Ensuring all students are future ready School Board Report May 28, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
February 2007IDEA Partnership1 Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention Fundamentals for Educators and their Partners.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
SEM Planning Model.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
October 14 th, 6-7:30 pm.  It is our hope that the feedback received from tonight’s meeting will guide the work of the ISSRC Subcommittee on Special.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
How It’s Being Done in Burlington Public Schools! Susan Astone Ellen Johnson John Lyons Deborah Dressler Dr. Eric Conti Superintendent of Burlington Public.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Response to Intervention
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.
ISSRC Update for BISD Staff  Instructional  Support  Services  Review  Committee February 2, 2015 Services covered: Special Education Title I / LAP.
D62 Response to Intervention
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
RTI Essential Components Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto National Consultant, Learning Forward, President, Learning Forward Oregon Leadership.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Special Education Review
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Ensuring all students are future ready School Board Report May 28, 2015

Purpose of the Instructional Support Services (ISS) Department Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable program of services that meets the needs of students in the Bainbridge Island School District. (Letter of Agreement, BIEA/BISD Contract ) 2

Goals of the ISS Department Review The goals of the review are to:  Identify strengths and areas of improvement of the current program  Review best practices and current research to establish a guiding vision to guide program development  Design a continuum of services model to maximize student success (Letter of Agreement, BIEA/BISD Contract ) 3

ISS Review Process School Year BISD contracts with Puget Sound Educational Services District (PSESD) ISS Review Committee (ISSRC) is formed PSESD conducts review ISSRC reviews PSESD report School Year Formation of ISSRC subcommittees Consultants Gordy Linse and Val Lynch support Special Education subcommittee Staff surveys and parent input meetings Special Education subcommittee develops focus goals around specially designed instruction, philosophy for the use of paraeducators, and professional development to support special education Response to Intervention/Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) subcommittees develop focus goals around universal screening, progress monitoring, and coordination, staffing and professional development to support MTSS Coordination with the District Improvement Plan and recommendations to the school board

ISS Review Committee  Julie Goldsmith, Associate Superintendent  Bill Mosiman, Director of ISS  Jeff McCormick, Director of Assessment  Karen Connors, Parent  Sandy O’Hare, Parent  Sheila Jakubik, School Board Member  Jill Philips, General Ed Teacher  Betsy Garfunkel, General Ed Teacher  Lisa Draper, Paraeducator  Briley Proctor, School Psychologist  Amy Jernigan, LAP Teacher  Robyn Stahl, Title 1 Teacher  Meg Evans, Special Ed Teacher  Rebecca Bjorgen, Special Ed Teacher  Melanie Elliott, Special Ed Teacher  Rebecca Dawson, Speech/Language Pathologist  Melinda Reynvaan, Principal  Dave Shockley, Principal  Tina Lemmon, Associate Principal  Diane Leonetti, Occupational Therapist/ISS Coordinator 5 Year 1

BISD contracts with PSESD During the school year, Puget Sound Education Services District (PSESD) was contracted to “conduct a review of the provision of services to students who require additional support to participate in and benefit from the general education curriculum.” Purpose of PSESD review was “to analyze the continuum of services available, and its effectiveness, and make recommendations for improving current services and practice.” 6 Year 1

Puget Sound ESD Overall Recommendation Develop and implement a unified system or framework of instructional support and procedures designed to meet the academic, social/behavior/emotional needs of students who are struggling in the general education curriculum. (PSESD Executive Summary, Spring 2014) 7 Year 1

ISSRC Special Education Subcommittee  Bill Mosiman**, Director of ISS  Julie Goldsmith**, Associate Superintendent  Karen Connors**, Parent  Lisa Draper**, Paraeducator  Signe Pierce, Paraeducator  Sara Edwards, Special Ed Teacher  Meg Evans**, Special Ed Teacher  Sheila Jakubik**, School Board  Melanie Elliott**, Special Ed Teacher  Melinda Reynvaan**, Principal  Tina Lemmon**, Principal  Amy Jernigan**, LAP Teacher  Janice Petaja, School Psychologist  Diane Leonetti**, Occupational Therapist/ISS Coordinator ** indicates member of ISSRC Steering Committee 8 Year 2

ISSRC RTI K-6 Subcommittee  Sandy O’Hare**, Parent  Kim Walker, Paraeducator  Jill Phillips**, General Ed Teacher  Anna Fehrenbacher, General Ed Teacher  Mary Sue Miller, General Ed Teacher  Terri Atkinson, General Ed Teacher  Robyn Stahl**, Title 1 Teacher  Janette Dodge, School Counselor  Brenda Austin, Speech/Language Therapist  Rebekah Ballmer, Special Ed Teacher  Sharon Pratt, School Counselor  Laurie Seaborne-Borda, School Psychologist  Dave Shockley**, Principal  Jeff McCormick**, Director of Assessment ** indicates member of ISSRC Steering Committee 9 Year 2

ISSRC RTI 7-12 Subcommittee  Liz Finin, General Ed Teacher  Betsy Garfunkel**, General Ed Teacher  Kirrin Coleman, General Ed Teacher  Kristine Schrutka, General Ed Teacher  Laura Kornfeld**, Special Ed Teacher  Gail Gronwall, Title 1/LAP Teacher  Susan Irish, School Counselor/School Psychologist  Briley Proctor**, School Psychologist  Rebecca Dawson**, Speech/Language Pathologist  Christina Peato, Parent and Indian Ed Coordinator  Kristen Hazlip, Associate Principal  Jeff McCormick**, Director of Assessment ** indicates member of ISSRC Steering Committee 10 Year 2

