Data Quality & the Consolidated District Performance Report (CDPR) Jesse Parsons & Russ Sweet, Education Specialists Oregon Department of Education August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Jessamine County Schools Pyramid of Interventions Update 2009.
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget March 19, 2013 March 20, 2013 Presenters: GayeLeia King, Supervisory Education Specialist.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
Welcome to the Performance Indicator Data Webinar Hosted by: The Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly. Thank.
Taking the Fast Lane to High-Quality Data Sarah Bardack and Stephanie Lampron.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Data Collections Demystified Amy McLaughlin Director of IT Support Services Oregon Department of Education.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I-A Coordinators Conversation May 15, 2014.
ANNUAL EVALUATION PLAN Schoolwide Programs. Annual Evaluation Plan.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Recent Arrivers Data Collection Title III webinar September 25, 2012.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
Oregon Department of Education Technology and School Finance Presenter:Doug Kosty, Director Presentation to the Joint Ways & Means Subcommittee on Education.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Association.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
1 Family and Community Involvement Oregon Department of Education NCLB Strategist Training April & May 2006.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Louisiana's Title I, Part C, Migrant Education Program (MEP)
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget
Title I-A Coordinators Conversation
Title I-A Coordinators Conversation
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Welcome to today’s Webinar We will begin shortly
October Caseload Count for Title I-D, Subpart 2
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Welcome to today’s Webinar We will begin shortly
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
ESL/Title III Consultants
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Data Quality & the Consolidated District Performance Report (CDPR) Jesse Parsons & Russ Sweet, Education Specialists Oregon Department of Education August 2014

Agenda Purpose of data collections How data flow from LEAs to the USED Ensuring data quality in the CDPR ◦ Sources of data ◦ Submitting data ◦ Assistance CDPR changes for ODE review of the CDPR data collection Telling your story through data 2

Purpose of Data Collections (General) Improved educational outcomes for students Compliance with Section 9303 (Consolidated Reporting) of ESEA 3

Purpose of Data Collections (General) Provide data to the USED and to Congress ◦ Data are used to estimate program performance ◦ Funding and budget decisions are based on performance results (Government Performance Results Act-GPRA) Communication Tool 4

Flow of Data from LEAs to the USED Individual Programs DistrictODEUSED 5

What is the CDPR? This is an annual data collection for districts that is used to complete required federal reporting Title I – A Students & Programs Title I – D Neglected & Delinquent Academic Achievement Title I – D Neglected & Delinquent Programs & Facilities 6

Ensuring Data Quality in the CDPR If data quality is not a priority at the local level, the problems become harder to identify as the data are rolled up- problems can become hidden If data issues are recognized late in the process, it is more difficult (and less cost effective) to identify where the issues are and correct them in time 7

Ensuring Data Quality in the CDPR Both ODE and districts have responsibility for ensuring data quality by implementing systems that make this a reality ◦ Using/submitting trustworthy data ◦ Using/submitting accurate data 8

How is this accomplished? Understand and communicate the collection process Provide technical assistance in advance ◦ Odyssey training ◦ Training webinars scheduled for each data collection Develop relationships with LEA and program staff 9

How is this accomplished? Develop multilevel verification processes Track problems over time Use the data Problem solve together 10

Submitting Data CDPR data are collected through a web- based application Set aside a block of time to enter data into the system. It does not allow for partial data saving and then returning later 11

Data challenges from year to year Performance vs Proficiency Race and Ethnicity Counting students (disaggregation) Program identification (Title I – D) 12

CDPR Assistance Webinars are held prior to the opening of the collection The CDPR User Guide explains the data elements ODE Specialists can assist with questions about the data elements The ODE Helpdesk can assist with issues about the web application 13

Changes being made by the USED to the CDPR Title I-A (minor changes) ◦ WHAT ARE THE CHANGES ? Title I-D (counts of Special Education and LEP students and transitions) ◦ WHAT ARE THE CHANGES ? 14

TELLING YOUR STORY Data Collections 15

What does the data reveal about: The strengths of our program(s)? The challenges of our program(s)? The priorities we should focus on? The kind of professional development we need? Who we are as opposed to who we thought we were? 16

Tips on using Data Actually use data to tell your story Share it in language the audience can understand Anecdotal and Quantifiable both work Anticipate questions and have answers ready Be authentic Others? 17

QUESTIONS 18

Contact Information Russ Sweet (503) Jesse Parsons (503) Emily Swope (CDPR support) (503) ODE Helpdesk (503)

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING TODAY’S SESSION 20