11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman Important reaction channels and the trigger concepts of former experiments Proposed 190 GeV/c.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIS 2008, London Transverse Spin Physics at PHENIX Douglas Fields (University of New Mexico) For the PHENIX Collaboration 4/9/20081 Douglas Fields for.
Advertisements

HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Workshop on Experiments with Antiprotons at the HESR – April 2002, GSI Charmed Hadrons in Matter Introduction Medium Effects in the light quark sector.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
E08-005: A y 0 in Quasi-Elastic 3 He(e,e’n) Scattering Elena Long Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 17 th, /17/2013Hall A Collaboration MeetingElena.
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
“Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at = 540 GeV” Okamura Yusuke Shibata lab. G. Arnison.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
EPECUR – Investigation of narrow baryon resonances Konovalova Elena St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) with collaboration Institute of Theoretical.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
R&D Studies of a Lead-Scintillating Fiber Calorimeter as a STAR Forward Detector Prashanth Shanmuganathan (for FCal group at STAR)  Physics and R&D goals.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
1 Hypernuclear  -ray spectroscopy via the (K -,  0 ) reaction K. Shirotori Tohoku Univ.
Experimental Search for the Decay K. Mizouchi (Kyoto University) (1) Physics Motivation (2) Detector (3) Selection Criteria (4) Branching Ratio (5) Background.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
E Precision Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor up to Q 2 =13.5 (GeV/c) 2 by the Ratio Method B. Quinn, J. Annand, R. Gilman, B. Wojtsekhowski.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Master thesis 2006 Shirotori1 Hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K1.8 beam line 東北大学大学院理学研究科 原子核物理 白鳥昂太郎.
COMPASS Hadron Trigger Meeting Munich Feb.11, 08 Trigger-relevant Summary of Physics Goals by Martin Faessler, Munich Feb 11, 08 Physics Goals (Hadron.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
NBI2006 Starting OPERA data-taking with the CNGS beam D.Autiero IN2P3/IPN Lyon 5/9/2006.
Measurement of Exclusive  - Electro-production from the Neutron in the Resonance Region Jixie Zhang Physics Department Old Dominion University 11/30/2006.
SPring-8 レーザー電子光 ビームラインでの タギング検出器の性能評価 核物理研究センター 三部 勉 LEPS collaboration 日本物理学会 近畿大学 1.レーザー電子光 2.タギング検出器 3.実験セットアップ 4.エネルギー分解能 5.検出効率とバックグラウンドレート.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Feasibility studies for DVCS and first results on exclusive  at COMPASS DVCS studies Physics impact Experimental issues Recoil detector prototype Exclusive.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
DIS 2011, Newport News, April 2011Joakim Nystrand, University of Bergen 1 Small-x and forward measurements in ALICE Joakim Nystrand University of.
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
G. Arnison et al., UA1 Collaboration
Plans for nucleon structure studies at PANDA
Single trigger, no target
Detector Concepts Target/Luminosity Additions: Recoil detector
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017.
Experimental Particle Physics
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Electroproduction of φ Mesons in CLAS
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Experimental Particle Physics
What is the CNI experiment
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Search for X - - Pentaquark in COMPASS
Presentation transcript:

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman Important reaction channels and the trigger concepts of former experiments Proposed 190 GeV/c with COMPASS: central Production: diffractive Scattering: what can we learn from WA102? and E852?

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman E852 Detector

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman E852 Detector Max Beam of 2x % Target Cylindrical (TCYL) Prop. Wire Chambers (TPX) CPVA,CPVB,CPVC,EV, BV Downs. Endcup Array (DEA) (LGD) } TDX4

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman E852 Trigger Pretrigger on BV and EV Level 1 trigger on DEA CPVB CPVC TCYL PWC Level 2 fast trigger processor total energy and effective mass of the LGD photon system, ‘able to handle up to 10 4 events/s’ at 10% dead time’: -(#TCYL tracks)-(#TPX1 hits)-(#TPX2 hits)-Level 2 trigger: TriggerProcessor energy –TriggerProcessor eta TriggerProcessor energy -TriggerProcessor eta

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman E852 Trigger from NIM A 387 (1997) 377:

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman WA102 Detector ( Omega + GAMS)

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman WA102 Detector description “telescope” of ten microstrip detectors to measure beam direction 60 cm hydrogen target + box counter (TB) fifteen 2mm pitch (A and B) MWPC + one 1mm pitch MWPC + two drift chambers (DC) to measure medium momentum charged tracks sixteen (eight left+eight right) 2 mm pitch (C) MWPC to measure slow proton system of microstrip detector placed at 5 m and at 10 m downstream to measure the outgoing fast track ( GeV/c) two Čerenkov detectors Č1 and Č2(not in 2006) + three scintillator hodoscopes HY1(not in 2006), HY2, HY3(not in 2006) for charged particle identification GAMS-4000 electromagnetic calorimeter for photons

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman WA102 Trigger fast particle crossing the microstrip telescope coincidence between two scintillator counters (A1+A2) placed close to the microstrip detectors at 5 m and 10 m (A2 split in two vertical direction A2L and A2R in order to determine the y-direction) slow particle left [right] defined by one hit on any of the fourteen slabs of the slow proton counter left (SPCL) [SPCR] + a hit in the left [right] element of the target box counter + >one hit in each of the two planes of the C MWPC on the left [right] side of the target zero hit in the other three sides of the TB to reduce backward diffraction or excitations events

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman WA102 Trigger slow left proton and a hit in A2(L) (LL trigger) or slow right right proton in A2(R) (RR trigger) exclude elastic scattering elastic scattering were reduced in the LR and RL case by requiring one hit in the in the downstream hodoscope HY1 GeV/c: LR observation of higher    and f 2 (1270) in the LL or RR case which cannot be due to the trigger or acceptance (Phys. Lett. B 388(1996) 853) enhancement of glueball candidates at high p T LL

11 February 2008 Compass Trigger Meeting I. Uman Conclusion Care has to be taken to choose of a correct trigger logic which does not bias physics in central production (maximize azimuthal acceptance) A choice of a common trigger which includes CP and diffractive scattering would reduce the beam time request