A note from the consultants to the ISSRC Special Education Subcommittee: One student not doing well should create a sense of urgency within our schools. 11 Year 2

Multi-Tiered System of Support 12 Year 2

RTI/MTSS is an integrated, multi-tiered system of instruction, assessment and intervention designed to meet the achievement and behavioral needs of all students. 13 Research-Based Core Curriculum Universal Screening Progress Monitoring Educational Support Teams Improved Outcomes For All Children Fidelity and Integrity of Instruction and Intervention Scientific Research-Based Interventions Tiered Levels of Intervention Data-Based Decision- Making

 Ongoing professional development  developed common vocabulary and definitions.  provide training on use of universal screening assessment  Administering and utilizing data for decision making.  Use FAST Bridge universal screening tool and progress monitoring tool at grades K-8 for reading and K-7 for math.  Fast, accurate data to inform instruction.  Administer 3 times a year to all students.  More frequent progress monitoring for struggling students receiving intervention support.  Assessment tool also has a behavior screener and early developmental milestone screener.  Identified the need to increase staffing to support MTSS Overall Recommendations for Multi-Tiered System of Support 14 Year 2

Tier I - Universal Tier I Universal - strong core curriculum and strategies to differentiate the curriculum for the broad range of learners. Currently providing: Universal screening in reading for students grades 1- 4 Developing: Instructional specialists FTE to support classroom teachers in development of differentiation strategies for all learners Implementation of universal screener in Reading and Math three times a year Professional development for universal screener 15 Year 2

Tier II - Targeted Tier II Targeted - for students who need additional academic and/or behavioral support. Currently providing: Targeted instruction in reading and math for identified students ACHIEVE support for striving learners grades 7-12 Title 1/LAP teachers in second year of implementation of common instructional materials Developing: Evidenced-based materials and strategies for intervention Professional development for intervention Refining and implementing a collaborative system for data review and academic support 16 Year 2

Tier III - Intensive Tier III Intensive - for students who require significantly greater levels of support Currently: Curriculum purchase, training and implementation Developing: Implementation of new online Evaluation/IEP system Ongoing training and implementation of new curriculum Exploring a blended service model Curriculum map for all tiers 17 Year 2

Special Education Subcommittee Focus Goals Develop a common understanding of specially designed instruction (SDI) within the context of Multi- Tiered System of Support (MTSS), create a plan to ensure consistency of programs and curriculum across the district. Create a philosophy for the use of para-educators to include: management, training, structure, and staffing used across the district. Design and implement a professional development program for all staff to ensure consistency of knowledge and skills for working with all students. 18 Year 2

Specific recommendations to address Special Education (Tier III) Focus Goals: Special Education Mission Statement developed Purchase of instructional materials K-12; ongoing professional development on alignment, training and implementation Research and define a district-wide process for the provision of specially designed instruction (SDI): Began data collection on current distribution of SDI minutes and location of services Continue analysis of current SDI practices Continue defining best practice for delivery of SDI Develop PD/communication to stakeholders regarding SDI Increase student independence while preparing students to be future ready: Study of paraeducator best practices and ways to increase independence and decrease isolation Professional development for stakeholders regarding ways to increase independence and decrease isolation 19 Year 2

Mission Statement Subcommittee on Special Education Ensure a quality Special Education program that:  accelerates academic growth  supports individual student goals  promotes independence and future readiness 20 Year 2

Additional Steps Moving Forward Develop a well-defined continuum, and procedures for movement across all Tiers Establish MTSS Committee and Re- establish Special Education Program Council Support continued development of Tier II and Tier III programs Expand and improve communication to all stakeholders Create opportunities for parent and community education and collaboration 21 Year 2

All Students Learning Instructional Coaches/Instructional Specialists (General Budget Funded) Direct support to teachers and students to meet the needs of diverse learners, support induction of new teachers, transition to Common Core /Smarter Balanced Assessments, and support of the Danielson Instructional Framework. 1.8 at Blakely, Ordway, Wilkes; 0.3 Commodore 0.4 Sakai; 0.4 WMS; 0.8 BHS Highly Capable (General Budget Funded) Direct support to students, teachers and parents of highly capable students. 1.2 at Blakely, Ordway, Wilkes; 0.1 Odyssey 0.2 Sakai; 0.2 WMS; 0.4 BHS/EHHS Intervention Support (Title I/LAP+) Reading And Math (BSF Funded) 1.6 K Achieve/Homework Clubs Gr Achieve/Homework Clubs Gr Proposed Plan of Support for for MTSS

A Final Note from Gordy Linse and Val Lynch “As outside consultants, we are very impressed with the sincere interest that the District and community have taken in addressing the issues identified through the initial Program Review. We have rarely seen the considered effort that has gone in to crafting a response to benefit the District’s struggling learners, including those in special education.” Thank you to the members of the ISSRC and subcommittees for your time, effort, and dedication to this review. 23

Questions 24