safe and effective individualized services to youth, who will.
National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Community Corrections 2018 Budget
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Determinate Petitions
Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law
Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Presentation transcript:

Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission

 Mission: To improve Ohio’s future by habilitating youth and empowering families and communities  Vision: A safer Ohio: one youth, one family and one community at a time Mission and Vision

 3 Juvenile Correctional Facilities  5 alternative placement options  5 Regional Parole Offices  12 Community Corrections Facilities  DYS funds and supports 600 community programs throughout the state serving 80,000 youth (based on annual program admissions) Reaching Youth in Ohio

Budget Overview

DYS Population DYS June 2000: 2,183 youth June 2007: 1,848 youth June 2014: 501 youth Parole June 2000: 2,013 youth June 2007: 1,446 youth June 2014: 372 youth

Total DYS Admissions CY 2007 to CY 2013

Youth Adjudicated for Felonies FY 2007 to % decrease FY 07 to FY % reduction in adjudications over the past 3 years

Juvenile Transfers to Adult Court FY 2007 to year average = 277; 10 year high = 362; 10 year low =163

Admissions by County

Admissions by Race 60.5% 7.1%

Admissions by Gender 92.7%

Admissions by Age Age at Admission (FY 14)

Admissions by Offenses

Services for Victims  January 2015  Youth with opted-in victims: 511  Youth impact statements on file: 140  Victim apology letters on file: 393

Serious Youthful Offenders (SYOs)  Youth classified as “SYOs” have cases that remain in juvenile court but are subject to a blended juvenile-adult sentence if found delinquent  DYS takes the issue of requesting the invocation of the adult portion of the sentence seriously  Because an adult sentence is involved, these youth must be indicted by a grand jury, and they are entitled to a jury trial

SYO Statistics

Mandatory Sentences ORC  Firearm on or about offender’s person or under control specification  Criminal gang participation specification  Automatic firearm or firearm muffler or silencer specification  Firearm displayed, brandished, indicated that offender possessed the firearm or used it to facilitate offense specification  Firearm discharged from motor vehicle specification  Discharged firearm at peace officer or corrections officer specification  Peace officer victim of aggravated vehicular homicide specification  Multiple OVI violations specification

Mandatory Sentences  As of , DYS had a total of 163 youth that had a mandatory sentence (35% of the population) – nearly all are for firearm specifications  133 youth Firearm displayed, brandished, indicated that offender possessed the firearm or used it to facilitate offense specification  22 youth Firearm on or about offender’s person or under control specification  8 youth fall into the other categories

Early Releases  522 releases in 2014  Judicial release to parole: 95  Judicial release to probation: 37  TOTAL: 132 youth (25.3% of all youth released from DYS)

Challenges and Strategies ChallengeStrategy Diverse needsIndividualizing services for youth ViolencePath to Safer Facilities GangsCommunity Model Approach to Gangs IdlenessQuality structured programming SeparationFamily engagement and volunteers

Moving Away from Using Seclusion as a Punishment

Buckeye United School District  Fiscal Year 2014  Served 727 students  86 youth received GEDs  26 youth obtained high school diplomas  Awarded 346 career certificates were awarded  Nearly half of all student receive special education services  Apprenticeships

Questions?